Engineering Education. 2015;49: 19-26.2. Coronella, C. Project-based learning in a first-year chemical engineering course: evaporativecooling. ASEE Annual Conference. Chicago, 2006.3. Barritt, A., Drwiega, J., Carter, R., Mazyck, D., Chauhan, A. A freshman design experience:multidisciplinary design of a potable water treatment plant. Chemical Engineering Education.2005;39: 296-300.4. Duke, S. R., Davis, V. A. Fuel cell car design project for freshman engineering courses.Chemical Engineering Education. 2014;48: 157-164.5. Hollar, K. A., Savelski, M. J., Farrell, S. Guilt-free chocolate: introducing freshmen tochemical engineering. ASEE Annual Conference. Montreal, 2002.6. Farrell, S., Hesketh, R. P., Slater, C. S. A laboratory project to design and
Collaboration ReflectionSelf-Reflection AssignmentsThe self-evaluation rubric has been incorporated into a junior-level chemical engineeringundergraduate course through self-reflection assignments. Five times during the semester,students were given an essay prompt to identify one or more skills to work on in the followingtwo-week period (first essay) or one-month period (subsequent essays except the last). Studentswere asked to assess their current proficiency level in that skill according to the self-evaluationrubric, describe their goals related to the skill and their plan for improvement, and share progressin the skill(s) if any had been made since the previous essay. This process required the
, skills, and ability to solve complexproblems and to produce excellent solution(s) within the structure of the team. This concept wasfurther developed to include defining team and task, team climate, communication, and reflection(for a detailed description, please see Table 1)23-26.Design competence focused on finding and evaluating variants and recognizing and solvingcomplex design problems. These were further defined as having the ability to discover and designmultiple solutions to a given problem and to effectively evaluate those solutions to determine thebest solution, and having the ability to see the overall picture of a complex design problem, thenbreaking it into smaller, more manageable parts to solve while keeping the overall problem
Anthony Butterfield is an Assistant Professor (Lecturing) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Development and Usage of an Online Homework System in a Chemical Engineering CurriculumWe have developed an online, open-source system to administer
market for the product(s) and other revenue generating streams was discussed (Outcomes 2 and 6). e) A clear recommendation as to whether the project should be considered in more detail was made. This recommendation was based on the I/O economic assessment, as well as on environmental and social measures. It was also made clear which process alternative(s) were viable, if any (Outcomes 1 and 4). f) The proposal was written in a logical format. There were minimal typos and formatting errors, the figures were clear and readable, and the references were cited correctly (Outcome 1).Students were assigned the prompt on the first day of class and were allowed eight weeks tocomplete the
comic must convey technical information) (3) printing of final comicsASAP, before the end of the semester and (4) rigorously assess student learning outcomes inrelation to student developed comics. Due to the positive feedback from students in this initialpilot, the instructor is encouraged to continue this effort in other courses and to perform morerigorous studies on various aspects of student learning in the future.References[1] H. J. Graff, Literacy and social development in the West: A reader. CUP Archive, 1981.[2] C. Gillenwater, “Lost literacy: How graphic novels can recover visual literacy in the literacy classroom,” Afterimage, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 33, 2009.[3] S. P. Connors, “Toward a shared vocabulary for visual analysis: An
. Inaddition, this experiment can be used to obtain thermodynamics data, specifically the enthalpy ofvaporization as well as a portion of the phase diagram for the chosen liquid.In the future I plan to work to improve this experiment. The first problem to explore is that theflask needs to be jostled to maintain boiling, likely due to the surface tension of methanol. Thismight be overcome by either using a shaker table or using a different fluid. In addition, it willlikely be beneficial for students to use addiitonal liquids so that they can build a “consensus” andbe even more convincing that boiling cold is not only possible but quite normal with a widevariety of applications.References[1] T. S. Kuhn and D. Hawkins, "The Structure of Scientific
would like to acknowledge financial support from The Leona M. and Harry B.Helmsley Charitable Trust through funding of the Consortium to Promote Reflection inEngineering Education (CPREE), a collaboration of twelve educational institutions.Additionally, the author(s) express gratitude toward co-directors of the faculty learningcommunity (FLC) held at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology during the summer of 2015 fortheir leadership and guidance on the subject of reflection. Thanks is given to ChemicalEngineering faculty who reviewed reflections. Much appreciation is given to Janie Szabo and theOffice of Learning and Technology for creating the Moodle tool for ranking reflections and tothe Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and
template will beavailable in the summer of 2017. At that time, all existing problems will be updated to this templateversion.Example 1 – filling a weigh tankWe outline the variable parameter problem creation process with an example from an introductory coursein Chemical Engineering. The original example problem, with highlighted regions of the values that willbecome variable parameters, is shown in Figure 2. A mass of 1500 pounds of liquid having a specific gravity of 1.2 and molecular weight of 150 is pumped into an empty weigh tank over the course of 25 seconds. The tank is cylindrical with a diameter of 3 ft. Determine the: a) average mass flow rate (lb/s) b) average volumetric flow rate (gal/min) c) average molar flow rate (lbmole/s) d
student preparation, although it does not account forpreparation in math or specific pre-requisite courses.Every effort was made to make the online instruction mimic in-class delivery. The sameinstructor taught both cohorts from the same set of lecture notes, and students were required touse the same textbook [38]. Homework assignments were similar, simulation-based learningassignments were identical, and midterm exams were of approximately equivalent difficulty.The project assignment was intended to replace Cohort #1’s third midterm, and the content ofthese assessments is not expected to influence preparedness for the final exam. Importantly, bothcohorts completed identical final exams in equivalent testing conditions.Final Exam PerformanceThe
shaft work, the energy balance simplifies to the following: ∆𝐻𝐻̇ = 𝑄𝑄̇ If the device can be assumed to be adiabatic, then the heat added to the system by the heater element is equal to the change in enthalpy.i) Set up an enthalpy table for the system, clearly identifying the reference conditions. References: Glycerin and propylene glycol liquids at 25°C and 1.01325 bar Substance 𝑚𝑚̇𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 �𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 𝐻𝐻 𝑚𝑚̇𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 (g/s) �𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 (J/g) 𝐻𝐻 Glycerin (A) 0 - 0.001748 �1
studentmisconceptions associated with the TBL from the transport class will hopefully be repaired.However, where misconceptions persist or new ones are revealed through posttest assessmentswe will modify videos, simulations and in-class activities as necessary and re-test the approachin subsequent course offerings. AcknowledgementsThis project is funded by NSF IUSE 1432674. The authors would like to thank Nehal Abu-Lailfor allowing us to implement this demonstration in her class. References1. A. Jacobi, J. Martin, J. Mitchell, and T. Newell. A concept inventory for heat transfer. in Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003 33rd Annual. 2003, IEEE.2. S. Kolari and C. Savander-Ranne, Visualisation promotes apprehension and comprehension
/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2017-2018/ (accessed February 12, 2017,3. Voronov, R., S. Basuray, G. Obuskovic, L. Simon, R. B. Barat, and E. Bilgili. “Statistical Analysis of Undergraduate Che Curricula of U.s. Universities.” Paper presented at the American Institute of Chemical Engineers National Conference, San Francisco, 2016.4. Vigeant, Margot, and David Silverstein. “Results From the Aiche Education Annual Survey: Chemical Engineering Electives.” Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.5. Falconer, John, L., J. L. de Grazia, G. Nicodemus, K. McDanel, and M. Medlin. “Teaching/learning Resources for Chemical Engineering
papers from scholarly journals.Table 1. Assignments using Perusall during one semester. Assignment(s) Length Required (pages) comments Chapter from textbook (7) Varies 7 Active learning paper from Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 6 5 Non-Newtonian flow paper from Transactions of the Society of Rheology 16 3 Intermolecular potential paper from Journal of the American Chemical Society 9 3 Polymer drag reduction paper from Experiments in Fluids 15
communication piece, length of the piece and its impact on the ability to convey the correct information Presentation Clarity of the final piece of communication, level of professionalismFor example, the following homework responses were coded as such: Table 2: Example response from the ROYGBIV game-based activityGame-based Text Entry Theme(s)ActivityROYGBIV Oral communication skills are just as 1. {Difficulties – stepping difficult as written skills to work on. I think out of comfort zone} it was a lot harder than it originally seemed. I 2
students making up theaudience appreciate this change as well. However, regardless of any increase in personalenjoyment it is important that assigning the AE format in an effort to liven up presentationsessions does not negatively impact students’ improvement in their presentation skills; therealistic possibility of a failed teaching experiment is a concern held by the author anytime whenintroducing new pedagogical method(s) to a course.This work describes the incorporation of oral presentation assignments using the AE model intodifferent sections of a senior ChE Unit Operation laboratory course. The objectives of this workare to: 1) determine if student presentation skills development is altered by assigning the AEmodel – in particular, if
, 2016.[4] D. Doorn, S. Janssen and M. O'Brien, "Student Attitudes and Approaches to Online Homework," International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, 2010.[5] R. L. Bangert-Drowns, C.-L. C. Kulik, J. A. Kulik and M. Morgan, "The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-like Events," Review of Educational Research, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 213-238, 1991.[6] D. M. Nguyen, Y.-C. Hsieh and G. D. Allen, "The Impact of Web-based Assessment and Practice on Students' Mathematics Learning Attitudes," Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 251-279, 2006.[7] J. P. Carpenter and B. D. Camp, "Using a Web-based Homework System to Improve Accountability and Mastery in
ScienceFoundation.References1. Jonassen, D.H., Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2000. 48(4): p. 63-85.2. Perrenet, J., P. Bouhuijs, and J. Smits, The suitability of problem-based learning for engineering education: theory and practice. Teaching in higher education, 2000. 5(3): p. 345-358.3. Heitmann, G., Project-oriented study and project-organized curricula: A brief review of intentions and solutions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1996. 21(2): p. 121-131.4. Freeman, S., et al., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014: p. 201319030.5
questions in ’05 & ’06 were worded somewhat differently.References 1. Silverstein, D.1; M. Vigeant2; D. Visco3; and, D. Woods4, How We Teach: Freshman Introduction to Chemical Engineering; Proceedings for 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; June 20-23, 2010, Louisville, KY, pp. 15.658.1-15.658.36; permanent URL https://peer.asee.org/15949 1 U. Kentucky, 2Bucknell U., 3Tennessee Technological U., 4McMaster U. 2. Chickerur, S.1 and O. Shabalina2, Integrating Problem-Based and Project- Based Learning for Effective Teaching learning in Engineering Education—a Case Study of Advanced Database Management Course; Advanced Science & Technology Letters, Vol 36 (Education 2013
Structure: Lessons for Engineering Instructors from a Capstone DesignCourse Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington.10.18260/p.2434810. Anderson, C. R. (2014, June), Development of a Drug Delivery Elective for ChemicalEngineers Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis,Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/2030511. Savelski, M., & Farrell, S., & Hesketh, R., & Slater, C. S. (2003, June), Fundamentals,Design, And Applications Of Drug Delivery Systems Paper presented at 2003 AnnualConference, Nashville, Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/1182712. Mansilla, V. B., Lamont Michele, and Sato, K. (2012) Successful InterdisciplinaryConnections: The contributions of shared
education.References1 ABET. Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs. (2014).2 Phase, I. Educating the Engineer of 2020:: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. (National Academies Press, 2005).3 Ainsworth, S. in Visualization: Theory and practice in science education 191-208 (Springer, 2008).4 Miskioğlu, E. E. in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE. 1-7 (IEEE).5 Kolb, D. A. Learning styles and disciplinary differences. The modern American college, 232-255 (1981).6 Miskioğlu, E. E. Learning in Style: Investigation of Factors Impacting Student Success in Chemical Engineering at Individual and Team-Levels with a Focus on Student Learning Styles, The Ohio State University
: The graphics are clear. In contrast, visual aids are not easily seen by many seats in a typical classroom. • Duration: The “twenty-minute” rule for length of lesson was not observed. However, students have the option to take a break(s) during the e-Lesson; break points are suggested. • Participation: Exercises are included during the workshop class to encourage students to begin their problem solving. Complete solutions are provided. • Quiz: A digitally-mediated quiz containing numerous short-answer (true-false, multiple choice) questions is provided after the new material has been presented in each e-Lesson. This quiz is not graded, and solutions are given for all responses. This approach is
learning.Out of a total of 40 students in the course, 33 consented to provide their information for the studyand also completed both the pre- and post-course surveys (an 82.5% completion rate). Changesin the self-efficacy scores were evaluated relative to student gender, ethnicity, and ACTcomposite score. These data were obtained with student consent from the office of the Registrar.A total of 17 female and 16 male students were surveyed. Ethnicities were divided into threesub-categories: (1) White (any students with White as their only race, N = 21), (2) Asian (anystudents with Asian or Asian and White listed as their race(s), N = 7), and (3) UnderrepresentedMinorities (URM, any students listed as Hispanic, Native American, Black, or Pacific Islander