gender as a predictor of the level-1 intercepts andslopes.MeasuresStudents participated in five online surveys throughout the fall semester. The first survey usedcomplete scales for all measures. The second, third, and fourth surveys contained short versionsof each scale. The fifth survey was comprised of short scales for the mindset measures and acomplete scale for engineering identity. Only the means of the short scales were used in theseanalyses.To measure engineering identity, items from Chemers’ science identity survey were adapted toengineers (Chemers et. al., 2010; Estrada et. al., 2011). The engineering identity measurecontained items such as, “Being an engineer is an important reflection of who I am.” Responsesranged from a scale of 1
groups. We found no significant differences acrossQuestions 1 and 4.Conclusions and ImplicationsOur data shows that participation in the Teaching Circle positively improves student evaluationscores for some questions, and it significantly improves them in some cases. In 5 of the 12questions analyzed, the intervention group showed positive improvement after participated in theTeaching Circle (Table 3). From our first analysis using linear regression, while the controlgroup had significantly decreasing scores before and after term 0 for two questions (Questions 15and 23), the intervention group did not reflect this decreasing trend in scores. In one other case,the Intervention After scores were significantly greater than those of the Control After
progress through theSTEM pipeline also depends on the types of opportunities, experiences, and support studentsreceive while in college (Chang, Eagan, Lin, & Hurtado, 2011; Espinosa, 2011). “Theeducational experience and the culture of the discipline (as reflected in the attitudes and practicesof faculty) make a much greater contribution to [STEM] attrition than the individualinadequacies of students or the appeal of other majors” (Chang, Sharkness, Hurtado, & Newman,2014). In addition to the academic and social supports deemed essential for studentpersistence and transfer, there appear to be some specific recommendations that encourageSTEM students in particular to persist, transfer, and ultimately complete a STEM degree
addition, mechanical engineering experiencehelped to take this project’s concept into completion. Utilizing the mechanical engineeringstudent’s experience with modeling and operations research, the group was able to modify theGridLab-D to model the experiment. As the nation’s only urban land-grant university, the University of the District of Columbia hasa special focus on urban sustainability, which is reflected in its curriculum and research focuses.The experience that these students brought to the framing of this project was integral to itssuccess. Collaboration through the capstone project allowed students to share the lessons they’velearned through their internships or research projects in a concrete manner. One student, who haddone
amount of feedback and comments were felt to be too low, which reflects the inabilityto motivate the peer review of the team submissions, and amount of coordination resources – forthe future iterations we need to either make sure more of the global coordination and exerciseevaluation is shared among the collaborating universities, or arrange more resources forcoordinating and managing the collaboration and technical implementation from CERN.Overall, the online platform testing with CBI 2 was a successful probe into the limits andpossibilities on how such platform can be used and is useful, and how the other elements of thecourse design can affect these limits. Enabling students to collaborate and learn in suchenvironment, and offering them the
of x, (b) Calculate 𝑍!" at 𝜆! /8 away from the load, (c)Calculate Γ! , (d) Calculate VSWR and (e) Calculate the transmitted power and reflected power as apercentage of incident power 𝑃!"Solution: (a) 𝑍! = 0, 𝑍! = 50 Ω. !! !!! Γ! = = -1 = 𝑒 !!"# => Γ! = 1 50 Ω 𝑍! !! !!! Φ = 180 ! !/! Applying this for 𝑉(𝑥) , we get ( 𝑉(𝑥) = 𝑉! (1 + Γ! )! − 4 𝑠𝑖𝑛! (𝛽𝑥
particular. Further,there are still few published studies that contribute in meaningful ways to our understanding ofhow to recruit and retain learners from diverse groups. We close by setting research agendas andavenues needed to understand and impact concerns over diversity and inclusion in engineering.Introduction and backgroundDespite myriad calls for and programs aiming to bring engineering into K-12 settings, progresshas been hampered by an already crowded curricular scope, comparatively limited resources forteacher professional development on teaching engineering practices, and a relatively sparseadoption of state standards that include engineering. In this metasynthesis, we reflect on pastfindings and contrast this with more recent
manufacturing. Students in Engineeringprograms have been very well versed in analysis, simulation, and abstract design. By themselveseach of these programs have strengths and weaknesses. However, when combining students fromboth of these program we develop teams that more closely reflect professional design teams. Theability to successfully implement complex design and build projects is enhanced.This paper outlines the design of a program at Western Carolina University (WCU) thatculminates with a senior capstone project for industry. Projects are done by teams of studentsmixed from the School disciplines of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electricaland Computer Engineering Technology, and Applied Systems Engineering Technology. A
engineering departments themselves remain pri-marily concerned with how design directly impacts their teaching and interactions with students.As architects, engineers, and planners for more than a dozen collegiate engineering-departmentbuildings in the past decade, SmithGroupJJR has helped develop a series of best practices re-lated to facility design in this new era. While not the only firm to explore them, SmithGroupJJRhas organized these new best practices into five distinct trends that encourage active participa-tion, collaboration, and even spontaneity, reflecting an underlying ethic of student engagementfrom the freshman level up. We present them here, provide real-world examples from Smith-GroupJJR’s portfolio, and also propose methods of
students haveperformed assignments in which each aspect individually presented the same level of challenge.Table 2 also details other aspects of experimental complexity that increased the challenge level ofthe experiments. One aspect of scaffolding was initial use of a DAQ system to record a singlesignal of data and later using the same system with modifications to record multiple signals ofdata. Another aspect of scaffolding was that measurements in early experiments could be recordedwithout an overall plan for the order in which they should occur. Experiment 3 introduced therequirement that the order in which data was collected must be decided in advance as data collectedout of order would not reflect the desired impact of hysteresis. Experiment
or reflections regarding competitiveness in thejob-market for recent graduates. Table 6 indicates the comments from respondents. Table 6. Comments regarding experience contributing to job-market competitiveness From my experience, there are many qualified candidates for a single position. On paper, most candidates will look the same. The difference comes when you are at an in-person interview and you must acknowledge something about yourself that makes you completely different from the other candidates; generally, this quality is not even related to work or academic experience. Should be able to frame a problem. No matter the position, being able to communicate well is critical, GPA can be used to thin a stack of resumes but I
determined.ALEKS Discussion:Figure 1 reflects a scatter plot that shows the relationship of the students’ average grade earnedbetween Calculus I, Physics I, and Statics courses and the associated ALEKS score. A point onthe scatter plot is determined by grade average (y-axis coordinate) and the ALEKS score (x-axiscoordinate). The trend line shows the tendency of the ALEKS score with a certain gradeoutcome.When comparing the individual class grades with the ALEKS score received, the graph showed agradual upward trend from lower scores to higher scores in relation to class grades. This is truefor each of the three classes. The three class grades where then averaged together and comparedto the ALEKS score. This trend line showed the students having the lower
Harvard’s Gender-Science IAT and were required to submit a form reflecting on taking the IAT (students did not submit the results from taking the IAT) 3. Implicit bias presentation: a lecture was given to all classes revisiting implicit bias, discussing why students took the IAT, showing interviews with women from industry, and suggesting possible ways to address implicit bias; students shared their own stories during lecture and via online formAlong with these implicit bias activities, we wanted to know how our students’ perceptions ofstereotyped traits, learning environment, and perceived abilities changed over the course of thesemester. Student cohorts can change drastically even from semester-to-semester, so it
and abandoned properties, and building on a sense of pride of place among the residents. Two undergraduate anthropology students studied, ethnographically, the interactions of the interns (e.g. Bernard 2011). They spent all 10 weeks observing the interns’ daily activities, participating in group events, conducting interviews, and analyzing interns’ periodic reflections. Two anthropology faculty met regularly with them. This paper principally relies on their anthropological analysis. This paper highlights some of the successes and challenges involved when the number of
hands-oninstruction to students on a variety of topics. Each week the program followed a similar pattern,involving a warm-up discussion about a professional from a STEM field, a thematic mainactivity, and a closing portion that encouraged review and reflection. At select points in theprogram, a field trip was incorporated that allowed students to visit university labs, sciencemuseums, or engineering open houses.SEBA Project OutcomesOver the course of the project multiple measures were used to assess student attitudes,engagement, and the overall impact that teaching assistants, parents, and mentors had onstudents’ perspective of STEM. Feedback about the program design, implementation, content,and outcomes was obtained from school staff, parents
goal of creating a matrix that could determine the optimal reuse option for a vacant lot in the Southeast neighborhood remained. The Tech Team was able to provide formal feedback regarding their experience with the VLO matrix through final project documents where they detailed the chain of events that led to the concept of the matrix and continued through the project’s completion. Similarly, students involved in the VLO matrix’s redefinition and expansion process over Summer 2016 were able to provide feedback on their work through reflections and project progress reports. In both
, the voltage across the resistor R2 is calculated as: (100𝐾) ∗ (5𝑉) 𝑉2 = = 4.16 𝑉 120𝐾The measured value was 4.088 V, which is about 1.7 percent deviation from the calculated value.The students were asked to reflect on the differences between the measured voltage and thecalculated one, and to give reasons for the discrepancy between the measured and calculatedvoltage. The measurements made by the students allowed them to have a deeper understandingof the Voltage divider rule. (a) (b)Figure 4: (a) Resistive Circuit (b) Voltmeter Readings of the
along threedimensions: Process, Project, and Reflection.With regard to the process we anticipate students will be able to: ● Describe the “lens” of one’s disciplinary framework ● Find, read, and incorporate information from across multiple disciplines ● Communicate one’s perspective and decision-making process to colleagues from other disciplinesWith regard to the project we anticipate students will be able to: ● Design and build a quadcopter using open source technology ● Plan and implement projects in an interdisciplinary team environmentWith regard to the reflection component of the course, we anticipate students will be able to: ● Articulate in verbal and written form the importance of interdisciplinary teams ● Identify
effect oftheir efforts. Often a true demographic of these students is not understood, leaving organizerswith generalizations based upon activities and interactions in the informal setting. Manysuccesses have been recorded and discussed at length11,13, without a great deal of differentiationof students based on gender, age, or ethnicities. All of them have been proven to influencechoice of major and extracurricular interests.Demographics. Some assert that the demographics of different STEM groups have changed dueto these efforts inside and outside of the formal school setting. However, the demographics havenot changed in ways that reflect current demographics of the population at large14. It is unclear ifthis is due to targeted or convenient
evaluating projected cash flows against a Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR), we bring up the issue of whether profitable plants should be closed if their rate of return is not sufficient. Closing the plant would put hundreds of people out of work, and decimate the local economy. A decision on whether to outsource a labor intensive activity to an overseas plant may need to account for qualitative factors such as local labor practices and how they might reflect on the company reputation, as occurred with NikeThese kinds of issues, that are quite real, require students to have an awareness of the biggerpicture, and a well developed value system.A number of approaches to improve the engineering economics course
from “totally agree” to “totally disagree”. The facilitator would then invite sharing ofperspectives along the spectrum, to engage the group in social knowledge construction. Students could beasked to breakout into small groups and craft pitches on portable whiteboards, and a facilitator wouldinvite a few groups to pitch the audience on their ideas for startups.As the Harvard education strategist Tony Wagner writes “The world doesn’t care what you know, it caresabout what you can do with what you know”[15]. There is clear opportunity for university libraries toform partnerships to develop a new layer of experiences focused on entrepreneurship that go beyondcontent delivery. The work herein reflects a collaborative partnership between two
situations needs significant purification. However, water purification units are expensive and not easy to obtain. Therefore, you are tasked to design an inexpensive, easy to use, easy to assemble, durable, and low maintenance water purification system using low cost, readily available materials to quickly remove contaminants from water. You will focus on reducing the turbidity of a sample of water. Testing Performance Turbidity is a measure of the lack of clarity (cloudiness) of water and is a key test of water quality. Turbidity is apparent when light reflects off of particles in the water. Some sources of turbidity include soil erosion, waste discharge, urban runoff, and algal growth. In addition to creating an unappealing
foreach user’s account (Figure 2). Although this is an imperfect metric since students often watchvideos together and this is logged only in one student’s account, students who benefit from theability to re-watch lecture material would presumably have a large number of video watchesand/or a large cumulative duration of video watching. Figure 2 shows that contrary to ourhypothesis, students who spend the most time watching videos do not perform better thanstudents who watch the assigned videos only once (59 videos, 17.6 hours). It is, however,important to note that the number of videos watched probably only reflects video loads, andwould not capture multiple watches of the same segment, so there could still be a hiddencorrelation, but this data
-curricular support: A multi-case study of engineering student support centers,” Virgnia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2015.[16] J. Nosoff, “Minority Engineering Student Organizations,” in Handbook on Improving the Retention and Graduation of Minorities in Engineering, National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc, 1985.[17] G. Young, D. B. Knight, and D. R. Simmons, “Co-curricular experiences link to nontechnical skill development for African-American engineers: Communication, teamwork, professionalism, lifelong learning, and reflective behavior skills,” in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2014.[18] W. C. Lee and H. M. Matusovich, “A Model of Co-Curricular Support for
collected from the participants’ teacher for a response rate of over 50%.Upon confirmation that both the participant and the participants’ parents had signed the letter ofconsent, the letter was removed from the responses to anonymize the data.Data AnalysisDespite underrepresentation of females in the survey population, over 50% of the participantsidentified as female. This was ideal for studying gendered perceptions, but may reflect somegendered perceptions of the importance of this area of research.In this work two questions of the survey will be analysed, those where students were asked torate the skill set of a typical engineer, and then rate themselves in those same skills. The 13 skillsevaluated are found in Table 2. Of the 27 respondents two
for a sample assessment question).Students completed self-assessments of each competency in which they rated their currentstanding on a nine-point scale, with a score of nine reflecting expert status. An open-endedquestion was posed for each competency in which justifications for the rating were solicited.Additionally, advisors completed assessments rating their graduate students on each competency.Individual feedback reports were generated for each student based on the assessment results (SeeAppendix A for a sample feedback report).Following the assessment phase, each student and his or her advisor were presented with anindividualized feedback report. A member of the research team then met with each student-advisor pair to review the
university with a private charter located on the eastcoast. Data were collected via a faculty climate survey in spring 2014. The survey was developedusing faculty climate surveys tested and implemented at the University of Wisconsin-Madisonand at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Some questions were taken directly from Bilimoria,et al.’s survey to reproduce their work with a high degree of fidelity. Finally, questions wereadded and refined to reflect the specific climate and history at our institution.The original sample consisted of 644 full-time faculty members on and off the tenure track.Because the professional experiences of faculty off the tenure track vary considerably withcollege and workload assignment, we limited our final sample to
engineering bachelor’s degrees. However, while women receive over halfof bachelor’s degrees awarded in the biological sciences, they receive far fewer in the computersciences (17.9%) and engineering (19.3%). This trend reflects upon the workplace in these fieldswith women making up only 29% of the science and engineering workforce, with relatively lowshares in engineering, around 15%. The need for more educational opportunities for femalestudents in fields of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) is present andthere is a need for programs to help correct this trend8.There are currently some STEM outreach programs in place within the United States. The UnitedStates Naval Academy (USNA) is the host of a STEM Summer Camp program. The
Design for an Integrated ProjectDelivery Studio. Proceedings of the 46th ASC International Conference. Omaha, Nebraska, 2011.8 Vanasupa, L., K.E. McCormick, C.J. Stefanco, C. J., R.J. Herter, & M. McDonald. Challenges in Transdisciplinary,Integrated Projects: Reflections on the Case of Faculty Members’ Failure to Collaborate. Journal of InnovativeHigher Education. 37/3, 2011.9 Estes, A.C. and Baltimore, C. “Using K’nex to Teach Large Scale Structures to Architects and ConstructionStudents.” Paper 2014-9826. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, ASEE, Indianapolis,2014.10 ARCE Magazine, “K’nex Connection: Students Play with Toys, Learn About Structures.” Department ofArchitectural Engineering, California Polytechnic
paper authors willpresent the impact of utilizing the “adaptive follow-up” modules in Pearson MasteringEngineering, as well as a reflection on the different methods used over the study period.As in previous years, assessment of the efficacy of homework assignments will be based onobservation of students’ performance on exams, and a survey of students’ perceptions relative tohistorical norms. Institutional review of research protocol determined that full board review ofthe study and informed consent was not required.IntroductionOver the past 3 years the authors have been collecting and reporting data on homework, quiz,and exam performance, as well as survey data on students’ perceptions of learning and opinionson the methods used in the course