4.1 4, 5 0.79 6. Determine open loop gain 4.4 5 0.64 7. Compensator design 3.4 3 0.77 8. Performance evaluation 3.9 3, 4, 5 1.00 c. ABET Outcome SupportAccording to the department ABET assessment plan, this course is supposed to provideassessment data for two ABET outcomes (Outcome f: ethics and Outcome h: impact). These twooutcomes were assessed through the incubator design project. To assess outcome h, the studentswere asked to conduct research and find out how their design may harm the embryo and lead topossible hatching defects if the steady-state-error or the overshoot of
engineeringdegree programs of 155.7. The GE+ program plans to seek accreditation under ABET’s generalengineering program criteria.BackgroundIn the 2005 publication, Educating the Engineer of 2020, the National Academy of Engineeringrecommended that undergraduate engineering programs introduce interdisciplinary learning and“more vigorously exploit the flexibility inherent in the outcomes-based accreditation approach toexperiment with novel approaches for baccalaureate education.”1 The American Society ofMechanical Engineers (ASME) Vision 2030 Task Force echoed this recommendation and named“increased curricular flexibility” as one of seven recommended actions intended to strengthenundergraduate mechanical engineering education.2 Developmentally, infusing
for Engineering Education, 2015 The Influence of Out-of-school High School Experiences on Engineering Identities and Career ChoiceAbstractStudents’ engineering career choices are not well understood. There are a variety of factors,including irrational ones, which affect students’ ultimate career decisions. Among them, out-of-school experiences in high school can impact their career interests and decisions. We examineddifferences in incoming engineering students’ high school extracurricular experiences, and howthose experiences influenced current and future selves, as well as career plans. The data for thiswork come from a national survey, distributed in Fall 2013, of 15,847 students from 27 differentinstitutions
Paper ID #11293Third-Year Status of a Summer Faculty Immersion ProgramDr. Juan C Morales, Universidad del Turabo Dr. Juan C. Morales, P.E., joined the Mechanical Engineering Department at Universidad del Turabo (UT), Gurabo, Puerto Rico, in 1995 and currently holds the rank of professor. Dr. Morales was the ABET Coordinator of the School of Engineering for the initial ABET-EAC accreditation of all four accredited programs at UT. He has been Department Head of Mechanical Engineering since 2003. His efforts to diffuse innovative teaching and learning practices derive directly from the outcomes assessment plan that he
potential funding sources (government agencies, foundations,industries, etc.) and, perhaps, identification of some colleagues at that university (inside andoutside of the engineering college) with whom they may overlap – perhaps with an eye towardsestablishing a center down the road. This research interest document can often be dozens ofpages as the applicant tries to impress the search committee not only with their accomplishmentsto date, but their “rain-making” plans for the future.The teaching interest/philosophy statement, on the other hand, does not often receive the samelevel of detail by the applicant for a variety of reasons (they don’t know educational literatureexists, they don’t know how to properly prepare a meaningful teaching
part ofthis approach, the instructor developed lab assignments (experiments and projects) whichrequired working in dyads and groups of four, which required students engage in some form ofstudent-centered, active learning within the flipped classroom. Evidence of the use of thisapproach was supported by students’ responses to learning questionnaires and further confirmedby classroom observations.Learning the dynamics of collaborative, group-directed learning Data revealed that, in the flipped classroom, when students worked in collaboration fordecision-making processes needed for planning the execution of lab assignments and whencompleting assignments, both collaborative and cooperative groups emerged. Despite differencesin group
“instrument blueprint” to be the pathor process plan that guides the content definition and item creation of an instrument. We presentthe blueprint to create an item set to be used in initial pilot testing; this process begins withidentification and refinement of the construct, moves to the creation and refinement of behaviormatrices, and ends with expert review and additional refinement of items.2. Theoretical FrameworkIn highlighting the importance of an instrument’s validity in the context of score interpretation,Messick notes that the construct validity of score interpretation undergirds all score-basedinferences.8 In short, score interpretation is dependent upon the validity evidence collected forthe instrument itself, making the rigor of the
times throughout the semester: asassigned and again before the midterm and final exams. Table 1. ENG1101 Pre-Lesson Videos Used in Fall 2014 Topic Length (minutes) Views Significant Digits 3.87 1182 Unit Conversions 6.71 684 Introduction to Spreadsheets 6.45 1267 Tables and Figures in Technical Documents 2.36 981 References in Technical Documents 2.52 1326 Management Plan (Gantt
favorable to PBL. At around the same time as theAlbanese and Mitchell22 and Berkson23 reviews that Kirschner et al.21 cited, there was a thirdmeta-analysis conducted by Vernon and Blake24. This analysis found that medical students inPBL curricula performed slightly worse on tests of basic science knowledge but performed betteron tests of clinical knowledge than traditional medical students. Unlike the “discovery learning”or minimally-guided instruction22,25, effective use of PBL requires extensive planning andprofessional development, a supportive environment, and tool and strategies for effectiveinstruction, including the use of technologies.26,27,28 After years of research on use of problem-based learning in medical school contexts, evidence was
valid values, that all dependent sources have uniquecontrol variables that are properly defined somewhere in the circuit, that there are no duplicatesought variable names, and that the circuit is in fact soluble by both node and mesh analysis (i.e.,not inconsistent). When this editor has been incorporated into tutorial exercises, as we plan to doin the near future, the validity check will be extended to ensure that the student has made acircuit transformation that is in fact correct. For example, we would check that the student hascorrectly combined a series or parallel set of elements if they are being asked to simplify thecircuit in that manner. They will be required to perform only one such simplification at a time,to make this check easier
and then discusswhy the correct response is correct and the distractors (incorrect responses) are not. 16iv. Minute Papers, Direct Paraphrasing, Application Cards, and Lecture SummariesThese are examples of individual approaches. In minute papers or clearest/muddiest point, theinstructor should stop two minutes before the class period ends and ask students to write mainpoint(s) of the lecture and the “muddiest” or least clear point(s). Collect the papers and useresponses to plan the next lecture. In direct paraphrasing, the students should write a definitionin their own words. In application cards, students should provide a specific real-worldapplication for the topic covered in class; and finally in lecture summaries, students shouldwrite
integrate and expand their research and teaching practice.Dr. Wendi M. Kappers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Wendi M. Kappers has a Ph.D. in Instructional Technology from the University of Central Florida (UCF). Her thesis work explored how educational video game effects upon mathematics achievement and mo- tivation scores differed between the sexes. During her tenure at Seminole Community College working as a Tenured Professor and Program Manager of the Network Engineering Program, she was Co-PI for the CSEMS NSF grant that explored collaborative administration and industry mentorship planning used to increase enrollments of woman and minorities with declared majors in the areas of Computer Science (CS
tenstudents participated in the pilot (in the future we plan to hold the information sessions earlier sothat students can plan accordingly).During the first class, students were introduced to the overarching theme of the SUCCEEd Page 26.1385.10program, which consisted of a hypothetical remodeling project of a small single familyresidence. Features of the project included the installation of an air conditioning (AC) unit on theroof, and the subsequent removal of an exterior wall to open up access to the yard. As much aspossible, competencies learned in the Statics course were integrated to the other courses. Forexample, as students worked on free
Paper ID #12600Starter or Joiner, Market or Socially-Oriented: Predicting Career Choiceamong Undergraduate Engineering and Business StudentsMr. Florian Michael Lintl, Stanford University Florian is studying Environmental Planning and Ecological Engineering at the Technical University of Munich (TUM). His majors are Sustainable City Development, Renewable Energy, International Land Use Planning and Environmental Economics. He is also participant in the Entrepreneurial Qualification Program ”Manage&More”. This is a program of the Center for Innovation and Business Creation at the TU Munich (”UnternehmerTUM”) which
Page 26.1438.7 on it, so we put the words from the suggested list. It wasn't very meaningful at that point to us. It was just an assignment we had to do, and we didn't really put much thought into it later on the semester. We just uploaded it because that was what we were supposed to do. (Student C) However, six students explained that the team charter was more useful in settingexpectations or making sure team members do their share of the work, which aligned with theteam charter’s objective in enabling each team “to develop and understand the rules of conductexpected of each team member27.” We also plan- started planning our team charter which was just a contract agreement between people in the
elevatorpitch rubric, our overall ICC (i.e., not broken down by dimension) was 0.59, which representsfair to good reliability. For the individual dimensions, we achieved ICCs that suggested fair togood reliability for all but one of the individual dimensions. Since this was our first use of therubric, we have developed a training and review plan for our next round of coding to increase ourfirst-time reliability. To explore the reliability of the elevator pitch rubric further, we contactedits developer19. He provided us with data that his team had collected using the rubric. This datashowed ICC values between 0.64 and 0.75 for the various dimensions of the rubric, suggestinggood reliability. All ICC values were based on the “average measure” in SPSS18.3
includes group design - build projects incorporating planning, management, and documentation. Page 26.262.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Assessment of Inverted Classroom Success Based on Felder’s Index of Learning StylesAbstractInverting the classroom is a pedagogical practice that has recently gained significant popularity.With the increase in its use, it is essential to understand the impacts of the practice and students’experiences in this type of classroom. This pedagogical structure was implemented in a first-yearengineering course
from employers their perceptionsregarding the project-work-related professional skills of graduates from WPI’s undergraduateprogram, both absolutely and relative to graduates from other institutions. A copy of theinterview protocol can be found in the appendix.Recruitment: WPI alumni were not considered for participation in this study. The initialrecruitment plan targeted engineering employers of high numbers of WPI engineering graduates.Staff members from WPI’s Career Development Center identified such employers for theexternal consultant and provided contact information for relevant and key individuals. For initialrecruitment efforts, the consultant sent appeal letters via e-mail to these individuals. The appealletters offered a $25
their first two years of college1. Therefore, it is particularly important to support studentsduring this critical period in their education, and help them build the skills necessary to ensuretheir continued success in engineering.To help combat this problem, the University of Portland introduced a retention programspecifically to assist 1st and 2nd year students who are behind in their degrees, and who areconsidered at risk of leaving engineering. During the year-long program, students work with acounselor to explore tactics for academic success, and to discuss educational planning(particularly with regards to getting on track to graduate in four years). For many of thesestudents, the perceived inability to graduate in four years, and the
the end of the semester design reports along with other FAs and thecourse coordinator. Forms are provided in the “Purple” book to guide reviews and grading. Electronicpage copies of these forms are available from the course coordinator and are usually provided when thereports are distributed. If you don’t have what you need, ask the course coordinator. Jump StartHere are some suggestions for successfully performing as an FA (adapted from Paliwal, Manish and Bijan Page 26.323.7Sepahpour, A Revised Approach for Better Implementation of Capstone Senior Design Projects, 2012ASEE Conference, San Antonio).Appendix A • Plan a
digitizeddata, and plan the flow of information through newly designed systems. This paper providesdetails on course content division, textbook selection, lecture and lab adjustments, studentreaction and other lessons learned, for the benefit of those who wish to try this approach.I. IntroductionA course on electric circuits has long been one of the core courses in a traditional engineeringcurriculum, providing a basic foundation for students specializing in a variety of disciplines. Atypical first semester engineering course on electric circuits such as Circuit Analysis emphasizeslinear, discrete elements such as the voltage and/or current source, resistor (R), capacitor (C) andinductor (L), focusing on how to find simplified equivalent circuit
change, disruptive/transformative innovation, development studies, strategic planning, and public policy. Mahmoud has authored/co-authored 50+ peer-reviewed published papers in well-reputed international conferences and journals, in addition to 25+ institutional/curricular frameworks and internal reports. Mahmoud has attained a number of research funding grants from the UK, Malaysia, and Qatar, and won a number of awards and scholarships during his studies and professional career. After finishing his Doctorate, Mahmoud worked as a researcher at Loughborough University, UK. In Fall 2011, he moved to Qatar University (QU), Qatar, as a faculty member with the Dean’s Office, College of Engineering. In Fall 2012, Mahmoud
interested in student attitudes andsubsequent performance. To accomplish this, we will continue to track a single cohort ofstudents from material balances through the remainder of their career in the chemicalengineering program. We will keep track of student retention, subsequent courses and respectiveinstructors, as well as performance, attitudes, and external experiences such as research orinternships. We also are in the planning stages of a more homogeneous course model for materialbalances. The revised course model will focus on exposing students to problems that engage thefull spectrum of learning styles. As learning styles describe the cognitive processes involved ininformation gathering and problem solving, we believe it is important to teach
had to be multiplexed, which are controlled by switches (Table 2). To achieve deeper understanding and learning, it was considered prudent to provide some facility which could be used to access additional internal register and/or control signal values. Unassigned output pins and seven segment decoders were setup for such additional registers and control signals as seen in Figure 9. Even though reassigning pins will decrease accessibility to standard registers, a user or a designer can observe and verify the internal working of a module for planned system improvement or expansion.Figure 8: Locations of WIMP51 register and control signal access as part of the standard viewing
program. Ourcareful planning has supported the success of the program and preparation of our students.Our biggest concern now is how to support this program once funding from CIRM ends. Whilethere are potential workarounds for the cost of running our laboratory courses, our largest costsare associated with the stipend our students receive during their 9-month internship. Studentscurrently receive a stipend of $2,652 a month for their internship. For 10 students, this costamounts to $238,680 for the duration of their internship. From discussions with our AdvisoryCommittee, this is a necessary component of the internship portion of our program. We arecurrently looking at various alternatives to support the continuation of the program as it
is acomponent where soft skills were developed12. The project was an open-ended problem whereteam members had to think about safety and functionality, and at the same time team membersdeveloped and applied skills on teamwork, project planning, economics, and communication7.The key difference was the domain where the students had to develop their project, the projectwas not a typical application of what they have learned in their coursework, but at the same timethis project presented the opportunity to illustrate a common situation that students will be facedonce they apply (and get) a technical job. It brings to light one of the message that are usuallyoffered in design courses where open-ended and different application domains are
educationprofessionals to improve delivery and assessment is ongoing, and processes to promotetransferability of research findings are under development.References: 1. American Society for Mechanical Engineering web site, accessed May 6, 2014: “Washington Policy Report May 2013.” 2. FEDERAL SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) EDUCATION 5-YEAR STR ATEGIC PLAN, A Report from the Committee on STEM Education National Science and Technology Council, May 2013 3. National Academy of Engineering (2014), Making a World of Difference, National Academies Press. 4. National Academy of Engineering, Grand Challenges for Engineering, www.engineeringchallenges.org, updated 9/2013. 5. Johnson, Steven (2012). Future Perfect
should be subjected to further structural analysisto provide insight on each of these other forms of validity.Using data collected from design thinking students, future analysis is planned to compare thegroup design decision results to constructs known to negatively impact decision making, such aswithin group conflict, to illuminate discriminant validity. Outcomes of effective decisionmaking, such as high quality decisions and satisfaction with the decision, will also be used toshow criterion validity and see if the instrument is useful for predicting future attitudes.Positive student perceptions of effective decision making are necessary antecedents for actuallyusing a good decision making process. However, another concern for validity is the
gaps rather than simply correcting errors in the students’ approach. The team must have itsdesign approved (typically after a revision) before they are allowed to run experiments in thevirtual laboratory.The team then undergoes the process of iterative experimental design by planning experiments,analyzing data, developing models, and identifying strategies. This process is punctuated by aTeam Update Meeting (TUM) with the team and the instructor, which has a similar structure tothe first meeting. Finally, the team submits a process recipe (or multiple recipes for multiplereactors) for release to high volume manufacturing and presents an oral and written report. Afterthe ten-minute oral presentation, an interactive questioning process between
Understands/works within the culture of the group Work Culture Respects diversity Recognizes political/social implications of actions Manages projects and/or other resources effectively Sets goals and prioritizes Organization Planning Manages several tasks at once Allocates time to meet deadlines Professional attitude toward work assigned Quality of work produced Evaluation of Work Habits