Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 1: IE-ing a Broader Perspective

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Faisal Aqlan, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); Yuan-Han Huang, Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); E. George Walters III P.E., Pennsylvania State University, Erie (Behrend College); Osama T. Al Meanazel, The Hashemite University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

, Product Design, Specification, and Measurement,which includes the course syllabus, course project, and detailed steps for the course project. Thecourse aims to provide an introduction to product design with an emphasis on the tools, standardsand methods used for product and part representation, specifications and measurements. Itinvolves hands-on learning and exercises in CAD and metrology laboratories. The class includeslectures, quizzes, laboratory assignments and reports, a CAD modeling project, exams, and in-class participation. The course content covers three main parts: product design and specification,dimensioning and tolerancing, and metrology. Product design and specification focuses on theproduct design process and basics of engineering

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kate D. Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science)

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

showed that the students performbetter on tests if they are told why they are not allowed to use computers in the classroom.The lack of difference found between the overall course grades was attributed to the factthat the overall course grade included both the course grades (within the study) and othergrades (outside the study). The students final course grade included points for how theyperformed on tests, as well as, points for participation and student achievement in labs.In future studies, the data could be parsed to analyze performance on all the testseliminating non-academic and laboratory factors that could affect overall course grade.Reasons for the difference in academic success in final exam test scores between the twogroups could boil

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 1: IE-ing a Broader Perspective

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan O. Schall, SOS Consulting, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

by such factors as education, participation in professional societiesand licensure. The program must also demonstrate the faculty have sufficient authority to ensureproper guidance of the program. Both of these can be demonstrated using the Hoshin Kanrimatrix by adding rows/columns intersecting the faculty rowsFigure 4: Hoshin Kanri Matrix for Criteria 2 - 6Criterion 7: Facilities ISO 9001:2015 states “The organization shall determine, provide and maintain theinfrastructure necessary for the operation of its processes to achieve conformity of products andservices”. [8] If you replace infrastructure with “classrooms, offices, laboratories, and associatedequipment” and conformity of products and services with “attainment of student

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 1: IE-ing a Broader Perspective

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cristina D. Pomales-Garcia, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez campus; Christopher Papadopoulos, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez campus

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

) evaluation, enhancement or design of worksystems following ergonomic principles. The course is a core 4 credit course (75 contacthours) with guided laboratory activities and a required design project. Typically, the courseproject is defined by the course instructor and can vary between a case study, classroomprojects or projects in service or manufacturing industry (Pomales-Garcia & Cortes, 2014). Inthis particular scenario, the project weight was 17% of the final course grade and required aproposal, a final written report and an oral presentation using a poster format. Courseactivities incorporated the use of rubrics for evaluation purposes (see Appendix A-C).MethodologyIn 2015, a group of 45 Industrial Engineering undergraduate students (22

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 2, IE-ing the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul C. Lynch, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Joseph Wilck, College of William & Mary; Amanda Elizabeth VanBuskirk

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

alsooptimized the use of a course management system. The IE EE class met three times a week (50minutes each lecture) for 15 weeks. The IE MFG class met twice a week (50 minutes eachlecture) and an additional time each week (110 minutes) for a laboratory session. The instructoranswered student emails promptly but refrained from emailing students in the class as a whole.The instructor communicated with the entire class of students at the beginning of each and everyclass period. It was at this point in time that all questions were answered and everyone wasbrought up to date on upcoming events in the ANGEL calendar. Both courses werepredominantly made up of junior industrial engineering students. The course managementsystem was the place where students

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 2, IE-ing the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

Introductory Engineering Courses”. Journal of STEM Education, 16(4):6-12.9. Girgis, M. (2015). “A Scaffolding Case Study for Teaching Engineering Problem Solving to Underrepresented Minorities”. Proceedings. American Society of Engineering Education Conference.10. Kellogg, S. (2007). “Technology Enabled Support Modules for Engineering Management”. Proceedings. American Society of Engineering Education Conference.11. Scriven, M., and Paul, R., (1987). “Critical Thinking as Defined by the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking”. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/76612. Jaksic, C. and Spencer, D. (2009). “A Manufacturing Processes Laboratory: What Book- Making and Sheet

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Omar Ashour, The Pennsylvania State University, The Behrend College; Faisal Aqlan, Penn State Behrend; Paul C. Lynch, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

instructors on what areas to focus on when planning forfuture offerings of the course.References[1] Guskey, T. R. (2005). Formative Classroom Assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: Theory, Research and Implications. In the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.[2] Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., and Madaus, G. F. (1973). Learning for Mastery. National Laboratory for Higher Education.[3] Bloom, B. S., and Carroll, J. B. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and Practice. Ed. James H. Block. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.[4] Keller, F. S., Sherman, J. G., and Bori, C. M. (1974). PSI, the Keller Plan Handbook: Essays on a Personalized System of Instruction. Menlo Park, Calif.: WA Benjamin.[5] Onipede, O