4.67 1.79 product?7. Did you enjoy working with the 0 0 2 0 4 4.33 1.79 customer(s)?remaining responded “fairly well.” It is interesting to note that the CDC team was observed bythe instructor to have significant communication issues during the first semester. However,during the second semester, the team performed with much greater cohesion. When the studentswere asked if working on the wind tunnel project had given them more confidence prior toentering the workforce, 2 students replied “yes/very much” and 4 replied “fairly well.” All CDCteam members were proud of the final product with 4 responding “yes/very much” and 2responding “fairly well.” Finally, 4
(procrastination) Questioning Study groups (peer learning) Use academic services* Prep for and taking exams *Tutoring, professors office hours, library, advising, career center, etc.Assessment:We propose two types of assessment for this assignment. First, an assessment rubric for theinfographics evaluates the quality of the infographic (see Table 2). The rubric is given when thefirst draft is assigned and students peer review the draft infographics using the rubric during thefacilitated in-class workshop(s). The rubric areas inform the authors of areas for improvementincluding creativity, graphics, fonts, and colors, but is also meant to inform instructors towardour
York, 19–39.17. Barbara K. Hofer and Paul R. Pintrich. 1997. The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of educational research 67, 1: 88–140.18. Petr Johanes. 2017. Epistemic cognition: A promising and necessary construct for enriching large-scale online learning analysis. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, L@S 2017. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3051457.305146219. Yvonne Kammerer, Ivar Bråten, Peter Gerjets, and Helge I. Strømsø. 2013. The role of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons’ source evaluations and decisions during Web search on a medical issue. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3: 1193
Senior or More n 5,819 1,722 4,097 807 932 2,714 2,384 721 % Total 100% 30% 70% 14% 16% 47% 41% 12%2 For the purposes of this study, underrepresented minority (URM) is defined as any respondent who indicated a Latino/a, African American, Native American or Pacific Islander race or ethnicity. First Generation College (FGC) is defined as any respondent whose parents(s)/guardian(s) had less post-secondary education than an Associate degree. There are many possible definitions of a first generation college student (see Choy 2001; Auclair et al. 2008; Toutkoushian, Stollberg, and Slaton 2015) and this
Space 2001 Conference and Exposition, AIAA, Albuquerque, NM, 2001.16 Royce, W.W., “Managing the development of large software systems”, IEEE WESCON, Vol. 26, No. 8, 1970, pp. 328-338.17 Boehm, B.W., “A spiral model of software development and enhancement”, Computer, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1988, pp. 61-72.18 Reich, Y., S. Konda, E. Subrahmanian, D. Cunningham, A. Dutoit, R. Patrick, M. Thomas and A.W. Westerberg, “Building Agility for Developing Agile Design Information Systems”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol 11, No. 2, 1999, pp. 67-83.19 Cohen, D., M. Lindvall, and P. Costa, “Agile software development”, DACS SOAR Report, Vol. 11, 2003.20 Porter, L. J. and A. J. Parker, “Total quality management—the critical success factors”, Total
.[9] P. Guo, “Why scientists and engineers must learn programming,” Communications of the ACM, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/166115-why- scientists-and-engineers-must-learn-programming/fulltext. [Accessed: 02-Jul-2017].[10] J. M. Wing, “Computational thinking,” Commun. ACM, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 33–35, 2006.[11] K. Lynch, A. Carbone, D. Arnott, and P. Jamieson, “Studio-Based Approach to Teaching Information Technology,” vol. 8, no. April 2013, pp. 75–79, 2002.[12] M. Woodley and S. N. Kamin, “Programming Studio : A Course for Improving Programming Skills in Undergraduates,” 1971.[13] R. A. Layton, M. L. Loughry, M. W. Ohland, and G. D. Ricco, “Design and validation of a web-based system
colleges and universities. This emphasis is echoed inmultiple policy documents, such as the Chinese Ministry of Education (MOE)’s “Opinions onVigorously Promoting entrepreneurial Education in Universities and Start-ups by College Students”[1] (2010) and “Opinions on Comprehensively Improving the Quality of Higher Education”[2](2012).The Chinese State Council’s annual “Report on the Work of the Government” in 2015 furtherclinches governmental support for entrepreneurial by encouraging people to “start their ownbusinesses and to make innovations” as a way to create jobs and increase their income. In May 2015,the State Council General Office provided a blueprint for implementing this national strategy inhigher education through its “Opinions on
. Grace. A framework to help analyze if creating a game to teach a learning objective is worth the work. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pages 1–7, 2016. [6] Sol Nte and Richard Stephens. Videogame aesthetics and e-learning: A retro-looking computer game to explain the normal distribution in statistics teaching. In The 2nd European Conference on Games Based Learning, pages 341–348, 2008. [7] A. Navarro, J.V. Pradilla, S. Londono, P. Madrinan, I. Abadia, J.C. Alonso, and A.X. Gonzalez. Test: Serious games for radio communications learning. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013 IEEE, pages 517–522, Oct 2013. [8] Natalie Lyon, Josep Valls, Caroline Guevara, Ning Shao, Junyu Zhu, and Jichen Zhu. Little
), “What Defines Effective Chemistry Laboratory Instruction? Teaching Assistant and Student Perspectives”, Journal of Chemical Education, 80(10), 1197-1205. 4. Yalvac, B., Smith, H. D., Hirsch, P. L. and Birol, G. (2006), “ Teaching Writing in a Laboratory-Based Engineering Course with a “How People Learn” Framework”, Chapter 5, New Direction for Teaching and Learning, No. 108, Winter 2006, Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc., 59-73. 5. Tan, R. H. (2014), “Project-based Learning Cycles Design Framework” http://sites.psu.edu/racheltan/2014/05/13/project-based-learning-cycles/ 6. Watai, L. L., Brodersen, A. J. and Brophy, S. P. (2005), “Designing Effective Electrical Engineering Laboratories using Challenge
. Students might resent us for having them do more work and that is alrightbecause it will take time for them to develop the skill and it is hard to see its benefits right away.Along the way some encouragement helps keep students motivated. Collaboration betweeninstructors is also important for consistency and permanency of the skill, so it is favorable if thestudents are using similar layouts throughout their program. The author is planing to collect follow-up feedback form the same students before theygraduate. Starting this new academic year, the author is also using the Force Concept Inventory9to assess students’ learning more quantitatively.1. S. Bonham, R. Beichner, and D. Deardorff, “Online homework: Does it make a difference?”, The
of Writing andSpeaking in the Classroom and Workplace,” Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 7, Number 1-2. The Institute forSTEM Education & Research, Auburn, AL, 2006[4] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020, Visions of Engineering in the New Century, NationalAcademy of Engineering, The National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2004. p.55.[5] Waggenspack, W.N., Liggett, S., Hull, W.R., Bowles, D.F., Davis, P. “Development and Assessment of anInnovative Program to Integrate Communication Skills into Engineering Curricula.” Proceedings of the 2013Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. Atlanta, GA, June, 2013.[6] Young, Art. “Writing Across and Against the Curriculum.” College Composition and
, creating a norm of all students keeping up with thepace of the class. Each of the six tables features a ‘go / no-go’ block that is red on one side andgreen on the other, with green indicating that all students at that table have completed the task(s)and are ready to move on. These blocks allow the instructor and any students who havecompleted the task to easily identify students who may need assistance.To accommodate this type of instructional arrangement, classes meet for longer periods of time(equal to the combined total of lecture plus lab hours allotted per week when those are taught asseparate classes in different rooms on different days and usually taught by different people).These longer class periods are assembled to align with university
., Lucas, J.P., Stoughton, T.B., Matin, P.H., Influence of transverse normal stress on sheet metal formability. International Journal of Plasticity 19 (10), 1567 – 1583, 2003.4. Matin, P.H., Smith, L.M., “Practical limitations to the influence of transverse normal stress on sheet metal formability”, International Journal of Plasticity, vol. 21, 4, pp 671-690, 2005.5. Matin, P.H., Smith, L.M., Petrusevski, S., “Methods for stress space forming limit diagram construction for aluminum alloys”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 174, pp 258-265, 2006.6. Parsa, M.H., Ettehad, M., Matin, P.H., Al-Ahkami, S.N., “Experimental and numerical determination of limiting drawing ratio of Al3105-Polypropylene-Al3105 sandwich sheet
identitydevelopment as engineers?Literature Review: Students’ Involvement in Outreach Programs Engineering students’ desire to be involved in outreach. A sense of purpose is amotivating factor that describes an individual’s goal(s) for their actions [5] . Students may be 4attracted to organizations that convey values aligned with their personal and professional goals [6-9] . For some students the messages that engineering outreach programs convey, such as theapplication of engineering to solving the world’s problems [10], the need for diversity amongengineers [11] and the fact that engineering involves problem solving, [12] are congruent with theirown
differencesbetween transfer student experiences within the same institution, particularly between verticaland lateral transfer students. These results indicate that institutions cannot view all transferstudents as having the same experience or requiring the same support. Fostering a welcomingculture, helping students build networks, providing access to institutional agents, and ensuringeasily accessible information are all ways that institutions can begin to improve the transferexperience.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1428502. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of
likeengineers and explicitly using the EDP has made the process of goal setting, intervention, andevaluation remarkably clear. The overall process and specific tools presented in this case studymay be easily extended to other institutions, whether or not they are presently exemplar withregards to undergraduate diversity.References1. Ohland MW, Brawner CE, Camacho MM, et al. Race, gender, and measures of success inengineering education. J Eng Educ. 2011;100(2):225.2. Hackett G, Betz NE, Casas JM, Rocha-Singh IA. Gender, ethnicity, and social cognitivefactors predicting the academic achievement of students in engineering. Journal of counselingPsychology. 1992;39(4):527.3. Valian V. Why so slow?: The advancement of women. MIT press; 1999.4. Cheryan S
among students, and to provide constructivesuggestions to curriculum design. Future comparisons of current findings and priorstudies that were performed in a North American or a European context will also helpdeepen our current understanding of engineering leadership in different culturalcontexts.Acknowledgement This research was supported by Chinese Ministry of Education, Humanities SocialScience Study Program (15YJC880147).Bibliography[1] Kumar, S. & Hsiao, J. K. (2007). Engineers learn ‘soft skills the hard way’: Planting a seed of leadership in engineering classes. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 7(1): 18-23.[2] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Vision of Engineering in the New
engineering from educators’ standpoint in the respectivenations and region. We also plan to study engineering ethics education in other countries.References[1] ConnecticutHistory.org[2] Baker, R, A Caplan, L Emanuel, and S Latham, eds. 1999. The American Medical Ethics Revolution:How the AMA’s Code of Ethics Has Transformed Physicians’ Relationships to Patients, Professionals, andSociety. 1st ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.[3] Pfatteicher, Sarah K A. 2003. “Depending on Character : ASCE Shapes Its First Code of Ethics.”Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 129 (January): 21–32.[4] Kline, Ronald R. 2002. “Using History & Sociology To Teach Engineering Ethics.” IEEE Technologyand Society Magazine
example, those shown in Figure 4for questions 5 and 10) and in the higher variance of responses for Civil Engineering versus Mechanical Engineeringrespondents (Table 5). Although the small N’s make it difficult to suggest other patterns with a degree of confidence, it was notedthat the Computer Science respondents were often underrepresented with respect to those who strongly agreed(positive formulation) or strongly disagreed (negative formulation) as suggested by the lack of 1’s in the responses.Electrical Engineering tended to have lower results overall compared to the rest of the population. Finally, all
classroom while also seeking the additional knowledge required to create a valuable endproduct for their client. Engineers are hired to create value for their employer, and if a studentonly knows how to follow a syllabus, then they will not be prepared to anticipate unknownopportunities to create value. Learning core engineering skills is the single most important part ofan engineering education, and by teaching an entrepreneurial mindset through programs thatreinforce these skills, we are better preparing the innovators of tomorrow.ReferencesBarrett, T. W., & Pizzico, M. C., & Levy, B., & Nagel, R. L., & Linsey, J. S., & Talley, K. G., &Forest, C. R., & Newstetter, W. C. (2015, June), A Review of University Maker Spaces
).7. DeLozier, S. J. & Rhodes, M. G. Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice. Educ. Psychol. Rev. (2016). doi:10.1007/s10648-015- 9356-98. Freeman, S. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 8410–8415 (2014).9. Prince, M. Does Active Learning Work ? A Review of the Research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223–231 (2004).10. Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B. & Zeytuncu, Y. E. Flipping a College Calculus Course: A Case Study. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18, 142–152 (2015).11. Talbert, R. in Best practices for flipping the college classroom (eds. Waldrop, J. B. & Bowdon, M. A.) 29–43 (Routledge, 2015
Paper ID #20398Horizontal Integration of the Same Design Project in Multiple Structural En-gineering CoursesDr. Benjamin Z. Dymond, University of Minnesota Duluth Ben Dymond obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech before obtaining his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Ben is currently an assistant professor of structural engineering at the University of Minnesota Duluth.Dr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matt Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T then worked as a bridge designer at
learning. This research needs to continue in otherengineering courses, including upper-level undergraduate courses, to understand similarities anddifferences in this established framework.AcknowledgmentThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF EEC1227110). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography1. Zawojewski, J. S., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Bowman, K. J. (Eds.) (2008). Models and modeling in engineering education: designing experiences for all students. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. (change 10 to 1, add 1 up to 10 to all so would be 12)2
faculty members in the Department wanted to follow suit, and began their search for theright type of practitioners, to enrich the academic process by bringing the practice into the classroom. After Foundation Engineering was over, and the final course grade was out, a“questionnaire” was sent to those who enrolled in the class seeking their opinions, evaluations,and any comment(s) they may wish to offer. Twenty six out of a total of 30 students returned the“questionnaire” on time! The opinions expressed and comments made were, by and large,positive to say the least. After regrouping, and rephrasing to correct the English language; thecomments offered by the ex- students, could be summarized as follows: The adjunct was easy to approach
continuous improvement within the curriculum.III. BME Assessment Committee Evaluation, Results and DiscussionThe department’s Assessment Committee annually evaluates ABET Student Outcomeperformance from the prior year’s spring design course teams (BME 201, 301 and 400-402)using the team’s final report(s) and peer-evaluations. In brief, the Committee first calibrates itselfusing a randomly selected senior team by discussing any discrepancies in scores and theassessment process itself. Following the calibration exercise, the Committee Chair assignsreviewers to a random sampling of projects. At least two reviewers assess each project’sreport(s) and peer evaluations to the expectation of graduating seniors for all levels. In 2010, weestablished a rubric
achievement and higher-education representation of under-represented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: a review of current K-12 intervention programs. J Women Minor Sci Eng. 2012;18(1).3. Glass JL, Sassler S, Levitte Y, Michelmore KM. What’s so special about STEM? A comparison of women’s retention in STEM and professional occupations. Soc forces. 2013;92(2):723-756.4. Sadler PM, Sonnert G, Hazari Z, Tai R. Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Sci Educ. 2012;96(3):411-427.5. Hill C, Corbett C, St Rose A. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.; 2010. doi:10.1002/sce.21007.6. Ceci SJ, Williams WM
as combine two or more datasets, add or remove variable(s), transformnumerical data to categorical (or vice versa), create new variable and assign value, andconditionally-screen output data. An in-class test will be graded.Research Project and PresentationThe group project will be assigned to students during the fourth module of the curriculum. Eachproject team includes three students, and they will be either assigned a topic or propose theirinterested analytical research project. The objective of the project is to develop and answer anaviation-related question by using aviation databases and statistical software package(s). Theteam will develop a research question, a methodology, data collection plan, and analysis plan.Ideally, the project
, first to the end of 2016, and then into the2017 spring semester. During this time, one additional research group was added.Program AssessmentWhether in clinical or research settings, the literature notes the difficulties librarians haveencountered when trying to evaluate the impact of embedded librarian services. Previous reviewsof clinical librarian services have discussed the challenge of identifying direct impacts,suggesting that forming casual links between information services and impacts on majoroutcomes such as improved patient care is “difficult if not impossible.”52 However, Brettle etal.’s systematic review of the effectiveness of clinical librarian services concludes that clinicallibrarians have created a satisfactory service model
second choices, nearly a fourth of the students ranked it theirlast choice.A second question asked: When you do not understand a concept in one of your math, science orengineering courses, what reason(s) would cause you not to seek assistance? (For example: Areyou too busy? Are you uncomfortable in asking questions of the instructor? Do you figure it isan unimportant question?) The responses to this question were reviewed to find the frequencyof various themes. Table 2 collects the common themes and counts their frequency. A givenresponse from a student could contain multiple themes. Theme Counts Time / Too busy 16
Engineering Dean’s Office were critical partners inthis endeavor, offering counsel and support throughout the program’s planning andimplementation.References[1] S. Pneena and C. J. Romanowski. “A Message from Recent Engineering Graduates in theWorkplace: Results of a Survey on Technical Communication Skills.” Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 685-693, 2001.[2] National Commission on Writing. (September, 2004). Writing: A ticket to work...or a ticketout. A survey of business leaders. Available:http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/writingcom/writing-ticket-to-work.pdf.[3] Engineers Canada Accreditation Board. (2015). Accreditation Board Criteria and Procedures[online]. Available:https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files