. Professor Washington received his BS, MS and PhD degrees from NC State. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Integration of Entrepreneurship in a First-Year Engineering CourseAbstractThis evidence based practice describes the integration of entrepreneurship into a project-basedfirst-year engineering course to encourage student innovation, and to develop student leadershipand self-efficacy. A module featuring a series of lectures on entrepreneurship and business plandevelopment was introduced as part of the curriculum. The module was further enhanced withthe introduction of multiple company founders and industrial leaders who were invited to deliverpresentations and interact with students
Swartwout, M. (2015). “Systems engineering entrepreneurship modules across aerospace engineering curriculum”. Proceedings, American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Seattle, WA.19. Harichandran, R.S., Carnasciali, M.I., Erdil, N., Li., C.Q., and Nocito-Gobel. J. (2015). “Developing entrepreneurial thinking in engineering students by utilizing integrated online modules.” Proceedings, American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Seattle, WA.20. Erdil, N., Harichandran, R.S., Nocito-Gobel. J., Carnasciali, M.I., and Li., C.Q. (2016). “Integrating e-learning modules into engineering courses to develop an entrepreneurial mindset in students.” Proceedings, American Society of Engineering Education Conference, New
engineering design in terms of the process that students engage in, the skillsthat students may practice, and the behaviors that students develop. The entrepreneurs were well-versed with Lean Launch, but not necessarily the engineering design curriculum, and thus, whenprompted, they were able to objectively identify similarities and differences between the twocontexts. These interviews enlightened many parallels between Lean Launch and engineeringdesign, suggesting that an integration of the two would be seamless. Furthermore, analysis of theinterviews revealed that the utilization of Lean Launch principles in engineering design coursescould strengthen engineering design curricula, allowing for the teaching and assessment of manyimportant engineering
other informal co-curricular programs. Although it is imperative to evaluate these programs to better informentrepreneurship education practices, minimal attention has been devoted to assessment ofentrepreneurship education programs. Furthermore, of the few existing studies, most haveexamined students’ perceptions of learning gains and affective responses such as entrepreneurialself-efficacy, mindset and attitude. In this study, we present an examination of students’ actuallearning in an entrepreneurship practicum course at large research university. The courseleverages widely used Lean Launch Curriculum and Business Model Canvas (BMC) to engagestudents in entrepreneurship in a project-based learning environment. In contrast with prior workthat
Paper ID #20166Using Lean Start-Up Approach to Integrate Engineering Education with En-trepreneurship Practices at Middle SchoolsDr. Jidong Huang, California State University, Fullerton Dr. Jidong Huang is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at California State University, Fullerton. His research had been supported by National Science Foundation (NSF), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and multiple private companies. Currently, his research interests are focused on innovative approches for STEM learning; robotics; the design of high-precision, integrated navigation sys- tem with high integrity; and their
assess and undertake reasonable risks. Societal issues 67 I am aware of how global issues influence society.Conclusion To provide students with a strong foundation in the fundamentals of engineering in anenvironment infused with an entrepreneurial mindset, the College of Engineering at LawrenceTechnological University intentionally weaves a continuous thread of entrepreneurially mindedlearning through the core engineering curriculum. The course described here, EGE 2123:Entrepreneurial Engineering Design Studio, is an integral part of this thread at the sophomorelevel. This course has been systematically designed in such a way as to allow
, Indiana, where he directs the Professional Writing major. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Entrepreneurial Thinking in a First-Year Engineering Design StudioIn summer 2016, the authors and several other collaborators developed and taught a courseaiming to advance the pedagogy informing a proposed new degree program in EngineeringDesign, in which design, writing, and engineering topics are integrated into a multidisciplinarydesign studio setting. Most closely associated with the disciplines of industrial design andarchitecture, design studios immerse students in an authentic problem-solving environment: "In studio, designers express and explore
outside of corporations.The work presented in this paper borrowed ideas on opportunity identification and marketresearch from the Opportunity Thinktank [9], a set of seven modules that help undergraduateengineering students establish an entrepreneurial mindset through opportunity identification.Different from their work, this paper emphasizes on how to integrate entrepreneurial mindsetconcepts in the teaching of entire engineering design process.Design and ImplementationIn contrast to the existing work, entrepreneurial mindset materials were incorporated in a first-semester freshman Introduction to Engineering course, tightly integrated in an open-endeddesign project. The entrepreneurial materials on opportunity identification, market research
Training Programs Province Figure 2 entrepreneurial Capability Training System in XJTU3.2.1 A Research -and-Teaching-Integrated Model for Engineering Education InnovationResearch and teaching integration consists of two parts: entrepreneurial curriculum and collaborationwith industrial partners. To begin with, XJTU creates an overall systematic plan for practicaleducation that features a comprehensive entrepreneurial curriculum. With inputs and participationfrom the industry, XJTU’s plan increases the proportion of practical education in students’ credits.This is done in part by creating for-credit entrepreneurial courses. The plan also providesopportunities for industry to play a greater role in cooperative education
efforts that acknowledge learner diversity, and understand their effects in students performance. Isabel received her professional degree in biological engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile and her MA in policy, organizations and leadership studies at Stanford Graduate School of Education.Dr. Constanza Miranda Mendoza, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile Constanza Miranda holds a PhD in design with a focus in anthropology from North Carolina State Uni- versity. While being a Fulbright grantee, Constanza worked as a visiting researcher at the Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering Department, at Stanford. Today she is an assistant professor at the P.Universidad Cat´olica de Chile’s
and practice. Asix-part Arduino workshop program created by Sparkfun and previously tested and usedin K-12 educators or students workshops was integrate into the curriculum. In additionto learning and experimenting with microcontrollers, students also learned how to use asoldering iron, a milling machine, and engineering software such as the 2D and 3Dmodeling software, OnShape. They were able to use this modeling software to createparts using a laser cutter and a 3D printer. At the end of each of these engineering toolmodules, students completed an individual project, which they brought home, for a totalof four individual projects. Students were also introduced to the engineering design process. Student groups weretherefore able to use a
characterization techniques and laboratory apparatus for advancement of novel electronic devices, in addi- tion to curriculum development for inquiry-based learning and facilitation of interdisciplinary, student-led project design. She emphasizes engineering sustainable solutions from a holistic perspective, incorporat- ing analysis of the full technological life cycle and socioeconomic impact.Prof. Bryan M. Jenkins, University of California, Davis, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Prof. Bryan Jenkins teaches and conducts research in the areas of energy and power, with emphasis on biomass and other renewable resources. Dr. Jenkins has more than thirty years of experience work- ing in the area of biomass
organizations, while striving to contribute value for stakeholders. An internship alsoprovides an immersive experience in the messiness of the real world, where a student willobserve situations that highlight inevitable distinctions between theory and practice. In addition,topics and issues that may not have been part of their formal academic curriculum make eachinternship unique and enriching, as each student becomes deeply knowledgeable concerning bothtechnical and social concerns specific to their internship context.The experiential learning from internships can support three changes that have been promotedfor professional education for many decades: “First, a new philosophy and new outlook whichwill comprehend the human and social as well as the
goal was to prepare graduates forengineering practice by equipping them with contextual (also sometimes called “professional”)skills. These calls for reform resulted in the EC2000 accreditation criteria, which require, amongother things, that graduates demonstrate the ability to integrate “realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” into the design process, including the development of new products. This ability,in turn, rests on other abilities including an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; anability to define and solve problems; an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility;an ability to communicate effectively; the
Paper ID #17938Promoting Entreprenuerially Minded Learning through Online DiscussionsDr. Lisa Bosman, Marquette University Dr. Lisa Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee. Her research interests include solar energy performance modeling, entrepreneurial minded learning, and STEM education.Dr. Brooke K. Mayer, Marquette UniversityProf. Patrick McNamara, Marquette University Dr. McNamara is beginning his 4th year as an assistant professor at Marquette University. His research group focuses on understanding how consumer product chemicals impact microbes and antibiotic resis
who completed the workshopbecame strong contributors and leaders in the Innovation Space.The workshop itself utilizes team-based experiential learning [6], coupled with real-life problemsto demonstrate the steps required to work through the engineering design process. By practicingand learning these skills the students become better prepared to interact in their engineeringcourses. Many of the personal interactions required of the workshop participants between facultyand their peers are what would be expected of them in their engineering curriculum. By havingthe students work on actual university related design problems, their interest level remains highand they tend to display more ownership of their solutions. Having an open-ended
other AP science teacher mentioned that a recent restructuring of the AP Physics coursecontent and sequencing led him to change from implementing IC as a required in-class program,which he did in previous years, to a voluntary after-school program, which was the case for the2015-2016 school year. He indicated that after the restructuring of the course, he did not have thetime or flexibility in the curriculum that he felt is needed in order to implement IC as a required,in-class program.Further, the elementary school teachers also discussed how they appreciate the opportunities theprogram offers, such as providing an integrated STEM experience and allowing students andteachers to move beyond the confines of their regular classroom and curriculum
-technical skills, and applications of learned materialto realistic problems (Kirschner, 2004; Litzinger, Lattuca, Hadgraft, & Newstetter, 2011).Despite the recent integration of entrepreneurship into engineering education, the concepts andattitudes of entrepreneurship were not explored as part of an engineering educational experienceat the institution previously. Thus, it was important to find a venue where the implementation ofentrepreneurial content would not be too abrupt for the students and to implement the content insmall quantities that would be palatable to instructors and students. In other words, we felt itimportant to tread lightly and conduct a minimally-invasive study, which, of course, does preventany attempt at extensive
curriculum offered by programs across the U.S. This is one of few studies thatinvestigate the impact of doing so. Given the inherent characteristics of an EM and the engineering design process, thispaper starts by describing the overlap between the two and reveals how they complement oneanother; then goes into a thematic analysis of the mindsets of twenty-seven students who had justcompleted a design activity accompanied by EM interventions in a first-year engineering course.The purpose of the study is to explore how their mindsets were revealed in their writtenreflections on: the attitudes and behaviors they perceive were necessary for successfullycompleting the design activity; the specified attitudes and behaviors they feel they possess
Shaffer is the Vilas Distinguished Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in the Department of Educational Psychology, and a Game Scientist at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research. His most recent book is How Computer Games Help Children Learn.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can
mindset and hence through longitudinalstudies measure the potential impact of curriculum and co-curricular activities on changingmindset. This paper compares and contrasts two relatively new tools for assessment ofentrepreneurial mindset: (1) Entrepreneurial Mindset Profile (EMP), which has origins back to2010 at Eckerd College in St. Petersburg, Florida, and (2) Entrepreneurial Profile 10 Index(EP10), by Gallup with underpinnings in 2009. Both are web-based surveys.For this research, 70 undergraduate students majoring in math, science, or engineering completedboth instruments. Forty students were enrolled in an Introduction to Entrepreneurship course,with the remainder enrolled in an Introduction to Engineering Management course. Theinstruments
thenature of the problems assigned, a stronger intuitive understanding of mechanical engineeringfundamentals irrespective of GPA, and an ability to abstract models to describe the real systems they wereanalyzing. When asked “What aspects of their education helped to nurture their creative problem-solvingskill?”, in truth, they had difficulty identifying anything. In the end, it was our belief that nurturingstudents to be creative problem solvers, capable of creating new ideas and validating their creations withmodels based upon engineering fundamentals was to be the goal of our course. In addition, a larger goalwas that this approach would also be integrated into the courses preceding our capstone modeling course.This realization has prompted us to
potential current or future career choice.’Hulsey et al. (2006) have broken further down the second thrust above in terms of: 1. Integratingentrepreneurship within regular academic programs and curricula and, 2. Providing co-curricularand other activities and initiatives that support and develop the entrepreneurial interests ofstudents. Wilson et al. (2014) have coined the term ‘pracademic’ to highlight the importance ofthe integration of practical and academic components into entrepreneurship education.A number of studies and reports have focused on the key question of ‘What Does It Take ToBecome An ‘Entrepreneurial’ University or College?’ In their 2012 report, the EuropeanCommission proposed a list of seven (7) features that characterize
Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative undergraduate engineering curricula. He has authored over 70 papers and offered over 30 workshops on faculty development, curricular change processes, cur- riculum redesign, and assessment. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in Education Conferences and the general chair for the 2009 conference. Prof. Froyd is a
member of the American Society for Engineering Education and the SAFE Association. Prior to receiving his Ph.D. in 1983, Dr. Nelson worked as a design engineer in industry and taught as an adjunct professor at the University of Houston and Texas A&M University at Galveston. In industry he was primarily involved in design of floating and fixed structures for the offshore petroleum industry. After receiving his Ph.D., Dr. Nelson joined the civil engineering faculty at Texas A&M University. He joined the civil engineering faculty at Clemson University in 1989 as Program Director and founder of the Clemson University Graduate Engineering Programs at The Citadel and became Chair of Civil Engineering in 1998. In
Paper ID #18624Getting ”There”: Understanding How Innovation and Entrepreneurship Be-come Part of Engineering EducationMrs. Elizabeth Nilsen, Purdue University Liz Nilsen is a Senior Program Director at the Purdue Agile Strategy Lab, helping nurture change efforts in engineering education, innovation, and beyond. Previously, she was a Senior Program Officer at Ven- tureWell, where she co-developed and co-led the Epicenter Pathways to Innovation initiative, an effort to engage with a cohort of colleges and universities to fully embed innovation and entrepreneurship in under- graduate engineering education. Her experience
highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up a large part of that vision and our future.Mr. Hugo Gomez, University of Texas, El Paso Mr. Hugo Gomez works as an Instructional Technologist at the University of Texas at El Paso, he is focused on expanding the professional and technical skill
) enay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion (JPEER). She received a B.S.E with distinction in Engineering in 2009 and a B.S. degree in Physics Education in 1999. Her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees are in Science Education from Arizona State University earned in 2002 and 2008, respectively. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Exploring Connections between Engineering Projects, Student Characteristics, and the Ways Engineering Students