itself is sometimesreplacing manager with leader as in project leader. But merely changing the title because leadersounds like a person who will do the right things and not just do things right doesn’t validate whatthe person actually does. A safety leader on a construction site may actually be a leader in nameonly, or worse, exhibit what has been called toxic leadership which puts his or her needs abovethose of the organization and its members.Academics are no better than industry when it comes to confusing leadership-in-name-only withunderstanding what and how a leader actually does. The American Society of MechanicalEngineers surveyed 68 academic department chairs about communication, ethics and leadershipknowledge and skills among their
Paper ID #14655Sports, arts and concrete canoes: Engineers learning to lead outside the for-mal curriculumDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is a Research Associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, critical theory, teacher leadership and social justice teacher unionism.Dr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Dr. Sacks is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto teaching leadership and positive
hour experience inwhich they assume roles of leadership in a community, business or an organization. There areseveral major learning objectives of this simulation: i) students are introduced to differentleadership styles and forced to discover that many of the leadership assumptions that hold true inbusiness-as-usual situations are violated in a crisis; ii) students learn how to utilize and allocatelimited resources and make necessary trade-offs; iii) students are exposed to situations in whichthey have to question the ethical implications of their decisions and determine what risks areacceptable and tolerable. Through a post-simulation reflection activity led by volunteer facultyand staff, as well as the local Emergency Services personnel
Technology Janille Smith-Colin, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstractThe Global Engineering Leadership Minor aims to develop global engineer-leaders, that is,engineers who can contribute and lead effectively in domestic and international contexts insolving global grand challenges and other societal problems, working effectively across cultures.The Minor is based on the Global Engineering Leadership Development (GELD) conceptualframework, adapted from the Skills Model of Leadership. The Minor curriculum includeslearning and application of leadership theory, enhancement of engineering problem solvingskills, development of interpersonal skills (communication, collaboration, ethics, andmanagement), application of systems-level
immensenumber of activities and university ethics regulations, only a few case study examples aredescribed here.Leadership in Cross-Disciplinary GroupsUndergraduate Music Society: In 2008, a group of like-minded undergraduate students withclassical music training sought to establish a music society specifically for engineering studentsto support the education and awareness around acoustical and noise engineering. This grouprequested financial support to purchase musical instruments that could be used by anyengineering student without access to their own instruments, either due to residence livingarrangements or cost, which would also be used in scientific demonstrations and related lecturesregarding the physics of music. After being successfully funded
nations. Ni˜no has published on the topics of organi- zational culture, courage, ethics, and the development of management and leadership skills. He holds a Ph.D. in Management from the University of Texas at Austin, where he also earned his B.A., B.B.A., and M.A. degrees. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Developing Engineering Leaders Using a Reflective Autobiographical Exercise David Niño, Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyThis paper describes an autobiographical exercise that helps engineering students build self-awareness of their distinctive leadership strengths and
test, p = 0.006). Respondents supported a variety of reasons that EL is a high importance component of undergraduate education, including: improving student’s career success (72%), the need for effective communication (78%), and the role of leadership in influencing the organization (81%). The strongest reason for this support was based on the professional obligation of engineers, where 85% of respondents agreed that without strong EL, the role engineers hold with respect to solving society’s greatest challenges will be diminished. One respondent took this further, stating “We have a moral and ethical responsibility to create the very best leaders....that is our very mission as post
flexible and having multidisciplinaryskills in basic technology and application technology, were covered. The Societal codebook included many of the condition aspects and societal issues inengineering. Constructs included "scholarly" atmosphere, respect principles, interactivecommunication and business elements during the engineering process. Relationships betweenengineering and social responsibility, politics, ethics, and global issues were identified associetal issues. According to the data of survey, 65% of interviewers selected "scholarly"atmosphere and only 8% selected the hardware condition among societal issues. Survey datashows that the interactive communication is the main method to cultivate the leadership in theengineering field. 85
a specialized curriculumthat makes program graduates skilled and competent in their field upon graduation. The VicePresident of Human Resources for one large manufacturing company provided the followingstatement regarding leadership development program graduates they have hired. “(Institution’s name omitted)’s engineering leadership development program does an outstanding job of preparing the students to enter the workforce with the readiness to assume leadership positions quickly. (Manufacturing companies name omitted) utilizes this program as one of our key talent pools for leadership roles. Through the program’s rigorous academic and extracurricular requirements, I have found that these graduates have an exceptional work ethic
interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, critical theory, teacher leadership and social justice teacher unionism.Dr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Dr. Sacks is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto teaching leadership and positive psychology at both the graduate and undergraduate levels. Robin also serves as the Director of Research for the Engineering Leadership Project at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering which aims to identify how engineers lead in the workplace.Ms. Annie Elisabeth Simpson, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto Annie is the Assistant Director of the