viewing data for the theory-based lecture videos that students areexpected to watch prior to class and the example problem solution videos are discussed in thispaper, but this accounts for more than 93 percent of the recorded material.Although extensive viewing statistics are available, a tremendous amount of data analysis andmanipulation is required to make sense of it and answer the research questions posed above.Raw data from Mediasite was downloaded in the form of two CSV data files for each video. Thedata was then assembled into an Excel file that was programmed to sort the data into a usableform. A total of 2886 individual lecture views reflecting over 428 hours of student viewing timehad to be categorized by student and by video title. For
(84 peer-reviewed) of Wendy Faulkner’s 2000 journal article where thedualism was first introduced. 11 Faulkner argued that gender and technology (includingengineering) are co-produced such that a gendered disparity exists between the image andpractice of engineering. 11 More specifically, the technical end of the dualism maps ontoindependent tool and technology use for practical purposes as a more valued and masculinizedform of engagement, or “masculine instrumentalism.” The social end of the dualism maps ontothe ideas of communication, interpersonal relationships, and expression of emotion inengineering as a less valued and feminine forms of engagement, or “feminine expressiveness.”However, such dualistic thinking does not reflect the blend
student demographics reflecting changes in Canada’spopulation over the past several decades in addition to the recent trend in internationalization inCanadian higher education. The demographic change is not just from international students whomake up an increasingly large proportion of the student bodies, but mirrors the ethnic, culturaland linguistic diversity and complex linguistic histories of the Canadian population. Accordingto Statistics Canada’s most recent available figures, immigrants make up 46% of the urbanpopulation where University of Toronto is located. Although the share of newcomers (recentimmigrants and new Canadian citizens) settling in this urban area declined slightly since the last(2006) census, the area still received the
. Utilizing a three-year Magnet School grant,DLJ established a Center for Mathematics and Engineering to developed and thenimplement its integrated, whole school curriculum with engineering as the core and theconnector. The results of this careful planning and meticulous attention to detailsproduced an elementary school environment that fosters student creative thinking withthe expectation of quantitative metrics to gauge that creativity. The merit of this totalemersion of engineering into an elementary curriculum is reflected in student scores onstandardized test as well as a plethora of awards and acknowledgements for the schoolincluding being named the top elementary STEM program in the nation by the 2015Future of Education Technology Conference
ownership of their courses. It was believed thatdeveloping this collaborative joint ownership, akin to a Community of Practice (COP) 8, wouldprovide a means for faculty to share common interests and passions for improving their coursesand then subsequently sharing knowledge and best practices to accelerate learning and change9.These smaller, course-centric communities (henceforth, called innovation COPs to reflect thelanguage used among the faculty in the program) were organized into a larger SIIP-widecommunity that sought to facilitate knowledge sharing across these innovation COPs. Whileeach innovation COP was composed of three to nine faculty members, SIIP as a whole hasengaged over 200 faculty members from 15 departments, creating a fairly rich
of scientific measurements. Anaccurate measurement reflects the true value (possibly within an error range or degree ofconfidence), while a precise measurement is consistent and repeatable.14 It is possible for ameasurement to be highly accurate but not precise (repeatable), or to be very precise but notaccurate (reflecting the true value). Figure 1 depicts the difference between accuracy andprecision in scientific measurement. Figure 1: Accuracy is the proximity of measurement results to the [reference] true value; precision, the repeatability, or reproducibility of the measurement. Figure and caption from Pekaje/Wikipedia.15The initial lesson on accuracy versus precision was developed by Dr. John R. Luchini as part of aguest lecture
,phenomenon, or process under investigation by thinking and thus writing and thus thinking evenmore about them” (p. 41). “Analytic Memos” can act as a “prompt or trigger for writtenreflection on the deeper and complex meanings it evokes”45 (p. 42). Examples of “AnalyticMemos” that Saldaña45 provided includes reflections about personal connections to the data,study’s research questions, codes, definitions, patterns, categories, themes, concepts, assertions,possible networks, theory, problems with the study, personal or ethical dilemmas, futuredirections of the study, other analytic memos, and study’s final reporting (pp. 43–50).“Analytical Memos” were used to help deeply contemplate the meaning of the data and usedthem to help analyze the data45
crosscultural training include meeting participant and program objectives and providing reflective learning opportunities where participants can engage in, comprehend, 4,5and appreciate cultural differences . Of relevance to this study, required crosscultural training components which have been cited include general and countryspecific cultural awareness, frameworks for understanding and valuing cultural differences, and business and social customs 3in other countries . In recent years, a common understanding has risen that today’s university graduates require some level of
to empower the students and to provide skills to navigate theirexperiences in an engineering workforce. Peer coaching is introduced and implemented throughexamples, training on key coaching skills, and five opportunities for the students to practice theseskills with one another.Mixed methods design is employed to identify emerging themes which can form the basis offuture theories and research as well as to assess the effectiveness of integrating peer coachinginto the classroom. Data analysis includes reflective journals from the perspective of servingboth as the coach and coachee, pre- and post-course surveys, as well as weekly post-classsurveys. While qualitative analysis aids in identifying theoretical frameworks for future studies,results
) contained a common part that asked students toself-assess their achievement of the course learning outcomes on a 5-point Likert scale. Thesurvey given to students from managed teams contained two additional parts. The first additionalpart asked students whether having a manager contributed to their achievement of each of thecourse learning outcomes, measured again on a 5-point Likert scale. The second additional partcontained open-ended questions about the ISD students’ interaction with the managers.Course project reflection report. At the end of the semester, the students in the ISD course wereasked to write a course project reflection report (CPRR). The CPRR (shown in Appendix C) hasbeen used for a number of years to provide students with an
of the strategic plans of the various engineering schools. Table1 provides a list of leadership-focused objectives and strategies within the strategic plans of theInstitute, College of Engineering and selected engineering schools reflecting the broad focus onthe development of leaders and expansion of global influence. These strategic plan elements arewell aligned with the National Academy of Engineers’ Vision for the Engineer of 2020, whichincludes the following attributes (1): (1) Technical proficiency (2) Broad education (3) Global citizenship (4) Ethical grounding (5) Ability to lead in business and public service.These strategic plans and the NAE vision were foundations for the development of the GELMinor
engineering courses. Most of the SDPs are real-world inspiredprojects, which are externally sponsored by industry and government agencies, and many of themare multidisciplinary in nature involving engineering as well as non-engineering students. Inaddition to carry out these design tasks, they are also required to interact with students in the EDMclass and provide feedback to their junior-level peers while enhancing their skills incommunication and design implementation through reflective learning. Pre and post-class surveysand feedback sessions are conducted to not only gain inputs from students to improve thecoordinated learning process, but also to engage them in self-reflection for continuous learning.The crux of the effort here is to develop an
enthusiasts and non car-enthusiasts. Asignificant portion of the curriculum content included a theoretical definition of emotiondefined in its broadest sense 21 to characterize and classify emotions with the intent toguide students during observation and reflection, and to prepare students to buildpreliminary insights from their reflections. Detail provided in a later section, “StudentsWatched Videos for Preliminary Assessment.”The general purpose of our study is to understand the user experience of driving a fully orpartially autonomous vehicle. We also seek to investigate designing emotion – that iscultivating and observing emotion while driving -- and find interface interventions thatmight help ameliorate issues with attention, trust, discomfort
“scaffolds student activity” and “supports epistemic practices of engineering.”Table 3. Categories and Codes Category Code Structures teachers’ lessons Scaffolds Provides reference for student decision making and consensus student Provides prompts for students and groups to refocus their activity activity Focuses student attention on relevant details and processes Previews future parts of the lesson and design process Prompts students to synthesize and reflect on engineering design Supports Provides record of testing information for design evaluation and improvement planning epistemic Supports communication of ideas to other students and to teacher
, it is suggested that theirassessment reflect that. Keeping the assessment simple also keeps the grading time short.In terms of grading time, there are some “tricks” that can be used to keep it to a minimum,especially in large classes. For example, if an instructor is teaching multiple sections of the samecourse, they may choose to give a free-writing exercise, such as that illustrated in Figure 1, toone section of students prior to when the concepts have been covered in class. In this case, theexercise could be given prior to the formal presentation of the concepts of impulse andmomentum. Then, the second section of students could be given the same free-writing exerciseafter the formal presentation of these concepts. In both cases, the
project12. Reflected on 5 13 11 8 -2weekly progress13. Managed 1 10 6 9 -4interpersonal dynamics14. Leveragedstrengths of group 0 11 5 11 -6members15. Demonstratedopenness to 5 14 7 9 -7constructive criticism1 Individual: I feel that I did this item well this week2 Team: I feel that my team as a whole did this item well this week3 Importance: This aspect of team science was very important this weekGoal Setting: There is a high level of agreement between the responses to the question of
effective classroom activity with a visual representation of the solution process.As a final assessment of teachers’ TPACK, on the final day of PD, they answered a set ofquestions designed to identify the role of the robot in each of the 10 lessons. The teachersidentified the pedagogical constraints and the benefits of incorporating the robot as a teachingtool for each lesson. This paper provides a description of three of these lessons, and anassessment of teacher reflections toward these lessons.2. Professional Development StructureThe goal of the professional development was to collaboratively and iteratively construct tenlessons that infused the LEGO EV3 robotics kit into existing middle school math and sciencecurricula; allowing
recording. Each instructor wasalso individually interviewed about their experiences. These interviews ranged between 30 to 60minutes. The semi-structured interview protocol focused on following questions: What preparation did you go through for this activity? Individually? With the others? Can you reflect on the experience of introducing the design heuristics to your course? What went well? What didn’t go as well? What would you do differently? What changes did you make between the first and second class session? Why did you make these changes? [note the difference in time and depth of examples/application between the two] How did the students react to this idea generation method? What are the implications for introducing idea
opportunitiesguaranteeing stimulating lifelong career-development opportunities. These benchmarks forsuccess include: “an ability to learn how to learn, an ability to form learning communities,and an ability to collaborate in distributed corporate settings, across countries, continents andcultures”[3].Universities attempt to capture the demand for the new skillset by revising and extending theexistent intended learning outcomes (ILOs) to include references to the meta-competencies.Biggs and Tang[5] note that the most effective ILOs will challenge students to go further than‘solve’ or ‘explain’, asking instead to ‘apply to professional practice’, ‘hypothesise’,‘reflect’, even ‘relate to principles’, in short to demonstrate the so-called higher-orderthinking skills
students usingCSILE focuses on a specified relatively broad problem and begin to build a database of informationabout the topic. There is opportunity for reflection and peer review of each others’ contributions bystudents. More recently, some authors used wikis to allow users to add, modify, or delete contentusing a standard browser, to create a site that thoroughly explores a topic. But, unfortunately, manyof those studies have not produced as good results as expected. For instance, Cole 13 conducted anexperiment in a course on information systems with 75 students; it was organized so that lectureswere in alternate weeks, the other weeks being intended for students to discover new material andpost to the class wiki. Fully one quarter of the
implementationactivities.Dialogues was grounded in an institutional strategic planning process and occurred as part of arange of gender equity activities implemented during an NSF funded ADVANCE project. TheADVANCE program provides significant funding to institutional change efforts that recruit,retain and promote women faculty in science, technology, engineering and math fields. TheDialogues process consisted of a series of sessions (ranging from three to eight) that engageddepartmental faculty in a total of eight hours of facilitated reflection activities and discussionsabout implementing the university’s strategic plan to meet the vision of the respectivedepartment. At each meeting, facilitators guided faculty through a series of activities aimed atdefining the
, simulated learning approach for accelerating systems engineering competency development validate the ability of such an environment to create an experiential, emotional state in the learner determine if such an environment, coupled with reflective learning, effectively compresses learning time.If the above are true, then the SEEA could significantly increase the experiential resourcesavailable to a systems engineer (SE) over time, and provide assimilation of the experiences at ahigher rate as compared what would occur naturally on the job.Figure 1 shows how the various concepts developed for the SEEA are related. Figure 1: Systemigram of the concepts involved in the SEEA Experience [6, 7]As shown, the
national dissemination of the survey, it maybe found that different types of teaching methods are more common in different types of coursesor disciplines. As an illustration of that idea, the prevalence of teaching methods used in requiredundergraduate courses (n=19) were compared to required graduate courses (n=5). Teachingmethods such as design and project based learning seemed more common in undergraduatecourses; lectures, guest lectures, and reflections seemed more common in graduate courses.Table 5. Methods that faculty use to teach students about ethics and/or societal issues in theircourses % of 19 required % of 5 required Teaching Method N
.”The approach to student engagement that we describe here—like many others developed bySTS/HSS professors teaching engineering students—was developed intuitively by author Wyliewhen she was confronted by an all-too-familiar situation: facing a lot of open laptops and verylittle class preparation or participation in an introductory STS lecture class of STEM studentswho were mostly freshmen, many first-generation college students, and many English languagelearners. In response to the students’ inability or unwillingness to read the assigned sources, she began asking them to interpret cartoons during class that reflected issues relevant to the day’slecture
attainment of the learning outcomes, whichdo not explicitly reflect SV skills, and can thus not be used to quantify improvements inSV. A further challenge is the difference in the order of topic presentation that the twoexperienced instructors favor, thereby inhibiting the development and use of a formativeassessment method to quantify the impact of the individual pedagogic measures on thestudents SV skill development. There are a number of tools that have been developed to assess SV development,with perhaps the most widely used (in the US) being the Purdue Spatial VisualizationTest (PSVT 34), of which often only the rotations section is used (PSVT:R) 35. Sorby andGorska 4 and Study 24 present a comparative of a number of available tests
more diverse in acceptedcategories or more accepting of complex identities that may not fit a single category7(p8). Thesechanges reflect shifting social norms, and appropriate assumptions about the individuals beingasked demographic questions7,8. For example, the first US census, conducted in 1790, countedboth (Whitea) males and (White) females, which was a novel approach at the time. However, ittook 180 years, until 1970, for the census to differentiate people of Hispanic or Latino originfrom those who identified as White, a change introduced to help measure anti-discriminationcompliance9. Beyond simply including new categories or dimensions of demographics, smallchanges in how questions are asked such as a shift from “select one” a response
: “Intercultural competence describes the ability to effectively and adequately in- teract in intercultural situations based on explicit attitudes as well as the special ability to act and reflect.” 1 (own translation)Looking into Deardorff’s work shows that by ‘explicit attitudes’ the author broadly under-stands, inter alia, a positive motivation for acting in intercultural situations, an appreciationfor cultural diversity, a curiosity towards foreign people, and tolerance for ambiguity in newsituations. Moreover, this definition clearly states, that intercultural competence can only beshown in intercultural situations. Consequently, this means, it only can be development incorresponding learning situations. The developed course should serve as
course did not include a semester projectthat could have been used as the main document for a writing assignment and any writingcomponent in the course should not have taken much weight on the grading scale and was not tobecome a course objective in itself. With that in mind, several low stake writing items wereassigned along the semester including discussions or comments in quizzes, tests or homeworkassignments, and reflection paragraphs on graded tests, while the main writing component of thecourse was an end of the semester paper that each student had to prepare on a chosen topic.Topics were selected from the material studied in class and the collection of papers resulted fromthis assignment were compiled into a class portfolio that was made
support business and community development, and alleviate public and environmental health hazards. Education: Educational infrastructure for K-12 educational programs, technology centers, community colleges, and research and comprehensive universities. Also included are the administrators, teachers, and curricula for each source of graduates. Leadership Development and Capacity Building: The organizational platform to administer Deming’s SPK is reflected in: Partnerships and collaboration among government, business, and nonprofit and philanthropic sectors. Analytical tools and technical support available to the organization. Tourism: Cultural assets of the arts, traditions, and musical heritage and the ecological assets such
-contained unit and generated labels to reflect its initial meaning. Third, we identifiedrelationships among labels and generated categories. These categories were constantlycompared to other categories, with the goal of grounding the categories in the data. Weconstantly compared responses for similarities and differences and asked questions: What isgoing on here? What category or what property of category does this incident indicate? Whatis actually happening in the data17? In the fourth phase of analysis, relationships between thecategories were examined and then collapsed under a construct (higher-level category) thatexplained most of the variation in the data3. The above steps led to the development of codebooks for Character, Technical