as a tool to define educationalobjectives, correlate documented material to a program's educational objectives, facilitate anopportunity for students to reflect on their learning, and assess the attainment of objectives.While the author does not present the mechanics of assembling individual portfolios (over astudent's academic career), the author illustrates how portfolios have been used to assess andimprove the learning process.Bhattacharya and Hartnett extend the use of student portfolios in engineering education beyondcommunications and into all aspects of engineering professional knowledge and skills. 4 Theportfolio serves both as a collection of a student’s best work and as a forum to encouragepersonal reflection. This perspective on
described here evolved from an earlier lesson on the difference betweenaccuracy and precision in scientific measurements. While accuracy and precision are often usedinterchangeably, they have distinct meanings in the context of scientific measurements. Anaccurate measurement reflects the true value (possibly within an error range or degree ofconfidence), while a precise measurement is consistent and repeatable.14 It is possible for ameasurement to be highly accurate but not precise (repeatable), or to be very precise but notaccurate (reflecting the true value). Figure 1 depicts the difference between accuracy andprecision in scientific measurement. Figure 1: Accuracy is the proximity of measurement results to the [reference] true value; precision
chance to showcase their science and business acumen for a chance to have a joboffer at the end of the internship. The internship shows the students how to apply their heart forscience with a mind for business, and the impact their contributions can make in a real worldsetting.Internship presentations consist of a PowerPoint presentation detailing the student’s place ofemployment, job duties, work results, and overall reflection of the internship experience. Everystudent in the MSPS program is invited to view the presentations of their fellow classmates. Thisallows them to have an idea of what is expected when they go to work for an industry, and whatkind of internships are available for each concentration. Student’s viewing the presentations
enthusiasts and non car-enthusiasts. Asignificant portion of the curriculum content included a theoretical definition of emotiondefined in its broadest sense 21 to characterize and classify emotions with the intent toguide students during observation and reflection, and to prepare students to buildpreliminary insights from their reflections. Detail provided in a later section, “StudentsWatched Videos for Preliminary Assessment.”The general purpose of our study is to understand the user experience of driving a fully orpartially autonomous vehicle. We also seek to investigate designing emotion – that iscultivating and observing emotion while driving -- and find interface interventions thatmight help ameliorate issues with attention, trust, discomfort
project12. Reflected on 5 13 11 8 -2weekly progress13. Managed 1 10 6 9 -4interpersonal dynamics14. Leveragedstrengths of group 0 11 5 11 -6members15. Demonstratedopenness to 5 14 7 9 -7constructive criticism1 Individual: I feel that I did this item well this week2 Team: I feel that my team as a whole did this item well this week3 Importance: This aspect of team science was very important this weekGoal Setting: There is a high level of agreement between the responses to the question of
from highly ranked schools. The inherent limitations of areputation system notwithstanding, USNWR rankings, like GRE scores and GPA, generallycorrelate positively with graduate school attendance and success in the research. 4 Thus, a degreefrom USNRW Top 20 ranked program remains an insufficient yet valuable characteristic ofincoming graduate students worth consideration.* The metrics described in this review are for recruitment process evaluation only, and have been adapted for the purposes of this paper. Thescores and conversions should not be considered as a reflection on the admission processes or policies of the UT Austin BME department or thegraduate school. The program’s domestic and international admission committees make final
summer bridge program was to smooth the transition for incoming engineeringgraduate students who were both demographically underrepresented and matriculating from a differentundergraduate university. Given the unique challenges these individuals face upon entering this newcontext, the experiences of past graduate students were leveraged to inform the development of thesummer bridge. A group of current engineering graduate students who were primarily fromunderrepresented groups (i.e., women and racial/ethnic minorities) identified key areas where graduatestudents new to the university (i.e., those matriculating from a different undergraduate program) mightbe disadvantaged and need further support. Through personal reflection and discussion with
dealing with difficult work issuesEach topic was addressed by an expert or a panels of experts in research, teaching, leadership,and/or service.To receive credit, students were required to attend at least 12 of the 14 classes. In addition, theysubmitted pre- and post-surveys, a curriculum vita, teaching, research and service philosophies,questions for panels, course segment reflections, and e-portfolios. By the end of this seminar,students were expected to (a) describe realities of the academic job market, (b) articulate theirprofessional aspirations and competencies, and (c) develop materials to compete for and succeedin the academic job market.This seminar and its evaluation emphasize development of doctoral students’ understanding offaculty
to illustrate a point. In describing how she would identifywhat needs to be and can be done related to a particular problem, Olivia referred to “whateveryone would say to do” (a literature search, in this case), which highlights again an emphasison what others might do in a given situation, but is also a rather simple answer that seems tosuggest a straightforward, “correct” way to address a problem.Category 2. Defining the middle of a continuum is perhaps the most challenging and allows forthe most variation. The responses in Category 2 reflected a range of themes and emphases.Overall, participants whose responses fell into Category 2 demonstrated a greater awareness ofelements that might be considered key to embarking in engineering
developed under the guidance of the following design principles: The workshop should entail approximately six hours of professional learning time Facilitators should include experts, practitioners, and seasoned TAs Participants should work in table groups of approximately eight people Sessions should make use of a diverse set of delivery modes, such as individual reflection and planning, small-group collaboration, and whole-group discussions Sessions should model what effective learning environments look like Participants’ experience and expertise should be acknowledged and leveraged Content should be based on research and proven educational practices A majority of the activities should be
—but in the first year of the survey (2011), the seminars werenot nearly as well received. This is interesting, as student responses are much more consistent inother parts of the survey, and may reflect changes to the EnSURE program over time (such asrefining the professional development seminars based on feedback from students in prior years). Table 4: Most Valuable Program Components 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total What part(s) of the summer program did you find most Percent of Percent of Percent of Percent of Percent of valuable or helpful? (n = 78) (n = 58) (n = 47
expertise, technological affordances, and assessment strategies is as clear as possible” (p.105).In contemporary pedagogy, it is crucial that learning environments provide learners ampleopportunities to actively participate in learning that will mimic real-world professional settings.Literature has shown that formative learning activities that engage learners in a collaborative andreflective manner also reflect current professional practices [6], [7], [8]. Formative assessmentsprovide instructors a truer representation of the knowledge and skills gained by the learners byusing various techniques throughout the teaching and learning processes [9].Assessments should also inculcate a culture of heathy dialogues among peers and go beyondassessing
carrysomewhat different meanings), peer review is often associated with Peter Elbow’s teacherlesspedagogy of the 1970s, shifting the responsibility for feedback from the instructor to thestudent.2The literature refers to numerous benefits from peer review. Topping et al. suggest that peerreview can create “an enhanced sense of ownership and personal responsibility.”4 Peer feedbackmay also support student engagement and reflection in their learning.5 In fact, some researchsuggests that students may actually get as much or more from student critiques of their work asfrom instructor feedback.3 In addition, work in peer review also proposes that students can learnfrom giving as well as receiving feedback.4,5 Topping et al. lists a wide array of
engineering can have on human lives, as is the focus ofmany recruitment campaigns and messages within undergraduate engineering programs as partof diversity campaigns. Indeed, the fact that the National Science Foundation requires thegraduate students to meet the same Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts criteria required bygrant awardees signifies commitment to requiring engineers, future academicians, andresearchers to carefully consider the merits and impacts of their work. This is potentially avaluable form of reflective practice (essential for developing expertise)35, and contributes to thedefinition of the essence of engineering and what it means to be an engineer, although facultydefinitions of engineering largely still differ from the
researchlaboratories due to lack of experience6. Meanwhile, for many students, particularly those who arethe first in their family to attend college, research is often unfamiliar, and a summer or semestermay feel inaccessible or overwhelming.In order to create academic institutions that reflect our nation’s diversity, we must seal holes alongthe leaky pathway from undergraduate degree programs to professional jobs in STEM. Animportant step is retaining students once they have enrolled in undergraduate degree programs andsupporting those students as they explore and continue along the academic pathway.The research program we report on here, titled “Spring Break for Research (SB4R)”, was designedat the University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering and
questions. First andforemost, the responses emphasize the importance of investing time and resources in educatingyour own undergraduates about the options available to them at their home academic institution.As reflected in the data, a number of students will opt to stay an additional fifth year to obtain amaster’s degree especially when they are not considering continuing on to a Ph.D. Furthermore,keeping faculty informed of your programs will pay dividends during the recruiting season. Evenin this advanced technological age, quality students continue to reach out to faculty members foradvice on where to attend graduate school. The combined response totals for interactions withfriends or program alumni as a significant factor in their decision to