specificcontent area, and micro-communities of practice as those reflecting collaboration of smallercohorts of STEM faculty, in-person and virtually.This study addresses the following research questions: 1) How do engineering faculty involvedin a community of practice engage in knowledge transfer? 2) How does knowledge transfer ofspecific evidence-based instructional practices occur in an engineering faculty community ofpractice?Conducted within a large research project aimed at exploring stages of pedagogical change, thiswork utilizes a qualitative methodology. Nine faculty in a first-year engineering departmentparticipated in hour-long semi-structured interviews exploring use of EBIPs and collaboration.Interviews were analyzed using thematic coding to
kit type and which library the kit was checked out from. From February1, 2013 to December 29, 2014 we recorded 1462 transactions, consisting of 695 check-ins, 697checkouts, and 70 renewals. Presumably the discrepancy from checkouts to check-ins representstwo kits that were on loan at the time the data was collected. Page 26.1081.5 Figure 1: Distribution of Checkouts by Academic DepartmentBoth of our main libraries saw strong usage, although James B. Hunt Jr. Library sawsignificantly more activity than D.H. Hill Library, 1237 to 225. We suspect this is due to thatHunt Library is the main library for the colleges of
experiences with engineering. This paper will present findings and discussion based upon the students’ responses in thefollow-up interview. Some emergent themes in the student’s responses are: 1) precollegeengineering experiences are structurally different than college engineering experiences, 2)students fail to recognize the diverse types of mathematical knowledge they are applying to solvethe design task and 3)precollege engineering is more hands-on than college engineeringcoursework. We anticipate that this work will give instructors insight in to the perceptions andexperiences that students have when they enter the college engineering classroom as freshmenand how those ideas may change over time as they work towards completing their degree
0.93 for different scales, validating the instrumentshigher level of reliability.HypothesisThere are three hypotheses we examined in this paper. 1. There is no significant difference between freshmen/sophomore and junior/senior students in public and private universities in Kyrgyzstan. 2. There is no significant difference between male and female students in public and private universities in Kyrgyzstan. 3. There is no significant difference between public and private universities in Kyrgyzstan.Literature Review The MSLQ tool was designed by P. R. Pintrich and T. Garracia4 and it is designed to measurestudents’ motivational orientations and their use of learning strategies5. The MSLQ is based on
Teaching, Education, Engineering and Technological LiteracyAbstractIn 2010 James Trevelyan [1] argued on the basis of studies of the work that engineers do thatthe engineering curriculum required to pay more attention to the development of what havecome to be known as “soft skills”, as for example communication and the ability to performeffectively in teams. He noted that engineering courses that taught communication treatedcommunication “only as information transfer” when what was required was a comprehensivedevelopment of social interaction skills. He thought that this could be achieved if studentswere given the opportunity to teach in their courses because “education, like engineeringpractice, relies on special kinds of social interactions
26.1497.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Technology education in primary school in Sweden: A study ofteachers’ views on teaching strategies and subject content.(Fundamental) Page 26.1497.2Technology education in primary school in Sweden: A study ofteachers’ views on teaching strategies and subject content.(Fundamental)IntroductionTechnology education in Sweden has been a mandatory subject in compulsory school sincethe mid-1980s. Its origins are in metal and wood working, but it has developed into aninterdisciplinary subject that includes crafts, engineering science and the history oftechnology. 1 2 The current curriculum, introduced in 2011
“graying” of the incumbent biomedical workforce andpending retirements was also considered. Some of the committee, including this author, felt thatthis proposed initiative presented an opportunity for the faculty to develop a new technicalprogram that would provide new graduates with the needed skill sets for the biomedical/healthcare industry that would be relevant well into the next decade. The unanswered questionswere, “who would take on this task” and “where would the necessary funding come from?”Interestingly and also unexpectedly, during these prolonged deliberations about the pros andcons of the Beacon Alliance requests, the Massachusetts Life Sciences Center (MLSC)5, a quasi-public organization charged with administering the ten year $1
forms of humor10.Table 1: Summary of Mark Nichol’s Research on Types and Forms of Humor (HumorousTechniques)10.Anecdotal Refers to comic personal stories that may be true or partly true but embellished.Blue A type of broad humor that is unrestrained, unsubtle humor often marked by coarse jokes and sexual situations.Burlesque Ridicules by imitating with caricature or exaggerated characterization.Dark/Morbid Grim or depressing humor dealing with misfortune and/or death and with a pessimistic outlook.Deadpan/Dry Humor delivered with an impassive, expressionless, matter-of
was represented by one or two On-Ramps participants: Chemical Engineering, Materials Science and Figure 1: Academic fields of On-Ramps Participants. Other includes Materials Science and Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Atmospheric Engineering, Atmospheric Sciences, Mathematics, Mechanical Engineering, Environmental Sciences, Mathematics, Engineering, Industrial Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, Mechanical Engineering, Geochemistry, Fish Ecology
, biomechanical engineering, or civil/environmental engineering) – (1)the student must have a good understanding of fundamental biology concepts to fullycomprehend the advanced engineering concepts and (2) most of the techniques discussed in thesecourses are too time-consuming, hazardous, or expensive to demonstrate in a classroom setting.We have addressed these issues by preparing a series of videos that review basic biologyconcepts and demonstrate several common biochemical engineering (BioChE) techniques andexperiments. The primary goal of the review videos is to ensure that students have a firm graspon basic biology concepts to help them fully understand the more advanced BioChE topicsdiscussed in class. These videos can also be assigned before class
Engineering Education, 2015Program Assessment Using Six Sigma Green Belt Certification Requirements Abstract The Six Sigma system is widely used in industry to implement quality systems. It is a formal application of theory and practice to make better business decisions about design and manufacturing. Given the applied nature of the methods, a certification system has grown to endorse professionals that have received the training, applied the knowledge, and demonstrated results. One such example is the American Society for Quality (ASQ) Certified Six Sigma Green 1Belt (CSSGB) . Naturally there has been interest in greater recognition of the standard from academia. The common response is that academia already prepares graduates
placed into teams of four for the challenge.Differentiation of requirements and materials by teachers facilitates scaffolding to meet variedpopulation needs. Materials used during two forty five minute classes dedicated to this challengerange from flashlights, colored paddles, rubber bands, straws and shoe boxes.Scaffolding includes guiding the teams with explicit prompts to consider the following points. ASecret Agent packet facilitates “seeing student thinking” and promotes team processing of eachcomponent of the process: 1. Determine what the code should be 2. Determine how the information can be transmitted. 3. Utilize the Engineering Design Process to elaborate the following points: State the problem Generate
, simulation can enhance a student’s problem solving skills,”2 (p. 1).Within engineering education, there is a constant effort to prepare students to enter theprofessional world. With the adoption of the ABET EC2000 criteria and the a-k programoutcomes, professional skills have moved to the forefront of the engineering curricula3. Industryadvisory committee members across the curriculum suggested a real need for students to developand maintain skills important to their specialized field of study, but can be integrated withspecific business elements such as, word processing, professional writing, and budgetarymanagement. Scachitti also highlighted this multidisciplinary challenge stating, “whetherstudents find employment in manufacturing, healthcare or
for the non-‐traditional students who now form the new majority in higher education [4]. At the University of Southern Maine (USM), NT students comprise of a large proportion of the undergraduate population [1]. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) acknowledges there is no precise definition for non-‐traditional student, but suggests that part-‐time status and age are common elements [8]. Other common characteristics of the NT student include: full-‐time employment, single parent, and eligibility for financial aid. Any and all of these variables can accumulate into external obstacles toward the NT’s degree completion. Internally
performance on specific course items using nonparametric analysiswith conservative Bonferroni adjustment for multiple tests. Across all courses involving1,945 students, course grades improved by 0.28 points on a 0-4 point scale (p-value <0.001), or 1/4 letter grade, from static to interactive textbook. More importantly, studentsin the lower quartile of the course improved by 0.38 points (p-value < 0.001), or 1/3 lettergrade. Exam scores improved by 13.6% (p-value < 0.001) and project scores by 7.4% (p-value < 0.001) from static to interactive textbooks. 98% of the students subscribed to theinteractive textbook and completed at least some activities on the interactive textbook.The average student completed 87% of the assigned activities in
120 students were asked to provide feedback on sample studentteam’s design work on four different milestones: Problem Scoping (Milestone 1), ConceptGeneration (Milestone 2), Concept Reduction (Milestone 3), and Concept Detailing (Milestone4). Each milestone was a 2-4 page long document describing the team’s progress on a particularaspect of the design project. The feedback from 15 students with at least one year of previousdesign experience (typically from high school) and 15 students without any previous designexperience was selected for this study.Instructors and graduate teaching assistants (referred to as educators in this paper) of the samefirst-year engineering course were invited to participate in this study as part of their
technologies. To do this, twoprogramming tools were chosen—the C programming language and LabVIEW. The first half ofthe course is dedicated to C programming. Topics include a brief introduction to computers andprogramming, I/O, data types, expressions and assignments, relational operators, loops andbranching, functions, and arrays. This part of the course is taught in a computer laboratory sothat each student has an individual computer. Every lecture includes simple exercises (~ 5minutes each) that are preformed by the students in real time as the relevant topic is covered.Most lectures are followed by a laboratory exercise. The laboratory exercises are based on theArduino microcontroller platform [1]. Code::Blocks [2] is used as the development
Northern Michigan University, Dynamicscourses (MET 2130 and MET 310, respectively) are high-enrollment, high-impact sophomoreMET core courses. 2004-2013 GPA data for MET courses offered at Michigan TechnologicalUniversity confirm the statement made by Magill [1] that Dynamics is “one of the more difficultcourses that engineering students encounter during their undergraduate study.”Dynamics is essentially the study of motion, but textbooks and whiteboards, the traditionalclassroom teaching tools, cannot capture this motion. MET 2130 and MET 310 have traditionallybeen taught in “chalk and talk” mode, where the instructor presents three, 50-minute lectures ortwo 100-minute lectures per week. For the majority of the class duration, students passively
of patents, with particular attention to issues of patentability ofsoftware. The course concludes with the law of copyright, including fair use. Some of the casesare more fun for the students than others. The classroom session on the fair-use case of Campbellv. Acuff-Rose Music, which involved 2 Live Crew’s parody of Roy Orbison’s recording of“Pretty Woman,” featured excerpts of both recordings. Table 1 presents an outline of thecourse’s content. Table 1. Outline of Course Content 1. IP overview and common-law misappropriation of “hot news” (1 week). The case law on misappropriation (e.g., INS v. AP (1918); National Basketball Ass’n v. Motorola, Inc. (1997)) provides a basis for understanding the nature of
teamwork are defined as importantfactors in developing and assessing entrepreneurial skills in engineers10,11 and in general.12,13Additionally, communication, teamwork and problem solving are essential components ofABET’s a-k outcomes.14 The development of programs for 15, 16 and assessments of17. 18 theseskills continues to be a focus on engineering education publications.MethodsMultiple methods were used to assess the Leadership Academy. An overview of all of thesemethods is shown on Table 1. Two surveys were given to students who participated in theacademy before and after the completion of academy activities. The first was a survey with itemstailored to each of the most recent KEEN outcomes called the Entrepreneurial Minded Learning(EML
NSF Pathways to Innovation Faculty Fellow. When not working Joe enjoys improvisational dance and music, running trail marathons, backpacking, brewing Belgian beers and most of all enjoying time with his children and wife. Page 26.287.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Blending Entrepreneurship and Design in an Immersive Environment 1 2 Bryan Boulanger and Joseph Tranquillo1 Department of Civil Engineering, Ohio Northern University, 525 S. Main St, Ada, OH 45810
-‐rich countries, since the 1990s. The State of Qatar is one of the countries in the region that has made one of the greatest investments in building human capacity to meet its development strategy, which is described in the Qatar National Vision 2030 (QNV). The QNV, which is the touchstone for all governmental spending priorities, highlights goals for Qatar’s economy, in human and social development, and for environmental stewardship (1). Qatar is a small peninsula located on the northeastern coast of Arabian Peninsula. The south of Qatar shares a land border with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; otherwise the country is surrounded by the
assessment of oral presentations, engineering notebooks, andwritten reports. The proposed future development of the assessment system includesincorporating weekly five minute oral updates from each student along with the weekly notebookevaluation. Additionally, it is proposed that alumni who have completed the same project beincluded in the assessment process.1. Introduction From its inception, the York College of Pennsylvania Mechanical Engineering Programhas always prided itself on being a “hands-on” engineering program. Lab experiences are usedheavily throughout the academic curriculum to reinforce lecture material, and all students arerequired to complete three separate terms of co-op experience as a graduation requirement.1 Thecapstone
in a built environment, BIM is amainstream, emerging tool in the AEC industry used for design and documentation. BIM is acomprehensive, integrated graphic and alphanumeric database, through which the collaborationamong the stakeholders can be effectively achieved.1 However, the lack of personnel with BIMskills is a significant constraint retarding use of the technology in the AEC industry.2 Thedemand for specialists in these two emerging fields, which are BIM and green building practices,is increasing tremendously due to the fact that green buildings education, research, and practiceissues are becoming driving forces in academia and industry
. Page 26.368.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Comparative Analysis of PhD programs in Engineering EducationIntroduction and BackgroundThe field of Engineering Education (ENGE) is a relatively new discipline that has been growingin the last years [1]. The purpose of the field is to increase the attraction and retention of studentsin engineering programs, as well as developing in engineering students, the required professionalskills and competencies that are expected in industry to increase innovation in the globalizedeconomy [2, 3]. According to Jesiek, Newswander [4] “Engineering education research hasexperienced a notable scale up in recent years through the development of departments
provide valid mouth-shape-movement comparisonand real-time visual feedback.Computer-Vision-Aided Lip-Movement Correction SystemWe hypothesized that by using computer-vision technology to show the difference of the mouth-shape movements of the user and the standard mouth-shape movements, learners could discernthe differences, and work to improve their pronunciation. To approve the hypothesis, a prototypesystem was developed to test different ways of training and evaluate the effectiveness of themethod. Figure 1: The main interface of the systemThe system (Fig. 1) keeps a repository of practice words and their pronunciation videos. Sincethis system is a prototype to evaluate the proposed pronunciation training method, we
exercises as a tool in engineeringeducation provides opportunities not only from a pedagogical standpoint but also as a potentialmechanism for generating research investigations that can contribute to the advancement ofscience and engineering. The teaming activity can be adopted for use in similar courses at otherinstitutions as well as adopted for other pairs of courses.IntroductionTeaming exercises in engineering education have been reported to: 1) improve student academicperformance; 2) increase student involvement and participation; 3) foster critical thinking skills;and 4) prepare a trained workforce to work in real-world settings with requirements forcollaboration and interaction on multidisciplinary projects1-4. Nanotechnology is a
theuniversity and visited the local STEM high school for girls. The Women in TechnologySymposium also featured female student researchers who gave oral poster presentations. Inaddition, to keep students involved and motived in the technology field, a series of workshops,mentoring, and professional development seminars were incorporated for ongoing studentengagement. Background: The need to improve diversity in STEMDuring the last several decades, there has been a growing public consensus that it is vital toprepare a qualified STEM workforce that will generate a profound impact on the nation’seconomy and prosperity 1. Even though the total percentage of undergraduate studentspursuing STEM degrees in the U.S. has moderately increased
successfully commercialized engineering tool. FEM as a CAE tool and its adoptioninto the undergraduate engineering curricula has become prominent especially in mechanicalengineering (ME) curriculum. The significance and development of FEM in ME undergraduatecurriculum has been addressed as early as in the 1980s.[1-4] Due to the fast development ofcomputer capacities and user-friendly commercialized FE programs, FEM has become wellestablished with time[4-7] .Most recently, efforts have been made to include the FEM into teaching methodologies in low Page 26.776.2level undergraduate courses [8-11] such as statics and mechanics of materials. For such low
. She is the co-editor of the anthology Feminist Science Studies: A New Generation (Routledge 2001) and author of the book Food Fray: Inside the Controversy over Genetically Modified Food (Amacom 2009). She is currently Co-PI on a Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education (NUE) grant from the National Science Foundation. Page 26.1182.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Nanotechnology Courses for General Education James Morris1), Peter Moeck2), Lisa Weasel3), and Jack Straton2) 1) Department of Electrical and