financial support to conduct this project. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the PacTrans Regional University Transportation Research Center. We thank those professors who gave their time and thoughts to make this research possible.1 National Science Foundation, Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics., 2012.2 Gould and Lewis, “Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think.”3 Borrego, Froyd, and Hall, “Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations : A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in US.”4 Everett Rogers, Diffusion
expressed in this material are those ofthe author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Rampell, C. “Enrollment Drops Again in Graduate Programs,” The New York Times (Sept. 28, 2012). Available online at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/28/business/new-enrollment-drops-again-in-us- graduate-schools.html[2] Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K. and Freeman, C., "Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers' classroom practices," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 668–690, August 2005.[3] Carpinelli, J.D., Kimmel, H.S., Hirsch, L.S., Burr-Alexander, L., Narh,K.A. and Dave, R., "Translating Research Experiences into
-faculty and student-student engagement. Every effort was made to ensure thatthe speaker diversity reflected that of the REU students, so that students could envisionthemselves taking the speakers’ paths. Further student-faculty interaction was provided throughweekly faculty research seminars. Each week, one faculty member presented brief vignettes oftheir research interests to the group, enabling students to learn of other imaging related researchbeyond their own projects.In addition to the program-related activities, students participated in several University-wideenrichment events. These activities included a weekly brown-bag seminar series on topics suchas Ethics, GRE preparation, Getting into Graduate School, and Abstract Writing
pedagogical technique in engineering and architecture programs untilthe 1990's when, with the accessibility of desktop computing and relatively inexpensivesoftware, computer-aided drawing began to dominate and manual drafting classes disappearedfrom the engineering curriculum. Visualization and analysis can now be done more quickly andaccurately using CAD programs. In addition, CAD addresses a more diverse range of problems,including those in three-dimensions. As a result, returning to hand drawing in order to solvestatics problems is not a choice anyone would make for efficiency.Visualization skills are thought to be fundamental to spatial thinking, as it is used to representand manipulate information, and as it contributes to the reflective
the public who have allowed theengineering profession to get by working quietly and diligently, but not putting all their skills tothe best use of humanity.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1158863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. (National Academies Press, 2004).2. National Academy of Engineering. Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding
significant proportion ofstudents to fail in exams, which consisted mostly of simulating the execution of thealgorithms for a given input. Usually, students made two types of errors: simple involuntarymistakes and errors that reflect a lack of understanding of the algorithm. After applying themethodology, the former were less common, and the latter were infrequent. We started usingthe methodology in the II semester of 2010 (in our college, I semester goes from March toJune and II semester from August to November). Tables 1 and 2 show the average grades forTest 1 applied during the II semester of 2009-2010 and the I semester of 2010-2011 (beforeand after applying the methodology, in each case). This test is about analysis of algorithmsand sorting
, buildings, and water systems. Our connection to theseartifacts of civil engineering are thus reflected in cultural products such as popular music, film,and other media which hold cultural currency with students. This paper explores strategies forcreating engagement for civil engineering students in lecture settings that take advantage of thisstrong connection between civil engineering and culture. Specifically, we examine three fieldsof cultural discourse - music, arts, and politics - then explain how these connections can be usedin pre-lecture activities, and discuss the results of these strategies, as developed and trialledduring a single semester sophomore course on Engineering Communication in civil engineering.Context:In fact, two problems are
are introduced to relevant zoning regulations andbuilding codes. Following this they determine construction type and appropriate structure for thefacility. The project then moves into design development/ construction drawings during whichstudents create site improvement plans, floor plans and reflected ceiling plans, flooring plans,elevations, sections, details (stairs, elevator and washroom), schedules, code compliancedrawings and a cover sheet. The construction drawings contain appropriate room sizes, corridorand stair widths, door sizes, wall types, structural elements, annotation among otherrequirements. Figure 1 & 2 show examples of student work created in AMS 363. Figure 1: Construction Drawings of floor
information is then captured and summarized on a Course-LevelAssessment Form.For each ETAC/ABET criteria a-k, one or more student outcomes are developed and mapped tothe criteria. In this paper, criteria “C” is considered for exemplification purpose. It is the abilityto conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; andto apply experimental results to improve processes.A student outcome can be proposed to reflect these criteria. In this paper, a student outcome isproposed to assess criteria “C” in the Electrical/Computer Engineering Technology program. Anew rubric to assess this student outcome is presented along with data collected. Ideas forimprovement are reported as well, in order to close the loop
instructional landscape foster possibilities forconnection and collaboration that the traditional classroom precludes, as a wider network existsbeyond the brick and mortar classroom. The Accelerate curriculum enhances these possibilitiesby relying on a broad-based philosophy of course integration that obfuscates abiding distinctionsbetween “hard” and “soft” skills, blends liberal and technical subjects, and—perhaps, mostimportantly—combines a range of populations, talents, and experiences to produce the nextgeneration of engineers. At the heart of the program lie six conceptual strands, or “grandthemes.” Developed in the fall semester of 2014 by Accelerate faculty and administrators, thesethemes reflect and inform the overall mission of integration
by (a) introducing students to legal reasoning, which would have been assumed in asecond- or third-year law-school course, (b) providing students with an overview of the U.S.federal legal system and the differences between common law and statutory law, (c) providingindividual feedback and encouragement for legal argument, and (d) asking students to work onreal projects in their project results that would actually affect the outcome of university decisionsabout protection of IP. Page 26.207.7The students’ post-course evaluation comments reflected both the unusualness of the course asan experience for students in technical majors and the
seeking a Mechanical, Civil, or Aerospace Engineering degree. As the SLC students have been presented with multiple approaches to solving problems, it was expected that these students’ understanding, problem-solving abilities, and critical thinking skills would be improved. These students are, therefore, expected to perform better in their subsequent fundamental core courses. Table 4 and Table 5 present the pass/fail rates of both fall 2013 and spring 2014 cohorts. All students were not combined into one cohort to be able to reflect the fact that some students from the fall cohort have taken a course (Calculus I, Physics I, or both) multiple times to pass the class while students from the spring 2014cohort are doing so in the current
overview of a STEM unit developed by threemiddle school life science teachers. In this unit, loon nesting platform design was chosen as acontext to make learning more relevant to student lives (Loons are the official state bird wherethe curriculum was implemented). The unit addressed the following NGSS: MS-ETS 1Engineering design, LS2C: Ecosystems dynamics, functioning, and resilience, and thecrosscutting concepts: stability and change. Page 26.260.3Table 1: Overview of the loon nesting platform unitTitle DescriptionLesson 1: This lesson begins by asking students to reflect on how humans impact wildlife.Move It or Students then
Member searches of professional society databases (e.g. the ASEE Member Database is institution-searchable) Ask departments that commonly participate in DBER to see if there are faculty or student contacts with education-based research interests (e.g. physics, chemistry, math, engineering; departmental secretaries are helpful!)Discipline-based educational research communities of practice will look different at everyinstitution. The boundaries of the domain of interest may change, the community itself will havea different dynamic, and the community’s practices will reflect the differences the membersbring to the organization. The recommendations and experiences presented in this paper focus onwhat has worked
volunteered likely felt strongly oneway or the other about the experiment. In the future, the authors will consider administering theMCI to the same students before and after the experiment. Page 26.313.11In addition, the experiment guide distributed to students will be altered. Though the guide willnot be collected for grades, additional open-ended questions will be posed. This will give thestudents the opportunity to better reflect on what they have learned and may likely improve theconceptual results of the experiment.Finally, the MCI is multiple choice and therefore not necessarily the best method to showconceptual understanding. In addition to
students with the intention of raising awareness.Forty students (8 female) attended the departmental information session during the College OpenHouse event on November 9, 2014. Four female students signed up to participate in a focusgroup. Twenty-four students (3 female) attended the two departmental new student orientationsessions on January 21 and 23, 2015. Two female students signed up to participate in the focusgroup.4.2 Special Registration Advisement SessionsAdvisement helps students register for the proper courses by following their degreerequirements; this is both important and challenging, as the CST degree program requirementsare constantly under modification to reflect new technologies. Students entering the College atdifferent times
meetings during the summer exchangeprogram in 2013 and 2014. He also attended some of the weekly team meetings in the fall, butgiven that UMCP is approximately a 3 hour drive from UMES, such visits were infrequent duringthe regular semester. However, the faculty leaders have encouraged his continued involvementwith some of the students who are working in synergistic projects at UMES. Figure 7: Student Survey Instrument and Assessment DataUndergraduate students working in the AIRSPACES project reported here are required to present Page 26.334.9their progress, share and reflect on their experiences, and get feedback to troubleshoot
Page 26.352.8groups of students who receive multiple years of exposure to sustainability grow and deepen intheir understanding of sustainability and how to improve BIM skills. The challenge in evaluatingan intervention using a quasi-experimental design is in managing a non-random sample andanalyzing the data to allow for causal inference to be made from the findings.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE-1140941. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Davis, K. A., and Casey Cline, R. (2009). “Improving course
considering inorder to be self-efficacious. Prior knowledge provides familiarity with the task and the actionsrequired to perform that task10.Self-efficacy includes confidence as well as one’s perceived capabilities to organize andimplement actions necessary to attain desired performance7. Thus, self-efficacy is a reflection ofone’s confidence to succeed at a task in the context of a domain12. Confidence can be a measureof self-efficacy, as the more confident one is in a domain, the more certain they are in theirresponses to questions about that domain5.Conceptual KnowledgeConceptual knowledge has been extensively studied, particularly in the field of PhysicsEducation13. Concepts are the organizers that sort our prior knowledge so we have an idea
India.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and re- flective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice
effective.Two worksheets were developed: one corresponding to a cognitive conflict strategy and the otherto an analogy strategy. Both worksheets led students through a scaffolded set of short answerquestions where they made initial predictions, were presented results which they discussed withother students in small groups and evaluated their predictions. Worksheets for both strategieswere designed to be completed in a 50 minute class section. Students in both conditions weregiven identical post-class analysis and reflection activities.The cognitive conflict strategy worksheet was developed based on the design of Laws andcolleagues.17 Students were asked to design two experiments the first of which considered thecooling of a beverage by comparing
of up to two years.PartnersThe efforts described in this article reflect a collaborative partnership between a large publicschool district, DPS, and a university, CSM. The demographics of the participants are describedin the subsections that follow.Public School DistrictDPS is approximately 58% Latino and 14% African American. Seventy-two percent of studentswithin the district qualify for free or reduced cost lunch. The district serves over 85,000 studentsin grades K-12 with an overall graduation rate of 61.3% and a dropout rate of 5% per academicyear.UniversityCSM is a public university specializing in applied science and engineering. There are over 4200undergraduate students enrolled, 73% of which are male and 13% who are
. Universities and fundamental research: Reflections on the growth of university-industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 10-212. Jones, G., McCarney, P., & Skolnik, M. (Eds.). (2005). Creating knowledge, strengthening nations: The changing role of higher education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.3. Knight, J. (2003). Updated internationalization definition. International Higher Education, 33, 2-3.4. Lantada, A.D. et al. (2013) Study of Collaboration Activities between Academia and Industry for Improving the Teaching-Learning Process. International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 1059–10675. The Boeing Company (2014) Boeing in China Backgrounder. Retrieved from http
larger than a classroomIndividual What is your little See if word count can beCommitment individual used to evaluate their level commitment to the of effort. project? some completeIndividual Include a narrativeCommitment reflecting your commitment to this project.Beneficial ElementsExternal interaction Will this project have no no any external yes yes
expect these students to graduate with these skills.A professor at a large Midwest land grant institution gave a senior level quality course an activitythat challenged the students to define critical thinking and demonstrate it. The results and potentialimplications are discussed in this article. Eighty- two percent of the students were scheduled tograduate at the end of the semester. Fifty- seven percent did not adequately define critical thinkingor demonstrate it. Twenty percent of the students had received offers of employment two monthsbefore graduation. The lack of job offers could be reflective of a competitive job market or a lackof readiness of the students for the workforce. We will develop recommendations and furtherresearch goals in
effect of significance has been an increase in direct, targeted recruitmentof women into the program — and subsequently from the program by employers. Weanecdotally note also that women in cybersecurity command a higher average placement wagethan men, although regret that to date, this data is not statistically significant due to insufficientdata samples.IntroductionAt the beginning of 2015, Intel announced a $300 million diversity initiative intended to give fullrepresentation to women within their company by 2020 3. Intel stated that its plan is to “hiredifferently and tie executive pay to performance on the issue 4.” Full representation in thiscontext means that Intel’s aims to reflect the amount of women who have the skills and aptitudeto
comparison across the two years.The cohorts for 2013 and 2014 comprised different groups of students and a different set ofresearch sites, with only two students participating in both the 2013 and 2014 REU programs.Results2013 Results – Development and First Use of VPTsThe 2013 data reflect the development of VPTs from a nascent idea to a functional programelement. Thirty of the 36 REU participants completed the online formative assessment survey.The first Likert scale question asked students to identify how effective the VPT activities were inhelping them complete their REU products (Figure 2). The data show the peer reviewinteractions of the VPT were the most effective activity of the VPT teams while regularlyscheduled meetings were somewhat
-Support-Connect program is an initiative that brought several diversity programstogether at The School of Technology (SoT) of North Carolina Agricultural and TechnicalState University (NC A&T State University) to successfully support female recruitment intotechnology majors. NC A&T State University is a Historically Black College and Universitywith a STEM Early College High School located on campus. NC A&T State University as awhole has a 54 percent female undergraduate student body, but in the School of Technologyonly 25 percent of our students were female. This past challenge gave us a unique position tocapitalize on the opportunity to make a paradigm shift to be more reflective of the nation’spopulation. Although the focus of this
)made a number of changes in the departmental PEOs, outcomes and curricula to accommodate :(a) the release of ASCE BOK II, (b)a change of credit hours 132 to 125 in response to theUniversity of Alabama lowering the “full-time load” for students to 16 hours/semester, (c)increasing numbers of students, (d) to communicate program specific criteria more explicitly,and (e) to reflect lessons learned during the departmental assessment of outcomes using studentportfolios. Table 4 shows the single set of departmental outcomes for both the CE and ConEprogram introduced in 2010. Note that when the program specific criteria need to be reflected ina degree, the words “civil engineering” or “construction engineering” are used. A carefulcomparison of Table 4
and organizational contexts. We aim to further explore how,through their participation in the routine practices of the undergraduate curriculum,students make themselves, and are made by others, into engineers. The specific focushere is on how a particular “ideology of engineering”2 is reflected in the discourse ofparticipants in presentations for a first year projects course. In particular, this paperdetails how engineering discourses serve to depoliticize complex social issues, and toreframe them as technical issues that can be resolved through design and refinement ofinnovative technologies. A second and related goal is to contribute to recentmethodological discussions in engineering education3, and specifically to introduce