need, meanwhile drawing upon the insights of non-engineeringclassmates to weigh technology against culture, cost, educational capabilities and operationalrequirements.Throughout the process, students are required to reflect on the process as well as on theirsuccesses and struggles. Comments from students over the three years of the course are used tohighlight specific learning outcomes. ● “Perhaps my view was too idealistic at the start of the course, but I am now at least aware that despite the best of intentions, many factors have to be well thought out before a large-scale project can help those in need sustainably. Furthermore, I am now aware of practical ways to account for the needs of project beneficiaries and ensure these
learning for a large introductory mechanics course using mobile phone data capture and peer feedbackAbstractProject-based learning (PBL) has been shown to result in many benefits, including improvedconceptual understanding and enhanced skills in communication, teamwork, and creativity, allwidely acknowledged to be core capabilities for engineers. However, implementations of PBLfrequently rely on large course staffs or small class sizes to be effective. In this paper we present aPBL implementation strategy used in an introductory dynamics course at the University of Illinoisat Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), which scales up to 500 students per term. This large-scale usageof PBL relies on two key implementation
previousNational Science Education Standards (NRC, 1990), The Framework and the NGSSoutline a learning progression of science and engineering practices for which studentsshould develop increasingly complex skills as they progress from early elementarythrough high school. Moreover, The Framework and the NGSS outline grade level andgrade band performance expectations related to engineering design. As a result,students are expected to engage in engineering design projects and engineering-relatedproblems in their science coursework. In an effort to address the need for high quality K12 engineering curricula, wedeveloped, implemented, and piloted the Biomedical Engineering Curriculum (BMEC, apseudonym for our program). BMEC curricula apply mathematics
publications in leading journals including Science Magazine, The Journal of Engineering Education and INCOSE addressing topics in large scale system integration, learning sciences and systems engineering. Michael often represents Boeing internationally and domestically as a speaker - presenter and has authored multiple patents on Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufac- turing, with multiple disclosures focused on system engineering and elegant design.Michael holds a B.A and M.Sc. from ESC Lille in Program Project Management and Ph.D. from SKEMA Business School with a focus on Engineering Education Research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Tale of Three UAVs – or
delivered by their strategic partners as a measure of theircontribution to education reform in Louisiana. 30 Grants awarded to primary and secondarycharter programs like TFA, KIPP Charter Schools, Firstline Schools, New Schools for NewOrleans, are used to create more seats for students to attend charter schools as well as developprograms like the First Line Blended Learning program which is aimed at closing achievementgaps among students.31 Entergy also partners with programs like New Orleans POSSE to providefunding for post-secondary education for high achieving but financially disadvantaged studentsmaking college access and youth leadership development hallmarks of their charitable efforts,they have also sponsored and supported the United Negro
answer issues addressed in the fall that is not repeated. procedural questions. directed towards new instructors. By implementing a presemester training program and preparing all instructors with knowledge on general university, departmental and course procedures prior to the start of the semester, many issues are resolved and instructors can focus on students and student learning. In addition, we try to cover the first two weeks of course material as well as an overview so that instructors are prepared for classes and to answer student questions. Table 2. During Semester Solutions to Training and Mentorship Challenges and Lessons Learned Challenges faced Our solution Lessons
those involved with the educational problem at issue. In this paper, we take up the long-discussed problem of struggling students inundergraduate engineering programs. Responses to the problem of struggling students have beenvaried; the following is a coarse literature review of some responses in order to position ourwork. Traditional quantitative retention research has documented the magnitude of the problemand clarified large-scale inequities in access to higher education in STEM based on gender, race,socioeconomic status (for example, Ong et al. and Seymour and Hewitt)2,3. This research oftendraws on a metaphor of the “leaky pipeline” to justify institutional remediation, includingsupport programs for racial, gender, and
Paper ID #16880Baton Rouge Community College/Louisiana State University: A Partnershipfor STEM Student SuccessMs. Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University Adrienne Steele has over 15 years experience in STEM education. Currently, Adrienne works at Louisiana State University in the College of Engineering, managing all aspects of the STEP project that consists of a large-scale peer mentoring program. Previously, she coordinated the Scope-On-A-Rope Outreach Program (SOAR) in the Department of Biological Sciences for 10 years with funding from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. In this position, she led over 175
have pledged to graduate at least 20 students specificallytrained in solving large-scale problems like the Grand Challenges.14The GCS program was developed such that each school could develop its own methods forstudent fulfillment of five program competencies. These five GCS program competencies areshown in Figure 1. The program competencies within the GCS program are intended to providethe foundation for graduates to tackle large-scale challenges, such as the 14 outlined in the NAEGrand Challenges for Engineering.14 Hands-on Project or Research Experience • Related to a Grand Challenge Interdisciplinary Curriculum • A curriculum that complements engineering fundamentals with courses in other fields, preparing
Waste Technologies, and Environmental Engineering Seminar. LTC Starke has published over 10 peer reviewed research arti- cles and has presented his research at national and international meetings (most recently Portugal). Most recently, he led a service learning project with 5 students to build a latrine-based biogas system in west- ern Uganda for an elementary school of 1400 students. LTC Starke is a registered Professional Engineer (Delaware), member of several professional associations, and is a member of the National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (NCEES).Lt. Col. Phil Dacunto P.E., U.S. Military Academy LTC Phil Dacunto is an Assistant Professor of Environmental Engineering at the United States
historically underrepresented within higher education and engineering. Cathryne earned a BA in Speech Communication, Masters in Public Affairs (MPA), and is currently pursuing an Ed.D. in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies.Dr. Matthew Dunbabin, Queensland University of Technology Dr Matthew Dunbabin joined QUT as a Principal Research Fellow (Autonomous Systems) in 2013. He is known internationally for his research into field robotics, particularly environmental robots, and their ap- plication to large-scale monitoring. He has wide research interests including adaptive sampling and path planning, vision-based navigation, cooperative robotics, as well as robot and sensor network interactions. Dr Dunbabin received his
sameproject over multiple years and with a familiar group of students. One of the challenges inrunning a VIP team is the multidisciplinary aspect. This paper discusses the challenges associatedwith transitioning traditionally discipline-siloed projects to multidisciplinary projects using VIPas the catalyst. Said another way, we describe the ongoing lessons learned of changing themindset of students (and faculty) from “you’re electrical engineering, I’m mechanicalengineering” to “we’re engineering”.In Fall 2015, the VIP Program at the University of Hawai‘i consisted of six VIP teams: threecomposed primarily of EE students, one composed of ME students, and two with a mix ofengineering students. The latter two teams are used as case studies to test our
, and computer science. The long term goals of this project are to increaseparticipant interest in STEM careers and college attendance. In the short term, we anticipateincreased technology proficiency, STEM engagement and academic achievement. Additionaloutcomes include increased teacher and mentor understanding of STEM instruction delivery andmentorship. This presentation will provide evaluation results and lessons learned during the firstyear of this project, including the effects of strategies, such as mentorship and early exposure touniversity-based STEM resources. Recommendations for developing a prototypical process fordeveloping programs that broaden participation of underrepresented students will also bediscussed.IntroductionIn many