- Conference Session
- Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University; Jim R. Baker, Michigan Technological University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
leverages his responsibilities for and experience with; industrial sponsored research contracting, technology transfer, startup business development, corporate relations into a bridge to student entrepreneurship, innovation and experiential education activities. He has taught undergraduate and graduate courses on technology commercialization and intellectual property law, is a licensed Patent Agent, holds a Ph.D. in environmental engineering, and a partner in a Michigan- based manufacturing company. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Integration of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Elements – The Whole is Greater than the Sum of the PartsAbstractAt Michigan
- Conference Session
- Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Andrew L. Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Douglas E. Melton, Kern Family Foundation
- Tagged Divisions
-
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
” passive lecture methods. These pedagogies include challenge-basedlearning (e.g., problem-based learning (PBL), project-based learning, case-based learning,inquiry-based learning)1 and a multitude of active/collaborative techniques (e.g., think-pair-share,quick think, jigsaw, and gallery walk). All of these learning methods excel in student learning ofcontent as well as a variety of process skills such as critical thinking, higher-level reasoning,differentiating views of others, and teamwork.2, 3 They are also highly effective with individualstudent accountability. In addition, they have proved to be successful pedagogies within STEMeducation, in particular with regards to achievement, persistence, and attitudes.4In 2008, it was noticed that the
- Conference Session
- Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Stuart G. Walesh P.E., S. G. Walesh Consulting
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
and the student working together to physically change the student’s brain.Zull reinforces the physical change idea by referring to the “biology of learning” as a wayof encouraging teachers to study the human brain.Educator Hardiman takes a similar tact in her book Connecting Brain Research withEffective Teaching: The Brain-Targeted Teaching Model23. She urges educators to“become better consumers of the mountains of research that have emerged since the1990s.” For example, she highlights the important role the physical environment plays inteaching and learning.We’ve all heard a struggling engineering student say “I don’t have the brains for this” orsomething similar. Perhaps you, like me, have said it to ourselves or others. Whateveryour or my