science and engineering in a variety of contexts, both in and out of school.Participation in informal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) activities,along with interest in STEM subjects, is associated with interest in STEM careers when studentsreach the university level [1]. Out-of-school, informal learning can occur at a variety of sites,including everyday experiences; designed sites such as museums, nature preserves, and libraries;and structured programs such as after-school activities and summer camps [2]. This paperdescribes the programming provided at one academic library to a STEM summer camp formiddle schoolers [3] and explores the opportunities and challenges of this kind of programmingin an academic library.STEM
assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics Department at Michigan Technological University since 2011. She is the founding director of the Nonlin- ear and Autonomous Systems Laboratory (NASLab). Her research interests include robotics, dynamics and control of autonomous systems, and energy autonomy. She is a recipient of 2015 National Science Foundation CAREER award and 2015 Office of Naval Research YIP award.Ms. Saeedeh Ziaeefard, Michigan Technological University Saeedeh Ziaeefard is a PhD student and research assistant with Nonlinear and Autonomous Systems Laboratory (NASLab) in the Department of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics at Michigan Technological University. Her
integrated waste-to-energy system, Environment- Enhancing Energy (E2-Energy), that simultaneously produces biofuel, treats wet biowaste and captures carbon dioxide via algae growing and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). Wan-Ting’s ongoing work fo- cuses on upgrading of the HTL biocrude oil converted from wet biowaste into transportation fuels by distillation, esterification, thermal cracking, and hydroprocessing with catalysts. Wan-Ting has been a SWE member since 2012 and is aiming for a future career in academia.Chaoyang Liu, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignProf. Rohit Bhargava, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Rohit Bhargava is Founder Professor of Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana
predicted that the growth of Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) related jobs will be approximately 13 percent from 2014to 2024; the only field with a higher predicted growth rate is the medical field [1], while theanticipated growth rate of all non-STEM fields is only estimated to be 11 percent [2]. Additionally,the growth of robotics and other automation in the workforce is shifting the demand to high-skill,high-wage jobs [3]. From 2000 to 2008 there was a decline of 32 percent in manufacturing jobs,while overall job growth was still 4.5 percent [4]. This, coupled with the large groups of futureretiring engineers [5], makes engineering a very promising career path for students to pursue.Students need exposure to STEM at a
synthesis, purification, analysis, and identification.The question on relevance asked: “Please rate how relevant you think the knowledge you willgain in the following classes would be to a typical career in biomedical engineering.” The Likertscale included the headings: “No relevance”, “Low relevance”, “Moderate relevance”, “Highrelevance”, and “Essential relevance”. Students were supplied with catalog descriptions of thecourses because most students had not yet taken these courses and might not know what thesecourses were. These descriptions are shown in Table 1.The question on motivation asked: “Please rate how motivated you are to learn the material thatwill be taught in the following courses.” The Likert scale included the headings: “Not at
Examiner, Setterfield balanced building code requirements with owner and contractor concerns. Setterfield teaches Autodesk Revit and its integration into analysis software, including Navisworks. Setterfield spearheaded a six-discipline IPD capstone resulting in student work that has been featured at various venues, including AU, the American Society for Engineering Educators and the League for Innovation in the Community College.Chad R. Bridgman, Sinclair Community College Chad currently serves as an Internship Coordinator for the Science, Mathematics, & Engineering Division at Sinclair Community College. Prior to managing the internship program he served as Aca- demic/Career Coach for Sinclair on a Department
education is often described by faculty and graduate students as “a journey”, “alearning process”, and “a transformative experience”. These descriptions speak to theexperiential nature of doctoral education which aims at bringing about some change in studentsto prepare them for their future career. In the research literature, the path and process ofbecoming an engineering education researcher is an emerging field. In this paper, we present theframing of a co-operative inquiry project to explore our personal growth as graduate students.Co-operative inquiry is a research method in which multiple people share and explore a topicfrom their own perspectives through collective dialogue, reflection, interrogation, andtransformation. Our co-operative
includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and
Karlin, University of Southern Maine Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now at the University of Southern Maine where she is a research professor of engineering and the curriculum specialist for the Maine Regulatory Training and Ethics Center.Dr. Cassandra M Degen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Cassandra Degen received her B.S. degree in Metallurgical Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in 2007. She received her Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering in 2012
) A comparatively large portion of current STEM professionals retiring athigh rates, particularly as baby boomers transition toward the end of their careers; and 2) Ashortage of younger STEM professionals with requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities in thesefields (Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century, 2007; NationalScience Foundation, 2006b; Southern Education Foundation, 2005; Perna et al., 2009). A morealarming explanation, however, given our nation’s changing demographic landscape, is the shortsupply of minorities in the STEM pipeline (American Institutes for Research, 2012, 2014). Among Blacks, in particular, this low rate of participation in the sciences and engineeringis well documented (Bowen
Paper ID #18517Unpacking Latent DiversityDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient
all activities.SMT has been revised each year to incorporate the very latest technologies, making sure thatstudents have access to and are instructed using tools and methods they could potentiallyencounter in later STEM studies and careers. Also, during each activity, and with specialemphasis in the week-long projects, we encourage students to complete their projects using theframework of the engineering design process (EDP). It has been shown that using the EDP as aguide for students during their projects is an effective tool in K-12 environments [3]. Inparticular, we stress the importance of iterating and improving their initial prototypes based onresults from testing their designs.AudioWorks: Custom-Developed iPad App for SMTAudioWorks is
has been honored by the American Society of Engineering Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential learning.Dr. Rocio C Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education Rocio Chavela is Director of Education and Career Development at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University, a B.S. and a M.S. in Chemical Engineering from Universidad de las Americas, Puebla in Mexico. Rocio’s current efforts focus on engineering faculty and graduate student development, with particular emphasis on the adoption of evidence-based instructional practices.Ms
ofveteran individuals in STEM professional contexts. Our telling case focuses on a discovery thatemerged from discussion with a group of participants who are veterans; several memberscomment on how perceptions about public views of veterans can be a hindrance in pursuing civil(non-military, non-combat) careers in STEM. Our exploration of this interaction doubly serves asan illustration of the inquiry process and insight derived from IE in action. IntroductionIn recent years, qualitative inquiry has played an increasingly prominent role in higher educationresearch, as educators and scholars strive to understand the complexities of learning andinstruction within university and professional settings (Pasque
succeed in STEM more than their female counter partsis reinforced as students mature and move into middle and high school.1 By early adolescence,females start to lose interest in the STEM disciplines and even lose confidence in their abilities inthese subjects.1 First Lady Michelle Obama stated “If we’re going to out-innovate and out-educate the rest of the world, we’ve got to open doors for everyone. We need all hands on deck,and that means clearing hurdles for women and girls as they navigate careers in science,technology, engineering, and math.”3,4Recognizing this call to action and the increased need for K-12 Engineering Education Outreach,in 2015 the University of St. Thomas Playful Learning Lab redesigned a preexisting camp forrising 7th
pillars of sustainable design in theircurriculum to better equip civil engineering students in their decision making to considersustainability issues. The three pillars of sustainable development are social development,economic development and environmental restoration. A major challenge to this integration isadding to the workload of the existing curriculum. In some cases, introducing the new conceptsrequires the loss of essential course material. Consequently, many civil engineering departmentshave successfully integrated sustainable design principles through course modules, and projectbased learning3. A recent study by Litchfield and Javernick-Will compared the career interestsand experiences of students and practicing engineers who
. For many, the ambassador rolebegins during a large, multi-institution workshop. Post-event surveys reveal high levels ofability, confidence, and preparedness to create and deliver outreach presentations. Post-workshopinterviews reveal that the training offers a platform for role identity development. Theambassador role aligns career-related motivations, resonance with messages contained in theNational Academy of Engineering’s Changing the Conversation report, beliefs about the missionof the EAN, and plans for fulfilling the Network’s mission. After the initial training, students’role identities reflect an integration of their undergraduate engineering student role with the newrole of ambassador, with the intermediary role of an effective
into the Traditional Engineering ClassroomAbstractScience in diplomacy, the use of trained scientist to inform and support foreign policyobjectives, has been a part of U.S. foreign policy since the time of Benjamin Franklin.The Diplomacy Laboratory project, a public-private partnership, allows the Departmentof State to ‘course source’ projects to seek input from universities and to recruit talentedstudents to consider careers in diplomacy. This paper provides a summary of a casestudy using a DipLab project as part of a term-length, writing assignment in courses forundergraduate and graduate environmental engineering students. An overview of DipLaband suggested best practices to integrate DipLab projects into engineering courses is
-Haase has an extensive history of serving in leadership roles and positions focusing on graduate education and research. Throughout her career she has published on graduate training, with recent scholarship focusing on the relationship between graduate student behavior and professional training expectations.Dr. Amy J. Moll, Boise State University Amy J. Moll is a Professor of Materials Science and Engineering and Dean of the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Moll received her B.S. degree in Ceramic Engineering from University of Illinois, Urbana in 1987. Her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering from University of California at Berkeley in 1992 and 1994. Following graduate
]. Additionally, while graduate students often pursue careers ininstitutions of higher education, these students primarily have experience with researchuniversities, despite the wide range of institutional types that exist [4]. Therefore, to besuccessful in a wide range of institutions and in a global society, graduate students benefit fromgaining familiarity with a variety of types of institutions that exist around the globe. To help students develop global competency and learn about higher education on a globalscale, the Virginia Tech Graduate School offers an innovative program, known as the GlobalPerspectives Program (GPP), which enables graduate students in all disciplines to explore anddiscuss higher education both in the United States and
measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Prof. Keefe B. Manning, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr. Margaret J. Slattery, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Margaret Slattery Ph.D., has been a faculty member at Penn State University in Biomedical Engineering since 2007 and her career has focused on undergraduate students and their academic experiences. She currently is directing a new office within
; Instruction at the University of Texas at Austin. She previously served as a Program Director at the National Science Foundation, on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education, and as an associate dean and director of interdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstanding publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. Dr. Borrego is Deputy Editor for Journal of Engineering Education. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and
may have diminished; previously when FE review was part of a gradedcourse it seemed to send a stronger message from the program and its faculty that the exam wasimportant to the students’ future career. For example, on the 2011-2012 graduating seniorsurvey, students were asked “how important is it to you whether or not you passed the FEexam?” Among the 56 respondents, 9% selected not at all/not very and 9% answeredmoderately; we believe that all students should respond moderately or higher. Also, it was feltthat the level of knowledge and learning acquired in the senior design course was insufficient formany of the professional skills. For example, the ability of students to analyze issues inprofessional ethics was not being documented
teaching development(TD) programs is the Longitudinal Study of Future STEM Scholars (Connolly et al., 2016),which studied graduate students from three large institutions. The goal of this work was toanswer the question “What are the short- and long-term effects of TD programs on doctoralstudents’ teaching-related skills, knowledge, attitudes, and career choices?” The three mostimportant results are captured in the executive summary: “1) TD during the doctoral programhad positive, significant effects for all participants, including those who do not take positions inacademia after graduating. 2) Participating in TD programs during the doctoral program had noeffect on students’ time to degree completion, which was six years on average. 3) For
. Caspi is interested in ways by which universal design, collaborative commons and cooperation can challenge and transform computing disciplines and technology design.Dr. Katherine M. Steele, University of Washington Dr. Steele is an assistant professor in mechanical engineering at the University of Washington. She received her BS in engineering from the Colorado School of Mines and MS and PhD in mechanical en- gineering from Stanford University. She leads the Ability & Innovation Lab, dedicated to designing new tools and techniques to improve human ability through engineering, and also a leader of AccessEngineer- ing to enable individuals with disabilities to pursue careers in engineering. Dr. Steele previously
design, part tolerances,CAD modeling, file conversion, and printer operation.There is a consensus that increasing access to higher education opportunities is necessary todecrease income disparity over the next decade. Contained within this objective is a desire toexpanded access to educational pathways and careers in the areas of Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics (STEM).4 In addition, the strength and vibrancy of the USeconomy relies on knowledge-intensive jobs staffed by well-trained individuals who drivediscovery and development of new technologies. Without these career avenues, individuals willface a lower standard of living as income disparity increases.5 To provide this workforce trainingservice, many educational institutions
and Rescue at TexasA&M University, since 9/11, robots have been used in 49 disasters in 17 countries. 24 of thosedisasters used UGVs- with the majority using the robot models from 9/11. [3]. Giving studentsthe opportunity to familiarize themselves with the controls, purpose, and design of USAR’sincorporates real world applications. Regardless of a students after high school career choicethey have a usable technological skill. The military, urban planners, law enforcement, andmunicipal safety personal use a variety of USAR’s to collect data, bombs, bodies, and pictures ofunknown impassable areas. [4]Robotics and Automation Texas High School CourseThe first author teaches Robotics and Automation at a Texas High School Career Academy
and programThe Program for Engineering Excellence for Partner Schools (PEEPS) is a NSF S-STEMscholarship program, and was inspired by the Posse Foundation1. At the California Polytechnic(“Cal Poly”) State University, we wished to create a program in which underrepresented studentsin engineering receive significant financial aid (up to $10k for at least 4 years) and a network ofclassmates, faculty, and staff to support them throughout their college career. Our term andacronym, “PEEPS,” captures the idea of a “posse,” “family” or “my peoples” as a group thatsupports and cares for one another.Our primary goal is to recruit, retain, and graduate academically talented, financially needystudents2 from disadvantaged backgrounds to enter the
* Explaining key physical effects influencing selective thermal emitters in order to achieve high performance thermophotovoltaic systemsDr. Krishna Madhavan, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Krishna Madhavan is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. In 2008 he was awarded an NSF CAREER award for learner-centric, adaptive cyber-tools and cyber-environments using learning analytics. He leads a major NSF-fundedprojectcalled Deep Insights Anytime, Anywhere (http://www.dia2.org) to characterize the impact of NSF and other federal investments in the area of STEM education. He also serves as co-PI for the Network forComputationalNanotechnology (nanoHUB.org) that serves hundreds
Through a Course Redesign InitiativeBackgroundThere have been myriad studies that have examined factors that contribute to student retention inengineering programs. These studies have helped guide efforts in implementing effectivestrategies to increase student retention, persistence, and degree completion. Two common themesrelated to engineering retention that have emerged from the literature are individual andinstitutional factors. Individual factors can be summed up as aptitude, pre-college preparation,academic performance, affective factors, personality traits, and satisfaction; while institutionalfactors include academic engagement, academic and career advising, environmental and socialdynamics, and climate