/home/CAIB_Vol1.html 5. Bates, S., “Flint water crisis: For young engineers, a lesson on the importance of listening”, NSF, 23 March 2016. Web. 29 March 2016. http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=138060&WT.mc_id=USNSF_1 6. Herkert, J., "Engineering ethics education in the USA: content, pedagogy and curriculum", European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 303-313 (2000). 7. Walther, J., Kellam, N., Sochacka, N., & Radcliffe, D., “Engineering Competence? An Interpretive Investigation of Engineering Students' Professional Formation.” Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 703-740 (2011). 8. Clark, D.B., Tanner-Smith E. E, & Killingsworth, S. S., "Digital Games, Design
class that is inhigh demand from the first-year engineering student body and that greatly enhances students’understanding of manufacturing.Tags: manufacturing, education, engineering, first-year, volunteerismIntroductionToday’s engineering curricula provide adequate design and analysis experience for students, yetprovide little or no formal education related to manufacturing tools and processes (Todd, Red,Magleby, & Coe, 2001), despite calls from industry to provide more focus on manufacturing inthe engineering curriculum (Mason, 1998). At the same time, many engineering programs in theU.S. now provide students with access to high-tech “maker spaces” to manufacture their designsfor student projects (Wilczynski, 2015). This provides an
Paper ID #18609Work in Progress: Increasing Interest in STEM and Improving Retention forAt-Risk Students - A Two-Year StudyDr. Melissa Danforth, California State University, Bakersfield Melissa Danforth is an Associate Professor and the Chair of the Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at CSUB. Dr. Danforth is the PI for a NSF Federal Cyber Service grant (NSF-DUE1241636) to create models for information assurance education and outreach. Dr. Danforth is the Project Director for a U.S. Department of Education grant (P031S100081) to create engineering pathways for students in the CSUB service
Paper ID #19927Algorithmic Grading Strategies for Computerized Drawing AssessmentsDr. Mariana Silva, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Mariana Silva is an Adjunct Assistant Professor and Curriculum Development Coordinator in the Me- chanical Science and Engineering Department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She received her BSME and MSME from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and earned her Ph.D. in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2009. Besides her teaching activities, Mariana serves as an academic advisor in the Mechanical
College • Collaborative Projects (2007-2013) – Orange, Lake, Sumter, Seminole and Osceola County Public Schools, Lockheed Martin, Electronic Arts, Girl Scouts, Junior Achievement, Prism, Orlando Science Center, University of Central Florida, Valencia, Seminole and Lake Sumter Colleges • Coordinator of Industry Expert Review Committee: 2008 Math Sunshine State Standards • Member of the Strategic Planning Committee (2011-2012) - Florida Center for Research in Math and Science Education • Medical Scholars Program (2014-present) – Florida A&M University, MCAT prep curriculum developer c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
teachers and the curriculum provider Engineering byDesign (EbD). Our workpresents an integration of novel curriculum materials—soft robotics, in contrast to traditionalrobotics—and methods—design-based research—to shed light on high-school student STEMperceptions and how instructional design can be leveraged to affect those perceptions. We arenearing completion of year two of the project, and are able to share findings relevant to ASEE’sPrecollege Engineering Education Division including lessons learned from the application ofdesign-based research methods; the present state of our curriculum materials; and preliminaryfindings regarding changes in student STEM motivation, self-efficacy, and interest in the contextof the curriculum experience.Novel
. Jennifer Olson, University of Illinois at Chicago Jennifer Olson is a clinical assistant professor in the College of Education at University of Illinois at Chicago. She coordinates the Secondary Education program and teaches curriculum, instruction, & as- sessment courses to undergraduate and graduate secondary education students. Jennifer’s research focus on urban high school reform is informed by nine years of teaching in Chicago Public Schools, giving her an informed perspective of how policy moves from theory to practice. Dr. Olson’s current research interests include urban teacher preparation, teacher professional development and student voice. Her most recent publication in Journal of Urban Learning
, and career pathways resulting in meaningful employment in the AdvancedManufacturing sector. Among the Advanced Manufacturing disciplines to be considered aremachining, rapid prototyping, specialty welding, and lean manufacturing. Facilities focused ontraining students, incumbent workers, and unemployed persons in transition for these specificdisciplines will also be considered. The desired competencies will be identified through closecollaboration with industry partners as well as the College Workforce Development Institute andwill be integrated in a comprehensive manner throughout the entire curriculum. Real-lifeexamples of the underlying principles will include an applications library. The goals of thisproject include identifying technical
an ASEE and IEEE Fellow and PAESMEM awardee. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Essential Components Found in K-12 Engineering Activities Devised by Various Types of Educators (Fundamental)Engineering activities used in the K-12 classroom arise from a variety of sources. As engineeringhas the opportunity to penetrate farther into K-12, through the implementation of NextGeneration science standards or through integrated STEM instruction, the proliferation ofactivities assigned the engineering moniker has increased tremendously. This paper describes thedevelopment of a method for examining activities from a variety of sources. The activities arecategorized as to pedagogical
activities that simulate the various communication exercises • Can be flexibly implemented to fit the learning – Documented problem solutionsWriting in the Disciplines is an integrated approach that ties writing assignments to that engineers practice in academia and industry. objectives for a coursethe learning outcomes of a technical course and provides relevant opportunities for
windows of the classroom and collecting additional data to see the impact.Summer Workshops An integral part of the ITEST project is to involve 4th through 12th grade educators inthe process and have them create and deploy relevant curriculum in their classrooms in order tohave direct impact on young students. To support this goal, the team will run summerworkshops where 4th through 12th grade educators from regional schools will be identified andthen trained in the relevant technologies. These workshops will last two weeks where the firstweek will be “teaching the teachers” and the second week will be devoted to assisting theteachers in developing appropriate curriculum that integrates the technologies discussed aboveinto their classroom
student learning.Dr. Ron Gray, Northern Arizona University Ron Gray, Ph.D. is an assistant professor of science education in the Center for Science Teaching and Learning at Northern Arizona University. He graduated from Oregon State University with a doctorate in science education. His work largely focuses on providing secondary science teachers the tools to design and implement learning experiences for their students that are effective and authentic to the discipline. Much of this work has been centered on model-based inquiry and the integration of scientific practices in a supportive and structured way. He has been funded by NSF and other agencies to conduct research on preservice teacher education, undergraduate
curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Dr. Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington Professor of Learning Sciences & Human DevelopmentDr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University Dr. Montfort is an Assistant Professor in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Motivating and Engaging Faculty in Cultural and Curricular Transformation of a Multidisciplinary Engineering School1. IntroductionIn an NSF-funded IUSE:RED
. Another very promising strategy is the integration ofliteracy with other school subjects. There is a great deal of research to support the efficacy ofintegrated learning for increasing the literacy of students. In particular, innovative strategies thatcombine Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) with literacy have beenfound to provide beneficial gains in reading as well as in STEM subjects.4-13 One example of thisis the Seeds of Science, Roots of Reading (Seeds/Roots) curriculum which integrates literacywith scientific knowledge to provide a fun and authentic context for learning both subjects.5, 6, 14Another example is the Engineering is Elementary Curriculum which has a story book that goeswith each of the STEM activities
Training Programs Province Figure 2 entrepreneurial Capability Training System in XJTU3.2.1 A Research -and-Teaching-Integrated Model for Engineering Education InnovationResearch and teaching integration consists of two parts: entrepreneurial curriculum and collaborationwith industrial partners. To begin with, XJTU creates an overall systematic plan for practicaleducation that features a comprehensive entrepreneurial curriculum. With inputs and participationfrom the industry, XJTU’s plan increases the proportion of practical education in students’ credits.This is done in part by creating for-credit entrepreneurial courses. The plan also providesopportunities for industry to play a greater role in cooperative education
the projects. Throughout my graduate studies I have worked with undergraduate engineering and business students, high school students, high school teachers, community college students and many more to aid in develop- ment of a well-rounded professionals. Mentorship is an integral part of the engineer I want to be, through giving back to my peers and fostering a community where we encourage each other to reach their full potential, I know that I am positively impacting my community. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #18171Catherine M. McEntee, North Carolina State University
Machining handbooks Systems automation. Manufacturers catalogs Specification sheetsTable 3 Competencies Required by the Various Courses in the Engineering Technology ProgramThe basic goals of adopting a constructivist approach are very simple. The goals are retention,understating, active use of knowledge and skills, hence the integration with other classes isessential to this strategy. Engineering Technology curriculum should be designed to direct towardsa more attentive approach in valuing knowledge integration [17], bearing in mind that from
licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Challenges of a Professional Issues Course in Civil Engineering: Comparison Across Two YearsAbstractThere are a number of professional skills that civil engineering students should possess whenthey graduate with a Bachelor’s degree, as articulated in the ASCE Body of Knowledge SecondEdition (BOK2) and the civil engineering program specific criteria under ABET EAC-accreditation. An analysis of the curriculum at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU
: Learning Assessment, Applied Statistics, ABET outcomes, Industrial EngineeringIntroductionIt is broadly recognized that the applied statistics course is one of the most important quantitativesubjects in the industrial engineering curriculum (Brown and Kass, 2009). Over the last decade,there has been raising attention given to the teaching and learning aspects of statistics course(Garfield and Ben-Zvi, 2008; Dinov and Christu, 2009; Bilgin, 2011; Harpe et al., 2012; Judi andSahari, 2013; GAISE Report, 2016)One of the essential components in the learning and teaching environment is an effectiveassessment that can promote learning as well as measure or certify outcomes (Garfield andFranklin, 2011; Clements and Cord 2013, Crisp et al. 2016
): p. 409-426. 4. Artemeva, N., S. Logie, and J. St-Martin, "From page to stage: How theories of genre and situated learning help introduce engineering students to discipline-specific communication". Technical Communication Quarterly, 1999. 8(3): p. 301-316. 5. Cross, K., M. Paretti, and H. Matusovich. "Student beliefs about learning communication skills", in 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2013. 6. Ford, J.D. and L.A. Riley, "Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula, courses, and support systems". Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 92(4): p. 325-328. 7. Manuel-Dupont, S., "Writing-Across-the-Curriculum in an Engineering Program". Journal of
Paper ID #18137Comparison of Intrinsic Motivation of Freshmen Engineering Students asthey Participate in a Multinational Design ProjectDr. Jorge Rodriguez P.E., Western Michigan University Faculty member in the Department of Engineering Design, Manufacturing, and Management Systems (EDMMS) at Western Michigan University’s (WMU). Co-Director of the Center for Integrated Design (CID), and currently the college representative to the President’s University-wide Sustainability Com- mittee at WMU. Received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering-Design from University of Wisconsin- Madison and received an MBA from Rutgers
provide the students with an opportunity 46 0.50 to use their skills and capabilities to a good human end, which is why most of the students entered engineering programs.” Multiple When integrating ethical “I think it is better to teach this concept Courses discussions throughout across the curriculum a little in every curriculum is discussed class rather than one single class. When it has a particular class, the students end
:23836. Accessed 3 January 2016.11 Bannerot, R, Kastor, R., and Ruchhoeft, P. "Multidisciplinary capstone design at the University ofHouston." Advances in Engineering Education 2.1 (2010): 1-33.12 The Ohio State University, “ME Senior Capstone Sequence Options,”https://mae.osu.edu/undergraduate/mechanical/capstone.13 University of Florida, “ME Curriculum,” http://www.mae.ufl.edu/PDFs/ME-Curriculum.pdf.14 University of Florida, “Integrated Product & Process Design,” http://www.ippd.ufl.edu.15 Carnegie Mellon, “Product Design Course 39-605/606,” http://www.ices.cmu.edu/product-design-course.asp.16 Widmann, J., Laiho, L., and Savage, R. "Initiating and sustaining an interdisciplinary capstone design course."Capstone Design
Paper ID #20096Teaching the Nature of Engineering in K-12 Science Education: A DelphiStudy (Fundamental)Dr. Brian Hartman, Walla Walla University Brian is a professor of education at Walla Walla University. He has 5 years of experience teaching high school science and practiced engineering for 12 years. His research interests include K-12 biological and chemical engineering curriculum development, nature of engineering, and creativity in engineering design.Randy L. Bell, Oregon State University Dr. Bell is an Associate Dean and Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Oregon State University. His
Carnegie Mellon University as a Teaching Faculty in August 2016. Dr. Bedillion’s research interests include distributed manipulation, control applications in data storage, control applications in manufacturing, and STEM education.Dr. Shaobo Huang, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Shaobo Huang is an Assistant Professor and the Stensaas Endowed STEM Chair in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Her research interests in- clude student retention and academic performance in engineering, student achievement evaluation and assessment, and K-12 STEM curriculum design.Dr. Cassandra M Degen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Cassandra Degen
studios, materialsof construction, general education courses, and the necessary calculus and physics courses thatare prerequisites for their first ARCE courses in statics and mechanics of materials. The result,as determined by exit interviews with the department head, was that ARCE freshmen did not feellike they were part of the department and were often dropping out or changing majors prior totaking their first ARCE course. Other than their ARCE faculty advisor who the freshman arerequired to see quarterly, these students had no contact with the ARCE faculty. The obvioussolution was to include an ARCE course in the curriculum that would remedy this and inspire thefreshmen for the structural engineering curriculum that laid ahead.The ARCE program
engineeringeducation field in general, a number of investigations have been conducted to explore therelationship and importance of empathy, self-awareness, and social-awareness in engineeringstudents [11-14]. These studies reveal the importance of empathy for effective innovation andengineering design. In biomedical engineering design, a more in-depth understanding of theentire patient experience may provide for more innovative and effective design alternatives.The efforts discussed in this paper to address the inclusion of the disease pathway and the entirepatient experience into the educational opportunities for biomedical engineering students are onestep to more effective integration of the liberal arts and humanities into an engineeringeducation. Previous
of targetedprojects with each touching on a handful of topics.1A potential pitfall arises when courses with a specific but disparate collection of topics designedto meet the needs of subsequent courses are presented to students without proper framing. Thiscan give the impression the content is encyclopedic in nature – part of a collection of knowledgewithout sequence that can be picked up or disregarded. This problem resembles concerns withproject-based learning. The primary concern with project-based learning is that it runs the risk ofneglecting topics that make up an essential sequence of knowledge and skill acquisition inengineering education.2While project-based instruction runs the risk of leaving knowledge gaps across curriculum, it
this research project focusing on key works that emerged fromthe study, and implications that emerged for practice.IntroductionIn the concluding chapter of the influential research compendium How People Learn,1 the editorsrecommend increased focus on research that elucidates “how student interests, identities, self-knowledge, self-regulation, and emotion interact with cognitive competence” (p. 280). Inengineering education, we have often considered emotion as a by-product of learning, but recentdevelopments demonstrate that emotion is an integral and central part of learning.2 This researchbuilds on the developments in neuroscience that point to the critical role of emotion in learningand decision-making.3,4In engineering education there has
, published by Prentice-Hall. He is a registered Professional En- gineer in the state of Indiana. He is senior member of IEEE. Ahmed’s current interests include embedded system design, electric vehicle, and VHDL design.Dr. Wangling Yu, Purdue University Northwest Dr. Wangling Yu is an assistant professor in the Electrical & Computer Engineering Technology De- partment of the Purdue University Northwest. He was a test engineer over 15 years, providing technical c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19061 leadership in the certification, testing and evaluation of custom integrated