failure, FalconSAT-1 represented an academicsuccess for the program as cadets participated from “cradle to grave” in a real-worldmission with an all too real-world outcome. Cadets designed and built FalconSAT-1’spayload and subsystems, and they were integral in the mission operations from devisingoperations plans to participating in the launch campaign. Cadets also manned theAcademy’s ground station during overhead passes of a satellite not operating undernominal conditions. Cadets involved with trouble-shooting the anomalies soon afterdeployment certainly gained deep insight into system functions and operations.Table 1 summarizes the various milestones in the Academy’s Small Satellite programthus far. The current project, FalconSAT-2, is the
, 11]. Aconcept model for such a graduate level program is shown in figure 1.This program should provide a solid foundation in data structures and algorithms and softwareengineering along with a clear understanding of computer architecture and operating systemrelationships. It should provide a solid background in systems engineering approach to systemdevelopment from need analysis, through identification of system functional and operationalrequirements, technical performance measures, preliminary and detailed design, construction andoperation, and system retirement with coordination of all the activities through a systemengineering management plan (SEMP). The program should also provide a strong understandingof the communication and network
, three hours for lectures and three hours fordesign laboratory. The model is used extensively to show how a plant is designed andconstructed, from process engineering, detailed equipment design, piping, civil electrical andinstrumentation and finally to construction.They now appreciate how complex the piping network is or how and why such a plot plan is puttogether. Students also have an opportunity to visit the actual plant in Chevron’s El SegundoRefinery. It is such a treat to the students to finally see the real plant, exactly the same as themodel which they have studied for several years. They climbed to the platform to see the largeair-coolers and their exposed finned tubes. They marveled at the height of the depropanizer.The design
class was able to do a project that uses mature tools and tech-niques to design and build a complex workcell. The project chosen by the students was to usedevelop a system to make customized penholders. The students planned out the system architec-ture, and then implemented it, as described in the following sections.3. The System LayoutThe system was designed to mill out penholders on precut 6” by 6” wood boards. The boards weremilled with an “S” or “M” for local football teams (Spartans or Michigan), and with a hole to holda pen. The decision to use an “S” or “M” was be based on an order placed at a computer.Figure 1 shows the layout of the workcell. The precut wood started in the custom built Feeder.When an order was placed, a pneumatic
concerning this project is already being done via the Internet by having the tele-experimentation system’s home page linked to the Departments’ home pages. These activitiesare being undertaken with the secondary objective of motivating lower-level Engineeringstudents and influencing pre-college students everywhere, but particularly in the region (themajority of whom are Hispanic), to study Engineering.Impact on faculty and other researchers Firstly, the project director and co-director had the opportunity to investigate how toimprove distance education using the Internet and to exercise their project management skills incarrying out a plan for doing so. Furthermore, it is under planning for faculty and other researchers who are off-campus
• when I secure external funding • when I get tenure, etc.The real answer to this question is that life is now! And, it is important to find the properbalance between living for the moment and planning for the future.As academicians, we have been groomed to be goal-oriented. We have been extensively trainedin an environment that rewards us for working hard to achieve the next level of success. Thetendency to believe that everything will be wonderful (or at least easier) once that next barrier iscleared is a difficult mindset to break. This idea that life’s troubles will suddenly be lessened orremoved following the completion of some goal is a perilous trap in which to fall.In many respects, life can be thought of simply as a series of hurdles
transportationengineering as part of the undergraduate curriculum. What works and what does not at this levelis presented with suggestions for others implementing such a program. In addition, a stepwiseprocedure for monitoring the changes via learning outcomes assessment is presented.Introduction: Historically, transportation engineering education has been limited at theundergraduate level. Specific topics of transportation planning, traffic engineering and highwaydesign have been limited in depth and breadth due to the limitations of the undergraduatecurriculum. In addition, educators have implied through their practice that undergraduates aretoo immature to appreciate the subtleties of and detail associated with these topics. It isunderstood that
3. Boundary Conditions (Liao, PML) 4. Implementation of Microstrip Structures using FDTD 5. Source Excitation 6. Fast Fourier Transform 7. Computation of S-parameters • Statistical Techniques 1. Design of Experiments (DoE) 2. MetamodelingThe goal of the course is for the students to perform research at an undergraduate level. At theend of the course the student will be able to define a work-plan, timely follow a work-plan,clearly communicate ideas both in written report and oral presentations, facilitate effectiveinterpersonal relationship within a team, effectively used CAD tools (XFDTD) for the simulationof passive structures, clearly and effectively
queries against the de- normalized data? • Will system performance be acceptable or unacceptable after de-normalizing?Physical Design of Data ModelsAfter designing the logical data models, we designed the physical data models toimplement the entities and relationships of the logical data model with DB2. In thephysical design, we defined data naming and data type, reviewed the table plan, andcreated DB2 tables, table space and indexes to maximize database access performance Page 6.1085.5within a DB2 data structure. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright
team. This strategy permits a faculty member tosupervise two teams simultaneously with the help of the SAs. At the beginning of the labperiods, there are short group activities that build on the topics discussed in the lectures such asteam building and brainstorming exercises.At the beginning of each week, the course staff including the faculty, SAs, and TAs, had a one-hour meeting to discuss the lecture and lab activities of the week and to plan the activities of thefollowing week. This meeting was extremely important to keep the design process proceeding onschedule in all the lab sections.In the semester that I taught the course, I chose biomedical engineering projects for my twoteams from a list of potential design projects solicited from
Astronautics(Engineering) (AAE) has joined forces with the Aeronautical Technology Section (AOT) of theUniversity’s Department of Aviation Technology (AT) on experimental basis to provide seniorlevel students with a design/build/text experience in an interdisciplinary team environment. Thepaper identifies the two types of projects (specific objective and research) used in support ofinterdisciplinary activities. It describes previous projects and discusses some of the successesand difficulties experienced in pursuit of this effort. Industry’s reaction to these interdisciplinaryteam activities is discussed, as well as, future plans for the expansion of interdisciplinarydesign/build/test team projects.IntroductionPurdue University provides a unique
Corrosion BatteriesAfter the work of the committee, the author was assigned to teach this course. With the abovethemes in mind, the detailed content of each lesson was planned. Table 3 provides a list ofcovered topics, and the engineering examples used. Note that these are not necessarily given in Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 6.700.5 Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationorder of their presentation throughout the semester. While it is not possible to describe alllessons in detail, two examples
(NSB), the governing body of the NSF. Thenew criteria were implemented later in 1997 and are now an integral part of the reviewprocess at the NSF. These two criteria ensure that all NSF funding decisions are madebased on a consistent definition of excellence. The two criteria are characterized by thetwo following questions in the context of the GRF. The lists of items beneath eachquestion are examples of the types of evidence that reviewers look for in eachapplication.What is the intellectual merit of the applicant? • Ability to work as member of team as well as independently, to communicate, to plan & conduct research, • Strength of academic record, • Proposed plan of research & previous research experience
meter to produce data points and all of thedata was collected for the lab section. The data for each set of measurements was randomlydistributed, providing a hands-on experience to introduce means and standard deviations as toolsfor estimating population characteristics. This also provided a set of choices to use whenestimating the torque required to move their tractor and sled. The motor characterizationexperiment was conducted as previously described.The Beginner’s Interdisciplinary Group TRActor Pull (Project BIGTRAP) built upon the lessonslearned during previous FOE projects. As mentioned previously, cost of materials was to be adesign constraint, project planning using either a Gantt or a PERT chart was required, thescheduled date for the
provides a theoretical bandwidth of 11Megabits per second, which was more than sufficient for delivering full-screen full-motion video, but only had a range of one hundred fifty feet. Multiple access ports can beplaced throughout an organization to provide a wireless access area beyond the 150 feetrestriction of a single access hub. Within the confines of the development phase of thisproject a single access hub was used. It worked as expected. The author found themaximum sustained bandwidth to top out at approximately 7.6 megabits per second.VII. Future plans & conclusionIn the end, the system provided the necessary infrastructure and media deliverycapabilities to operate as an on-site reference tool for learners, but could be improved in
disciplines by means of guest lecturing in courses andhaving students in one discipline demonstrate their projects to students in another. This latterapproach provides a good opportunity for students to practice presenting technical concepts to anaudience from an alternative area of expertise, an important real-world skill (as evidenced by theneed for the MPAG itself). Area Course Concepts Emphasized Concepts Shared Computer Artificial Intelligence Embedded agents, deliberative/ Subsumption architecture, Science reactive robot control, planning, search strategies, multitasking
and planning on the part of the student, as well asrequiring exploration of various resources to justify items on their resumes. The resume includesthe following items: 1. G.P.A. and class ranking (out of 50 students), 2. name of college, major, minor(s), and date of graduation (e.g., University of Cincinnati College of Engineering, EE or CompE major, VLSI/Photonics/Math/etc. minor, June 2005), 3. all honors and awards earned, 4. co-op experience (where, how many quarters, responsibilities), 5. technology skills mastered, and 6. campus organizations/activities.In addition to the one page resume, one page of justification that includes the following issubmitted: at least one library
. These meetings allowed thestudents and the industrial mentors to decide upon the scope and set the expectations on theprojects.Part of the training at the bootcamp included a discussion on the state-of-the-art of CFD software,its limitations, and interpretation of results. These discussions were provided by AEA TechnologyInc. and by Fluent Inc.At the end of the bootcamp each of the design teams presented their plan of how they were goingto solve the problems proposed by the industrial mentors. The students were given instruction onhow to interact through email or the WebTalk bulletin board at the MSU web site to work on theirprojects and to discuss course material. ii. Web courseThe purpose of the web course is to provide the students with
professional staff. The same staff handles health and travel issues,risk management, and re-entry issues. At the completion of a project, each student team submitsa substantial written report to the sponsoring agency and the faculty advisor. In addition, aformal presentation is made to the agency.Our goal is to maximize the benefits of this experience not only for the students, but also for allinvolved. Developing a comprehensive assessment plan for the entire program, given its complexnature, is indeed a challenge. A variety of surveys, interviews and other tools are used toevaluate many aspects of the operation. The main product-oriented evidence currently used toassess student outcomes is the written report. New initiatives are underway in a
such as grants, teaching awards and scholarships can behighlighted because they bear testament to a recognition of the faculty person’s effectiveness asa teacher.Future Goals with Respect to TeachingFollowing responses and feedback from students and peers, it is possible to develop a plan forimproving both the course content and teaching method. The plan should include short termand long term goals. Short term goals could be improvement in frequency of studentassessment, an increase in the frequency class discussion sessions, or modifications in thelaboratory assignments. These are goals that can easily be accomplished within an academicyear. Long term goals may include the use of audio-visual materials in class, addition ofcomputer-based
demonstrated and measurements are recorded.At the relay laboratory the students are exposed to digital relays and perform actual testing of anovercurrent relay using the company’s tools and software.5. Senior Design ProjectAt the beginning of the second semester the students are assigned a senior design project. Theproject objectives are to perform preliminary design of a power distribution system for anindustrial facility. Students are given a site plan of the facility as well as dimensions of thebuildings. Load characteristics are given for each of the buildings with one building being givenin full details. After determining rated demand for the facility, the students have to adjust powerfactor of the plant and to propose at list two variants of the
Outcome Goals Goals Assurance Plan ASSESSMENTS Curriculum/Program School Level Institution Level Constituency Group A: State; SCHEV; BoV; Other Constituency Group B: IT&E Advisory Board; Employers; NVTC; Administrative Council; Alumni; Student Leaders; Student Advisory Group; Other Constituency Group C
& Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationNACME plans to develop a national public service advertising campaign to educate the publicabout issues related to a higher education.4 Since many of UTEP’s students are first-generationcollege students, parents may not fully appreciate the value of a higher education. These parentsmay be less informed about the process and be less able to guide and support their children duringtheir college education. In fact, research shows that first-generation students have higher attritionrates, whereas students who have a parent who earned at a minimum a bachelor degree are morelikely to complete college2.Studies have shown that students employed full-time
designcourse as a major source of assessment data for EC 2000 accreditation. We have shown at bycarefully planning the process for grading the design reports and presentations, we can obtaindata for Criterion 3, items a, b, c, d, e, g, i and k, leaving only items f , h, and j for assessment inother courses.VI. References[1] URL http://www.abet.org/eac/EAC_99-00_Criteria.htm[2] Skvarenina, T.L., “Developing a Department-Wide Learning Assessment Program,” Proc. 2000 Frontiers in Education Conference, St. Louis, MO, Session T1A, Oct. 2000.[3] Daniels, P., and Mailer, K., “Assessment of the Senior Design Experience and ABET 2000,” Proc. Best Assessment Processes in Engineering Education, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre
association, academic andprofessional advising, and work experience opportunities in place to support the new curriculum.Project members plan to meet several times each year to coordinate the project and do a lot ofcoordination on line.There has been significant interest among other schools in the shared curriculum concept. Theanticipation is that upon completion of the initial project, other schools with an interest inparticipating will be allowed to join the ECAA with the investment of a new course and a plan todevelop a new academic area of emphasis, together with its support infrastructure. Thecurriculum will belong jointly to the Alliance members, so expansion will be up to thosemembers.Summary and ConclusionsA second generation shared
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationThe Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) class synthesizes theory and programmingapplications to provide a plan for the automation of a local feed mill. Following adequateclassroom training on sensors and the PLC relay ladder logic instruction set, the students go to alocal mill, where they take notes on the current non-automated method of operation. The teamsthen prepare a plan for automating the process and a formal report describing their new design. Ithas been gratifying to see the level of effort and quality of work emerge from just averagestudents when they are released to be creative. Figure 4 shows a
, worked toestablish the UM-ASEE Student Chapter. The process consisted of developing a framework and Page 6.206.1constitution, becoming a recognized student organization on campus and chapter of the American “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”Society for Engineering Education, electing officers and planning events. With the constitutionratified in August 1994, the first events during the 1994-95 academic year included a few paneldiscussions on topics pertinent to graduate students exploring
continuing education opportunities for practicing manufacturingengineers. The M.S. program is currently in the curriculum planning stage with a projectedinitial program offering in the fall of 2002. This masters program will provide several additionalavenues of applied research for program faculty and students. In addition, the masters programwill provide opportunities to increase the scope of selective course offerings, especially in therealm of maintaining global competitiveness through applied manufacturing philosophies.Future plans will also strengthen the industry partnerships that funnel real industrial applicationsback to the classroom and lab. The masters program will significantly strengthen thesepartnerships as many of the survey
rationale for the choice• A detailed cash flow diagram of revenues and expenses for a planning horizon of at least 10 years• Specification of how the cost of the stadium would be divided between the city and the team owners• A detailed, realistic time frame for paying back the loan, if any• A decision on who would own the stadium- city or team- upon its completionStudents were advised that both the city and the team had an absolute veto on any stadium plan,so their design must appeal to both groups to be effective.Public Speaking Skills: In recent years, many engineering educators have recognized5-7 thattechnical communication is a vital component of engineering practice and have sought ways todevelop these skills in their students
a continuing interest in environmental and analytical chemistry.MARIA CURRO KREPPELMaria Curro Kreppel is professor of English and Communication at the University of Cincinnati’s OMI College ofApplied Science. Dr. Kreppel teaches oral and written communication courses, concentrating on research anddesign project curricula within engineering technologies. Trained in English and American literature and holding adoctorate in Organizational Communication, her scholarship ranges from technical communication and policyanalysis to organizational systems, strategic planning and alternate dispute resolution (ADR). More specifically,her study of organizational communication has focused on planning and implementing the communication oforganizational