develop both knowledge and lesstangible characteristics. Page 5.65.7Program representatives will develop a knowledge map for each sub-program within theirdiscipline (e.g. computer engineering within the Electrical Engineering program). Theknowledge map will identify the source of the knowledge, any prerequisites, and if possible thecourse(s) responsible. At this level, the knowledge items are at a higher level than those found atthe course level. (Example: Course-level: apply node voltage analysis to solve multi-nodecircuits. Program-level: solve circuits using various analysis techniques.)Faculty members identified in each department will
on assessment andcontinuing improvement in its philosophy.II. Defining Continuous ImprovementThe term “continuous improvement” is derived from the essence of the Japanese term KAIZENwhich is a systematic approach to the closing of gaps between customer expectations and thecharacteristics of process outputs. First used in the 1950’s, it has since been known by termssuch as Continuous Quality Improvement and Continuous Process Improvement as well as beingclosely tied, and almost synonymous, with the umbrella expression called Total QualityManagement (TQM).In an article in Quality Digest, Danny Langdon [1] states: Continuous Process Improvement is designed to utilize the resources of the organization to achieve a quality-driven
: learning cycle/constructivist approach, active learning, team teaching,cooperative learning, integrated instruction, technology-based investigations, andproblem/project-based assignments and assessments.Problem Solving in Engineering Science for Teacher s follows the guidelines set forth in theNational Science Teachers Association’s (NSTA) position statement on Science TeacherPreparation Standards. While focusing on understanding and developing the major conceptsand principles of properties of matter, it helps students conceptualize the inter-connectedness ofthe sciences, mathematics, and technology. Students relate the study of matter and materials tocontemporary, historical, technological, and societal issues. Students are able to
think-pair-share exercise on“Did you change your mind about your solution: why or why not?”, followed by another 20minute discussion. Again, the instructor makes no value judgements and gives no hints regardingthe “correct” answer to the case study.The day the instructor returns these graded papers, writing is discussed and the instructor leads afinal discussion concluding with his or her own reasoning about which answer(s) is correct. If thenational survey results from the Applied Ethics webpage are known, these results are shared withthe class. If the survey results are not yet known, the instructor will lead an additional discussionwith the class at the time these results are available.These assignments and discussion periods are summarized
was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed arethose of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation.IX. Bibliography1. Summary Proceedings from the Tennessee Exemplary Faculty for Advanced Technological Education Project (TEFATE), 1998. TEFATE, Technologies Division, 120 White Bridge Road, PO Box 90285, Nashville, TN 37209-4515.2. SEATEC information brochure, 1998. SEATEC, Technologies Division, 120 White Bridge Road, PO Box 90285, Nashville, TN 37209-4515.3. URL: www.nsti.tec.tn.us/seatec; for additional information concerning the projects.4. Sbenaty, S., Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20-23, Charlotte, NC.WILLIAM CALLMr. William Call is
. THIEDEDr. Ted Thiede is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics at Murray StateUniversity. He received a B. S. degree in Aerospace Engineering from the U.S. Naval Academy, an M.S.E. degreefrom Purdue University and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Iowa State University. He has industrialexperience as a U.S. Navy Engineering Duty Officer. His research interests are in the fields of fluidized bedhydrodynamics and combustion. Page 5.195.10
Experiments," 1988 ASEE Conference Proceedings,pp. 80-85.2. Behrous and Forouzan, Introduction to Data Communications and Networking, WCB/McGraw-Hill,19983. Microsoft 95 Resource Kit, Microsoft Press, 19954. Microsoft 98 Resource Kit, Microsoft Press, 19985. Russel C. and Crawford S. Running Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Server 4.0, Microsoft Press, 19976. Helslop B. and Angell D., Mastering Solaris 2, Sybex Inc., 19937. redhat 5.0 Linux Operating System Installation Guide, October 19978. Stallings W., Data and Computer Communications, 5th edition, Prentice Hall, 1997.9. Comer D and Stevens D, Internetworking with TCP/IP Volume II, Prentice Hall, 3rd edition, 1995.10. Geier J, Wireless LANs, , Mcmillan Technical Publishing, 1999.11. Hunt C., TCP/IP
. Kido, M. Kimura, and K. Nagai, "Multilayer white light-emitting organic electroluminescent device," Science, vol. 267, pp. 1332-1334, 1995.2. J. E. Littman and S. A. VanSlyke, "White light-emitting internal junction organic electroluminescent device," U.S. Patent 5405709, 1995.3. M. Granström and O. Inganäs, "White light emission from a polymer blend light-emitting diode," Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 68, pp. 147-149, 1996.4. www.jademountain.com Jade Mountain Inc., P.O. Box 4616, Boulder, Colorado, USA 80306-46165. L. L. Kazmerski, "Photovoltaics: A review of cell and module technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Rev., vol. 1, pp. 71-170, 1997.6. J. C. Yang, "Advances in amorphous silicon alloy technology-the achievement of high
safety hazards of materialsDevelop “Chain of Custody” proceduresIdentify physical condition of materialsIdentify marking proceduresSelect sampling toolsIdentify preparation and preservation procedures of samplesCollect and label samplesDocument samples using “Chain of Custody” formsSign over “Chain of Custody” form Page 5.207.10Competency: Remediate site (Phase III) I@12, R@AD, C@BDCompetency Builders:Identify optionsResolve issue with concerned party (s)Assess options for corrective actionImplement selected option for correctionDocument investigation with summary reports Page 5.207.11
P. Sloan Foundation, Ethnography and Assessment Research, Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 1994.11. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Atman, C., & Shuman, L. “Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education. April 1997, pp. 139-149.12. Brainard, S., & Carlin, L. “A Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineeirng and Science,” Page 5.209.6 Proceedings, Frontiers in Education Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, November, 1997.SHAWNA FLETCHERShawna Fletcher is Program Coordinator of the Women
integrated curriculum. This aspect will be studied in more detail bythe authors over the next year.Bibliography1. Nelson, J., and Napper, S., Ramping up to an Integrated Curriculum to Full Implementation, presented at the November 1999, FIEE conference.Biographical informationWILLIAM JORDAN is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. He has B.S.and M.S. degrees in Metallurgical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines. He has an M.A. degree fromDenver Seminary. His Ph.D. was in mechanics and materials from Texas A & M University. He teaches materialsoriented courses and his main research area deals with mechanical behavior of composite materials.NORM PUMPHREY is an Associate Professor of Civil
available forcovering costs of studying – to be returned during 10 years after graduation. In Italy, thetuition fees have been generally increased. In Norway, Spain and Sweden, the level ofsubsidies, transferred from the State budget to the IHEs, has been related to the effects ofeducation (e.g. to the number of graduates).The first symptoms of a severe financial crisis of higher education appeared in Poland in theearly 90’s. As a response, based on the analysis of the world situation, the idea of partialpayment for studies, coupled with individually-granted loans available to all interestedstudents, was put forward. It was being justified in numerous discussions in the followingway:! it should increase availability of higher education by
and Learning, pages 3–16. Jossey-Bass, 1996.4. J. A. Centra. The how and why of evaluating teaching. In T. E. Sutherland and C. C. Bonwell, editors, Renewing and evaluating teaching, volume V of New Directions for Higher Education, pages 93–106. Jossey-Bass, 1977.5. S. Courter, R. Lyle, K. Nickels, D. Noyce, A. Pearce, J. Reeves, L. Schaefer, and R. Wickra- masinghe. Change agents: Immediately implementable teaching and educational hints from the engineering education scholars program. In Proceedings American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 1999.6. A. B. Ellis, C. R. Landis, and K. Meeker. Conceptests. In E. Lewis, editor, Field-tested Learning Assessment Guide for science, Math, engineering, and
Complex Learning. Panel: Scaffolding Constructivism in the Learning ofComplex Knowledge: International Perspectives on the Design, Use and Evaluation of Advanced TechnologicalLearning Environments. In T. Ottmann & I. Tomek (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 98.Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 1998, pp. 2112-2113.4. Jonassen, D.H. Hypertext as Instructional Design. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, Vol. 39, No.1, 1991, pp. 83-92.5. Babu, S., Suni, I.I., & Rasmussen, D.H. Development of a CD-ROM in Thin Film Technologies: Design,Usability Assessment and Challenges, Journal of Engineering Education, 1998 Supplement, pp. 583-589.6. Cordell, B.J. "A Study of Learning
needed a general review ofresearch tools and techniques and literature searching, the students were in a hurry to find thepractical tools they would need to answer their very specific questions. The most importantmonographic resources covered in this first meeting were some key reference books. The Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (3rd Edition) was to prove a fundamental source,including a sample flowsheet of the dehydrogenation process. McKetta’s Encyclopedia ofChemical Processing Design was also useful, although in 1989 it had not yet published volumesup to the letter “s”!The design teams needed answers for at least the first two questions that had been put to them,and I hoped that the journal literature would provide both the
, Sue, ed., Teaching the Majority, Teachers College Press, 1995.[8] Rosser, Sue, Female Friendly Science, Teachers College Press, 1991.[9] Mayberry, Maralee and Margaret N. Rees, “Feminist Pedagogy, Interdisciplinary Praxis, and ScienceEducation,” NWSA Journal, July 1994.[10] R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman, "Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education," EngineeringEducation, 78(7), 674 (1988).[11] Arcaro, Jerome S., The Baldrige Award for Education: How to Measure and Document Quality Improvement,CRC Press, 1995.LAURA J. BOTTOMLEY is the Coordinator of the Women in Engineering Program and an Adjunct AssistantProfessor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina State University. She received her BSEE andMSEE degrees from
Corripio [1]. The FOPDT model is: K P e −sτd G PRC (s ) = (1) 1 + τPsAn alternate method of fitting the data is through use of the Control Station [2] software package.The data are downloaded into the Control Station software where the FOPDT model is selected.Process gain, time constant and dead time are evaluated automatically by the Control Stationsoftware. Page 5.276.3 Changing the controller output by the same percentage, but starting from a differentinitial controller output, allows students to determine whether a process
teaching.Bibliography1. Chinowsky, P. S., and Vanegas, J. A., “Combining Practice and Theory in Construction Education Curricula”, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, Session 1221, 1996.2. Ciesielski, C. A., “Teaching Meeting Skills in the Classroom”, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, Session 3515, 1996.3. Coehn, E., “Practitioner and Student Recommendations for an Engineering Curriculum”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 241-248, July 1995.4. Kolar, R. L., and Sabatini, D. A., “Changing from a Lecture-Based Format to a Team Learning/Project-Driven Format: Lessons Learned”, Proceeding of the ASEE Annual Conference, Session 1675, (1998).5. Prusak, Z., “Challenges to Future Engineering Professionals - How to Prepare Students to Face Them
written report wasdrafted that highlighted positive aspects of the system and identified any areas of the system thatneed improvement. Most departments have found the internal audits to be beneficial. Theassessment system model developed by the committee was used as a standard for comparison. Itrecommends each department provide documentation of the following items or activities: • Brief description of department and its programs • Departmental Mission Statement • Learning outcomes for degree and program option(s) • Current curriculums and plans of study • Documentation of methods and techniques used to assess degree learning outcomes • Course descriptions and learning outcomes for courses • Documentation of methods
of theair traveling through the outside shell of the combustion chamber to promote wall cooling. Thisair was mixed with the combustion products at the end of the inner shell. The cross-sectionalarea of the combustion chamber was designed to give an air velocity of 5 m/s in both shells.This velocity was the original velocity that the swirling vanes were designed for in the oil burner.The ratio of cross-sectional area of the inner liner to the outer liner was determined using theMathCAD simulation.The combustion chamber was made from stainless steel in order to withstand the hightemperatures that were generated by combustion. The sheet steel was fabricated into the 3.4”diameter inner shell using a slip-roll. The tube was then spot-welded using
They Know, Anyway: 2. Making Evaluations Effective,” Chemical Engineering Education, 27(1), 28-29 (1993). Available on-line at < http://www2.ncsu.edu/effective_teaching/ >.13. Covey, S.P., A.R. Merrill, and R.R. Merrill, First Things First. New York: Simon and Schuster (1994).14. Fink, L.D. “Orientation Programs for New Faculty.” In M.D. Sorcenelli and A.E. Austin, (Eds.), Developing New and Junior Faculty, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (1992).15. Angelo, T.A., and K.P. Cross, Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teaching (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (1993).16. Felder, R.M., R. Brent, D. Hirt, D. Switzer, and S. Holzer, “A Model Program for Promoting Effective Teaching in Colleges of
architecture, as a profession, must continually address.”2Bibliography1. Blau, Judith, Architects and Firms: A Sociological Perspective on Architectural Practice, Cambridge, MITPress, 19842. Boyer, Ernest L.; Mitgang, Lee D., Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education andPractice,Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 19963. Gropius, Walter, Scope of Total Architecture, New York, Harper and Brothers, 19554. Haviland, David S., “Some Shifts in Building Design and Their Implications for Design Practices andManagement”, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, Chicago, Locke Science PublishingCo, Inc., 19965. Johnson, Paul-Alan, The Theory of Architecture, Concepts, Themes and Practices, New
Figure 19 – The Digital PartBibliography1. Boylestad, R. L. (1995). Introductory circuit analysis (6th ed.). Ohio: Merrill Publishing.2. Budak, A. (1974). Passive and active network analysis and synthesis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.3. Floyd, T. (1997). Digital fundamentals (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.NGHIA T. LENghia T. Le is an Assistant Professor in Electrical Engineering Technology of Purdue University. He teaches atPurdue University, School of Technology at New Albany, Indiana. He earned his B. S. and M. E. E. E. degrees fromthe University of Louisville. His specialty is instrumentation and controls. He can be reached at nle1@purdue.edu
that a change is necessary. However, obtaining consensusregarding the details of how and who will develop the new curriculum is not an easy matter. Ingeneral, faculty do not like the added demands of developing and teaching the new classes sinceusually there are no rewards or recognition for such efforts. Moreover, their extra efforts mightreceive criticism if they do not conform to others' expectations. However, these concerns can be Page 5.98.6resolved as long as the assigned teacher(s) understand the program's philosophy and has thepatience, enthusiasm and flexibility to implement the necessary innovations.Students’ resistance to change
phenomenon.Bibliography1. Incropera, F. P. and DeWitt, D. P. (1996), “Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer,” John Wiley & Sons.2. Cumo, M., Farello, G.E., and Ferrari, G. (1969), “Notes on Droplet Heat Transfer,” Chemical EngineeringProgress Symposium Series, Heat Transfer, Vol. 65, pp. 175-187.3. Gottfried, B. S., Lee, C. J., and Bell, K. J. (1966), “The Leidenfrost Phenomenon: Film Boiling of LiquidDroplets on a Flat Plate,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 9, pp. 1167-1187.4. Wachters, L. H. J., Bonne, H., and van Nouhuis, H. J. (1966), “The Heat Transfer from a Hot Horizontal Plate tosessile Water Drops in the Spherodial State,” Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 21, pp. 923-936.5. Wachters, L. H. J. and Westerling, N. A. J. (1966
really show a good work ethic.” The engineers did notoften fault the quality of the work by either the PT or ETE students, just the ease ofcommunication and desire to act in a seemingly timely fashion. At an extreme wefind–“Overall, this project has been a disaster for both the IE and the ETE group[s]. To startout, both groups were quite successful about getting together and contributing ideas...Then theIE group kept receiving e-mail on [the] night before or the day of the meeting telling us that theywere too busy with other things and canceled.”Students noticed the lack of direction provided by instructors, but reported different reactionssuch as: “The situation was not aided by the fact that the ETE students’s instructor gave themlittle
modified over the Internet. The future work will include applying theidea of implementing the Virtual City to internet-based engineering design.AcknowledgementsWe acknowledge the financial support in part from the National Science Foundation,Grant No. EEC-9872505.References[1] John S. McCright, PC Week Online, “Cisco’s Chambers: e-learning will help us control our destinies”, http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/, Nov. 16, 1999 Page 5.397.12[2] Qiuli Sun, Kurt Gramoll and Michael Mooney, “Self-Paced Instruction to Introduce Traffic Engineering in Virtual City (Sooner City)”, 1999 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Charlotte, North Carolina, June 20
., Isaksen, S. C. and Dorval, K. B. Creative Problem Solving: An Overview. In An Introduction to Creativity (2nd Ed.), 1997, Copley Custom Publishing Group: Acton, MA, pp. 114-122.KATHRYN W. JABLOKOWKathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University. She iscurrently located at Penn State’s School for Graduate Professional Studies near Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Jablokowteaches and conducts research in the areas of Robotics, System Dynamics and Control, and Problem Solving. Shehas developed several new courses which focus on Invention, Innovative Design, and Creativity. Dr. Jablokowreceived her B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Ohio State University
program(s) holds the title of Chair, followed by 15% Director, 13%Head, 11% Dean, 5% Coordinator, and 3% classified with some other title. In 38% of the two-year schools, the person in charge is classified as Chair, in 27% Dean, in 15% Coordinator, in6% Head, in 2% Director, and in 12% this person holds some other title. In summary, the typicalfour-year engineering technology program is housed in a university and directed by a department Page 5.673.2chair. The average two-year program is most often housed in a community college and led by achair or a dean.Bachelor of Science programs in 75% of four-year schools are divided into departments
laboratory work is one method forgetting the practical education needed to be a successful ceramic engineer.VI. BibliographyFurther information about the principles, procedures and properties related to the experiments outlined in this papercan be found in several texts, including the following:1. J. S. Reed, Principles of Ceramic Processing, 2nd Edition, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1995.2. Engineered Materials Handbook, Volume 4: Ceramics and Glasses. ASM International, 1991.3. W. D. Kingery (ed.), Ceramic Fabrication Processes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1963.MOHMAED N. RAHAMANMohamed N. Rahaman is a Professor of Ceramic Engineering at the University of Missouri-Rolla, where he hastaught Ceramic Engineering courses at the undergraduate and