Asee peer logo
Displaying all 4 results
Collection
2014 EDI
Authors
Joseph Helble
Thayer School of Engineering PhD Innovation Program Training PhD-level Engineering Entrepreneurs Joseph J. HelbleDean, Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College ASEE EDI Annual Meeting Scottsdale, AZ April 2014 THAYER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AT DARTMOUTH background – STEM challengeCHALLENGE • National need for STEM-education for global competitiveness • Reports issued 2004-2006 cite need for STEM funding, lead to COMPETES • Less noticed, also cite need for better translation of invention out of laboratories • “Entrepreneurship” programs developed by engineering schools –UNDERGRADUATE • PhD programs remain focused on producing faculty as
Collection
2014 EDI
Authors
Balaji Narasimhan
interdisciplinary Immunology Economics• Systems approach encompassing bench-to-bedside considerations Pharmaceutical Science and Device Design from the earliest stages of conceptualizationCompetitive Edge and Differentiators • Systems approach to vaccine design - Design, delivery, and deployment • Technology niche - Needle-free - Single dose - No refrigeration - Combination therapies • Bench-to-bedside • Partnerships with universities, government laboratories, and industry Images: Courtesy Johns Hopkins, Ideo, Ohio State, Mystic Pharmaceuticals, and Atlantis OnlineRoom Temperature Nanovaccines• Today’s
Collection
2014 EDI
Authors
Phil Regier
Fulton Engineering - Engineering Ira A Fulton Engineering - Engineering Software Engineering Engineering Electrical Engineering Management Engineering ManagementAverage Number of Hours Transferred by Students in Electrical Engineering 68 Why Online Engineering?• I am a married father of three boys and I work full time at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. I am . . . in pursuit of a B.S. in Engineering Management. I plan to move from a technical assignment into a
Collection
2014 EDI
Authors
Stephen M. Phillips P.E.
engineering Separate program or same program Separate program approach requires separate accreditation. – Cannot be accredited until the first student graduates (but is then can be retroactive). – Initial review is likely to be intense Same program approach (every “path” must meet accreditation criteria) – Admissions requirements and processes, transfer evaluation, advising, tracking progress – Curriculum, prerequisites, electives, faculty qualifications, support departments – Assessment (collect separately), continuous improvement, constituent buy-in – ** Laboratory experiences, teamwork, capstone design, placement services Risk of same program: If online path fails, original program