-Riddle Aeronautical University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Lessons Learned: Student Perceptions of Successes and Struggles in One-year Master’s Programs in EngineeringIntroduction:In recent years, more condensed graduate programs (such as one-year Master’s programs) haveemerged to better enable students to expand their understanding beyond the undergraduate levelto aid in potential career advancement. However, limited research has been conducted tounderstand how the student experience in these programs compares to more traditional graduateprograms and the motivators that influence students to enroll in these new programs.One of the few studies exploring one-year Master’s
the bridge program in the comingyear as effective as possible, the project team interviewed current engineering graduate studentsat Purdue whose undergraduate degree is from an MSI or other relatively small school, to learnwhat challenges they faced when making the transition from a small, minority-serving institutionto a large, majority institution.During conversations with faculty members at MSIs and with URM students participating in thefirst year of the summer undergraduate research program, it became clear that the end of thejunior year was too late to introduce students to the idea of pursuing a graduate degree andfaculty career in engineering. By that time, most of the top students had already participated incorporate internships or
accordingly.In ideal circumstances, you would begin the graduate school application process no later than thesummer before your final year of undergraduate studies. During this summer (or earlier), youshould complete the following tasks: Identify potential schools, based on your research interests, family/personal needs, geographic preferences, and career/personal goals. Determine if you are required to complete any graduate school competency exams, such as the GRE [3]; if so, study for and complete these exams Determine if you are required to complete any language examinations, such as the TOEFL [4]; if so, study for and complete these exams Identify 3+ references, at least two of who are faculty members who
2016, a new interdisciplinary Energy Science and Engineering master anddoctoral graduate major degree program called the “energy course” was created withapproximately 140 faculty from 6 departments and approximately 100 students. To graduatefrom the master or doctoral energy course, students must complete energy theory, discipline-based and career oriented coursework, and prepare a research-based thesis. In this paper, bothenergy programs will be introduced, discussed and summarized based upon a best practices pointof view.Energy EducationEnergy and in particular renewable energy education and degree programs in higher educationhave been growing over the last two decades with the green economy1. For example, the Univ.California Berkeley’s
semester. Faculty whohad experienced a student’s accidental death just months prior were approached aboutrecommending their advisees participate in Group Wellness Coaching with the objective ofcreating community and connection.In order to be intentional, consultation regarding objectives, outcomes and evaluation wassought. University resources utilized include Counseling & Consultation Services, Office ofDiversity, Student Wellness Center, Engineering Career Services, University Center for theAdvancement of Teaching, and Center for the Study of Student Life. It is the author’s hope thatpresenting the material will encourage other staff and faculty to collaborate across theircampuses to create holistic graduate student programming to meet unmet
. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical
education is often described by faculty and graduate students as “a journey”, “alearning process”, and “a transformative experience”. These descriptions speak to theexperiential nature of doctoral education which aims at bringing about some change in studentsto prepare them for their future career. In the research literature, the path and process ofbecoming an engineering education researcher is an emerging field. In this paper, we present theframing of a co-operative inquiry project to explore our personal growth as graduate students.Co-operative inquiry is a research method in which multiple people share and explore a topicfrom their own perspectives through collective dialogue, reflection, interrogation, andtransformation. Our co-operative
-Haase has an extensive history of serving in leadership roles and positions focusing on graduate education and research. Throughout her career she has published on graduate training, with recent scholarship focusing on the relationship between graduate student behavior and professional training expectations.Dr. Amy J. Moll, Boise State University Amy J. Moll is a Professor of Materials Science and Engineering and Dean of the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Moll received her B.S. degree in Ceramic Engineering from University of Illinois, Urbana in 1987. Her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering from University of California at Berkeley in 1992 and 1994. Following graduate
]. Additionally, while graduate students often pursue careers ininstitutions of higher education, these students primarily have experience with researchuniversities, despite the wide range of institutional types that exist [4]. Therefore, to besuccessful in a wide range of institutions and in a global society, graduate students benefit fromgaining familiarity with a variety of types of institutions that exist around the globe. To help students develop global competency and learn about higher education on a globalscale, the Virginia Tech Graduate School offers an innovative program, known as the GlobalPerspectives Program (GPP), which enables graduate students in all disciplines to explore anddiscuss higher education both in the United States and
intersecting theories that lend themselves well to strategies for the “careand keeping” of graduate students. By considering the processes and mechanisms by whichgraduate students develop, faculty members can reform or revise their leadership practices(formally and informally) to better meet the needs of graduate students at various stages in theiracademic careers. Although these theories may seem disparate, they intersect and overlap in anacademic research group context. As we lead the attendees of this interactive panel workshopthrough the following activities, we ask them to reflect on how these theories impact how theymake decisions for their research group and how theory-guided decisions might help themimprove or plan for effective and productive
understanding and tools to design and construct crops with desired traits thatcan thrive in a changing environment. Students with “T-shaped” experiences will differ fromtraditional STEM graduate programs that produce students with deep disciplinary knowledge inat least one area. This depth represents the vertical bar of the "T". The horizontal bar representstheir ability to effectively collaborate across a variety of different disciplines [T-Summit, 2016],which is the focus of P3 as shown in Figure 1.This paper reports on the progress of the project to date and presents results on the first year’sproject assessment on the effectiveness of the cross disciplinary training. The P3 programis preparing students for productive careers in plant phenomics
textbook and applied very easily. Adamwanted a challenge. He thought about how his father—a professor—was happy, and Adambegan to consider a career in academia. Eventually, he decided to apply to Ph.D. programs.Preparing for the GRE proved fruitful, as he was admitted to and attended his first-choiceinstitution. Adam was excited about the proposition of being an independent researcher butperceived obtaining a Ph.D. as a hurdle to his ultimate goal. He wanted to work on ill-defineddesign problems. For Adam, choosing a research lab was predicated on finding a facultymember engaged in integrated-circuit (IC) design work. He was less concerned about theparticular application as it was unlikely, in his view, that he would be able to craft
., graduate teaching assistants, mixedundergraduate/graduate courses, research seminars and presentations, undergraduate researchopportunities in a graduate laboratory). Unfortunately, not all colleges have a graduate programthat provides these same opportunities. As a prime example, Wentworth Institute of Technologyis an undergraduate-centric college, without a day-time graduate program or on-campus graduatestudents. This likely puts the undergraduate students at a disadvantage, as they are not exposed toa graduate community; as well as decreasing the overall interest in graduate school, as studentseither don’t know it is an option, or don’t understand what they will be doing in graduate schooland why and when it matters for career success.A team of
researchmethods, theories, and philosophical stances.”28Unlike direct pathway graduate students, returners enter graduate school with more variedrhetorical experiences due to their years of writing in industry. They have already learned howto write in a new context when they began their professional careers and continued this learningprocess as they needed to produce different types of documents, either in a new position in thesame company or after moving to other employment. The amount of time they devote to writingat work is substantial and rises as engineers move up the corporate ladder.29 Thus, they may havemore “cultural capital” (similar to the previously mentioned “experience capital”) on which todraw in the transfer process than their classmates
Professional The nine competencies are relevant to my 4.77 0.25 competencies career goals. Assessment process The online rating system was easy to use. 4.53 0.49 Feedback report & The meeting to discuss my feedback report was 4.66 0.83 meeting useful for my professional development. Goal-setting meeting & The resources provided on competency 4.73 0.29 resources development were helpful. Overall program Participating in this program will help prepare 4.93 0.14 me for my future career.Note. All items were assessed with a scale ranging from 1 (strongly
curriculum2. The Master of Science in Technologyprogram at Purdue University Northwest has followed this suggestion. Faculty, through theirindustry contacts, place students in internships before graduation. Many of these students arethen hired in the respective business or industry because of the internships. On their assessmentreport of a cohort-based Master’s degree in Technology, Latif and Dyrenfurth3 reported that therequired directed project work enhanced student’ knowledge and skills at their workplace andalso a large number of students reported career growth after graduation. In other studies, theauthors emphasized on the value of Master’s projects and internships, especially for thosestudents with no or minimal industrial experience, in
Beta Pi. His research on passive radon-resistant new residential building construction was adapted in HB1647 building code of Florida Legislature. Najafi is a member of numerous professional societies and has served on many committees and programs, and continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses, seminars and workshops, and has developed courses, videos and software packages during his career. His areas of specialization include transportation planning and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, and public works.Miss Sarah Rajkumari Jayasekaran
professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses, seminars and workshops, and has developed courses, videos and software packages during his career. His areas of specialization include transportation planning and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, and public works. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Technical Review of Companies able to Support the Education and Naval Installations’ Renewable Energy Goals through the use of Tidal and Hydro Kinetic Energy DevicesAbstractTidal Energy uses the earth’s gravitational interactions with the sun and moon to converthydraulic energy into usable electric power for
residential building construction was adapted in HB1647 building code of Florida Legislature. Najafi is a member of numerous professional societies and has served on many committees and programs, and continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses, seminars and workshops, and has developed courses, videos and software packages during his career. His areas of specialization include transportation planning and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, and public works.Mr. Chi Xu, University of Florida Ph.D. in Civil Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (Begins in Jan
IndividualDevelopment Plan (IDP) facilitates student self-reflection, goal setting and career planning as theTable 3. The interdisciplinary graduate education program. Curriculum & Activity Timeline Disciplinary Grounding Year 10 Summer School in Computational Materials Science Summer 1 Assessment Rubric Learning Outcome & Skill Multidisciplinary Courses Course 10, 11, 12 7. Understand concepts/methodologies of Year 2 Projects
recognitions include the 2011 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers, the 2011 Sloan Research Fellowship in Physics, the 2012 DARPA Young Faculty Award, the 2012 IBM Faculty Award, an 2016 R&D100 Award, the OSA’s 2017 Adolph Lomb Medal , and the 2017 ACS Photonics Young Investigator Award.Mrs. Jaime Goldstein, Massachusetts Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Technical Communication Instruction for Graduate Students: The Communication Lab vs. a CourseAbstractCommunication skills are critical to engineers’ success in both academia and industry. Neverthe-less, a variety of factors keep engineering students from
global and from interdisciplinaryteam? What behaviors and milestones are critical for new team members to develop mutual trustwith other team members?In graduate level engineering settings, this type of research could be helpful in three practicalrespects. First, today’s graduate students are tomorrow’s experts working to lead global andinterdisciplinary teams in industry and in academia. By illuminating mechanisms by whichcollaborative competencies such as trust are developed and the impact they have on collaborationsuccess over time, there is a potential for graduate students to be able to be more immediatelyproductive in their future careers. Second, determining the role of trust in research groupcollaborations could “jump start” the