- Conference Session
- Computing Technology Applications-I
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Raja S. Kushalnagar, Gallaudet University; Gary W. Behm, Rochester Institute of Technology; Kevin T. Wolfe; Peter Yeung; Becca Dingman; Shareef Sayel Ali, Center on Access Technology ; Abraham Glasser, Rochester Institute of Technology; Claire Elizabeth Ryan
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Computing and Information Technology
example, he investigates how deaf individuals acquire information through speech-to-text (captions/subtitles) or sign language in- terpreters, compared with their hearing peers who listen directly. He also develops accessible computing solutions to address these disparities in multimodal information access. For example, he has implemented and verified the benefit of enhanced captions that provide visual cues to non-speech information. In the ac- cessibility/intellectual property law field, he advocates for updates in accessible and intellectual property law, to incorporate accessible computing advances such as automatic captioning/subtitling. He worked in industry for over five years before returning to academia and
- Conference Session
- Computing & Information Technology: Curriculum and Assessment
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Michael Oudshoorn, Northwest Missouri State University; Rajendra K. Raj, Rochester Institute of Technology; Stan Thomas, Wake Forest University; Allen Parrish, United States Naval Academy
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Computing and Information Technology
shows the accredita-tion status for computer science programs at the top 20 US universities as ranked by U.S. News& World Report 5 . A little more than one-half of these programs do not have their Computer Sci-ence program accredited, although most if not all of these institutions have engineering programsaccredited through ABET. Hence, one could conclude that some institutions deliberately elect notto seek ABET accreditation for their computer science programs because they do not feel there issufficient value in it for themselves.Several of the institutions on the list have a sufficiently high-profile that they may feel that ac-creditation provides no additional benefit to them. Potentially, these institutions believe that theyhave
- Conference Session
- Topics in Computing and Information Technology-II
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Andreas Febrian, Utah State University; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Kamyn Peterson-Rucker; Alia Melvin; Shane E. Guymon
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Computing and Information Technology
, no. 10, pp. 100–102, Oct. 2009.[6] M. Chaudhry, “Your Kids Aren’t Robots, And That’s Exactly Why They Must Know How To Code,” Forbes, Washington, DC, 26-Aug-2015.[7] J. Carpenter, “Chicago private schools lead ‘high-tech, high-touch’ movement,” Chicago Tribune, Chicago, 28-Aug-2015.[8] A. O. Stallings, S.B. 107 Computer Science Initiative for Public Schools (Filed). 2015, p. S.B. 107.[9] E. Kao, “Exploring Computational Thinking,” Google Research Blog, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2010/10/exploring-computational- thinking.html. [Accessed: 28-Aug-2015].[10] K. Wilson, “STEM in K-5: Start computational thinking early!,” International Society for Technology in Education