used in other disciplines, and more focused on technological solutions. Materialtaught in engineering courses on sustainability tends toward the quantitative. Mainstreamdefinitions such as that put forward by the Bruntland Commission2 are presented with little timefocused on dissenting definitions.3 Environmental justice considerations are largely absent,despite clear relevance to engineering. 4As part of a community based learning grant funded by Campus Compact, members of theEngineering, Social Justice, and Peace network developed learning modules for engineering corecourses that addressed different aspects of social justice issues.5 One of the modules I developedas part of that project explored the class dimensions of Life Cycle Assessment
Paper ID #14133Work in Progress: Flatlab - An interactive learning environment for experi-ential learning, problem-based assessment, and dynamic instruction in engi-neeringProf. Peter Goldsmith P.Eng., University of Calgary Peter Goldsmith is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Calgary. He holds a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toronto. His research interests are in human-computer interfaces, control theory, robotics, mechanism analysis and design, applied and pure mathematics, and engineering education
who ordered tickets online. 25 audience members responded,approximately 8% of the total attendance. Survey results are summarized in Table 1.For the first set of questions that relate to audience interest and enjoyment, responseswere generally quite favorable. Responses to the second set of questions on audienceexpectations varied widely—many did not expect the degree to which technology andaudience participation would play a role in the production. The third set of questions,which measured audience interest in music, science and engineering, indicate that whilethe audience had high interest in music, they also had significant interest in science and toa slightly lesser degree, engineering.ConclusionsBased on responses from participants and
actual engineering practice, and scores were based on individual performances of this student.Measures used were tested and validated to ensure that they measure knowledge, skills, and abilities(KSAs) as used in the professional world. In short, validated measures were used by capable instructorswho judged performances of individual students under authentic professional experiences—yieldingcredible scores.Capstone design courses are common sites of student assessment, but most assessment is focused onABET (formerly, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) accreditation and awardinggrades. Current practices in capstone courses often prevent sound assessment of individual student
), Academic deputy Director 2005-2008), Graduate Studies deputy Director (2009-2014) and Innovation deputy Director (2014-). Member of the Mexican Academy of Sciences, member of the Mexican Research System.Dr. Martin Edgar Reyes-Melo, Universidad Aut´onoma de Nuevo Le´on Ph.D. in Materials Science at Universit´e Paul Sabatier, Toulouse France 2004.Ing. Jos´e Alejandro Cazares, Teacher I am a teacher of mathematics and physics for students of the fistr year of engineering. I am also a re- searcher on issues related to education in Engineering, Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship. Cur- rently I’m the administrative head of the Office of Innovation at the Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
. Jordan also founded and led teams to two collegiate National Rube Goldberg Machine Contest cham- pionships, and has co-developed the STEAM LabsTM program to engage middle and high school students in learning science, technology, engineering, arts, and math concepts through designing and building chain reaction machines. He has appeared on many TV shows (including Modern Marvels on The His- tory Channel and Jimmy Kimmel Live on ABC) and a movie with his Rube Goldberg machines, and worked as a behind-the scenes engineer for season 3 of the PBS engineering design reality TV show, De- sign Squad. He also held the Guinness World Record for the largest number of steps – 125 – in a working Rube Goldberg machine.Dr. Micah
with engineering.One of the most pervasive engagement strategies employed in K-12 engineering education is useof real-world, context-driven engineering design. This is especially true of the Engineering isElementary (EiE) curriculum for grades K-8. EiE’s mission statement is “fostering engineeringand technological literacy for ALL elementary school-aged children.”16 The EiE curriculum issponsored by the National Center for Technological Literacy and is hosted by the Museum ofScience, Boston. Through curriculum development, research, and teacher professionaldevelopment, EiE disseminates engineering design-based curriculum for life science, earth andspace science, and physical science. The science focus in EiE is consistent with
architecture. Forthe architecture students it was a first experience in having to request, manage andappropriately integrate outside technical knowledge into their design process, for theengineering students it was their first exposure to the design process and the multifacetedway their highly specific skills are deployed in a real world process. The teaching,evaluation and assessment of the courses represent an opportunity for educators to thinkabout the role of service learning in architecture and engineering education. The Bergcompelled students to integrate technology and structure in the design process, requiredstructural engineers to and as such can be seen as experiments in advancing designpedagogy.BackgroundDesign build, community service and
of Applied Leadership at City University of Seattle; meyers@cityu.edu. Page 26.1508.1Mr. Fabian Zender, The Boeing Company Fabian Zender is an Engineering Performance Coach at The Boeing Company where he participates in research in the Technical and Professional Learning Solutions group. He obtained his undergraduate and graduate degree in Aerospace Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. In his research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #14006
Paper ID #13792Tapping into the Talent: Exploring the Barriers of the Engineering TransferPathwayDr. Brooke Charae Coley, University of Virginia Dr. Brooke Coley is Associate Director of the Center for Diversity in Engineering in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. She comes to the University of Virginia from the National Science Foundation (NSF) where she was an Engineering Analyst in the Engineering Education and Centers Division of the Directorate for Engineering. She began at NSF as an American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Science & Technology Policy Fellow
Paper ID #12556Anatomy of Assessment of Manufacturing Design Engineering Academic Pro-gram – Do’s and Don’tsDr. Shekar Viswanathan, National University Dr. Viswanathan is a Professor at the Department of Applied Engineering at National University, Cali- fornia. Dr. Viswanathan is an educator, researcher and administrator with more than twenty-five years of industrial and academic experience encompassing engineering and environmental consulting, research and development, and technology development. Career experience includes teaching at the University level, conducting fundamental research, and developing continuing educational
Paper ID #14060Enhancing the STEM Curriculum Through a Multidisciplinary Approachthat Integrates Biology and Engineering: Biomaterials ModulesEthan Sclarsky, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Chemical Engineering undergraduate student at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Tyler Marquis Cooper, Rowan UniversityDr. Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University Dr. Johannes Strobel is Director, Educational Outreach Programs and Associate Professor, Engineering & Education at Texas A&M, College Station. He received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in Information Science & Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri. His
Paper ID #12404Reengineering an ”Introduction to Computing” course within a College-WideCommunity of PracticeDr. Wade Fagen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Wade Fagen is a Lecturer in the Department of Computer Science in the College of Engineering at The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). He teaches one of UIUC’s largest courses, Introduction to Computer Science, known as CS 105. His research aims to improve learning by using technologies that students already bring to the classroom.Dr. Cinda Heeren, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Cinda Heeren is an award-winning Senior Lecturer
Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #12978Engineering & Engineering Technology Educator Award. He has won several awards at VT includingthe Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Award in 2013. Virginia Tech nominated him for the 2015Outstanding Faculty Award of the State of Virginia. Page 26.1767.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Work-in-Progress: High-Frequency Environmental Monitoring Using a Raspberry Pi-Based SystemAbstractThe Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System
University Press.15. Downey, G., & Lucena, J. (1997). Engineering selves. In Downey, G. and Dumit, J. (Eds.), Cyborgs and citadels (117-142). Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press.16. Lagesen, V. A. & Sørensen, K. H. (2009). Walking the line? The enactment of the social/technical binary in software engineering. Engineering Studies, 1(2), 129-149.17. Huff, J. L. (2014). Psychological journeys of engineering identity from school to the workplace: How students become engineers among other forms of self. Retrieved from ProQuest (3669254).18. Bijker, W., & Law, J. (1994). Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.19. Downey, G. (2005
Paper ID #12753The LAWA technique implemented in a course in nanomedicineLindsey Taylor Brinton, University of Virginia Lindsey Brinton is a PhD candidate in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. She received her B.S. in Biomedical Engineering and B.A. in French from the University of Virginia in 2009. Her dis- sertation research is in the laboratory of Dr. Kimberly Kelly and focuses on the development of liposomes targeted to the stromal compartment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. She has served as a teaching assistant for Calculus I and Physiology II as well as a co-instructor for Nanomedicine.Colleen T
Executive Director of FUSP - The Foundation for Supporting the USPDr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on
. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and
. He received his bachelor’s in computer engineering at Harding University.Prof. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Global En- gineering Program, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Quantifying and Qualifying the Preparedness of Engineering Students Collaborating with Underserved Communities InternationallyAbstract:Increasing globalization and technological innovations have redefined the role ofengineers in working towards sustainable development. This is reflected in the creationand adoption of ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 which included six professional skillsto prepare engineers who were more aware of how their profession, products and servicesare embedded in the larger global, socio-economic and political context. The question ofhow to measure and evaluate preparedness of engineering students to meet theserequirements remains an open question.This
of engineering to pursue a career in education. For the past 5 years, Brian has taught various levels of high school physics, mathematics, applied technology, and robotics. Brian joined Sparkfun Electronics to help integrate ”tinkering,” electronics, and computational thinking into the classroom. One of his goals is to help teachers to de-mystify how household consumer electronics work. With a few simple tools, classrooms can excite and encourage students to explore the possibilities of microcontrollers, electronics, and physical computing. Brian Huang has a Bachelor’s of Science in Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign and a Masters in Education from the University of
, displays, and electronic paper. He is an NSF CAREER, AFOSR and Sigma Xi Young Investigator. Dr. Heikenfeld is a Senior member of the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers, a Senior member of the Society for Information Display, and a member of SPIE, a member of ASEE, and a Fellow of the National Academy of Inventors. In addition to his scholarly work, Dr. Heikenfeld is now launching his 3rd startup company, and has lead the creation of programs and coursework at the University of Cincinnati that foster innovation, entrepreneurship, and an understanding of the profound change that technology can have on society. Website: http://www.ece.uc.edu/devices
Paper ID #14197Lessons Learned from Two Years of Flipping Circuits IProf. Gloria J Kim, Northwestern University Gloria Kim is a Clinical Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Northwestern University. She also a courtesy faculty member with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Uni- versity of Florida. She obtained her B.S. in Chemistry from Seoul National University, M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Johns Hopkins University, and Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. She teaches courses in biomechanics, biomaterials, bioinstrumentation, and nanotechnol
critical need for qualified engineering graduates to join the workforce. The mostrecent U.S. Bureau of Labor projections through 2020 show significant growth of jobs in thescience, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines. Marra1 et al states thatengineering and science fields will grow at more than 3 times the rate of other disciplines.However, in the midst of the demand, institutions of higher education are faced with thechallenge of retaining students within their engineering programs1-5. Student attrition has beenattributed to several factors including: student attitudes and a sense of belonging in discipline,preparation for the course material, and quality of teaching and compatibility with studentlearning styles1,6-10. Although
Engineers.4. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. 2014, ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission: Baltimore, MD.5. Kalkani, E.C. and L.G. Boussiakou, Observations on an introductory engineering course and suggestions for enhancement. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 28(3): p. 317-329.6. Idrus, H., A.M. Noor, and M.N.R. Baharom, Motivating Engineering and Technical Students to Learn Technical Writing by Inculcating Lifelong Learning Skills. The International Journal of Learning, 2012. 18(11).7. Bodmer, C., et al., SPINE: Successful practices in international engineering education. 2002. p. 102.8. Jeffryes, J
26.1170.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Fundamental: Motivating Factors for Choosing Engineering among Minority StudentsIntroduction Minority populations continue to be underrepresented in the fields of science, technology,engineering, and math (STEM).1 Increasing the diversity in these fields must start with growingminority students’ interest in pursuing STEM undergraduate degrees. In 2009 less than sixpercent of undergraduate engineering students were African American, ten percent wereHispanic, and less than one percent were Native American.1 Klotz compares the need for diversity in engineering to the need for biodiversity in anecosystem in order to
interests include understanding how students become involved, stayed involved, and complete their major in engineering and STEM majors in general, particularly for students in underrepresented populations.Dr. Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of Engineering and Mathematics at Canada College in Redwood City, CA. He received a BS in Geodetic Engineering from the University of the Philippines, his MS in Geode- tic Science from the Ohio State University, and his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and increasing the representation of female, minority and other underrepresented groups in
Paper ID #13654Valuing and engaging stakeholders: The effects of engineering students’ in-teractions during capstone designIbrahim Mohedas, University of Michigan Ibrahim Mohedas is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2011. His research focuses on the design of medical devices for resource limited settings, particularly related to the use of design ethnography in developing these technologies. He works in the Laboratory for Innovation in Global Health Technology (LIGHT
. Colleen Claire Naughton, University of South Florida Colleen Naughton is a doctoral student at the University of South Florida in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. She is advised by Dr. James R. Mihelcic. Colleen is also part of the Peace Corps Master’s International Program where she served and conducted research in Mali, West Africa for three years as a Water and Sanitation Extension Agent. Her research was focused on ”Monitoring and Evaluation of an Appropriate Handwashing Technology.” Colleen’s dissertation research involves a human and embodied material energy analysis of the Shea Butter process; mapping the Shea Butter belt using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to estimate the area and
Committee of Educational Researchers. She is the President of the Executive Committee and Member of the Network of Centers for Research in Mathematics Education (2014-2016). Since 2009, she has coordinated the faculty academy of differential equations in the Mathematics Department (ITESM Campus Monterrey). She is a thesis advisor and professor in the graduate programs of Education and Ed- ucational Technology and in the PhD program in Education at ITESM’s Virtual University School of Education Her interests are the teaching and learning of mathematics for future engineers through model- ing and technological applications and the construction of a bridge between the discipline of mathematics education and the community of