Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

students. But, since we often focus onteam dynamics conversations and coaching at the beginning of any team experience, we may bemissing an opportunity to provide just-in-time guidance and facilitate even greater growth ofteam skills by actively re-engaging in coaching near the end of the experience.Conclusions and Future WorkWe observe that senior design has a positive effect on self-efficacy, as gains were evident in themajority of items measured. There is, however, a time-dependency (which may suggest anexperience-dependency) of these gains. Some items saw gains only between surveys 1 and 2, andothers only between 2 and 3. This suggests that factors of the natural course progression, andperhaps the teamwork that is begun between surveys 2 and 3

Conference Session

Instructional and Learning Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Kirk A Reinkens, Washington State University; Stephanie Anne Pitts, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

discoveries in engineering. 19 I enjoy learning engineering. 9 I am confident I will do well on engineering tests. 14 I am confident I will do well on engineering labs and projects. Self-efficacy 15 I believe I can master engineering knowledge and skills. 18 I believe I can earn a grade of an “A” in engineering. 21 I am sure I can understand engineering. 5 I put enough effort into learning engineering. 6 I use strategies to

Conference Session

Instructional and Learning Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

anycorrelations between student learning styles, self-efficacy, attitudes/perceptions, andperformance in an undergraduate material balances course, in an effort to better understand ourstudent population and provide a basis for curricular development. We categorized the learningstyles engaged by exam problems of five instructors in their presentation and solution. While wediscovered several instances where students of one learning style preference either outperformedor underperformed relative to others, we made an even more interesting observation whilecategorizing the learning styles exploited by exam problems of different instructors. In mostcases, there was little variation between the learning styles exploited by individual instructorsover the course

Conference Session

Instructional and Learning Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico; Jamie R Gomez, University of New Mexico; Victor Law, Program of Organization, Information, and Learning Sciences at University of New Mexico; Sophia Bowers, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Process: An Expert Study of Advanced Practicing Professionals, in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2005, ASEE: Portland, OR. p. 1-27.55. Carberry, A.R., H.S. Lee, and M.W. Ohland, Measuring engineering design self‐ efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(1): p. 71-79.56. Nocito-Gobel, J., et al., Are Attitudes Toward Engineering Influenced by a Project-Based Introductory Course, in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology Education in a Global World. 2005, ASEE: Portland, OR. p. 693-706.57. Sheppard, S., et al., Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People