. (2010). An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First‐Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 319-336.6. Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 525-548.7. Godfrey, E. (2007). Cultures within cultures: Welcoming or unwelcoming for women. In Proceedings of 2007 of American Society for Engineering Education. Honolulu, HI.8. Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Lord, S. M., Long, R. A., & Ohland, M. W. (2012). Women in Industrial Engineering: Stereotypes, persistence, and perspectives
students were somewhat less motivated, and came with lessthan adequate science and math background. This student diversity made it a major challenge todesign the course content in a way that can be attractive to both populations. In addition, sectionsizes were very large (80-90 students in each) and the instructor’s interaction with students waslimited. As a result, mentoring and active learning opportunities were less than ideal.A large body of literature exists on the freshman experience. Based on existing research and ourprevious experiences with the course, plans were made to adopt the team teaching modelsuccessfully implemented at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Instead of usingadjunct faculty to teach the course, a team
processes as a means of deepening their understanding2, 5, 6. Cunningham et al.1highlight the two broad categories of metacognition explored in the literature: knowledge ofcognition (including understanding people, tasks, and strategies) and regulation of cognition(including planning, monitoring, controlling, and evaluating one’s own practices in learning anddoing). In our study, we focus on students’ knowledge of engineering tasks and theircorresponding ability to effectively monitor their task performance. To do so, we look at writing-to-learn (WTL) and reflective practice strategies as tools to both support and evaluate students’monitoring capabilities.Writing-to-LearnThe Writing-to-Learn (WTL) movement began in the 1980s in the wake of Emig’s
more than others, hands-on experience is an essential element of learning. Inengineering, many concepts simply cannot be fully taught in a lecture hall or out of a textbook.The teaching of these concepts requires the development of a supplement to the textbook, whichdemonstrates the interplay between basic electromagnetic theory and engineering practice.5 Inthe long term, the plan is to create a laboratory component for EE 330 in which the students willspend two hours every week complementing what they have learned in lecture and practiced inhomework problems with hands-on experience using current tools and technology to solve real-world problems. In the short term, two new hands-on laboratory activities have been created tocompliment the four
by preparing engineers, who arebetter equipped with the latest knowledge and skills. The outcome of this paper might be ofrelevance to anyone planning to offer similar courses in their institutions. The authors believethat this course will be a foundational one for developing future courses relevant to the field ofDDM.IntroductionConversion of the computer aided design (CAD) model directly into a physical object isbecoming a mainstream technological innovation in manufacturing, which has seen anexponential growth in recent years1. This advancement is creating a renaissance of United States(US) manufacturing, and some people even called it a new industrial revolution2. A consensusis building in the support of aforementioned perception and
observed wasunaffected by gender of the students or the teaching subject of advisors. Continual assessment,and improvement of assessment instruments, is vital as project-based learning continues to be afocal point for teaching about energy, and as organizers plan how to best shape future events toimprove energy literacy of our current and future decision-makers.IntroductionEnergy literacy encompasses knowledge of energy principles in technical, social, and economicrealms, as well as the ability to critically apply that knowledge to solve problems and formopinions. Collective advancement of energy literacy among the general population is thought tobe instrumental in implementing sustainable energy solutions in the near future. Langfitt et al
experiences as the reason for the decision to pursue full-time employmentimmediately following undergraduate graduation in place of an original plan to continue intograduate studies. The subjects stated two reasons for these change in plans. First that for thecareer field they had chosen to enter, an advanced degree was not necessary and/or was notparticularly useful. The added fear that turning down a job offer to instead attend graduate schoolwould account for a lost opportunity with that employer in the future was cited as an additionalreason for a change in academic and career plans.Not surprisingly, full-time subjects all agreed that their previous co-op experiences specificallyhelped eased the transition to full-time employment as an engineer
achieve sharedaims in engineering education: encourage student autonomy and exploration, grow diverselearning communities and environments, and positively impact retention for those students atrisk of leaving.Prior Work on Maker SpacesTo date, there have been a number of studies of academic and non-academic maker spaces thatprovide answers to important questions. To identify best practices for those planning new makerspaces, Wilczynski2 conducted a review of six of the first university maker spaces illuminatingthe need for 1) a clear mission statement, 2) user training, 3) proper staffing, 4) collaboration, 5)alignment with student work schedules, and 6) attention to creating a maker community oncampus. Similarly, Barrett et al.,1 reviewed
knowledge was also included, which was defined as students organizing“their problem-solving process by directing which stages they should go through to reach asolution” 21. Strategic knowledge is knowing when, where and how to apply the knowledge.Some researchers also include a self reflection component23, which indicates the strategicknowledge is making the general plan of action and representing a higher level of inquiry.However, it was found difficult to differentiate the strategic step or strategic mistake from thefirst three procedures during our homework analysis. On one hand, students’ problem solvingstrategy was already implied in their formula choice and quantitative solution. All the abovethree knowledge elements were parts of the
. Feedback to studentsis immediate and student misconceptions and misunderstandings are corrected, hopefully, beforethe student attempts the homework.Though flipped approaches may vary, successful approaches are reported to share thesecharacteristics. 1. Learning environments are highly structured, often planned to the minute. 2. In class activities involve significant quizzing, problem solving, and other active learning activities to increase student engagement with the material 3. Students are incentivized through grading and instructor expectations to complete out of class work and participate in class activities.In 2014, Faculty Focus, a publisher of articles and materials for effective college teaching,conducted a survey of its
Civil and Urban Engineering department. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Assessing Gender Differences between Student Motivations for Studying EngineeringAbstractThis research paper investigates what motivates students to major in engineering, and how themotives differ between men and women. It aims to address curriculum planning in first-yearengineering programs to improve retention and diversity. Previous research has identified coursepractices – such as team-based projects – that have positively impacted engagement of women inengineering. Understanding the motivations for students to choose engineering can connect thereasons why certain curricular
and post-surveys provided the researchteam with valuable information regarding the structure of the camp, including the following.What do you think it means to be an engineer? This question was asked at the beginning and endof the camp, and by comparing student answers, we are able to determine if we were effective inmeeting goals #1 and #5. What did you learn at this camp? Students provided thoughtful answersto this question, that have allowed the research team the opportunity to discover what learningobjectives they would like to include in the curriculum next year. While explicit learningobjectives were noted on the lesson plans concerning laser cutting and circuitry, answers to thisquestion, such as “how the CNC machine works” and the
done to ensure that the childrenparticipating in the program were provided with a high quality experience as the lead facilitatorwas chosen because of her demonstrated ability to work well with children. As such, should theactivity not work out as planned, she could improvise so that the children still gained somethingfrom the experience and had fun during their after school session.After the initial soft pilot at the Kroc Center, the activities were then open for facilitation (betapilot) at other schools. One of the faculty members involved in the project offered students inher junior level mechanical engineering course extra credit if they facilitated an activity at anarea school. Approximately 50% of the students enrolled in the course took
Journal of Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Shuman is an ASEE Fellow.Dr. Cheryl Matherly Dr. Cheryl Matherly is Vice Provost for Global Education at The University of Tulsa, where she has responsibility for the strategic leadership of the university’s plan for comprehensive internationalization. Dr. Matherly’ co-directs the
structural members/systems.Course DetailsTwo sections of CEE 461: Reinforced Concrete Design I (hereafter RC1) were offered in theSpring 2015 semester at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the Department ofCivil & Environmental Engineering. Of the 89 civil engineering students (82 undergraduates, 7graduates) in the course, two-thirds had a primary concentration in structural engineering and theremaining one-third was largely in construction management. Students indicated their mainmotivation to take RC1 was that it was a core course necessary to complete their primary/secondary specialization. A significant number of students also indicated they planned topractice as a structural engineer or in some engineering capacity where the
things—on one side of the card jot down briefly why the students wanted to take a collegegrammar course, in general; and on the other side of the card, list three favorite nouns (persons,places, or things). I asked question one to get a better sense of my audience and to make sure thesyllabus of activities I had planned would be sufficient for the group. I asked question two as anicebreaker and fun factor.Out of the 58 students initially present, 23 indicated they were there to take a grammar course tolearn grammar theory; 22 indicated they were there principally to learn applied grammar, that is,common grammar mistakes and how to spot them and fix them in documents; and 3 studentsindicated they wanted to learn more about the history of English
student needs. Some Scholars continuemeeting once a week through graduation while others make appointments as needed. Advisingcovers academic planning and success strategies, transition issues, and any personal problemsthat may impact a Scholar’s retention in STEM or at Rice. All student performance is activelymonitored, enabling advisors to intervene even if students are being seen less frequently. RESP’slongitudinal, intrusive advising model proved so successful it has been adapted for other Ricestudents through the development of the Office of Student Success Initiatives. RESP additionallyprovides ongoing term-time programming to address common transition issues, training inlearning and study technique, and student professional development.The
, personal, and professional development. Science education, 91(1), 36-74.10. Kinkel, D. H., & Henke, S. E. (2006). Impact of undergraduate research on academic performance, educational planning, and career development. Journal of Natural Resources & Life Sciences Education, 35(1), 194-201.11. Olson, S., & Riordan, D. G. (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President.12. Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science (Washington), 316(5824), 548-549.AppendixSkull Fracture Biomechanics (2013)This
as many of the 2015-2016 ECS Faculty Development Seminars as possible • Attend the ECS Faculty Half-day Teaching Workshop on December 8, 2015 • Attend a luncheon on December 8, 2015, with past KEEN Innovators to discuss lessons learned/best practices • Design an implementation plan to design, develop, and deploy the module(s) produced in the award timeframe • Assess the initial results of the module(s) • Make the module and all related teaching materials available for use throughout the KEEN network • Results of implementation and assessment will be published in a discipline-appropriate venue in the 2016-2017academic year. One faculty member has already published his results in the spring 2016
, where he has been teaching Construction Graphics/Quantity Take-Off, CAD & BIM Tools for Construction, Building Construction Systems, Building Construction Estimating, Heavy/Highway Construction Estimating, Construction Planning, and Construction Project Management. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include Construction Informatics and Visual Analytics; Building Information Modeling (BIM), Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Construc- tion Management; and Interactive Educational Games and Simulations. E-mail: leen@ccsu.edu. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Team Building for Collaborative Learning Environment in Construction
notable migration of e+’s direct-matriculation students out of theprogram and into discipline-specific engineering programs to three distinct shared studentmotivations: 1) students who developed a new or greater passion for a more traditional,discipline-based engineering program; 2) students who strategized acceptance to the CEASthrough the (not enrollment-limited) e+ program with the intention of transferring later to amajor they perceived as enrollment-limited; and 3) students who inadvertently arrived to the e+program thinking that it was the engineering college’s “open-option” major.Perhaps not surprisingly, the program advisor noted that many first-year students did not arrivewith a curricular plan for themselves and were slow to select
ofthe academic literacy skills identified in the Screening and the Diagnostic. CommunicationInstructors who work with the two first-year courses were made aware of the students whoscored in Band 1 and given access to their diagnostic results in order to better inform theirinteractions with the students on their written assignments. These are only preliminary responsesto the screening and diagnostic process. Currently, plans are being made to address thechallenges of earlier and more efficient communication of the diagnostic results to both studentsand instructors. Plans are also being made to more efficiently collaborate with students throughstrategy sessions and their course assignments.At Queens University the 24 students whose diagnostic
- Test setup for analog PI controller using analog discovery board. Figure 14 - Command (C1) and tachometer output (C2) for analog PI controller.IV. Lessons LearnedThe authors have successfully used the analog discovery board in their courses as a supplementto traditional bench lab equipment, or in some cases to allow for lab-like exercises in lecture onlycourses. Like any other teaching method, careful planning can maximize effectiveness of theAnalog Discovery usage in the classroom. For in-class experiments and demonstrations, timeallocation could range from 5-10 minutes in length or up to an entire lecture session, dependingon the complexity of the experiment and how well the experiment can be utilized as a vehicle forstudying a given
continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses, seminars and workshops, and has developed courses, videos and software packages during his career. His areas of specialization in- clude transportation planning and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, public works and renewable energy.Ms. Emily Rivera P.E., University of Florida Emily Rivera is a Civil Engineer with the US Army Corps of Engineers at the Washington Aqueduct in Washington, DC. She holds a BS Degree from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus and is pursuing a Master’s Degree in Water Resources Planning and
at Clemson University studying Bioengineering. Through many research opportunities in the department, Carson has led a team to the Limbs Summit in El Paso, Texas where they presented a functioning, 3-D printed, lower arm interface that allowed a subject with a con- genital arm defect to successfully use a forearm crutch. Carson now focuses her research on designing medical devices for the developing world with an infant temperature regulation device. Having had these opportunities, Carson plans to pursue further research that enables her to reach out to others through engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Year Two: The DeFINE Program
’ perception of how much they learneddramatically shifted towards the above average and well above average categories after theimplementation of the 3D technology project. Another set of questions in which the majority of the students agree on their perceivedlearning is shown in Figure 6 for the first year and Figure 8 for year two. In this set of questions theagreement of the students was higher than 60% and lower than 70% for year one and between 80%and 82.6% for year two. Here we can see that the 3D technology project had a high impact in theareas of time management, engineering career awareness and planning, research methods andtechniques, critical thinking concepts, and unit systems and conversions. From previous research wehave confirmed
recommended, forexample, just to clarify the problem, prior to trying for a solution. Or, to derive a plan for action,once a strong solution has been found. And at four other times. For a given engineeringproblem, the use of brainstorming at each stage, or not, would depend on how difficult theproblem was and how creative the solution was expected to be. Or, more specifically, how do those questions apply to this aspect of the problem solving process? In engineering, the generalidentification of the problem-solving phases could be mapped onto particular engineeringactivities, like customer requirements gathering, high-level design, and acceptance testing.Note the diamonds shown in this process depiction. These imply that each problem solving
future course offerings.As in fall 2014, the web-based machine animations, originally developed by Riaz in MATLAB25,proved very useful and popular for in-class demonstrations. The instructor developed newMATLAB and MATHCAD demonstrations to supplement them, and plans to continue with it.Classroom Evaluation MethodsBehavioral observation of the non-lab portion of the course was conducted as a course evaluationmeasure in 2014 and 2015 using the TDOP – or Teaching Dimensions Observation Protocol26.Using the TDOP, the total class period was divided into a series of five-minute segments. Forexample, if a certain class period was 75 minutes in length, it had 15 observation segments, ortime windows. During each segment or window, the various activities
backgrounds.This increased demand is reflected in the proposed revision to the ABET teamwork guideline inCriterion 3, now labeled number 7: one outcome of an engineering education should be thatstudents have gained the ability to function on teams, but also that these teams should “establishgoals, plan tasks, meet deadlines, and analyze risk and uncertainty.” In previous work at theNYU Tandon School of Engineering (previously known as Polytechnic University) in Brooklyn,New York, it was found that many students thought that they had experience working on teams,but it was suspected that many of those team experiences were working on a projectsimultaneously. Engineering programs will have to do more to demonstrate their effort forgenuine teamwork outcomes
to identify the effectiveness of the TIED UPframework. If found effective, the script will be shared with the instructors of the same course inother universities. The instructors from other schools can enrich this script with their expertise.We plan the implementation of the framework in multiple universities as well.Acknowledgements:Support for this work is provided by the National Science Foundation Award No. DUE 1504692.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Theauthors would also like to acknowledge the support from Dr. Vinu Unnikrishnan from Universityof Alabama and Dr. Eric Hamilton from