universally designed engineering laboratories and machine shopsinclude the availability of: ● Adjustable height lab tables or work benches ● Equipment and controls that can be reached from a seated position ● Clear, large-print, or Braille labels ● Adequate lighting or additional light sources ● Clear lines of sight between instructional and laboratory areas ● Wide aisles throughout the space that are kept clear of obstructions ● Clear safety procedures for students with mobility, vision, and hearing impairmentsEnvironmental and curricular changes with UD in mind may increase the likelihood that studentswith disabilities and students from other underrepresented groups pursue and persist inengineering. By providing examples of UD
Paper ID #13732Vulnerable heroes: Problematizing metaphors of male socialization in engi-neeringDr. Prashant Rajan, Iowa State UniversityCharles T Armstrong, Purdue UniversityElizabeth J. O’Connor , Ketchum ChangeProf. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. Editor of three books and author of over 150 articles and chapters, her research centers on the intersections of career, gender communication, lead- ership, and resilience. Fellow and past president of the
Paper ID #12714Theorizing can contribute to marginalized students’ agency in engineeringpersistence.Mr. Stephen Douglas Secules, University of Maryland, College Park Stephen is an Education PhD student at UMCP, researching engineering education. He has a prior aca- demic and professional background in engineering, having worked as an engineer and project manager in building acoustics consulting firms for 5 years prior to becoming an educational researcher. His research interests include socio-cultural dimensions of engineering classrooms.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Research
joke back, they really don’t mind that, they’re used to, or have gotten used to it whether they like it or not they, they’ve learned, adapted to that situation and are fine. And then the people that it really bothers, um, I think that’s, that’s difficult (Female faculty)The issue seemed beyond some of the faculty members’ comfort levels: Yes…I don’t think engineers are traditionally very good about addressing some of the touchier issues, and I would certainly not feel comfortable. If I had to do it, I’d give it a good shot, but I’d rather just have them know that I don’t want to hear that kind of language, but I don’t want to discuss precisely what it is I don’t want to hear. You should have your own
. Women,Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013. Special Report NSF 13-304.Arlington, VA. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.2. Rethink your gender attitudes. Nature Materials, 2014. Page 26.88.9 83. Shen, H. Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap. Nature, 2013.4. Moss-Racusin, C.A., et al., Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences, 2012.5. van Anders, S.M., Why the Academic Pipeline Leaks: Fewer Men than Women Perceive
world, their surroundings and themselves.”12 Gender adds another layer of influence.Girls, for example, tend not to see physics as relevant to their lives; they find it challenging andobscure.13 “Young people, especially young girls, although they appreciate technology, wouldrather like to have an identity that conveys late modern post-material values. Such values mightbe self-realization, creativity and innovation, working with people and helping others.”14 For theengineering identity to resonate with civic-minded Millennial females, it must convey the roleengineers play in fostering a strong sense of community, both local and global.3. WEMADEIT Program DescriptionIn Spring 2013, four faculties of engineering (Ryerson University, University of
developed with two objectives in mind: 1. Encourage a broader understanding among graduate students of the range of choices, opportunities and challenges that women must navigate, and of the impact of culture, community and context on women, whether in their personal lives, in higher education, or in the workplace. 2. Encourage and support the development of community among graduate students.The program met six times (approximately bi-weekly) during the spring semester of 2014 in alarge conference room in the College of Engineering. Discussion sessions were held duringlunch time (12:00 p.m. until 2:00 p.m.) and participants were free to come and to leave duringthat timeframe based on their individual schedules. Three of the
Exposition of theAmerican Society for Engineering EducationGattis, C., Hill, and B., Lachowsky, A. (2007). A successful engineering peer mentoringprogram. Proceedings of the Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society forEngineering Education.Halpin, G., & Halpin, G. (2012). A promising prospect for minority retention : Studentsbecoming peer mentors. The Journal of Negro Education, 69(4), 375–383. doi:10.2307/2696252Johnson, S., Davis, P., Thibodeaux, A., Ikuma, L., Rusch, K., and Waggenspeck, W. (2011).Proceedings of the Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for EngineeringEducation.Light, R. J. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds (1st ed., p. 242).Cambridge: Harvard University
Page 26.850.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Honing Interpersonal Communication Skills for Difficult Situations: Evidence for the Effectiveness of an Online Instructional ResourceIntroduction Interpersonal communication skills can be conceptualized as understanding the dynamicsand applying the principles of receiving and sending verbal and nonverbal messages.1Acrosscareer and educational fields, interpersonal communication skills are considered fundamental tosuccess. Effective communication has been associated empirically with higher quality academicaccomplishments, better professional and personal relationships, and increased
Paper ID #11294Developing an effective mentoring program for early-career STEM faculty:Lessons learned from the first three years of an ADVANCE PAID programDr. Laila Guessous, Oakland University Laila Guessous, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the department of mechanical engineering at Oakland University (OU) in Rochester, MI. Her research and teaching interests lie in the areas of fluid mechanics and heat transfer, with an emphasis on computational methods. She is the program director for the NSF- funded AERIM REU program at OU, as well as a co-PI on the Oakland University WISE@OU NSF ADVANCE Partnerships for Adaptation
departments. A comprehensive programevaluation survey is done at the end of the mentorship experience and solicits feedback fromboth the student mentees and faculty mentors.Program ObjectivesAs originally designed, the primary objective of the program has been to help increase retentionof women students in engineering and technology majors. While this initial objective continuesto be important, the program has had numerous other benefits to both students and faculty. Withthis overall objective in mind, sub-objectives were developed to support the mentorshipexperience to assist and encourage the student participants to: • Form relationships with faculty and connect with upperclassmen and others within their departments and the
emerging biotech pharmaceutical services com- pany. Ronald Brandt also served as President of the Drug, Chemical and Allied Technologies Association (DCAT). Ronald Brandt earned a Bachelors of Engineering (Chemical Engineering) from The Cooper Union, a Masters of Business Administration from Rutgers University and a Masters of Arts (Ed.) from Seton Hall University. Brandt is a member of the Beta Gamma Sigma and Kappa Delta Pi honor societies. The American Chemical Society selected Ronald Brandt as a Hach Scientific Foundation Scholar for his work as a high school chemistry teacher. Page 26.1737.1
Paper ID #11743Implementation of Advocates and Allies Programs to Support and PromoteGender Equity in AcademiaDr. Canan Bilen-Green, North Dakota State University Canan Bilen-Green is Vice Provost for Faculty Advancement at North Dakota State University. She is also Dale Hogoboom Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and PI of the ADVANCE Program at North Dakota State University. She holds Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Statistics from the University of Wyoming and a M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Bilkent University.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Carpenter is Associate Dean
Technology Advisory Board. Clearly defining and measuring academic success has helped to create the path forward for our faculty and students. Students participate in various hands-on, minds-on exercises designed to enhance applied STEM skills for managing enterprise systems. We target students who are interested in information technology from disciplines such as computer science, information systems, engineering, accounting/finance, and marketing. Corporate participants in past years have included: BB&T, John Deere, IBM, Cisco, Red Hat, Bank of America, Clear Blade, First Citizens Bank, Fidelity Investment, and Northrop Grumman, to name just a few sponsors. High schools participating include students from Greensboro, Winston-Salem
Paper ID #12765Factoring Family Considerations into Female Faculty Choices for Interna-tional Engagement in Engineering, IT, and Computer ScienceDr. Quincy Brown, American Association for the Advancement of Science Dr. Quincy Brown is AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow and an Assistant Professor in the Computer Department at Bowie State University. She is a 2009 recipient of the National Science Foun- dation/Computing Community Consortium CI Fellows Postdoctoral Research Fellowship award. She completed her doctoral work at Drexel University where she was a National Science Foundation GK-12 and Bridges To the
within my college.Of course, I expect to encounter worldviews very different from my own and don’t assume thatmine are more valid. But I am wondering whether the story the administrator is telling alsoallows for other versions of becoming an engineer. The story doesn’t demand outright that Iconform but there is a tacit hostility in the way other points of view are unacknowledged andexcluded, like the feeling of dismissal when somebody doesn’t take the trouble to learn yourname.After telling us about our importance to the economy, the administrator then tells us how exactlywe are important: “The role of technology, and the infusion of technology in our society, has just become limitless, right?”To my mind, these comments even seem to
experiences.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
Paper ID #11738Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocatesfor Gender EquityDr. Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University Dr. Genalo is a University Professor and Associate Chair of the Materials Science and Engineering Department at Iowa State University. He is a Fellow of ASEE and has run the NSF Grantees Poster Session for nearly 20 years. He is a former chair of DELOS and the Freshman Programs Constituent Committee (the year before it became a Division).Dr. Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green received the B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering and the