implementation. The problem synthesis phase involves buildingthe solution approach and the problem implementation phase involves the actual implementationof the solution. Simulations and computational models are implemented in the problem synthesisphase and using these simulations and models, the problem solution is implemented in theproblem implementation phase.In this study, we investigate the impact of coupling the integrated model of problem solving withthe use of modeling and simulation for learning the concepts of kinetics of materials in graduateengineering students. The theoretical framework guided our learning and research design asfollows. Students first conducted a preliminary literature review on a given topic, then they wereasked to
, but also the costs and benefits of nuclear energy and other energy sources.They appreciated the complexities of the field, the physics and chemistry behind it, and thesociopolitical issues surrounding it. They demonstrated critical thinking, learned how to questionand verify sources of information, and practiced their independent research skills andresourcefulness. At the end of the course, the students walked away with knowledge and skillsthat has solidly contributed to their preparation for a university-level engineering class.Introduction to Civil Engineering: Course Objectives and ComponentsThe Introduction to Civil Engineering course exposed student to both the art and the science ofengineered structures. Using principles of math and
for the globalworkforce is a national priority in the U.S.1 In order to address this need, educational institutionshave made great efforts to increase the recruitment and retention of students in engineering andimprove students’ professional skills through engagement in educational purposeful activities.Involvement in out of class activity has been believed as an effective way of promoting students’cognitive, affective, and career development in higher education.2, 3 The Final Report for theCenter for the Advancement of Engineering Education posits that research on student experienceis fundamental to informing the evolution of engineering education.4 College impact researchsuggests that focusing on what students do during college, both inside
, software engineering and innovation management. Recently his paper won the Best Teaching Strategies Paper award at the most respected international conference in the area of engineering education - Annual conference of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE).Gautam Akiwate, University of California, San Diego Gautam Akiwate is currently a graduate student at the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of California, San Diego with broad areas of interest. He got his bachelor’s degree from the College of Engineering, Pune. While in COEP, Gautam was involved in a lot of activities including a CUBESAT mission. Gautam’s current research interests are systems and networking in addition to
processes and strategies involved in engineering design using solid modeling, spatial thinking, and conceptual and procedural knowledge interplay in novice engineering students.Christopher Green, Utah State University Christopher Green is a senior in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering program, with an Aerospace Emphasis and a minor in Computer Science. He plans to finish his undergrad in Dec. 2015, and continue to earn his MS in Aerospace Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education. In addition to school, he researches common misconceptions students struggle with in engineering and develops ways to overcome them. After graduation, his career goals include working in the industry of unmanned aerial vehicles and
course for future goals were used. Procedures regarding saliva collectionspecifically followed best practices guidelines provided by the Institution of InterdisciplinarySalivary Bioscience Research (IISBR) at Arizona State University. Upon entering the classroom, students were given a packet of materials that describedthe study. This packet also included a saliva collection kit, a self-report survey, consent formand a bottle of water. The saliva collection kit contained two oral swabs and two collectionvials marked with the participants’ unique identification code. After collecting signed consentforms, a researcher explained the saliva collecting process and instructed students to rinsetheir mouths with water and to place the oral cotton
and learning process. The goal of this project is to explore the educational philosophiesenacted in the most impactful undergraduate classrooms, according to graduate students’perceptions, in order to give the new educator a foundation for their own course design process.Previous ResearchWhy Examine Students’ Perceptions of Learning Environments?At the start of the new semester, students enter a classroom not as “blank slates,” but withparticular conceptions about teaching and learning based on their prior experiences5. As a result,the effects of learning activities and perceptions of classroom interactions among the instructorand the students may differ by student5,8. Further, research has also shown that students’conceptions about teaching
Paper ID #11752Exploring Neural Engineering with a Teacher-Authored Science Curriculum(Curriculum Exchange)Kristen M Clapper Bergsman, Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering Kristen Clapper Bergsman is the Pre-College Education Manager at the Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering at the University of Washington. She is also a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington. Previously, Kristen worked as an educational consultant offering support in curriculum development and production. She received her M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction
. Her research focuses on methods to improve the teaching and learning of team effectiveness in engineering design courses.Dr. Penny Kinnear, University of Toronto Penny Kinnear currently works with the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto where she focuses on the development and delivery of Professional Language support for a highly student body. She has a background in applied linguistics, second language and bilingual education and writing education. She is co-author of the book, ”Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education: An in- troduction through narratives.” Her current research projects include a longitudinal study on professional identity development of Chemical Engineering
morelikely to implement codes into their work even when not required or enforced by law. A portionof learning to build back stronger includes educating to the IRC. Understanding the current statusand best practice for teaching students majoring in architecture, civil engineering, andconstruction science management (here in after known as “construction students”) about the IRCprovides the first step to mitigating communities in the future 6.BackgroundA literature review for teaching about the IRC produced no new publications since the early2000’s when the International Code Council (ICC) was formed and states began adoptingversions of the IRC. Prior to the ICC, research publications discussed the difficulty in codeintegration to the curricula due to
, forexample, and at the micro-level, related to instrument design and usage, depending on the projectfocus. A holistic view will help students understand the broader impact that device design canhave on overall improved interactions, experiences and outcomes in these environments.For most of the students, who are primarily undergraduates (although there are some first yearmedical students, and occasionally MFA Design graduate students and MBA students), this is adrastically different approach to problem solving than they have learned in previous classes, andperhaps more so for the bioengineering students. Usually, the subject matter of focus for aparticular team’s problem is new to all of the students, regardless of discipline, and
Paper ID #11164Case Study Based Educational Tools for Teaching Software V&V Course atUndergraduate LevelDr. Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University Dr. Priyadarshan (Priya) Manohar Dr. Priyadarshan Manohar is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Co-Director Research and Outreach Center (ROC) at Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, PA. He has a Ph. D. in Materials Engineering (1998) and Graduate Diploma in Computer Science (1999) from Uni- versity of Wollongong, Australia and holds Bachelor of Engineering (Metallurgical Engineering) degree from Pune University, India (1985). He has worked as a post-doctoral fellow
Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science departments on diversifying their under- graduate student population. Dr. Brawner previously served as principal evaluator of the NSF-sponsored SUCCEED Coalition. She remains an active researcher with MIDFIELD, studying gender issues, trans- fers, and matriculation models in engineering.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 20 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a
. First, the Scholars created a need specification statements that included:defining the problem, explaining the significance of the problem, describing the physiology ofthe problem, describing how the problem is currently approached, explaining the issues withthese approaches from all three observational perspectives, summarizing new approaches on thehorizon, and listing the constraints that any future solution will have to meet. Second, theScholars generated three potential solution concepts as well as a preliminary productdevelopment plan that reflects FDA design control and regulatory best practices. Plans includedrealistic timelines considering the necessary research, experimentation and an iterative designprocess.Of the three plans that
Paper ID #13238Changes in Latino/a Adolescents’ Engineering Self-efficacy and Perceptionsof Engineering After Addressing Authentic Engineering Design ChallengesDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, West Virginia University Joel Alejandro Mejia is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at West Virginia University. He is interested in research regarding underrepresentation of minority groups in Science, Technology, Engi- neering, and Mathematics (STEM), especially the use of culturally responsive practices in engineering education. He is particularly interested in the use of comprehension strategy instruction in linguistically
by (1) integrating new student orientation with math assessment and learning, (2) linking STEM faculty educational training with STEM freshman learning communities and with orientation, and (3) integrating and expanding, based on research best practices, existing programs such as learning communities, undergraduate research, and faculty development. The program targets all first year students for success and is expected to have a significant impact on at-risk students. Students at-risk for not earning or completing a STEM degree include those who are underprepared in math, those with financial need, Hispanic students, women, and students with low self-efficacy.”The grant was motivated by significant
of Physics Teachers’ Millikan Medal. He holds five patents and begun three companies. Materials and curricula developed by Dr. Sadler are used by an estimated fifteen million students every year.Dr. Gerhard Sonnert, Harvard University Gerhard Sonnert is a Research Associate at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and an As- sociate of the Harvard Physics Department. He received master’s and doctorate degrees in sociology from the University of Erlangen, Germany, and a Master’s in Public Administration from Harvard University. One of his major research interests has been the impact of gender on science careers. This research has resulted in two books (both authored with the assistance of Gerald Holton
Paper ID #14163Design Elements of a Mobile Robotics Course Based on Student FeedbackProf. Alisa Gilmore P.E., University of Nebraska, Lincoln Alisa N. Gilmore, M.S.E.C.E., P.E. is an Associate Professor of Practice at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She has developed and teaches courses in robotics, telecommunications, circuits and controls. Page 26.460.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Design Elements of a Mobile Robotics Course
Page 26.1753.5 impacts on people and the natural environment that may limit possible solutions. MS-ETS1-3. Students, who demonstrate understanding, will be able to analyze data from tests to determine similarities and differences among several design solutions to identify the best characteristics of each that can be combined into a new solution to better meet the criteria for success.Respondents were provided a link that allowed them to view these performance expectationswithin the NGSS context. This enabled them to view the other Engineering Design performanceexpectations, as well as the Science and Engineering Practices, Disciplinary Core Ideas, andCrosscutting Concepts which the NGSS indicate underpin these
instrumentation.Kyle Joe Branch, University of Utah Kyle Branch is a second-year graduate student at the University of Utah Department of Chemical Engi- neering. He has helped develop and teach the described freshman laboratory course. His main research interest is in engineering education, focusing on the creation and analysis of interactive simulations for undergraduate chemical engineering courses. Page 26.1337.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Results & Lessons Learned from a Chemical Engineering Freshman Design LaboratoryAbstractA
engaged in team projects. This integration ofengineering with other disciplines would further enhance the experience of students and betterprepare them for teamwork after graduation by enhancing learning and facilitating self-efficacyand innovation.References 1. Holley, K.A., 2009, "Best Practices Related to Interdisciplinary Education," ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(2), 89-99. 2. Hotaling, N., Hermann, C. D., Fasse, B. B., Bost, L. F., and Foresta, C. R., 2012, “A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 630-656. 3. Zohar, Ori. Letter to the author. 25 Jan 2015. TS
engineering experience to mirror a team research anddesign environment as opposed to the lecture/lab environment found within most study abroadprograms world-wide. The team-based structure also best allows the transfer of ideas andperspectives among the students. To accomplish this, the summer design experience wasconstructed as a program made up of multidisciplinary teams not only based on educationaldiversity but also including cultural and gender diversity. The instructional staff for the summerprojects selected a broad program theme, but individual teams were given the freedom to pursuea project topic of interest within that theme. For the 2014 program, the theme was visible light(wavelength) communication systems (VLC). Within this theme, the
- ing practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Ms. Courtney S Smith, Virginia Tech Courtney S. Smith is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests span the mentoring experiences of African American women in engineering, campus climate and best practices for diversity and inclusion in the STEM classroom. Page 26.1425.1 c American Society for
of differ- ent factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different universities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site Director for Center for e-Design.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Research Scientist and Adjunct Assistant Professor in Engineering Education in at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in
Migration in Engineering Programs." Journal of Engineering Education, 2008: 259-278.11. Evensky, Jerry, Wayne Grove, Yue Hu, and Timothy Wasserman. "Closing the Loop: Enhancing Collegiate Performance by Empowering Self-Assessment." American Economic Association Annual Conference. 2008. 647. Page 26.92.1012. ASEE. Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering, Engineering Technology and Computing Students. American Society for Engineering Education, 2012.13. Cabrera, Nolan L.,l Danielle D. Miner, and Jeffrey F. Milem. “Can a Summer Bridge Program Impact First- Year Persistence and Performance
areas such as outcome-based education [1], curriculum design, andpedagogical and assessment strategies. IMODS aims to solve this complex problem and provideinstructors an easy-to-use software interface that will allow them to design their courses.The IMODS is an open-source web-based course design software that: • Guides individual or collaborating users, step-by-step, through an outcome-based education process as they define learning objectives, select content to be covered, develop an instruction and assessment plan, and define the learning environment and context for their course(s). • Contains a repository of current best pedagogical and assessment practices, and based on selections the user makes when
Paper ID #12239Managing and Exchanging Knowledge Underlying Aerospace EngineeringDesign DecisionsElizabeth Scott Fleming, Georgia Institute of Technology Elizabeth ”Scottie-Beth” Fleming is an Aerospace Engineering PhD candidate and NSF GRFP Fellow in the Cognitive Engineering Center (CEC) at Georgia Tech. She graduated from Georgia Tech with a B.S. and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering. Her research within the CEC examines interdisciplinary teams within the engineering design process, training approaches for pilots, and human interaction with technology.Dr. Amy Pritchett, Georgia Institute of Technology Amy R. Pritchett is the
Kim, University of Washington- Seattle MJ Kim is a Ph.D. student in Educational Leadership, Policy & Organizations Studies (Higher Educa- tion) at the University of Washington College of Education. She has been involved in a 5-institution, 5-year, NSF-funded project that investigated to understand the impact of belonging and other connections to community on academic engagement for undergraduates in science, math, and engineering (STEM). Broad range of activities related to the research questions at hand included data collection (surveys, in- terviews, focus groups, and classroom observations), analysis of the data(quantitative, qualitative, and mixed), assessment and revision of research design, data
leaders can orient basic research toward Page 26.1211.3developing ambitious technology platforms that can have practical application, fostercollaboration spanning traditional silos, and facilitate a smooth commercialization process thatincludes all relevant players. Our results show building an organizational culture around theseprinciples can have a dramatic impact on technology transfer outputs. We also propose sevenquestions for future research to encourage further work in this important area.Introduction: The innovation imperative Innovation is a key battleground in the twenty-first century. Economic experts agree, ifany country wants to
college cost increased about 15%. The US global rank [11] in the highereducation attainment is 10, in the since and technology researchers is 6; corporate investment inR&D is 5, and in government investment in R&D is 8. Half of the employers surveyed [11] saidthey had trouble finding qualified college graduates to hire.Adopting the systems engineering approach will open a new horizon to aerospace engineeringstudents and excites them to embrace the new challenges. Throughout this approach, varioustechniques for generating creative design alternatives are introduced. An effective approach increative design as a source of new ideas is brainstorming which is mainly applicable in theconceptual design phase. In general, aircraft design requires