private organization, the E. EugeneCarter Foundation, provided an incentive for degree completion, the Carter Opportunity Award,to undergraduate women in the form of a repayment of subsidized student loans upon completionof an engineering degree. No requirements beyond completion of an engineering degree werestipulated. No time limit for degree completion was designated, and recipients were not requiredto work in a specific field or location after completion of their engineering degrees.Student loan repayment is an incentive often used to recruit and retain highly qualifiedprofessionals into lower-paying careers or services for a certain period of time. It has beenwidely used by government agencies such as U.S. Army, National Institute of Health
wereevaluated using pre-established rubrics by a nanotechnology expert on campus, who is notconnected to the course. This project was approved by the authors’ Institutional Review Boardin April of 2015.ConclusionAlthough the specific details of this assignment may be challenging to duplicate at otherinstitutions due to a variety of difference, there exist common themes in courses that engineeringstudents study. The authors believe that creating interactions between courses with overlappingthemes can enhance student learning. As we educate engineers and citizens, it is critical for ourstudents to consider how their careers and personal lives will be impacted by new technologicaladvances. By involving students in both classes to engage in discussions
resources aimed towards engagingand interesting students in STEM fields throughout their primary and secondary school careers.7–9 There has been a great push by many organizations, companies and individuals to do just that.One example is the NSF GK-12 program which pairs graduate fellows in STEM programs withprimary and secondary education teachers to develop and implement hands-on, inquiry basedprojects relating to STEM fields in the classroom. This program and others like it have led to thedevelopment of a vast supply of resources for teachers interested in increasing engagement andinterest in STEM among their students. But with all these teaching resources available, studentengagement in STEM classroom activities and lessons is still a
skill for communication throughgraphics. It has been defined as “the ability to mentally imagine, understand, rotate, andmanipulate geometric objects” (1-3). Spatial skills are very important for a large variety ofcareers. In 1964 Smith 4) identified at least 84 career areas for which spatial skills are important.Studies have also shown that spatial visualization skills are a strong predictor of the success andconfidence of engineering students (5-9). A 2010 report on the role of women in STEM fieldsidentifies spatial visualization skills as important for the success of women students in STEM-related fields (10). The report also presents findings that women and underrepresented minoritiesin STEM have comparatively lower spatial visualization
Paper ID #16398Analogy Methods to Address Warping and Plasticity in TorsionProf. Somnath Chattopadhyay, University at Buffalo, SUNY Dr. Somnath Chattopadhyay teaches mechanics, materials, manufacturing and design at University at Buffalo He has authored a text on Pressure Vessel s and till recently was an Associate Editor of the ASME Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. His research interests are in the areas of fatigue and fracture of metals, carbon nanotubes, multi-scale material modeling and engineering education. He had a very successful industrial career with Westinghouse Electric where he directed and performed
ETAC of ABET and is on the editorial board of the Journal of Engineering Technology.Prof. Robert De La Coromoto Koeneke, Daytona State College Robert Koeneke is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology at Daytona State College. He received his B.S. in Electronics Engineering from Universidad Simon Bolivar in 1977 and his M.S. in Computer Science from Santa Clara University in 1982. His 34 years of professional career covers: teaching at undergraduate and graduate level, planning, developing and managing project in the areas of Telecommunications and Information Systems. His research interest includes embedded systems, digital programmable devices and computer communications. He is a member of IEEE
', Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11 (2004), 247-72.8 Ruth Deakin Crick, and Guoxing Yu, 'Assessing Learning Dispositions: Is the Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory Valid and Reliable as a Measurement Tool?', Educational Research, 50 (2008), 387-402.9 S. M. Lord, J. C. Chen, K. J. McGaughey, and V. W. Chang, 'Measuring Propensity for Lifelong Learning: Comparing Chinese and U.S. Engineering Students', in Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013 IEEE (2013), pp. 329-34.10 John C Chen, Karen McGaughey, and Susan M Lord, 'Measuring Students' Propensity for Lifelong Learning', in Profession of Engineering Education: Advancing Teaching, Research and Careers: 23rd
and wireless networks, cognitive radio networks, trust and information security, and semantic web. He is a recipient of the US Department of Energy Career Award. His research has been supported by US Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Research Laboratories, Ohio Supercomputer Center, and the State of Ohio.Prof. Chi-Hao Cheng, Miami University Dr. Chi-Hao Cheng received the B.S. degree in control engineering from National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan in 1991, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from The University of Texas at Austin in 1996 and 1998 respectively, both in Electrical and Computer Engineering. He is currently a professor in the Department
research interests include optical networks, real-time computing, mobile and wireless networks, cognitive radio networks, trust and information security, and semantic web. He is a recipient of the US Department of Energy Career Award. His research has been supported by US Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Research Laboratories, Ohio Supercomputer Center, and the State of Ohio.Dr. Deng Cao, Central State University Dr. Deng Cao received his Ph.D in Computer Science from West Virginia University in 2013. He earned two master degrees in Statistics and Physics from West Virginia University, and his bachelor degree in Physics from Hunan Normal University in
- ing. His research interests include optical networks, real-time computing, mobile and wireless networks, cognitive radio networks, trust and information security, and semantic web. He is a recipient of the US Department of Energy Career Award. His research has been supported by US Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Research Laboratories, Ohio Supercomputer Center, and the State of Ohio.Prof. Chi-Hao Cheng, Miami University Dr. Chi-Hao Cheng received the B.S. degree in control engineering from National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan in 1991, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from The University of Texas at Austin in 1996 and 1998 respectively, both in
improvement that the organization needs todemonstrate as part of their accreditation process.In addition to these concrete deliverables the exposure to systems thinking and lean approachesto the solution of problems, as well as the knowledge of methodologies for process improvementand quality, benefit the organization as a whole and individual constituents as they continue torecognize and address opportunities for improvement in the healthcare outcomes of theirorganization. The best indicator that the value of this new perspective is recognized by thehealthcare organizations who have partnered with Mercer may be the number of students whohave been offered internships, part time employment, and career opportunities by a number ofthese
, and they learned technical and professional knowledge that they would not believe would be available to them through their high school education. • They thought that the interaction with the customer was very good, but they complained about the changes to the requirement by the customer (this was actually designed into the experience by the PI). • They now have a better understanding of what it takes to work on a complex project and be part of a big team. • They now have a better understanding of what potential career opportunities exist, if they purse a computing degree. • Most of the students thought that they underestimate the complexity of the project, but as they proceed
range of questionsand depth (i.e. difficulty) within the existing question set in order to appropriately assessengineering students’ spatial ability improvements. At least not within a measurement constructusing pre- and post-testing to bracket spatial instructional interventions. Literature indicatesstudents entering and pursuing engineering degrees often have higher native spatial ability, butsome work also points to potential ceiling effects that may exist using certain spatial metrics11.There are a number of relatively young engineering students achieving top scores on spatialability instruments. This creates a dilemma in that we are unable to measure how much theycontinue to improve over the course of their academic career when they may
anticipated that the deeper understanding of the materials gained by being aUTA will entice them to enroll in more rigorous courses as they matriculate. It is possible thatthe teaching experience may influence them to pursue an academic career at either the primary,secondary or collegiate levels.5. AcknowledgementsPartnership for Retention Improvement in Mathematics, Engineering, and Science (PRIMES),National Science Foundation Project NSF-08569, $1,997,451, June 1, 2011 – May 31, 2016.Bibliography1. Otero, V., Pollock, S. & Finkelstein, N. A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model. Am. J. Phys. 78, 1218 (2010).2. Otero, V., Finkelstein, N., McCray, R. & Pollock, S
be leading individuals/teams in their careers in different organizations in industry22.Referring to the role of management in an STS, it becomes apparent that engineering and managementstudents represent the population that will serve as the balancing element between the social and technicalsystems organizations. Consequently, many of the respondents will be directly engaged with Leanimplementations or practices during their daily work.A sample of convenience was chosen to execute this project. Given the connections to several academicinstitutions, both stateside and abroad, the authors targeted a select group of American and Germanuniversities. More specifically, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Technical UniversityBraunschweig
. Pachepsky, Y.A., Shelton, D.R., McLain, J.E.T., Patel, J., and Mandrell, R.E. 2011. Irrigation Waters as a Source of Pathogenic Microorganisms in Produce: A Review. In: Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 113, pp. 73-138, D. Sparks, editor. Academic Press, Burlington.8. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.9. Kolb, D. A., & Wolfe, D. (1981). Professional education and career development: A cross-sectional study of adaptive competencies in experiential learning. Final report NIE G-77-0053, ERIC no. ED 209 493 CE 030 519.
design to freshmen. From its start in 2008 through 2014, she was also co-PI and project manager of Penn State’s $2.5M, NSF-sponsored, Toys’n MORE project.Dr. Kathleen Fadigan, Pennsylvania State University - Abington Kathy Fadigan received her BS in Biology and her Ed.D. in Curriculum, Instruction, and Technology in Education from Temple University. She is currently the Program Chair for Education at Penn State Abington. She teaches courses in sustainability, early childhood and STEM education for pre-service elementary teachers. Her research investigates the long-term effects of out-of-school STEM programs on students’ educational and career trajectories. c American Society for Engineering
in the engineering field specifically1. It has been recorded that enteringengineering students have a significantly higher spatial ability than their colleagues in otherfields of study1. Within the engineering field, those with higher spatial ability perform, onaverage, better than other students in the same field of engineering who have lower spatialability1, 3. This better performance in their academic career then translates to their professionalcareer1, 2. Terms such as spatial thinking, spatial cognition, and visuospatial thinking, in additionto spatial ability, are commonly used to discuss individuals’ spatial understanding of innatelyspatial topics. For this paper’s purposes, the term spatial ability will be used and defined as
Paper ID #14668Programmable System-On-Chip (PSoC) Usage in an Engineering TechnologyProgramMr. Stephen A. Strom, Pennsylvania State University - Erie Stephen Strom is a lecturer in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology department of Penn State Behrend, and holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. His career includes over thirty years experience in designing and programming embedded systems and has multiple patents for both hardware designs and software algorithmsProf. David R. Loker, Pennsylvania State University - Erie David R. Loker received the M.S.E.E. degree from Syracuse
computing and numerical analysis, where he works on computational algorithms for simulating complex stochastic systems such as atmospheric aerosols and feedback control. Prof. West is the recipient of the NSF CAREER award and is a University of Illinois Distinguished Teacher-Scholar and College of Engineering Education Innovation Fellow. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Sustaining innovation in engineering education through faculty communitiesIntroductionImproving the quality of engineering education requires that we understand not only whatteaching methods are effective but also why faculty choose to adopt and continue to use thoseteaching methods1
participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars.”Given Lee, English for Specific Purposes 28 (2009) 142–156“Crossing the Distance: Adjustment of Taiwanese Graduate Students in the United States”.4Michelle A. Swagler and Michael V. Ellis. Journal of Counseling Psychology. (2003), Vol. 50, No. 4, 420 – 4375 “Why Keep Silent? The Classroom Participation Experiences of Non-Native-English-speaking Students”. SibelTatar, Language and Intercultural Communication, (2005) 5:3-4, 284-293, DOI: 10.1080/147084705086689026 Bakker et al. (2010), “The Role of Personality in the Job Demands-Resources Model: A study of Australianacademic staff”. Career Development International, Vol. 15 No. 7, 2010, pp. 622-6367 “Correlates of Deficiencies in a First-Quarter
currently works as a Research Assistant in the Combustion and Energy Research Laboratory (COMER). His current research is focused on new catalyst development, ceramic materials for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), combustion, energy conversion, fuel cell modeling, fuel cell technology applications and system design. Ryan is a Syracuse University Graduate Fellow and an Astronaut Scholar.Mr. Michael J. Garrett, Syracuse University Michael Garrett is an incoming graduate student at Syracuse University. Throughout his undergraduate career he developed an interest in energy systems which encouraged him to pursue energy related research. During the summer of 2015, Michael began working as an Undergraduate Research Assistant in
in engineering is considered to be one of the critical coursesstudents will take in their journey towards the attainment of an engineering degree as a key piecein career development. However, not all departments support the idea of a multidisciplinarycapstone because they fear it will negatively impact their ability to meet their department’sspecific curricular needs, and ensure ABET requirements are met. The administration andfacilitation of a multidisciplinary capstone takes significant resource dedication, and asustainable structure would need to be built the appropriate infrastructure to ensure futuresuccess.Implications and RecommendationsMultidisciplinary capstone has much support across campus, as it reflects experiences studentswill
faculty represented the majority (93%) of respondentscovering all degree levels (Baccalaureate – 93%, Masters – 84.5%, and Doctoral – 34.5%).Instructional areas included engineering (5%), technology (19%), engineering technology (10%),engineering and technology teacher education (32%), design (10%), and education (7%).Building construction management, business, sustainability, and career and technical educationare also represented instructional areas in the data set. Tenured or tenure-track professorscomprised 89% of the respondents. Thirty percent of respondents report greater than 30 years ofteaching experience with all other respondents distributed consistently from 4-30 years ofteaching experience. When asked if they have flipped a classroom
1 Detail 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - Question 4 did not received any answersDiscussion and Implications for Teaching and LearningThe results suggest that the participants possessed several misconceptions and conceptual gapson basic knowledge of how to secure a communication between the server and the web browser.This fact was unexpected given that the students were coursing the last year of aTelecommunication and Networking career. The results imply a necessity to strengthen generalsecurity and web security concepts on cybersecurity education as suggested by McGettrick [11] inhis work “Toward Effective Cybersecurity Education”.Third-party validation is a
interesting motion.The goal is to motivate students to think about designing and prototyping programmable, electro-mechanical devices at an early stage of their engineering career. In doing so, they apply funda-mentals to a fun and exciting design problem of their choice, learn to think critically, communicateideas, and work in a team.ResourcesAlthough, the aforementioned CLOs comprise of a fairly comprehensive range of topics seeking toprepare students for their final project, it would be naive to assume that at freshman level studentscan apply a basic knowledge of Statics, Kinematics, Dynamics, Strength of Materials, DesignMethodology, Mechanisms and Machines, Sensors, Actuation, and Micro-controller programmingto carry out a project of such
physical equipment that are available through the Internet – are an important part ofthis phenomenon and are constantly gaining motion in the higher education scenario.However, remote laboratories can also be effective assets in pre-university education. Severalinitiatives and projects have been or are being carried out worldwide aiming at exploring theuse of remote and virtual laboratories by secondary school students. For example, theEuropean Commission funded project Go-Lab (http://www.go-lab-project.eu/) is building afederation of Online Laboratories and tools to embed these labs in the lectures of secondaryschool teachers to serve as a motivation for students to pursue a career in STEM subjects.However, most of these projects treat students
to society offer a highly effective vehicle for motivatingstudent interest in engineering and other STEM fields. Additionally current science standards –Next Generation of Science Standards (NGSS)1 - incorporate engineering design into thelearning objectives of science in grades K-12. However few classroom teachers have had thebenefit of exposure to engineering design before beginning their teaching career. Just like theirstudents, early exposure in the undergraduate curriculum that enriches future teachers’knowledge of engineering and technology and its relationship to the world would benefit thesecandidates.Project based learning (PBL) and the engineering design process are a natural pedagogical fit.PBL is focused on knowledge and
emailaddresses (N=2301) via repeated emails (Constant Contact) with links to an online survey(Qualtrics). Responses were solicited for a two-week period from mid-September to earlyOctober 2015.The survey began with questions about our current curriculum and our alumni’s satisfaction withtheir overall level of preparation for their respective careers. This was followed by questionsabout self-perceptions and the importance of three core areas of emphasis for our undergraduateprogram: Active Learning, Professional Development, and New Technologies. Assessment itemsfor the Design Studio were embedded in the Active Learning section, which included ratings ofthe quality and importance of undergraduate laboratory and design spaces, design projects, in-class
science career decisions and active learning.CBE - Life Sciences Education, 6, 297-306.[4] Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell BiologyEducation, 3, 270-277.[5] Lopatto, D. (2004). What undergraduate research can tell us about research on learning. Washington, DC:Project Kaleidoscope.[6] Doreen Hinkel, Scott Henke J. Nat. Resour. Life Sci. Educ. Issue 35 pp.194–201 (2006)[7] Philip D. Mannheim, “Alternatives to Standard Gravity”, Physical Review D, 2006[8] James G. O’Brien and Robert Moss, “Rotation Curve for the Milky Way Galaxy in Conformal Gravity”,American Journal of Modern Physics, 2014[9] Greg Sirokman, “Student-constructed Biodiesel Processor: Applied Undergraduate Research in