Asee peer logo
Displaying all 9 results
Conference Session
Technical Session: Pedagogical Strategies and Classroom Techniques for Teaching Assistants
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Charles Algeo Wilson IV, Louisiana State University; Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University; Wei-Hsung Wang Ph.D., Louisiana State University; Linda Lee Ramsey, Independent evaluator
Tagged Divisions
Student
LSU and administers a comprehensive radiological control program under a broad scope radioactive material license. Dr. Wang received his B.S. in geology from National Taiwan University, M.S. in environmental health engineering from Northwestern University, and Ph.D. in health physics from Purdue University. He is certified by the American Board of Health Physics (ABHP), the Board of Certified Safety Professionals, and the Board of Laser Safety. He is a member of the ANSI Z136 Technical Subcommittee on Laser Safety Control Measures and Training, the Editorial Board of Environmental Health Insights, Sigma Xi, and Phi Kappa Phi. Dr. Wang has been a full member of the Health Physics Society (HPS) since 1993, and a
Conference Session
Technical Session: Pedagogical Strategies and Classroom Techniques for Teaching Assistants
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephen W. Crown, University of Texas, Pan American; Ana Alanis, University of Texas, Pan American ; Jose Luis Chavez Jr., The University of Texas, Pan-American; Joel Guadalupe Montemayor, University of Texas, Pan American; Ricardo Montemayor, University of Texas, Pan-American; Haidy Enid Soto, University of Texas, Pan American
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student
VaNTH ERC on the Educational Practices of the School of Engineering and Computer Science at UTPA." 9. Roselli, Robert J., and Sean P. Brophy. "Effectiveness of Challenge‐Based Instruction in Biomechanics." Journal of Engineering Education 95.4 (2006): 311-324. 10. Bransford, John D., Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, 1999. 11. Schwartz, Daniel L., et al. "Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs." Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory 2 (1999): 183-213. 12. Bransford, John. "Preparing people for rapidly changing environments." Journal of Engineering
Conference Session
Technical Session: Professional Development Opportunities for Students
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Natacha Depaola, Illinois Institute of Technology; Jamshid Mohammadi P.E., Illinois Institute of Technology; Paul R. Anderson, Illinois Institute of Technology; Eric M. Brey, Illinois Institute of Technology; Roberto Cammino, Illinois Institute of Technology; Bonnie Haferkamp, Illinois Institute of Technology; Fouad Teymour, Illinois Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Student
(see Fig. 1). The examples of the student’s work, which allows to customize for individualcareer focus, include final reports on competitions entered and projects completed, narrativesprepared after attending a seminar or a roundtable, and papers or posters published uponcompleting participation in the Armour R&D program, IIT’s Program for UndergraduateResearch in Engineering (PURE) and Mentored INnovation Development (MIND) program. Therecords of the student’s activities are electronically entered into the portfolio when he/she attendsseminars, roundtables, discussion groups, field trips, etc. The records of critiques by a facultymentor, and any awards and recognitions received by the students are also compiled in theportfolio. These
Conference Session
Research on Diversification & Inclusion
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Brewer, University of Georgia; Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering
within my college.Of course, I expect to encounter worldviews very different from my own and don’t assume thatmine are more valid. But I am wondering whether the story the administrator is telling alsoallows for other versions of becoming an engineer. The story doesn’t demand outright that Iconform but there is a tacit hostility in the way other points of view are unacknowledged andexcluded, like the feeling of dismissal when somebody doesn’t take the trouble to learn yourname.After telling us about our importance to the economy, the administrator then tells us how exactlywe are important: “The role of technology, and the infusion of technology in our society, has just become limitless, right?”To my mind, these comments even seem to
Conference Session
Interactive Panel on Improving the Experiences of Marginalized Students on Engineering Design Teams
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lorelle A Meadows, Michigan Technological University; Denise Sekaquaptewa, University of Michigan; Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Debbie Chachra, Olin College of Engineering; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education, Electrical and Computer, Engineering Libraries, First-Year Programs, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering, Student, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering
experiences.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
Conference Session
Technical Session: Pedagogical Strategies and Classroom Techniques for Teaching Assistants
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Pennsylvania; Julie Schafer McGurk, University of Pennsylvania; Emily R. Elliott, University of Pennsylvania; Ursula J. Williams, University of Pennsylvania; Leann Dourte Segan, University of Pennsylvania
Tagged Divisions
Student
Paper ID #11750Facilitating the Transition of a Traditional Engineering Course to a Struc-tured, Active, In-Class Learning Environment as a Teaching AssistantSarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Pennsylvania Sarah I. Rooney is a Ph.D. candidate in the Bioengineering department at the University of Pennsylvania. She received her B.S.E. (2009) and M.S.E. (2010) in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor).Dr. Julie Schafer McGurk, University of Pennsylvania Julie McGurk is an Associate Director for the Center for Teaching and Learning at the University of Pennsylvania. She earned her B.S. in
Conference Session
Technical Session: Student Experience & Perspectives
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dylan Christenson, Texas Tech University; Daniel Baldwin; Maeghan Marie Brundrett, Texas Tech University; Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University; Kevin A. Nguyen, Texas Tech University; Audra N. Morse, Texas Tech University
Tagged Divisions
Student
in Science Technology,Engineering, and Math (STEM) disciplines, the affective domain has been demonstrated to havea significant impact on student performance and learning outcomes8,9. This is especially true interms of student motivation and self regulation10-12. Speer examined the impact held beliefs hadon actual practice with mathematics instructors13 and Singer examined the teaching paradigms ofcollege faculty on instructional practices14. With these results in mind, this work is viewed as thefirst step of assessing both student and teaching assistant held beliefs and perceptions about thecharacteristics of an effective teaching assistant. The objective of the study is to examine theseperceptions and assess any potential differences
Conference Session
Technical Session: Professional Development Opportunities for Students
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathleen A. Harper, The Ohio State University; Hannah Christine Zierden, The Ohio State University; Kevin Robert Wegman; Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Student
component selection and everything in between.”Ten of the students reported improved professional skills. While some just generally mentionedteamwork or communications, several gave specific examples of management-level skills. Someexamples of these were the ability to break a large project into smaller pieces, to manage a teamof software engineers, and to “let go and delegate tasks.”Career ImplicationsTAs were also asked about how their participation helped them in their search for employment,be it a fulltime job, a co-op, or an internship. Thirteen of the TAs said their participation in thedesign project development helped them in their job search. Keeping in mind that 8 of therespondents were in their first term of working on the project and 4
Conference Session
Technical Session: Student Experience & Perspectives
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Andrew H. Theiss, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Student
Paper ID #12160Enhancing TA Grading of Technical Writing: A Look Back to Better Under-stand the FutureDr. Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the connection