, the paper identifies biographicalinformation common to those who appear to be most engaged in the topic and compares it toexisting national faculty profiles. These findings are augmented through national survey ofengineering faculty. The survey investigated faculty perceptions on the importance ofengineering leadership development and the manner faculty think these materials should beincorporated in engineering curricula. These perceptions are investigated with respect toparticipant’s backgrounds and experiences outside the academy. This work will be of interest toboth faculty building commitment for and materials supporting integration of engineeringleadership in the curriculum and the engineering leadership profession.IntroductionMany of
thecoursework required for their degree, there are also seminars offered which attempt to moreexplicitly connect the work and experiences of engineers to that of the K-12 mathematicsclassroom. There are five seminars offered over the course of the program and range in topic toinclude engineering, technology, curriculum, professional communities, and other aspects ofinterest to new teachers.This paper describes an activity used in one of these seminars to connect the Engineering DesignProcess to the content and process standards in the Common Core State Standards. In thissession, 10 engineering undergraduate students and 10 beginning mathematics teachersparticipating in the special program worked together to solve an engineering design challenge byusing
curriculum that would encourage and improve students’creativity? Additionally, Kazerounian and Foley [7] showed a valid argument for the importanceof creativity in engineering as well as a lack of techniques to foster it in our engineering students.Thus, an engineering professor at a western university developed a pedagogical approach toengineering graphics instruction called Conceptual Design Blending (CDB) that facilitatescreativity in engineering students. The term CDB has its root in Fauconnier and Turner’sConceptual Blending [8] and Arthur Koestler’s Bisociation [9] where students are asked togenerate an entirely new design using features of two or more pre-existing designs. [10] Withregard to CDB, as defined by Bell et al.: “CDB is
to pursue a PhD have the opportunity to obtain a masters that will give them thescience and business skills they desire to be successful in an industry setting.Program DescriptionWhen the MSPS program was first established, it had three concentrations: Biostatistics,Biotechnology, and Healthcare Informatics. Due to the undeniable success it has generated, itnow contains six different concentrations: Biostatistics, Biotechnology, Actuarial Science,Geosciences, Healthcare Informatics, and Engineering Management.5 All concentrations requirethe same business courses, but have their own specific core curriculum. Each individualconcentration has a designated advisor that assists students in creating schedules, obtaininginternships, and
, especially those associated with the instructors’ personal research/consulting experience, received highly positive feedback and students would often approach the instructor to ask follow up questions. These types of case-studies should be more fully integrated throughout the semester, rather than concentrated at the end as they were in the Fall 2015 semester. Students enjoyed the creativity associated with the final design project and the fact that each team’s problem statement was unique. Many requested that some of the experiment- based activities from earlier in the semester be replaced with small design challenges. Instructors would have to be selective to insure curriculum topics are still addressed if this
Paper ID #16737Systematic Team Formation Leading to Peer Support and Leadership SkillsDevelopmentDr. Corey Kiassat P.E., Quinnipiac University Dr. Corey Kiassat is an Assistant Professor and the Director of Industrial Engineering at Quinnipiac Uni- versity and has a BASc and a PhD degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Toronto. He has an MBA, majoring in Marketing and International Business, from York University. Corey is a Pro- fessional Engineer and has 11 years of industry experience in manufacturing engineering and operations management with General Motors in USA and Canada. He has also been involved
Engineering and Technology. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: 2015- 16. (ABET, Inc., 2016).7. Bailey, R., Dugan, J.B., Coso, A. & McFarland, M. ECE/SYS Integration: A Strategy for Evaluating Graduates from a Multi-year Curriculum focused on Technology Systems Integration. in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (ASEE, San Antonio, TX, 2012).8. Cardella, M. et al. Special Session - Assessing student learning of engineering design in Frontiers in Education (ASEE/IEEE, Rapid City, South Dakota, 2011).9. Vinck, D. Everyday Engineering: An Ethnography of Design and Innovation, (MIT Press, 2009).10. Newstetter, W.C. Of green monkeys and failed affordances: A case study of a mechanical
)References[1] P. Jennings, “New directions in renewable energy education”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, pp 435–439 (2009)[2] J. Swart and T. Sutherland, “Fusing theory and practical in a curriculum for engineering students-A case study”, IEEE AFRICON Conference, Article number #4401497 (2007)[3] H. Banchi and R. Bell, “The Many Levels of Inquiry”, Science and Children, Vol. 46, pp 26-29 (2008)[4] J. R.V. Flora and A. T. Cooper, “Incorporating Inquiry-Based Laboratory Experiment in Undergraduate Environmental Engineering Laboratory”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 131, pp 19-25 (2005)[5] K. Kephart, “The discourse of engagement: an approach to analyzing conceptual understanding in an inquiry
engineering. Taking action as an ambassador might in turn impact her beliefs about how and whyindividuals decide to stay or leave the STEM pipeline in school. Actions might also impact herself-perceptions about her capacity to influence and lead others, thus strengthening herprofessional goals of achieving a leadership and mentorship position in engineering career. Thismight lead to further action possibilities of becoming a senior ambassador, and perhaps lookinginto engineering management as a future career goal. In this hypothetical case, all of these roleidentity components are in alignment. Moreover, different other roles, such as that ofundergraduate student (and the imagined role of future engineer) are integrated with the role ofthe
., Electrical Engineering University of El Mina Cairo, Egypt, May 2001.Prof. Gregory P. Neff, Purdue University - Northwest Gregory Neff is professor of mechanical engineering technology at Purdue University Northwest, Calumet campus. He is a Registered Professional Engineer, a Certified Manufacturing Engineer, and a Certified Manufacturing Technologist. Greg is active in ASEE where he won the Meryl K. Miller award in 1994 and in SME as faculty advisor for SME student chapter 161 and an advisor for Tau Alpha Pi. He is a mem- ber of ASHRAE and sponsor of student members. He is active in ASME, where he has served as chair in 2001-2002 for the Mechanical Engineering Technology Department Head Committee (METDHC) of the American
bedside.As such, the Bioinnovation Program requires that fellows not only become well-versed in humanphysiology and science and engineering fundamentals, they must also develop an understandingof the business, regulatory and administrative hurtles they will face in today’s rapidly evolvinghealthcare industry. To this end, business and law classes have been integrated into theBioinnovation curriculum to supplement a rigorous science and engineering course load, andfellows regularly participate in entrepreneurship-focused seminars, conferences andcompetitions. One additional critical component of their training is a 12-week summer internshipat the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in Silver Spring, MD in the Division ofPostmarket Surveillance
design process evolvesthroughout a student engineer’s educational experience.10,11 For example, senior engineering studentsgenerally have more breadth in how they approach design problems.13 When compared to expertdesigners, students spend less time on problem scoping and also gather less and less diverse informationto solve the design problem.11 Thus, there is a need for the creation of a model that helps scaffold noviceengineers’ design knowledge management and problem-solving strategies. Educational approaches toengineering design can be improved by integrating a coordination lens. This paper describes designknowledge coordination and validates this model using an authoritative model of aerospace engineeringdesign
Badging System is to provide an open-source resourcefor other campus Makerspaces that may be interested in controlling access to some equipmentand logging equipment usage. A demonstration system will be available at the ASEE conferencewith functionality determined by successful completion of the project by the capstone designteam and the vagaries of internet access. The complete plans and code for the project will furtherbe made available on a public website at the conclusion of the project in early May 2016.1 Kotys-Schwartz, D., D. Knight, and G. Pawlas, First-Year and Capstone Design Projects: Is the Bookend Curriculum Approach Effective for Skill Gain, in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition2010
Gill, M. J. The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1094428113518348 (2014). 11 Kupers, W. Embodied “inter‐learning”‐an integral phenomenology of learning in and by organizations. The Learning Organization 15, 388‐408 (2008). 12 MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Kay, K. & Milstein, B. Codebook development for team‐based qualitative analysis. Cultural Anthropology Methods 10, 31‐36 (1998). 13 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. (2006). 14 Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (Sage Publications, Inc., 2009). 15
Paper ID #16184Development of Authentic Engineering Problems for Problem-centered Learn-ingDr. Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University Yen-Lin Han is an Assistant Professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Seattle University. Her research interests include micro-scale Molecular Gas Dynamics and heat transfer applications such as the Knudsen Compressor, a temperature driven micropump with no moving parts. Her work in exper- imental and computational investigations of gas transport phenomena has been published in high impact journals including Physics of Fluids, Applied Materials and Interfaces, and Journal of
actually presenting enough distinct processing options as well as providing enoughopportunity to actual practice making decisions. Current options for ethics training arenoticeably limited in these areas.Approaches to Ethics InstructionThere are multiple methods of ethics training currently in use. When determining what should beincluded in ethics training, there are aspects of both the delivery and the content to consider.Delivery methods are often separated based on whether instruction is disseminated as part ofstand-alone ethics course focused on either general or more field specific ethics or if it isdelivered in an ethics-across-the-curriculum method which is essentially an integration of ethicscontent in otherwise technical skills courses. 4
contributing to narrow perceptions of ethicsamong students.22 For example, educational reforms aiming to introduce more social and ethicalrequirements into curricula can be perceived by students as “constraints” and “discreterequirements” rather than integral to both their education and future professional practice.Related research has additionally questioned whether engineering education has measurableimpacts on the ethical capabilities and moral development of engineering students. For instance,Shuman et al. coded student responses to an open-ended ethical dilemma, and found littleevidence of growth in ethical reasoning from the freshman year to senior year, althoughrelatively few of these students had taken formal ethics courses.23 Similarly, Wu et
were doing it to satisfy their own intrinsic values. While they still believed that good writingwas important to an engineering professional, the lack of continuity in the curriculum madewriting seem far less important to an engineering student.Compounding this devaluation, students often received negative social messages from otherstudents and even faculty about the value of communication coursework. Some students hadbeen told by peers to expect their writing class to be tedious, and mostly just a meaninglessrequirement. One student reported that in a subsequent class with a communication component,the instructor explicitly messaged that the students were there to get an easy grade on thatcomponent and pass through to more important work.The
David Reeping is an undergraduate research assistant with a major in Engineering Education and a minor in Mathematics. He is a Choose Ohio First scholar inducted during the 2012-2013 school year and the recipient of the Remsburg Creativity Award for 2013 and The DeBow Freed Award for outstanding leader- ship as an undergraduate student (sophomore) in 2014. David is a member of the mathematics, education, and engineering honor societies: Kappa Mu Epsilon, Kappa Delta Pi, and Tau Beta Pi respectively. He has extensive experience in curriculum development in K-12 and develops material for the Technology Stu- dent Association’s annual TEAMS competition. His research interests involve the analysis and refinement of the
principles.Keywords: Backward Design Process, Course Design, Outcome Based Learning, Statics.I. INTRODUCTIONA. Setting for the Curriculum ProjectThe specific setting for this curriculum project is outlined as follow:1. Salient characteristics of the institution or sponsoring organizationAs described by Anand (2005), " Engineering Mechanics - Statics is a core course in most of theengineering disciplines, and is generally taught by a civil and/or a mechanical engineeringfaculty at the nations' ABET accredited colleges and universities" (p.1). The institutional settingfor this course is also considered an ABET accredited engineering college that offersundergraduate degree programs for civil engineering and/or mechanical engineering students.This course is not
viewed as more important emphases or topicsthan they were years ago.Second, the EBOK and the ECM each are products of the integrated effort of manyvolunteer academics and practitioners representing a wide range of engineeringdisciplines. That kind of diverse participation enhances the credibility of the resultingproducts.Preliminary Ideas on How the Seven Capabilities/Competencies Might be Reflectedin the Next CEBOKConsider two ways to explicitly include one or more of the seven elements in Table 1 in athird edition of the CEBOK or as an amendment to the second edition. The basic optionsfor each are adding an outcome, while maybe deleting one or more, or introducing astrong theme. Example of the New Outcome OptionUsing
the classroom. Previously, Dr. Cutler worked as the research specialist with the Rothwell Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence Worldwide Campus (CTLE - W) for Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.Dr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach James J. Pembridge is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He earned a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, M.A. Education in Curriculum and Instruction, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. His research has focused on mentoring as pedagogy for project-based courses and understanding the adult learning characteristics of undergraduate students.Dr. Matthew A. Verleger
assessenergy conservation opportunities. In addition, the students demonstrate the appropriate usage ofenergy monitoring and measuring equipment commonly used by energy specialists and energyauditors. The course is taught as a lecture-practicum with an emphasis on clean energy and energyefficiency both in class and in laboratory. In particular, the key energy efficiency topics arediscussed how they can be integrated into manufacturing coursework to include sustainabilityprinciples.1. IntroductionFusing U.S. innovation on green science and clean manufacturing is an environmental necessity.There is a need to instill sustainability awareness and concepts among undergraduate students, inorder to ensure that sustainable production will be achieved in the
, stimulate cross-disciplinecollaborations and serve all ranks. Faculty representing departments across the College eachcreated an at-a-glance ‘bio-board’, a one-page laminated pictorial summary of name, researcharea and current research project. Participants were divided into two groups positioned in pairsopposite each other on two sides of a long table and engaged in a controlled series of ten minuteresearch exchanges. The activity stimulated integrative and collaborative research conversations,built relationships across rank and disciplines, and resulted in the pursuit of collaborativefunding. Agency, national laboratory, and industry visits began in 2009. The COE Associate Dean ledfaculty on annual visits to funding agencies, national
website lists fourteendegree programs at US schools related to nanotechnology: four minor programs innanotechnology, six degrees that include a specialization or concentration in nanotechnology,and four B.S. degree programs in nanoscience or nanoengineering.7 A review of nanotechnologyprograms by Minaie et al. categorized current initiatives into nine models of integratingnanotechnology into engineering curricula.8 Of the universities included in their review, TexasState was the only school categorized as integrating nanotechnology into existing courses. Themajority of nanotechnology education efforts focusing on teaching nanotechnology as a separatesubject or in addition to traditional topics in the curriculum is incongruous with the
hard. This could be particularly relevant forfreshmen and sophomore students who may struggle with relating the course content with theirproject. It is expected that students find involvement with undergraduate research as one possiblemeans of developing analytical and professional skills that they can use in a rapidly changingenvironment where employers are seeking a very diverse set of skills from graduating students.13Survey results indirectly indicate that the scaffolding approach used in introducing students toundergraduate research has been useful. However, further development of the framework used tointroduce undergraduates to research is needed. In the long term, undergraduate research couldbe integrated into curriculum through a
Masters program. He currently works as a Digital Electronics Engineer at Northrop Grumman Corporation.Dr. Wagdy H. Mahmoud, University of the District of Columbia Wagdy H. Mahmoud is an Associate Professor of electrical engineering at the Electrical Engineering Department at UDC. Mahmoud is actively involved in research in the areas of reconfigurable logic, hard- ware/software co-design of a system on a chip using reconfigurable logic, application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), digital logic design, image compressions, digital signal processing, computer architec- ture, embedded systems, system on a chip, and renewable energy.Dr. Nian Zhang, University of the District of Columbia Research Interests: Dr. Zhang’s
members were connected with an array ofworkshops and mentoring opportunities and assessment feedback indicated that they reallyappreciated mentoring around pitch practices and the opportunities for connection at the mentordinner. Students indicated a number of skills gains related to the development of a businessmodel with skills related to selecting key activities and identifying key partners for their projects.Alumni results revealed stronger skills gains after the program in the area of identifying keyresources for their projects. Teams provided additional feedback on the alumni survey indicatingcontinued mentor support after the program and additional fundraising success (two teamsreceived $250k investment).Integration of results with on
assess the student. • For some outcomes, the workplace is simply better suited for assessment. For example, the assessment of teamwork skills in the academic setting might take place through a variety of projects, activities, and labs scattered throughout the curriculum. (Not every course is conducive to assessment of teamwork!) However, these are often very discrete events and the faculty member may have limited access to observe the student interactions. In contrast, an employer can work closely with a student on a full-time basis over an extended period of time. Since most industry settings rely heavily on teamwork skills, we believe that the supervisor is much
is explicitly stated in multiple ABET criterion and the BOK. The BOK’s Outcome9 calls for graduates to “design a system or process to meet desired needs within such realisticconstraints as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,constructability, and sustainability.” The ABET General Criterion 3 requires “an ability todesign a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability.” ABET General Criterion 5 also requires that “students must be prepared forengineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on theknowledge and skills