residential building construction was adapted in HB1647 building code of Florida Legislature. Najafi is a member of numerous professional societies and has served on many committees and programs, and continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses, seminars and workshops, and has developed courses, videos and software packages during his career. His areas of specialization include transportation planning and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, and public works.Mr. Chi Xu, University of Florida Ph.D. in Civil Engineering University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (Begins in Jan
Technology in 2005 and 2007, respectively. Dr. Ashour is the first recipient of William and Wendy Korb Early Career Professorships in Industrial Engineering at Penn State Behrend. His research interest mainly includes process improvement, modeling and simulation, and decision making modeling of manufacturing and healthcare systems. He is a member of the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE), Jordanian Engineering Association (JEA), and Society of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM). Currently, Dr. Ashour serves as a co-Chair for the Modeling and Simulation track in the 2017 IISE Annual Conference and Expo, a chair for the Sustainable Manufacturing track in the 2016 Detroit IEOM
students were genuinelyexcited about completing a challenging, cutting-edge project that pushed them beyond their“comfort zones” into new areas of learning. They really appreciated being able to build whatthey were designing, and seeing how this influenced the design process. They were moremotivated to engage and find answers to hard questions. They were able to make application ofsystems engineering principles on a real project with real consequences. As a result, they realizedthe benefits of the systems engineering approach. They were motivated to work throughteamwork and management issues in order to achieve successful system development. Andfinally, this experience opened their eyes to career paths in systems and test engineering.The student
Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Gannon University in the US. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs in 2005. His research interests include embedded systems, rapid prototyping with FPGA, biometrics, and engineering education.Dr. Yanchun Yang, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute Yanchun Yang is the director for Academic Affairs Division of UM-SJTU Joint Institute. His division supports the academic mission of the UM-SJTU Joint Institute, helping students fulfill the requirements of the JI, reach the optimal level in personal and professional development, and achieve their academic and career goals. Yanchun has rich
student responses and thinking processes through the evolution of responsesfrom individual to team to individual; identifying factors that may influence student thinkingprocesses during these exercises; and developing suitable performance measures. The findingswill inform instructors on the effectiveness of these active learning exercises in the classroom.This paper reports on the salient results of this two-year experience. In particular, it is discussedand demonstrated how the decision worksheets and written evidence from active learningexercises were used to extract information to help understand how students: (a) learn about andapply knowledge of new and career-relevant information; and (b) influence each other’s learningprocesses when
, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 111(23):8410–8415, May 2014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.3. D. Derrick Rodriguez, J. Blacklock, and J. M. Bach, “Letting students learn through making mistakes: Teaching hardware and software early in an academic career,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Seattle, WA (2015).4. S. W. McKnight, J. E. Pelletier, and P. G. Leventman, “Introduction to Engineering Course At a Community College Using Hands-On MATLAB Experiment Control,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, San Antonio, TX (2012).5. G. W. Recktenwald, “Six Year of Living with the Lab
computational algorithms for simulating complex stochastic systems such as atmospheric aerosols and feedback control. Prof. West is the recipient of the NSF CAREER award and is a University of Illinois Distinguished Teacher-Scholar and College of Engineering Education Innovation Fellow. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Algorithmic grading strategies for computerized drawing assessments1. IntroductionIntroductory mechanics courses have important learning objectives focusing on students’ abilityto accurately draw or sketch particular types of diagrams, such as free body diagrams and graphsof shear forces and bending moments in beams. To achieve mastery of these drawing skills it isessential
clear-cut solution.” And according to (Herkert,2000), they “encourage students to express ethical opinions, identify ethical issues, and formulateand effectively justify decisions.”There are disadvantages, however, that limit their educational effectiveness. At the conclusion ofthe case, the appropriate course of action may be obvious, particularly with well-known cases.Students may view the events described in the case as exceedingly rare occurrences that they areunlikely to encounter in their careers, or they may not consider the employment scenariopresented as a realistic possibility for themselves. A third-person account of events also may notprovide the experience required for students to engage emotionally, as is suggested by (Newberry
IndividualDevelopment Plan (IDP) facilitates student self-reflection, goal setting and career planning as theTable 3. The interdisciplinary graduate education program. Curriculum & Activity Timeline Disciplinary Grounding Year 10 Summer School in Computational Materials Science Summer 1 Assessment Rubric Learning Outcome & Skill Multidisciplinary Courses Course 10, 11, 12 7. Understand concepts/methodologies of Year 2 Projects
, online interactionwith other learners, and interactive online content could be implemented in the course.It was eye opening to see how outdated the course had become over time. The original instructorhad left the university several years back to pursue a career in the private sector. We had adifficult time reaching out to communicate our concerns, but finally we had a chance to discussthe course with the instructor. In 2016, the instructor and this department agreed to redesign thecourse.III. Backward Design - Utilizing Current Technology and PedagogyThe original Fundamental Skills and Knowledge of Cost Engineering was a produce of its time.As a legacy course, it followed a content delivery model that, while suitable for the technologyof the mid
of Electrical and Computer Engineering at George Mason University. She earned a BS in Electrical Engineering and a BA in Economics from Rice Uni- versity in 1998. She attended the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for graduate study, earning an MS and PhD in Electrical Engineering in 2001 and 2005, respectively. Dr. Nelson’s research focus is in statistical signal processing, specifically detection and estimation for applications in target tracking and physical layer communications. Her work on target detection and tracking is funded by the Office of Naval Research. Dr. Nelson is a 2010 recipient of the NSF CAREER Award. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and the IEEE Signal
disagree d. Somewhat disagree e. Strongly disagree7. What uses, value, benefits and impact have you experienced using the TeachEngineering digital library?8. How has using the TeachEngineering digital library impacted your personal teaching philosophy or pedagogy?9. How has using the TeachEngineering digital library helped prepare your students for college and career?10. Please tell us about yourself. I am a: a. K-12 teacher b. A K-12 educator in an informal learning setting c. A community member engaged in K-12 outreach d. An engineer engaged in K-12 outreach e. Other (text box)[For K-12 teachers]11. For how many years have you been practicing as a teacher? a. 1-2 years b. 3-5 years c. 6-10 years d. 11-20
) enay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards of Science Education and the Journal of Pre-College Engineering Educa- tion (JPEER). She received a B.S.E with distinction in Engineering in 2009 and a B.S. degree in Physics Education in 1999. Her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees are in Science Education from Arizona State University earned in 2002 and 2008, respectively. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Exploring Connections between Engineering Projects, Student Characteristics, and the Ways Engineering Students
this model in the compressible flowclass with examples, students’ reflections and feedback. Students found this model to bedifferent and more effective than traditional graduate classes and were able to connect,apply, understand and appreciate the relationship between the complex mathematicalequations and the real-life applications. It was also found that creating a portfolio takes moretime and effort when compared to traditional exam based class and the workload might needto be reduced.I. Introduction Preparing graduate students to be successful in all aspects of their career has remained avelleity for many years in academia. Recent study finds that the perceptions of the students in theircompetence in the workforce does not align with
Paper ID #19677Investigating Engineering Students’ Understandings of Social and EthicalResponsibility: Coding Framework and Initial FindingsProf. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from
executive in the medical device industry and in academic instruction as a professor in biomedical engineering. His industry experience includes medical product development, marketing and sales, international business development, strategic and business planning, and senior man- agement with P&L responsibility. Currently, Bost is the Executive Associate Dean in the School of Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University. He oversees development of innovation and outreach programs along with the School’s mar- keting and communications, human resources, information technology, and student career service activ- ities. Bost is also Director of the VCU Institute of Engineering and Medicine located in the Virginia
engineering design in real-world and virtual professional environments, and how to assess engineering design thinking.Mr. Zachari Lucius Swiecki, University of Wisconsin, Madison Graduate student in educational psychology, learning sciences area.Prof. Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison Naomi C. Chesler is Professor of Biomedical Engineering with an affiliate appointment in Educational Psychology. Her research interests include vascular biomechanics, hemodynamics and cardiac function as well as the factors that motivate students to pursue and persist in engineering careers, with a focus on women and under-represented minorities.Prof. David Williamson Shaffer, University of Wisconsin, Madison David Williamson
associated with a response of “Not at all”Survey Question: Before After1. How important are writing skills for a successful career in engineering? 3.07 3.932. How important is it for an engineering student to spend time writing lab reports? 2.86 3.643. How important is it for an engineering student to have good writing skills? 3.23 3.85 4. How much does an engineering student need to know about the lab content to 3.14 3.93 write a successful lab report? 5. How much can your engineering professor assess what you know about content
(ethnography andpeople counters) are described.Study One: Longitudinal Quantitative. Data on GPA, design self-efficacy, retention, ideageneration ability, and makerspace involvement are collected on mechanical engineeringstudents at three different times throughout their undergraduate career at a large, public, R1university in the southern United States (Site One, Data Set One). Data on GPA, design self-efficacy, and makerspace involvement are collected on undergraduate engineering students ata large, comprehensive, public university on the East coast in the United States (Site Two, DataSet Two) and at a predominately Hispanic-serving southern public university (Site Three, DataSet Three). With respect to the Longitudinal Quantitative study, this
scientific endeavor to which teams ofscientists have dedicated their careers. The author believes the students are better able to assessthe challenges inherent in modeling earth systems and genuinely have become more aware ofindividuals limitations and approaches to complex systems modeling. None-the-less, students © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 ASEE Annual Conferencewere largely satisfied with the place-based project approach to learning the subject, even thoughstudents were challenged with sorting through a complex scenario at the beginning of the course.SummaryThe objectives of the systems engineering course were tailored to personal interests through aplaced
somewhat misaligned with the instructor’s thinking that, primarily, studentsshould learn how to learn to be able to use new tools, equipment, or whatever they may see intheir career. Similarly, the overall course was not intended to be a tool-specific skills workshop;the idea was to help students learn a basic form of experimental design process, so that they havea prototype or a template, so to speak, on which to continue building their expertise in whicheverfield they may be working in future. This message may not have reached some students.It appeared that some students could not or did not want to tolerate the ambiguity of the open-ended project set up as presented by the instructor. They seemed to think that, in a “good”classroom, the
. J.V. Koch, “TQM: Why is its impact in higher education so small?,” TQM Magazine, vol. 15, no. 5, 2003, pp. 325. 9. R. Schroeder, et al., “TQM in Education: Changing the Culture of Schools ” 1997; nsf.gov. http://www.nsf.gov/award search/showAward.do?AwardNumber=9712991. Accessed: 24 May 2010. 10. Landis, Ray, “Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Career”, 2nd Edition, Discovery Press, 2000. 11. Colby, Sandra L. and Jennifer M. Ortman, Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060, Current Population Reports, P25-1143, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, 2014. 12. Perez, O. A., Gonzalez, V., Pitcher, M. T. & Golding, P. (2011).Work in progress: analysis of
and discussions of engineering ethics tend to blur the distinction betweenethical judgments/decisions and actions/behaviors, assuming the ability to make ethicaljudgments/decisions will simply lead to ethical actions/behaviors – where unethicalactions/behaviors result from either a lack of knowledge regarding ethics or the inability to applythis knowledge. Charles Huff draws attention to this dichotomy, in terms of “decision-orientedapproaches to teaching ethics and approaches that are intended to develop ethical behavior overthe course of an entire scientific or engineering career.”26 However, personally andprofessionally, the actions and behaviors of others seem more important than their decisions andjudgments.For example, the decision of a
engineering major and theprospects of having a fulfilling career in engineering. At the end of the course, students wereasked to rate their level of agreement on additional questions regarding their use of WeBWorKand their feelings on the use of WeBWorK as a homework tool in their thermodynamics course.The survey showed that 17% of students who completed the survey (n = 23) had no experiencewith WeBWorK prior to taking the thermodynamics course. Students who reported having earlyexposure to WeBWorK identified the use of WeBWorK in the mathematics courses and inengineering Circuits (ENGR 221) and engineering Statics and Mechanics of Materials (ENGR220). The survey polled students regarding the amount of time per week students dedicated toworking on
Pennsylvania. His research interests are in radio frequency and analog integrated circuit design, embedded systems, biomed- ical electronics, and engineering education. He received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from MIT.Miss Kristin Imhoff, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Kristin Imhoff graduated from Drexel University with her Bachelor’s in Mechanical Engineering in 2009. She began her career at Drexel in 2009 as an academic advisor for the Mechanical Engineering & Me- chanics department, serving as a professional academic advisor to over 550 students. In January 2012, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
of liability and compliance – topics which are not often highlystressed in engineering college coursework – with the practitioners placing a greater degree ofimportance on these sources than the students. It could thus be argued that an improvedunderstanding of external impacts from this type of oversight may better prepare students forprofessional careers. On the other hand, the students generally believed that the aesthetics andlearnability (i.e., ease of use) of a potential product for the given scenario should be more highlyprioritized than the practitioners, an unexpected outcome that will require additionalinvestigation. Also worth noting is the variability of survey answers within each group. For eachof the 15 questions, there was at
(procrastination) Questioning Study groups (peer learning) Use academic services* Prep for and taking exams *Tutoring, professors office hours, library, advising, career center, etc.Assessment:We propose two types of assessment for this assignment. First, an assessment rubric for theinfographics evaluates the quality of the infographic (see Table 2). The rubric is given when thefirst draft is assigned and students peer review the draft infographics using the rubric during thefacilitated in-class workshop(s). The rubric areas inform the authors of areas for improvementincluding creativity, graphics, fonts, and colors, but is also meant to inform instructors towardour
engineering decreased by 15%. Nationally,less than 50% of the students who enrolled in engineering curriculum complete the program [1].At Colorado State University, we typically lose 40% of our electrical and computer engineeringstudents during the first two years of their undergraduate engineering program [2]. The causes for the declining attrition trend can be attributed to many factors from socialsupport systems available to students, to low self-efficacy due to poor academic performance, tolack of perceived value and career opportunities relative to the amount of effort required to gothrough the program, to the rigid ECE curriculum structure and the lecture-style learningenvironment that discourage active and inquiry-based learning [1,3,4,5
researchers seek to understand whether and to what extent thedevelopment of engineering “habits of mind and action” in middle school STEM (science,technology, engineering, and math) courses leads to improvements in problem solving abilities,integration of STEM content, and increased interest in engineering. The Next Generation ScienceStandards (NGSS; NGSS Lead States, 2013) call for “raising engineering design to the samelevel as scientific inquiry in science classroom instruction at all levels” (p. 1). Reflecting thisemphasis on engineering as a core idea, recent reforms include proficiency in engineering designas a key component of college and career readiness (Auyang, 2004; Carr, Bennett, & Strobel,2012; Duderstadt, 2008; Kelly, 2014
engineering, human-centered computing, and software engineering education. He is a recipient of the U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER Award and the best research paper award at the IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2016). He is a member of ASEE and a senior member of IEEE.Mr. Wentao Wang, University of Cincinnati Wentao Wang is a Ph.D. student at the University of Cincinnati, United States. His research interests include software engineering and requirements engineering. Wentao received a Master degree in software engineering from the Beijing Institute of Technology in 2010.Dr. Carla C. Purdy, University of Cincinnati Carla Purdy is an associate professor in the School of Electrical