. This was a six-year study about current education practices atmajor engineering schools. One of their main points is that education innovation requiresengineering and education expertise working in continual cycles of educational practiceand research. In the Innovation1 report, Recommendation 5 states: “Raise awareness ofthe proven principles and effective practices of teaching, learning, and educationalinnovation, and raise awareness of the scholarship of engineering education.” It is withthis goal in mind that the committee approaches the Best Practices in EngineeringEducation series.Besterfield-Sacre17, et al. surveyed engineering faculty & deans across the country aboutpossible pathways for transforming engineering education. They fit
communication skills for Ph.D.s in engineering, but by looking at the data througha service and justice lens, Transformation indicates the application of knowledge to a broader orglobal environment. One participant urged Ph.D.s in engineering to be “flexible, open-minded,open to new cultures, [and] new understanding of the global environment.” Other participantsnoted use of their expertise and position to establish global engineering exchange programs withinstitutions around the world so students (future stewards of the disciplines) could gain globalengineering experience or work to support undergraduate research initiatives and other outreachprograms. Specifically, some participants noted the importance of transformation in their effortsto introduce
performance and attitude data. Itwas shown that students performed better in written examinations and had slightly more positiveattitudes at the end of class when compared with a controlled traditional class6. Additionally, aproblem-based learning program was implemented in civil engineering at University ofLimerick, Ireland7, which provided a new learning experience for students that was wellreceived7. Furthermore, a study conducted at Setubal Polytechnic Institute, Barreiro, Portugalshowed that active learning techniques increase student engagement, class attendance andparticipation8. Active learning techniques such as clicker quizzes, Think-Pair-Share, PowerPointjeopardies, one minute papers, group work, flipped classroom, peer surveys, mind
Paper ID #13316How Engineering Students Study: Alone, Together, or Start Alone, End To-getherDr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of belonging, self-efficacy, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence.Dr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Dr. Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington.Prof. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State
Paper ID #11169New Faculty Experiences with Mastery GradingDr. Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State Hazleton Dr. Joseph Ranalli has taught since 2012 as an Assistant Professor at Penn State Hazleton in the Alterna- tive Energy and Power Generation Engineering program. He previously earned a BS from Penn State and a PhD from Virginia Tech, both in Mechanical Engineering. Prior to his current appointment, he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the National Energy Technology Lab in Morgantown, West Virginia. Dr. Ranalli’s current research interests include development of tools and methods for solar energy resource
Paper ID #11847Using Humor to Create a Positive Learning EnvironmentProf. Ralph Ocon, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology) Page 26.1667.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Using Humor to Create a Positive Learning EnvironmentAbstractHow to enhance student learning is a critical issue in academia. Throughout the author’sacademic career, teaching effectiveness has always been an on-going challenge.Consequently, he has experimented with different teaching techniques and approaches.The author’s
Paper ID #11823Writing and Implementing Successful NSF S-STEM ProposalsDr. Evelyn C. Brown, East Carolina University Dr. Brown is a professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. Most of her research is in the are of applying industrial engineering techniques to health care process improvements. However, she also does reserach in the area of STEM education. Dr. Brown has published education- related research in INFORMS Transactions on Education, Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE National Meet- ing, and Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Southeast Section Meeting. She is PI on an active NSF S-STEM grant in
synergetic instructor and student assessments that result from awell-crafted and strategic approach to the use of ARS in the classroom.References 1. Roselli, R.J., and S.P. Brophy. 2006. Experiences with formative assessment in engineering classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 95(4): 311–24. Page 26.675.122. Chen, J.C., D.C. Whittinghill, and J. A. Kadlowec. 2010. Classes That Click: Fast, Rich Feedback to Enhance Student Learning and Satisfaction. Journal of Engineering Education 99(2): 159-168.3. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school
Paper ID #12167What makes an undergraduate course impactful? An examination of stu-dents’ perceptions of instructional environmentsDr. Alexandra Emelina Coso, Georgia Institute of Technology Alexandra Coso is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning. She completed her Ph.D. in 2014 in Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Tech. Prior to her time at Georgia Tech, she received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from MIT and her M.S. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include graduate student experiences in engineering programs, engineering
Paper ID #12820Tricks of the trade: Developing research fundingDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Dr. Gehringer is an associate professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of programming, computer architecture, object-oriented design, and ethics in computing. Page 26.1607.1
Paper ID #12015Leadership Development in Change: A Panel to Explore Experiences, Skills,and Learning in Change Management for New Engineering Educators.Dr. Ella Lee Ingram, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Ella L. Ingram is an Associate Professor of Biology and Director of the Center for the Practice and Schol- arship of Education at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her educational research interests include promoting successful change practice of STEM faculty, effective evolution and ecology instruction, and facilitating undergraduate research experiences. Her teaching portfolio includes courses on: nutrition
Paper ID #11293Third-Year Status of a Summer Faculty Immersion ProgramDr. Juan C Morales, Universidad del Turabo Dr. Juan C. Morales, P.E., joined the Mechanical Engineering Department at Universidad del Turabo (UT), Gurabo, Puerto Rico, in 1995 and currently holds the rank of professor. Dr. Morales was the ABET Coordinator of the School of Engineering for the initial ABET-EAC accreditation of all four accredited programs at UT. He has been Department Head of Mechanical Engineering since 2003. His efforts to diffuse innovative teaching and learning practices derive directly from the outcomes assessment plan that he
within my college.Of course, I expect to encounter worldviews very different from my own and don’t assume thatmine are more valid. But I am wondering whether the story the administrator is telling alsoallows for other versions of becoming an engineer. The story doesn’t demand outright that Iconform but there is a tacit hostility in the way other points of view are unacknowledged andexcluded, like the feeling of dismissal when somebody doesn’t take the trouble to learn yourname.After telling us about our importance to the economy, the administrator then tells us how exactlywe are important: “The role of technology, and the infusion of technology in our society, has just become limitless, right?”To my mind, these comments even seem to