Conference Session

Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession – and ASCE

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janey Camp P.E., Vanderbilt University; Leslie Nolen, American Society of Civil Engineers; Carolyn Sofman, American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

teachers may ask students when exploring the Report Card and relatedactivities are as follows: • Q: Which of these infrastructure types do you see and/or use in your daily activities? o Activities:  A discussion with students could include the infographic “How Much Infrastructure Do You Use Before Noon?”  Students choose one category of infrastructure to explore in more detail through creation of a short report, a photo collage of that infrastructure type (younger students),  Teachers lead a field trip around their community and have students identify the different infrastructure components around them

Conference Session

Balancing Act: Ideas in Pre- & Post- Surveys and Assessment of Professional Skills

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Simon Thomas Ghanat P.E., The Citadel; James Kaklamanos, Merrimack College; Suresh Immanuel Selvaraj, University of Evansville; Corrie Walton-Macaulay, Bucknell University; Matthew Sleep, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Conference Session

Integrating Teaching Assistants, Tenure-track, and Non-tenure-track Faculty into a Cohesive Department

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Molly A McVey, University of Kansas; Caroline R. Bennett P.E., University of Kansas; Jae Hwan Kim, University of Kansas; Alexandra Self, University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

. Q&A and leading group per class period · 100% reported communicating discussions) · 97% indicated that the most common weekly with UGTFs (but one · 75% of the UGTFs reported meeting interaction with UGTFs was Q&A; responded that they did not with their faculty at least 1x/week, 60% indicated that UGTFs also personally meet a weekly basis) but 1 UGTF reported not asked questions; 30% noted that the · 75% reported that UGTFs increased communicating outside of class at all UGTFs facilitated group discussions the level of in-class student group with

Conference Session

Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: The Role of Engineering Education towards Attaining UN Sustainable Development Goals

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Zelinka, University of Colorado, Boulder; Bernard Amadei, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering, Community Engagement Division, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering

-44 0.000 Figure 4. Values of influence, Figure 3. SDGs influence (I) vs. dependence (D) diagram dependence, influence ratio, net influence, and priority index Figure 2 shows that the double causality table has a total of Q = n2 – n = 272 interactionswhere n = 17 (number of SDGs). The diagonal terms are assumed to be 0 since they represent agoal influencing itself, which mathematically