- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus; Susan E Chappell, Penn State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships
development of tools and methods for solar energy resource assessment and the role of technology in engineering pedagogy.Mrs. Susan E Chappell, Penn State University Susan Chappell, M.Ed., coordinates Employer Engagement for Penn State University Career Services on the eastern part of Pennsylvania, working closely with five of Penn State’s Commonwealth Campuses to develop pathways of industry engagement that add value to the student academic experience. During her time at Penn State, she has also worked within the Division of Undergraduate Studies, Alumni Relations, Corporate Engagement, and Outreach and Continuing Education before joining Career Services. Prior to working in higher education, Chappell spent several years
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Sonya Overstreet, EASi
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships
Paper ID #17717Developing America’s Next Generation of Electric Utility ProfessionalsMrs. Sonya Overstreet, EASi Sonya Overstreet, Learning and Development Manager (North America) at EASi a global engineering services company. Mrs. Overstreet’s professional career includes years of experience in the engineering field. For several years, she managed the integration, use, and support of engineering design software at a multi-regional civil engineering firm. In her current position, Mrs. Overstreet is responsible for executing learning & development strategies to ensure the building of employee capabilities, development
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Simeon Ntafos, University of Texas, Dallas
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships
the program must meet thresholds set by the academicprograms; these generally amount to having background roughly at the level of a secondsemester sophomore in the major. Assistance for job placement for graduating students ishandled by the University-wide Career Center.Q3: Have you worked (or are now working) in an industry position (other than internship)associated with your major?20% responded “Yes”, 80% “No” overall; 28% of SE Design students responded “Yes” while19% of students in UTDesign responded “Yes” . The percentage of positive responses wouldlikely be significantly higher if the positions were not restricted to be related to the student’smajor. Other sources indicate that working while going to school is pretty common and thatmost
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Ibrahim F. Zeid, Northeastern University; Marina Bograd, MassBay Community College; Chitra Javdekar, Mass Bay Community College
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships
and require students to work a 9‐5 schedule for a designated period of time. The Community College student population is often non‐traditional; many have full time jobs and family obligations that prevent them from participating in a traditional 9‐5 temporary internship. ASEE Off‐Site Internship 2017 2 Experiential learning is important at all levels including the exposure it provides for graduate students who aspire to teach, with an opportunity to work with non‐traditional Community College students. Mentoring non‐traditional Community College students, while working with Community College faculty, better prepares them for a future teaching career and increases
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
David Dylan John, Georgia Southern University; Yunfeng Chen, Georgia Southern University
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships
/ professionals were highlighted tobe the lack of experience and real world exposure, lack of entrepreneurial and business acumen,commitment, inability to write scientifically and go through a process of research andinvestigation, methodically communicate and structure proposals for action and change. Thisperspective seemed to share a relationship with another weakness that was highlighted byparticipants, which was the weakness in written and spoken communication. Some of thesupervisors highlighted that many STEM employees did not seem to show a strong desire tolearn on the job as they seemed to perceive, that they already knew everything they need to knowand also desired quick and unsubstantiated upward mobility in their careers. This desire forcareer
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Blair J. McDonald P.E., Western Illinois University; William F. Pratt, Western Illinois University; Il-Seop Shin, Western Illinois University; Khaled Zbeeb, Western Illinois University
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships
in May of 2011 and the program was ABET accredited in August of 2012. The School will add a separate Mechanical Engineering Degree in 2017. He has experienced a varied career in government, academia, and industry and has six patents for advanced composite materials.Dr. Il-Seop Shin, Western Illinois University Il-Seop Shin received the B.S. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from California State Uni- versity, Fresno in 1997, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst in 1999 and 2007, respectively. In 2007, he joined Biomedical Sensing and Signal Processing research center at the University of Mas- sachusetts Amherst, as a
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
David Schmueser Ph.D., Clemson University; Johnell Brooks, Clemson University; Shayne Kelly McConomy, Clemson University; Pierluigi Pisu, Clemson University; Andrej Ivanco; Robert Gary Prucka, Clemson University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships
the selection of one concept that is based on carefully balancedenvironmental, economic, performance, and social design imperatives. During the process,faculty serves as student mentors rather than direct knowledge providers. Students areempowered to make decisions and justify their concept selection to different programgroups, i.e. sponsoring industry partners and faculty. The last eight months of each projectis devoted to building a physical prototype and validation of the vehicle targetrequirements.IntroductionTraditional approaches to engineering education in the US have struggled to provide early-career engineers with the skills and experiences needed to succeed in today’s fast changingtechnical fields. Current engineering educational
- Conference Session
- College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Eric Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
- Tagged Divisions
-
College Industry Partnerships
publication output, patent output, and likelihood of collaboration Topic: industry funded research effects on faculty's view of their research Topic: industry funded research effects on faculty tenure and promotion Topic: industry funded research effects on effects on faculty service work Topic: industry funded research effects on effects on faculty teachingIt may be interesting to replicate the survey and analysis done by Gulbrandsen and Smeby (2005)in Norway on a US engineering faculty population. The research questions addressed in theirstudy, as applied to US engineering faculty, would shed interesting light on the effects ofindustry funded research on faculty careers, and create an interesting comparison between the USand