and international students. Thus,the internship coordinator and faculty members have modified the format of the experience,adding in-house research projects sponsored by the faculty members along with external researchexperiences including National Science Foundation (NSF) Research Experiences forUndergraduates (REU) or similar programs. In addition to REUs, some students are also findingemployment directly at the partnering colleges.For the assessment process, the program has utilized student and employer surveys in gainingfeedback for continuous improvement. Student surveys are based on the perception of studentson attaining the ABET student outcomes (a-k) while supervisor surveys are performance metricsand competency based. This paper will
Paper ID #15002Using and Evaluating Remote Labs in Transnational Online Courses for Me-chanical Engineering StudentsMr. Dominik May, TU Dortmund University Dominik May holds a degree in Industrial Engineering from TU Dortmund University (Germany). Cur- rently he is a research associate and doctoral candidate at the Center for Higher Education at TU Dort- mund University in the area of engineering education research. In his position he is managing several research and development projects on engineering education and technical training. Furthermore he of- fers workshops on professional teaching and learning for engineering
Education (HE) Project was undertaken, involving 14 universities in the UnitedKingdom, in which the learning dimensions were shown to be valid for these HE populations23.These seven dimensions of learning were adapted as a theoretical framework for this pilot study.Qualitative codebooks24 for use with hypothesis coding of the data, a method most often usedwith content analysis25, were subsequently developed. Two qualitative codebooks were generated: the first an aggregated version with one tothree key phrases to describe each learning power as defined by Deakin Crick et al. (2004)6. Asecond, more comprehensive codebook was developed using the same seven categories butextensively defining each, as well as including a list of 3 – 12 behaviours
mentoring.Dr. Melissa Danforth, California State University, Bakersfield Dr. Melissa Danforth is an Associate Professor and the Chair of the Department of Computer and Electri- cal Engineering and Computer Science at California State University, Bakersfield (CSUB). Dr. Danforth is the PI for a NSF Federal Cyber Service grant (NSF-DUE1241636) to create models for information assurance education and outreach. Dr. Danforth is the Project Director for a U.S. Department of Educa- tion grant (P031S100081) to create engineering pathways for students in the CSUB service area. She is also the co-PI for an NSF IUSE grant (NSF-DUE1430398) to improve STEM retention and graduation, the Activities Director for a U.S. Department of
Paper ID #17035Identifying Features of Engineering Academic Units that Influence Teachingand Learning ImprovementDr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Oregon State University Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She is currently participating in a project that supports the use of evidence-based instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses through developing communities of practice. Her research interests focus on understanding how organizational change occurs in higher education with respect to teaching and learning in STEM courses.Christina Smith, Oregon State University
scaling to launch. There is plenty of support in place to nurture thestudents and projects as they move from one stage to another – mentors, community knowledge,resources/deals, and online tools. Our entrepreneurship program seems to fall in between theapproaches of Rice and Cornell. Perhaps more importantly, our situation allows us to viewentrepreneurship and engineering business from a distinctive perspective and to recognizepotential problems that are emerging (and from which we are certainly not immune).Good Intentions Gone Astray? How Entrepreneurship Gets Reduced to Composite SkillsAn article published in The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship in 2015 by Duval-Couetil,Kisenwether, Tranquillo, and Wheadon illustrates one path by which
has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene
leisure, andmore than 150 million Americans play video games.5 By creating a game similar to gamesfamiliar to students, there is a low barrier to entry. The long-term goal of this project is to awardgame progress based on class assessments such as quizzes, homework, and exams. By tyingprogression in the game to a student’s progress in class, the student may find the class morerelatable, as their actions in class influence a game with familiar mechanics. The gamified classmay also motivate students to complete more difficult homework and exams. Students havingpositive experiences with giving increased effort on tasks and overcoming challenges can lead toimproved persistence and increase the likelihood of engagement in the class. This paper
mechatronics, anassociate’s degree in mechatronics and robotic systems, and a bachelor’s degree in electricalengineering technology.This pathway could not come at a better time, as the International Federation of Robotics (IFR)projects 1.9 to 3.5 million jobs related to robotics will be created in the next eight years. In orderto help meet this employer demand, Bay College and Michigan Tech have developed state-of-the-art training labs featuring FANUC robots and articulation agreements between theinstitutions that will allow students to begin pursuing a high-tech education and career as early ashigh school. Furthermore, stand-alone programs are being developed to train and certify studentsfrom other institutions, industry representatives, and other
Heads(CIEADH).6Comparison of Two CoursesThe broad comparison of ergonomics classes at the authors’ universities is shown in Table 2.There are many similarities and a few differences. Most of the differences are programmatic,rather than classroom specific.Similarities: University A and University B are similar in that they both require a prerequisitecourse in basic Methods and Standards as well as a basic course in probability and statistics priorto taking Ergonomics. They both have an extensive lab component with written reports used forlearning assessment and incorporate a student project. They both include physical and cognitiveergonomic concepts with a foundation in the PE Exam topics, and they both require studentprojects.Differences: Term
for an NSF grant which provides schol- arships and career counseling to engineering students at Suffolk University. Her role in the project is to assess career development trajectories for the scholarship students, create program evaluations, collect assessment data and disseminate information to the STEM community.Emily Shamieh, Latino-STEM Alliance Emily Shamieh, Latino-STEM Alliance Emily Shamieh is a leader of the Latino-STEM Alliance. She has spent over 30 years as a bilingual educator, including 19 years as an Elementary School principal, plus another 7 years as a Budget Director & Assistant Commissioner for the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. During her career, Ms. Shamieh has been active
NationalCenter for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter). Epicenter is funded by the NationalScience Foundation and directed by Stanford University and VentureWell (formerly NCIIA). Oneof the elements of participation involves redesigning the capstone senior design curriculum tomake it more innovation and entrepreneurship oriented and as such have a positive impact onstudent satisfaction. This paper details the expectations of students beginning a two-coursesequence in the capstone curriculum. The student survey data led to a rebalancing of the curriculumto one that was solely based on “how-to-do” senior design projects to one that still includes “how-to-do" lecture themes but now includes lecture themes in innovation and entrepreneurship
-Centric Capstone Design Teams: A comparison of military and civilian engineering programs.IntroductionThere is a continuing call for the development of engineers who can become leaders in helpingsolve the world’s grand challenges.1-3 Although many programs look toward the capstone designexperience to help build students’ professional skills,4-6 which includes leadership,7 studentpreparation for the leadership challenges associated with the capstone design team experience maywidely vary. Leadership scholars suggest that “shared leadership” may be a more effectiveleadership model than the hierarchical, individual leadership model that is typically used in team-based capstone design projects.8 The
byNewstetter and Svinicki [4]. 1. Students should have opportunities to participate in the social and material practice of the targeted community. Since learning occurs as students progressively participate in the community, instructional activities should reflect the real world problems. In this way, learning occurs when students “interact with the tools, people, and physical world” to better understand the impact (pros and cons) and culture considerations of tools around them. 2. Students are encouraged to try on the identity of the community members. 3. Students should have the ability to create their own learning path. Projects and problems should be designed to
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), serving as the past Program Chair for the Minorities in En- gineering Division. He has served as a chair, vice-chair, program chair, and program committee member for numerous conferences of ASEE.Dr. Mohd Abdelgadir Khairi, Najran University I, Mohamed Khairi, my bachelor degree in computer science. I did my Masters in system science from University of Ottawa, Canada. My PH.D was in ”Master Data Management” from University of Phoenix. I have over 20 years of experience in IT industry - ten of them with Microsoft in Redmond, WA. Currently I’m assistant professor at University of Najran. In addition of teaching and Research I’m coordinator of graduation projects and
Education, 2016 Improving the Writing Skills of Engineering Students: Assessment of a Writing Workshop ModelAbstractThis Evidence Based Practice paper will report on a multi-year project to improve the writingskills of engineering freshmen at San José State University (SJSU). For the last ten years, thecollege has offered an optional class to students who are not proficient in writing. Students canenroll in a one-unit lab class as many semesters as they wish to get practice in writing. The goal isto provide students with weekly writing activities that include: instruction in basic grammar,proofreading, and editing. In addition to study and practice exercises, students in this writingworkshop have writing assignments, which provide
andtraining of military members and veterans who have served on or after September 11, 2001.From its implementation through the end of 2013, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hasrecorded an increase of greater than 200 percent in Post 9/11 GI Bill awardees. Projections arefor this number to continue to grow, reaching two million total beneficiaries by 2020.1 In manycases, engineering and engineering technology programs have not adjusted their student supportservices to serve the rapid increase in these non-traditional students. Failure to understand andmake the most of this non-traditional student population diminishes an outstanding opportunityfor schools to utilize a unique set of knowledge, skills and life experiences that can enhance
project is acritical part of the Ideation Flexibility Project, which is a collaboration with researchers at thePennsylvania State University, Rutgers University, and the University of Michigan, which aimsto help engineers become more flexible in their ideation by investigating interventions thatsupport the production of ideas that range from incremental (more adaptive) to radical (moreinnovative), and all points in between.In the Ideation Flexibility Project, the ideation results of engineering students using threeinterventions are being compared to their ideation results using a neutral problem statement.Neutral problem statements encourage students to generate ideas in their naturally preferredmethod as indicated by their individual cognitive
afinancial need. The average financial package was $7,659 for full-time students and $5,144 forpart-time students, which, when compared to Table 1, fell significantly short of the overall costsof attendance. Furthermore, in April 2011, the S-STEM project team surveyed all science,engineering, and mathematics majors at SUU. Of the 299 students that responded to the survey,58% were receiving no financial assistance from their families, 50% were accumulating debteach year they attended college and 35% of students had at least one other person who dependedon them financially. In addition, 59% of respondents claimed that the number of hours employedin a job unrelated to their field of study had a negative impact on their academic performance,and 50
deafblind people and communities. While there are time telling devicesavailable in the market, those designs and implementations are inaccurate and exclusive. Tactilewatches allow the user to open the cover of the watch and feel the hour and minutes hand withthe corresponding dots raised to indicate the number. This gives the user a general idea of thetime. Speaking time telling devices operate by announcing the time when the user presses abutton to indicate their need to tell the time. Such devices can go unheard in loud areas and canbe problematic and noisy in a quiet classroom/work environment. Additionally, such devicesserve no purpose for the deafblind people as they cannot hear. This objective of this project is todevelop an inexpensive, user
in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. James M Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor of mechanical engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford University and has served as a Fulbright Scholar at Kathmandu
also enjoys a cappella performance and writing music arrangements outside of academics.Mr. Chris Lorch, Center for Instructional Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #16745 Chris works as a Learning Technologies Specialist along with faculty and department staff at Duke Uni- versity to create engaged learning experiences using learning technologies. He provides technical sup- port and leadership for projects and experiments which extend and enhance Duke’s learning technology ecosystem.Dr. Genevieve M Lipp, Duke University Genevieve Lipp received a B.S.E. in
traditional in-class lectures are provided to thestudents in some form outside of the classroom setting 20-22. The classroom time is used toanswer in depth questions related to the theory, work on projects associated with the theory, orwork on practice problems and apply the theory 20, 23. Most survey data from the students’perspective related to the use of flipped courses to provide instruction is positive 21, 24, but theincrease in learning from this delivery method is inconclusive. Some research reports anincrease in learning 23 and other reports no significant difference in relation to traditionalinstruction 25. One of the relevant questions for this research is how do students use theresources provided in a course of this structure? Answering
pulmonary vaso-occlusion in sickle cell disease mice. She is engaged in the teaching community at the university through being a member of Pitt-CIRTL. Her teaching as research project was implemented at the university’s Camp BioE for high school and middle school students last year. She received her BS degree in Bioengineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2007 and her PhD from Yale University in Biomedical Engineering in 2012.Mr. Ruben Hartogs, University of Pittsburgh Ruben Hartogs is a junior undergraduate student at the University of Pittsburgh pursuing a degree in bioengineering with a concentration in medical devices and a minor in mechanical engineering. He is cur- rently on co-op at Zimmer Biomet, an
mathematical modeling course and suggesting standards for secondary modeling education.3. Infusion Working Group: We propose a working group of active participants be charged with formalizing strategic approaches to address challenges teachers face in infusing modeling in their daily practice.4. Repository: We recommend a small group develop a proposal for a curated repository of modeling resources, preferably peer-reviewed. (This is likely a huge, ongoing project, needing foundation support for any chance of being successfully and popularly used by teachers and the public.)The first of these is nearing completion, while the other three are all supported by a new NCTM-SIAMJoint Committee on Modeling across the Curriculum, which will likely
formally introduced until junior year.For example, North Carolina State University’s multidisciplinary minor in nanotechnology offersthe first course, Introduction to Nanoscience and Technology,” in the junior year.3 The relativelyfew published examples of nanotechnology being introduced at the freshman level include, butare not limited to, Indiana University-Purdue University’s nanotechnology themed learningcommunity3 and project to effectively communicate nano- size and scale,4 Ohio StateUniversity’s freshmen lab on a chip design project5 and a Computer Numerical Control (CNC)milling course6. However, these specialized programs do not result in all students being exposedto nanotechnology as a pervasive part of science and engineering. The NNI
worked for over 27 years. She worked as project manager, engineering manager, utility manager, maintenance manager, and finally as the Resident Engineer managing all technical areas of the facility. During her tenure, the brewery saw dramatic increases in productivity improvement, increased use of automation systems, and significant cost reductions in all areas including utilities where they received the internal award for having the best utility usage reduction for 2014. Since joining Ohio State, Aimee has joined the American Society of Engineering Educators and serves as the treasurer of the Engineering Economics division.Ms. Yeonsu Ryu Yeonsu Ryu is a master’s student in Biomedical Engineering at The Ohio State
Paper ID #14773Using the Flipped Classroom Model to Improve Construction Engineeringand Management EducationDr. Namhun Lee, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Namhun Lee is an associate professor in the department of Manufacturing and Construction Manage- ment at Central Connecticut State University, where he has been teaching Construction Graphics/Quantity Take-Off, CAD & BIM Tools for Construction, Building Construction Systems, Building Construction Estimating, Heavy/Highway Construction Estimating, Construction Planning, and Construction Project Management. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include Construction
Paper ID #16509Balancing the Influence of Driving and Restricting Factors to Use ActiveLearningDr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach James J. Pembridge is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He earned a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, M.A. Education in Curriculum and Instruction, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. His research has focused on mentoring as pedagogy for project-based courses and understanding the adult learning characteristics of undergraduate students.Dr. Kari L. Jordan, Embry-Riddle
. - Communicate geotechnical engineering recommendations by composing professional written and graphical documents.The PBL began with students being introduced to the arena construction project with pictures ofthe site prior to construction, pictures of the current state of the excavation (at the time of thePBL), and renderings of the complete facility. The primary purpose of the introductorypresentation was to provide students with an understanding of the magnitude of the excavation.The students were then shown a demonstration where moist sand was transferred from one cupto another of identical size. Despite fitting perfectly into the first cup, the soil overflows from thesecond cup, due to particle rearrangement and a change in void space