and as an entry route to the engineering profession.It is crucial to develop system of continuous programmes improvement at universities through anindependent external accreditation of educational programmes by the agencies representing nationaland international professional community.External evaluation process leads to several positive impacts. It helps to increase credibility to theprogramme from different stakeholders. International recognition gained upon successful accreditationof the educational programme facilitates its competitiveness and accountability and leads to realquality improvement of the whole educational programme[1].The first steps in setting up and implementing a system of Quality Assurance of engineering educationin
apply are summarized in table 1.Table 1: Summary of relevance of faculty-led study abroad courses to the different engineeringcurricula. Engineering Mechanics I Engineering Technical (Statics) Economy WritingAerospace Engineering R E RBiological Engineering R E R Chemical Engineering R E R Civil Engineering R E
project results in learning analytics tools for practice-basedSTEM learning that are appropriate for real-world learning environments.IntroductionThe PELARS1 project is intended as a testing ground and generator of 21st-Century STEMknowledge and skills. The project generates, analyses, uses and provides feedback for analyticsderived from hands-on, project-based and experiential learning scenarios. These scenarios are: 1. European High School level STEM classrooms. 2. Postsecondary Science and Engineering practical environments. 3. The more open-form studio environments of the Interaction Design Schools (which form the basis and inspiration for many of the project’s orientations).The project serves to help better understand learners' knowledge
through the course, and a final one at the end of the course. The Product Owners,with help by team members, present the system to the entire course as well as the teachingteam and other stakeholders, i.e. the future users of the system, and receive feedback.Within the project, a custom-tailored version of the Scrum process is used as a frameworkfor development efforts (see Figure 1). The teams follow the Scrum process as closely aspossible, with necessary adaptations being made to account for the fact that students arenot full-time developers. XP (eXtreme Programming) practices are also taught, as their1 https://www.codeschool.com/courses/rails-for-zombies-reduxfocus on engineering complements the management practices of Scrum and we agree
fororal communication acts (Item 8; mean= 75; S.D. =18).At the other end of the spectrum, students reported the least increase in their confidence onItem 1, their ability to identify objectives in speaking about their work, (mean = 76;S.D.= 18).As Table 4 shows, there still was a statistically significant increase in this measure, but notthe strong increases shown in Items 3, 5, 6, and 8. Part of this lower measure of self-efficacymay have come from the highly directive approach of the design team in which studentswere not invited to think about their objectives but instead had a specific activity prescribed.Students then were instructed to complete that activity. A slower pace and more autonomymight have given students time to think critically
; 2005; Jamieson et al., 2009; Mena et al., 2012; Hundley et al., 2012;Knight, 2012; Spinks et al., 2006; Bourn and Neal, 2008). In the Middle East, the GCC, andQatar an investigation similarly has not been conducted, hence this study sheds an importantperspectives bridging an empirical gap in the literature and contributing to better design offuture engineering education in Qatar.There are four main dimensions that are driving Qatar’s economy into a KBE: 1- QatarNational Vision 2030, 2- World Cup 2022 and the associated mega projects, 3- Instability ofOil and Gas prices, and 4- Regional growth and competition for skills, products, andinvestments in the GCC region mainly led by UAE and Saudi Arabia.Qatar is increasingly investing in knowledge
modules in collaboration, a successful launching of a travel course comesfrom not just a single module, but an integrated efforts of them all. All the modules incollaboration are intertwined, and they are fostered throughout the entire duration of thetravel course’s development and implementation.To foster an effective collaboration, the key is to find out the trustworthycollaborators, trust them, learn from them, and appreciate them.Through the collaborations with a wide-range of colleagues and friends, we discovered acolleague had previously drafted a travel course proposal, but the proposal was declinedby the administration. That is why there had never been a travel course offered in ourdepartment before. The common concerns include:1. Why is
suggestions for designing similar engineering leadership programs in the future.IntroductionFast-paced technological transformation and innovation demands not only technical expertisefrom future engineers, but also multiple soft skills, in particular leadership [1]. Crumpton-Young indicated that engineering leadership is the influence and ability to lead otherengineers and technical staff to design, create, innovate, implement and evaluate and assessservices and products [2]. MIT-Gordon engineering leadership program describes engineeringleadership as a set of capabilities and values that enable a person to accomplish a multi-disciplinary complex project by leading teams instead of functioning as an individualtechnical contributor. Engineering
and Remote Laboratories as one of the most importantfuture technologies in learning.1 With this in mind researchers and academics have madeconsiderable advances in the design and development of online laboratories. These laboratoriesare accessible via the Internet 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. These advancements havebeen possible because of the growing advancement of Internet and networking technologies aswell as new developments in e-learning and e-work tools. The forerunners in this area areengineering disciplines and the natural sciences.Active learning by means of online laboratories is especially valuable for blended learningapproaches. Students can access online laboratories from almost any location and the onlyneed is web access
Education Development Graduate Research Assistant at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University and Global Stu- dent Forum Chair for 12th GSF’2016, Seoul. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Global Student Forum: A model for developing student leaders in engineering educationIntroductionThe Global Student Forum (GSF) is a three-day event organized by the Student Platform forEngineering Education Development (SPEED).1 Students come to GSF from all over the worldto participate in a series of workshops, discussions, and presentations, culminating in the creationof action plans. The chief aim of these projects is to enable students to become a factor
disciplinary success (4 attributes) • Professional Attributes: Workplace-related competencies needed for effective global performance (5 attributes) • Personal Attributes: Individual characteristics needed for global flexibility (4 attributes) • Interpersonal Attributes: Skills and perspectives needed to work on interdependent global teams (2 attributes) • Cross-cultural Attributes: Societal and cultural understanding needed to embrace diverse viewpoints (5 attributes)Of these, the top eight attributes (assumed order of perceived importance) reported by Hundley2are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Top Eight Attributes of the Global Engineer (adapted2) Category
; help them prepare for academic success and future careers. References[1] Hutorskoy, А.V. (2003) Didakticheskaya evristika. Teoriya i tehnologiya kreativnogo obucheniya [Didactic heuristics. Theory and Creative Learning Technology] Moscow: Publishing House in Moscow State University, 416 p.[2] Karimov, A., & Kazakova, V. (2015) Intellectual Virtues and Education Practice. The Social Sciences, 10 (6): 1317-1323.[3] Khalid, A., Chin, C.A., Atiqullah, M.M., Sweigart, J.F., Stutzmann, B., Zhou, W. (2013) Building a Better Engineer: The Importance of Humanities in Engineering Curriculum Paper presented at ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/19270
english professor. Students gained valuable transferable skills while workingon this project including creative thinking, audience awareness, teamwork, technical writing,visual design, and communication. The authors of this paper, who include the students thatworked on the project, aim to promote and encourage the idea of undergraduate students activelyengaging and creating STEM programs and initiatives for K-12.IntroductionThe idea of STEM education has been around since the early 1900’s. Originally called, SMET(science, mathematics, engineering, and technology), educators focused on instructing studentsin skills that would benefit their future societies[1]. The idea of enriching these fields by creatingstudents well versed in them quickly
complete all four years at WUST or transfer to UB after two years, will be granted aCertificate of Graduation and a Bachelor’s degree from WUST after satisfactorilycompleting of the program requirements. There are several important characteristics of theprogram between UB and WUST: (1) the program focuses on a specific academic program,so both universities design the program that fits students at WUST: (2) a collaborativeprogram by transferring the credits earned at the other institution: and (3) UB professors visitWUST to teach courses, while WUST faculty members from China visit UB for professionaldevelopments as visiting scholars. As a result of the program, eight WUST students havetransferred to UB at the junior level in Fall 2015, and about
students and morethan 1.800 faculty. The educational project1 of the University of Valparaiso, reformulated in2012, has been defined as “learning outcomes oriented”, which is a nuanced interpretation ofthe learning outcomes educational model. This approach was undertaken to allow the initialintroduction of the learning outcomes model in a public and traditional university, whereresistance to change and administration formalism are serious threats to a massive curriculartransformation. Hence this definition does not necessarily force to completely change allcurricula, but rather a conceptual change that involves four key elements2: 1. Graduate profiles are formulated in terms of learning outcomes 2. Curricular design must be driven by the
Perspectives in Science and Engineering Ethics Abstract In 2014 an interdisciplinary team of researchers from the University of Delaware began a 5-‐year project with the Online Ethics Center (OEC) to gather international perspectives on science and engineering ethics, broadly construed.1 We seek instructional and scholarly materials from international institutions and individual foreign scholars and teachers. This paper describes the rationale and outlines the theoretical foundation of this project. The central issue to be addressed here is: if there is indeed a benefit to the “internationalization” of science and
laboratories based onsimulations are called Virtual Laboratories [1-5]. On the other hand, hands-on/physicalexperiments require equipment. With the traditional approach of performing experimentdirectly with equipment, the need for equipment grows proportionally to the increase ofthe number of students, often resulting in considerable expenses. Following hands-onapproach, the only way for universities to share the same equipment is if the students of aother universities are moving physically to a given university to perform their laboratorysessions. We all now know that one way to overcome this drawback is the use of remotelaboratories [6-14]. Remote laboratories allow students to access and manipulate realequipment located anywhere in the world
produces significantlearning gains for students, although research is sparse on learning thataccrues from internships and co-ops in engineering (Linn, Howard, & Miller,2004). Still, it is estimated that thousands of students participate in either co-op or internships annually, 67% of recent college graduates completed atleast one internship while in school, and 56% of employers expect to hiremore interns in the future. Despite their widespread use and popularity, weknow relatively little about the influence of co-ops and internships on URMstudents' learning in engineering. This is the gap addressed by this study. 1 There is