Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Retention of Undergraduate Students

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

IndustrialDistribution students into high power careers by creating a space that consistentlyexhibits the achievements and perspectives of Industrial Distribution alumna, as well ascultivates soft skills to create meaningful impact and interactions. These skills can varyfrom proper interviewing skills, work life balance, contract negotiations, changing careerpaths, etc.The idea of SWID came about after a student attended a guest lecture, wherein a maleexecutive shared his career path. The student felt that this presentation was over achinglythe same as the majority of the guest speakers that present their experiences to the studentbody. There was no female perspective. The speakers did not seem to realize that thesediscourses target a very specific number of

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shafagh Jafer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

 Allocate $5,000 additional merit scholarship for every qualified female applicantThe additional funding have been already requested from two external agencies (pending results)to help cover the following costs:  Travel: $2,500 to assist students attending conferences to present their research  Student Salary: $2,000 for student assistants working at the WEI  Scholarships: $2,500 to fund five scholarships ($500 each) for women engineering students with high academic achievement and financial need  Page 26.1745.5 Workshop: $2,000 to host technical or soft skills workshop on-campus)  Outreach activities

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Curricular Programs

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Secules, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

herself, which has been rehearsed and reinforcedover time due to its productive empowerment.A final way Rachel resists the “suck at math” narrative is through active work to counter aculturally dominant belief about the importance of math in engineering. Rachel develops a senseof a bigger “real world” out there that rarely gets represented in her STEM classes, a sense thatengineering jobs rely more on soft skills and cultural understandings and less on math. We seeagency through what bell hooks style “liberatory theorizing” simply in the production of thatcounter-narrative; but remarkably, Rachel actively seeks evidence in the “real world” to confirmher theorizing. She attended networking events (set up by her Women in Engineering program)to make

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division: Strategies Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Evelyn R. Sowells, North Carolina A&T State University; Nina Exner, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University; Sherry F. Abernathy, North Carolina A&T State University; Rajeev K. Agrawal, North Carolina A&T State University ; Brenda S. Faison Ph.D., North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

members within their program of study. What made this workshop design different is the participation from each entity in the alliance and their knowledge about technology programs. The objectives for the workshops are accomplished by the following activities: 1. The students joined American Toastmasters or similar organizations which assists them with soft skills and helps them with their writing skills and public speaking. 2. Students received job training through practical lab assignments and real life applications. The students then present discoveries and are evaluated by their peers, industry, faculty, and advisory board. 3. Increase students’ technical