Paper ID #16919A Longitudinal Study of Social and Ethical Responsibility Among Under-graduate Engineering Students: Preliminary ResultsDebra S. Fuentes, Brigham Young University Debra S. Fuentes is a doctoral student at Brigham Young University in Educational Inquiry, Measurement, and Evaluation specializing in Mathematics Education. She received a Master’s degree in Curriculum and Instruction emphasizing English as a Second Language, and a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, minoring in Spanish and pre-medicine studies. She previously worked in education as a teacher and administrator in Utah and Mexico for
her BSArc from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), both in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development companies in Brazil. Her research interests include team work in construction, effective communication in spatial problem solving, and design - field team interaction.Dr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University, West Lafayette Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education at Purdue University. Dr. Exter’s research aims to provide recommendations to improve or enhance university-level design and technology programs (such as Instructional Design, Computer Science, and Engineering). Some
. Brummel, The University of Tulsa Dr. Brummel is an Associate Professor of Industrial/Organizational Psychology at The University of Tulsa. He received his PhD from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.He conducts research on training and development and individual differences in the workplace. He also investigates the use of role play simulations for teaching ethics.Dr. Jeremy S. Daily P.E., The University of Tulsa Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Using the Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT) for Ethics InstructionThe purpose of this paper is to describe an innovative approach of ethics instruction forengineers. This
1, 2, and 3 relate to ABET 3f, question 4relates to ABET 3h, and questions 5 and 6 relate to both ABET 3i and 3j. The EPSA discussioninstructions are used to provide a framework for the creation of an EPSA scenario. Table 2. EPSA Discussion Instructions Imagine that you are a team of engineers working together for a company or organization on the problem/s raised in the scenario. 1. Identify the primary and secondary problems raised in the scenario. 2. Discuss what your team would need to take into consideration to begin to address the problem. 3. Who are the major stakeholders and what are their perspectives? 4. What are the potential impacts of ways to address the problems raised
. 8References1. Drash, W. (2015). Imagining daddy: A rig worker's daughter and her dreams. Retrieved September 2, 2015, from http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/10/us/oil-rig-victim-families-five-years-later/2. Juhasz, A. (2011). Black tide: The devastating impact of the gulf oil spill. Hobokon, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.3. Li, F. J., Duggal, R. N., Oliva, O. M., Karki, S., Surolia, R., Wang, Z., . . . Antony, V. B. (2015). Heme Oxygenase-1 protects Corexit 9500A-induced respiratory epithelial injury across species. PloS one, 10(4).4. Klimasinska, K. (2012). Deepwater permits in U.S. Gulf exceed pre-BP spill level. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2012-10-17/deepwater-permits-in-u-s-gulf-exceed-pre-bp-spill- level.html5
question also asked to what degree ethical issues factored into their decision to leavetheir job. There were also 12 items to assess attitudes toward professional social responsibility,selected from among the fifty Likert-items on the Engineering Professional ResponsibilityAssessment (EPRA) survey.28 The selected items focused in the professional connectedness (6items), costs/benefits (3 items), and analyze dimensions (3 items) of the Professional SocialResponsibility Development Model (PSRDM).29 The survey ended with demographic itemsincluding discipline(s) of their undergraduate and graduate degrees, and gender. The precisesurvey questions relevant to the current study are provided in the Appendix.An email invitation to participate in the survey
size does not make modern cruise ships impregnable. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jan/15/costa-concordia- not-impregnable-size8. Ministry of Infrastructures and Transports, Marine Causalities Investigative Body. (2013, May). Report on the safety technical investigation. Retrieved from http://cf.gcaptain.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Costa_ Concordia_-_Full_Investigation_Report.pdf9. Carnival Corporation. (2015). Mission & history. Retrieved from http://phx.corporater.net/phoenix.zhtml? c=200767 &p=irol-history10. Gabel, S. (n.d.). What is included in a Carnival cruise? USA Today. Retrieved from http://traveltips.usatoday. com/included-carnival-cruise-107048.html11. Dake
College of Engineering and Technology East Carolina University Greenville, North Carolina, USA John S. Buckeridge School of Engineering RMIT University Melbourne, Victoria, Australia AbstractEthical decision-making is central to the practice of construction management. This is no moreevident than in the twenty-first century, when the construction industry must function in verydiverse organizational contexts. While construction companies pursue projects in internationalmarkets, many investors are
. References1. Bloodgood, J., Turnley, W., and Mudrack, P. (2010). Ethics Instruction and the Perceived Acceptability of Cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 23-37.2. Williams, S. D. and T. Dewett: 2005, ‘Yes You Can Teach Business Ethics: A Review and Research Agenda’, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 12(2), 109–120.3. Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2015). Retrieved on October 1, 2015. http://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/ethics.4. Harris, C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S. and Rabins, M. J. (1996), Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When? Journal of Engineering Education, 85: 93–96. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830. 1996.tb00216.x5. Desplaces, D., Beauvais, L., Melchar, D., and Bosco, S
areas of interest include Controls, Robotics, Automa- tion, Systems dynamics and Integration, Metrology, as well as Engineering Ethics, professionalism, and Education. Dr. Barakat is currently the chair of the Technology and Society (T & S) Division of the ASME and current chair of the ASEE Ethics Division. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Exploring Societal Interaction with Emerging TechnologiesAbstract Emerging technologies are an integral part of technological progress in this era. Researchin emerging technologies is characterized as having a sudden or persistent impact on society byinducing far-reaching changes in an attempt to influence the human quality
a new paradigm for engineering education,one based upon a contemplative pedagogy in conjunction with service learning. The nexus of thetwo paradigms seems to hold great promise in developing the skills in engineering students theNational Academy of Engineering has described. Such a paradigm has been utilized in acombined senior capstone design and engineering ethics sequence.IntroductionMy goal in the present work is to share some teaching tools and resultant impacts on students Ihave recently experienced. I offer them with complete humility in the same spirit of an openingcomment made by the Dalai Lama at a conference on the environment held at MiddleburyCollege in the 1990’s.1 His Holiness began by asserting that he was not very special
ideasborrowed from environmental ethics seem particularly relevant. One such methodology, firstdeveloped by Johnson, termed a morally deep world view, cautions that both the individual andthe system(s) in which that individual is embedded, matter from an ethical point of view.3 Asecond approach uses the development first offered by Thomas Berry4 and further refined bySwimme 5 and Swimme and Tucker.6 This paradigm takes us from an individual or localperspective on ethical reasoning to an Earth and Universe perspective which is alive, integratedand dependent. Berry described three universal principles that ought to govern our response toethical dilemmas. Those principles include differentiation, subjectivity and communion orcommunity. Here
instructions were left vague on purpose to foster avariety of results and encourage later discussion. This approach succeeded, as some teamsaccepted the task as an engineering challenge and worked hard to calculate error ranges anddegrees of precision, while other teams were satisfied to find an answer online and submit theirreport quickly. Table 2: Summary of student teams' project reports. AVERAGE MEASUREMENT # DATA TEAM # MEMBERS # TUBES LENGTH METHOD(S) POINTS
://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/09/should-private-research-on-vehicle-software-be- hidden-from-the-public/19. Greenberg, A. (2015, 21 Jul.). Hackers remotely kill a Jeep on the highway—with me in it. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/20. Stallman, R. (1999) The GNU operating system and the free software movement. In DiBona, C., Ockman, S. and Stone, M. (Eds.) Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.21. CBC/Radio Canada. (2016, 19 Jan.). Volkswagen shareholders to sue over plunging stock price. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/volkswagen-lawsuit-1.340886222. Free Software Foundation, (n.d.). About. Retrieved from fsf.org
/~bowers/ethics2015/. 10 S. Baase, “A Gift of Fire: Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues for Computing Technology (4th Ed.)”, Prentice Hall, 2013. 11 K. Shilton, S. Anderson, “Blended, Not Bossy: Ethics, Roles, Responsibilities and Expertise in Design”, Interacting with Computers, 2016. 12 K. Shilton, “Values Levers in Design”, Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Human Factors in Computing (CHI), 2012. 13 C. Knobel, G.C. Bowker, “Values in Design”, Communications of the ACM, 54(7):2628, 2011.
right vertical axis, representsthe percentage of students indicating that a given behavior was not wrong or unethical. All student responses regardless of class werepooled in this analysis (n=49).Figure 5: This question asked how many times in the prior two academic semesters had the student engaged in each of twenty behav-iors. Allowable discrete responses were zero, one, two, or three or more times. The segments of the bar represents the percentage ofrespondents selecting a given answer. The left half of each composite bar represents the responses from the freshmen (n=17), while theright half represents the upperclass students (n=31).References [1] John S. Baird. Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17(4):515–522
. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 2010.[10] Dermody, RJ. Embracing the Past: Using Historical Structures to Teach Engineering Fundamentals. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[11] MacNamara, S. The Use of Historical Precedent in Teaching Structural Analysis to Architecture Students. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, 2011.
frameworks are presented and an emphasis is puton theories and canons of professional ethics and the stakeholder models in conjunction or oftenbeyond the technical teachings and competency development objectives to better prepare thestudents for business decision making in professional context and in their workplace.REFERENCES: 1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Code of Ethics, The Engineers Charter (http://www.asce.org/engineer-s-charter/) 2. Business Ethics (MBA 691) Resources, John Molson School of Business (JMSB), Concordia University, Montreal, Canada 3. Ethics Cases, Educational Products and Services, Murdough Center for Engineering Professionalism, Texas Tech University (http://www.depts.ttu.edu
stakeholders, and a concurrent lack ofinfluence offered by more abstracted stakeholders. Another interpretation of this finding suggests that ethics in these teams was directed byand linked to a human-centered orientation. Many students were not able to expand thisorientation beyond overt or clear links between their everyday work and the specific humanstakeholders involved. This finding supports Zoltowski et al.’s (2012) discussion of theimportance of critical experiences in aiding students’ experiences of HCD. Critical experiencesmay include meetings with users or other events that students found transformative to theirthinking about the stakeholders and their user’s experiences. It is difficult to distinguish theorigin of the human-centered
-302.2. Herkert, J., Engineering Ethics Education in the USA: Content, Pedagogy and Curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2000. 225(4): p. 303-313.3. Stephan, K., A survey of ethics-related instruction in US engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 1999. 88(4): p. 459-464.4. Monzon, J., Teaching Ethical Issues in Biomedical Engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 1999. 15(4): p. 276-281.5. Li, S., A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2012. 18(2): p. 339-349.6. Lynch, W., Teaching Engineering Ethics in the United States. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 1997. 97: p. 27-36.7. DeLyser, R., Evolution of the university of denver