design, analysisand technical problem solving skills in students. In addition to the topics presented in the text,Engineering Ethics and Material Selection were introduced as separate lectures. Page 26.265.2The reverse engineering project involved dissecting a product that the students chose and thenput it back together. 180 students in the class were broken into groups of four students and eachgroup chose a specific product to be dissected and analyzed in detail. In this process thestudents got a broader perspective on engineering decisions. For the product dissected theresponsible group investigated the design, answering questions about
Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering at Lawrence Technological University where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter has served as the University Director of Assessment and the founding Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning. He conducts funded pedagogical research and development projects, has published numerous engineering education
interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. Page 26.1710.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Volunteerism in Engineering Students and Its Relation to Social ResponsibilityAbstractAddressing how engineering students view their role in society, their social responsibility, isseen as a central aspect toward creating holistic engineers
: ABET Criteria 3 (a-k) Outcome ABET Criteria 3 a an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and b interpret data an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs c within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f an understanding of
., Designing a Global Ethic for Engineers. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, 2003.3. Walter, S. and D. Walden, Associate systems engineering professional (ASEP) Page 26.709.10 certification: A credential tailored for sstudents and junior engineers. 2010 ASEE Annual Conference, 2010. 94. Alungbe, G., et al., Professional certification in construction in USA. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, 2008.5. Bush, T. and L.J. Genik, The importance of the disciplinary society in leadership skill development and advancement. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, 2013.6. Hole, L.D., D.W. Radebaugh
program, students will have a concentration in engineering leadership notedon their transcript.Formal coursework is designed specifically for undergraduate engineering students. The coursesexplore topics including: self-awareness and emotional intelligence, leadership styles andtheories, servant leadership, team dynamics, motivating and guiding others, diversity in theworkplace (cultural, gender, etc.), communication, conflict management, ethical leadership,leading change, leading technology and innovation, market analysis, product development,entrepreneurship, and strategic and financial planning.A variety of assessment methods were employed in the first year. A pre- and post-testleadership inventory was administered to students to during the
program's various constituencies in which theobjectives are determined and periodically evaluated (Criterion #2);2. The students in the program must attain “an ability to design a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” (Criterion #3); and3. The overall competence of the faculty may be judged by such factors as education,diversity of backgrounds, engineering experience, teaching experience, ability tocommunicate, enthusiasm for developing more effective programs, level of scholarship,participation in professional societies, and licensure as professional engineers (Criterion#5).Teaching
the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Professional Practice Courses—Any content relative to the professional practice of engineering; examples would be business, communications, contract law, management, ethics, public policy, and quality control.Due to the nature of technical societies and/or industries and consulting firms who might offerthese courses, most of them could be one-day to one-week-long workshops and could includecourse content that is proprietary in nature. Page 26.3.6In addition, the societies could collaborate to develop course requirements that must meet thefollowing
, problem-solving, communication, knowledge of business processes, teamwork, and agood work ethic, that can leverage the technical skills for greater impact for both the companyand the worker. Likewise, through their survey of 200 companies (2006), the metro-DenverWIRED Initiative discovered a need for technical workers with a broader-than-expected range ofskills, i.e. a call for technical workers to have solid writing, marketing, leadership, or sales skills.When evaluating job applicants, businesses surveyed indicated they value experience and skills,most, and find that applicants do not have the required written and verbal communication skillsthey need to be viable candidates. Based on a 2007 study, the Indiana Business Research Centerpredicted
design beyond just the technical solutions. In her book: The 21st Century Engineer,Patricia D. Galloway states:1 If engineers are relegated to the role of technician, they will no longer command the level of responsibility that will enable them to successfully compete in the global economy or assume the leadership roles that will enable them to elevate standards of living worldwide and provide enhanced protection of the environment.Similarly the National Academy of Engineers states:2 Thus, within the context of professional engineering practice, one must consider a system that includes … the economic, political, ethical, and social constraints as boundary conditions that define the possible range of solutions for
Center for Professional &Research Ethics. An in-person session is conducted to discuss with the students the importanceof ethics and why responsible conduct of research is important to all - not only to researchers. Page 26.511.6Networking SocialsThe community of ASPIRE scholars have the opportunity to meet once each semester withfaculty, alums and other local industry professionals. Alumni can provide valuable insight andmotivation to the students to persist to degree completion. Direct networking with local industryprofessionals can supplement career placement services to enhance employment opportunitiesfor ASPIRE scholars.Graduate School
engineering leaders should not only take action, butthat they should have the “energy and drive”11 to achieve a “personal vision”15. Anyone who hasworked on an engineering project understands this need for leaders to strive for the best and bethe champion for the implementation of innovations3. This theme relates to the concept of self-management, where engineering leaders must be able to work efficiently, manage their time, andhave a strong work ethic in order to achieve their personal vision2.Teamwork. Regardless of one’s role, engineers are almost always required to work in a teamsetting. It is therefore logical that teamwork would be an essential part of engineering leadership.Competencies within this theme were phrased both as “teamwork with
, and teamwork skills. Students are also presented the opportunity to improve theirprofessionalism and ethical values through these simulations. In Industrial Engineering (IE)teachings, where a variety of tools are used to design, improve, and manage integrated systems,simulation-based approaches become an important piece in the learning environment.There are a number of publications in literature that analyze the impact of simulation-basedteaching environments. A vast majority supports the experiential learning theory proposed byKolb [2]. In Umble & Umble [3], researchers utilize in-class simulation exercises for supply chainand inventory management principles. These exercises provide opportunities for in-class studentdiscussions that
competent field. The National Academy of Engineering, for example,have stated in their vision of “The Engineer of 2020” that engineering activities should beframed in the context of rapidly moving technological changes, global interconnection ofresources, and an increasingly diverse and multidisciplinary population of individuals involvedin or affected by engineering developments. Among the NAE aspirations for the engineeringfield is “a future where engineers are prepared to adapt to changes in global forces and trendsand to ethically assist the world in creating a balance in the standard of living for developing anddeveloped countries alike”3. This vision reflects the need to embrace global competencies framedwithin ethical considerations, where
the socio-economic dynamicsand business culture globally even to succeed locally. Recognizing the need, many engineeringschools in the U.S. have started offering ethics and study abroad programs to their undergraduatestudents. Our research shows that selection of countries for study abroad programs have widenedsignificantly in the recent years. For example, in the nineties, the US Universities were offeringstudy abroad programs mostly in European and few other developed countries in the Asia pacificregion. In recent years, that list has grown significantly including many other countries aroundthe world like South Africa, Brazil, Russia, China, Chile, and India to name a few. This paperpresents a survey of select U.S. engineering schools
underserved communities globally.Prior research shows that difficulties often arise as students arrive unprepared to addressthe cultural and technical challenges international work entails. For example, oneparticular case study in Gary Downey’s book highlighted the challenges inimplementation of a program to connect student engineers with underserved communitiesin an international setting. Differences in culture and language coupled with thegeographical distance compounded made the project untenable and it had to stop. Someof the reasons she cited included that “the large body of knowledge in the developmentarea was not readily accessible or available to engineers,” and students did not activelyseek out the ethical and social understanding necessary
engineering (e.g., teamwork, communication, ethics, inclusiveness anddiversity, new ideas/business development). The development of these professional skills arealso integrated into all courses within the curriculum.Curriculum Design Approach We are using a combination of instructional systems and the “Backwards Approach (BA)”to design GalvanizeU/UNH curricula. As a field, instructional design is historically andtraditionally rooted in cognitive and behavioral psychology, though recently constructivism(learning theory) has influenced thinking in the field. Instructional Systems Design (ISD) orsimply instructional design8 is the practice of creating "instructional experiences which make theacquisition of knowledge and skill more efficient
Engineering Design Service Projects various Public Policy Professional Organizations various Ethical Responsibility Engineer Interactions various Lifelong Learning“Students-Teach-Students,” These lectures place responsibility on students to teach new coursematerial to their peers. Students are assigned a course topic, which necessitates considerablepreparation and understanding in order to teach their peers. Student presenters are encouraged toprovide handouts, notes, and/or PowerPoint presentations, plus use approaches to keep theirclassmates engaged. The professor is on-hand to assist students through lecture material, ifnecessary
questions and essays, and if that can be available to the students from the first day, the iterations to conceptualize the subjects as well as the skills to solve problems will be much more meaningful. It may sound that we are teaching for a test, but if the problems are conceptual with applications in mind that is fine. 5. Teaching engineering needs to be connected to the philosophical basis of engineering and reflect on this connection. We need to teach within the pragmatic and ethical framework of engineering . The instructor needs to have strong connection to historical events and 13 relevant applications and encourage reflection on these aspects. The concepts specifications, what is a good
program, each stu-dent sketches out the process they followed. They were all unique, but there were some importantthemes. None of them were the simple design process found in textbooks. Instead, they weretangled non-linear webs of activities – exactly what is needed to solve messy tangled problems.And their drawings contained a high number of non-traditional design topics - economic, ethical,historical, social and political impact - that were integrated into the traditional design process. Inessence, they had learned to view engineering design in a wider context.Without grades or credits, our role becomes that of a cognitive coach - a motivator, guide andemotional support. All feedback becomes formative. Self-reflection naturally becomes a
understand, and the document states that the goal was not to be aninclusive of all engineering. Additional recommendations for K-12 engineering instruction havecome from the 2009 NAE/NRC report, which state that engineering at this level shouldemphasize engineering design, incorporate developmentally appropriate mathematics, scienceand technology skills and promote engineering habits of mind11. The engineering “habits ofmind” mentioned in this document refers to the values, attitudes and thinking skills associatedwith engineering and these include: (1) systems thinking, (2) creativity, (3) optimism, (4)collaboration, (5) communication, and (6) attention to ethical considerations11. Therefore, asmore K-12 schools and teachers are integrating
on multidisciplinary teams 3.6 4.7 4.3 3.6 4.0 4.3 3.8 3.9 4.9(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering 4.3 3.6 3.8 3.5 4.6 4.1 4.2 3.5 3.9 problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility 3.5 3.6 3.7
experiment, fail, andlearn. Students were challenged in courses to explore and understand the root cause of theproblem they were assigned, the sustainability of technical solutions, and consider the ethics ofproposed actions; these objectives harking back to the intent as described in 1996.Assessments conducted in the Program’s International Leadership of Engineering andDevelopment course highlighted the value of virtual international collaboration but also pointedtoward the need for travel-based experiences. These results led to the expansion of virtual andtravel activities. 2 The perceived need for enhanced global awareness and enhanced worldviewintegrated within the leadership curriculum drove an investigation into how best to deliver
quantitative thinking [22; 23; 24]. In light of the persistence of this issue, we argue that the engineering education community is 2 uncertain “about what matters”, both in the sense of why this problem matters (e.g. is diversity a question of equity and ethics? Or putting together a more diverse and thus competitive American workforce?) and how to address the problem (see discussion of polarization below).Polarization “[that which
business acumen 4% 23% 46% 27% 0% 26 High ethical standards, integrity, and responsibility 0% 15% 27% 46% 12% 26 Critical thinking 0% 12% 27% 58% 4% 26 Willingness to take calculated risks 4% 19% 46% 23% 8% 26 Ability to prioritize efficiently 12% 15% 19% 50% 4% 26 Project Management: supervising, planning, scheduling, budgeting, etc. 4% 15% 27% 50% 4% 26 Teamwork skills and ability to function on
ofEngineering (NAE) Engineer of 2020 report.47 In this paper, we focus only on the ABEToutcomes, which were listed on the survey as shown in Table 2. Page 26.371.8Table 2. ABET Criterion a-k outcomesMath a Ethics c aScience CommunicationPlanning/conducting experiments b Global/societal context d bAnalytical skills Environmental context dDesign Economic issues dTeamwork
the F-Word: Feminist Epistemologies and PostgraduateResearch. Affil. J. Women Soc. Work 28, 440–450 (2013). 21. Riley, D. Hidden in plain view: feminists doing engineering ethics, engineers doing feministethics. Sci. Eng. Ethics 19, 189–206 (2013). 22. Coulter, R. P. Anti-Racism, Feminism and Critical Approaches to Education. Can. J. Educ. 21,219–220 (1996). 23. Gaskell, J. Course Enrollment in the High School: The Perspective of Working-Class Females.Sociol. Educ. 58, 48–59 (1985). 24. Anderson, D. Status of Women. The Canadian Encyclopedia 1–11 (2014). at 25. Clark, P. Clio in the Curriculum: Vindicated at Last. Can. Issues 42–46 (2013). at 26. Gaskell, J
IME Elect (END XXX) 3 Prod Plan. and Control IME 483 (END 421) 3 Integr. Eng. Design IME 490 (END 492) 3 Plantwide Process Control IME 476 3 Eng. Ethics & Prof. PHIL323 (ITB 217E) 3 Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Interdisciplinary Studies IS XXX 3 3 TOTAL 15 18The number of credit hours taken at SIUE is 67 and the number of credit hours taken at ITU is 76,making the total 143. Although this number is well above the SIUE’s requirements, it is the
radioactive waste management, advanced nuclear fuel cycle systems, and nuclear security policy to energy science and technology, energy sustainability, engineering ethics, and engineering education. She is a national member of the American Nuclear Society and a founding member of Nuclear Pride.Prof. Wil V. Srubar III, University of Colorado Boulder Wil V. Srubar III is an assistant professor of civil, environmental, and architectural engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. Prof. Srubar received his PhD in structural engineering and materials science from Stanford University in 2013. He received his bachelors degree in civil engineering and ar- chitectural history from Texas A&M University in 2006 and his
efficiency, renewable energy, and fundamental heat transfer. Before joining the university, Heather Dillon worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer.Dr. Timothy A Doughty, University of Portland Dr. Timothy A. Doughty received his BS and MS from Washington State University in Mechanical and Materials Engineering and his Ph. D. from Purdue University. He has taught at Purdue, Smith College, and is now an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Portland. From 2009 to 2001 he served as a Faculty Scholar with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories and has served as the Dundon-Berchtold Fellow of Ethics for the Donald. P. Shiley School of Engineering