- Conference Session
- First-year Programs Division: Online Learning
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Benjamin Emery Mertz, Arizona State University; Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University; Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University; Alicia Baumann, Arizona State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
First-Year Programs
whichversions of all first year classes are being developed for this MOOC environment with options toreceive college credit from Arizona State University (ASU). Through this program, learners cantake a course completely for free in the “audit track” which allows them access to all coursematerial, but does not provide instructor grading of assignments or any kind of “verified”certificate of completion. For these students, the course is treated much like a traditionalMOOC, but with the benefit of an instructional team that includes professors who monitor andparticipate in discussion boards and host live “Q&A” video sessions throughout the course. Theinnovative aspect of this course is that there is a parallel track that students can opt into
- Conference Session
- First-year Programs Division: Online Learning
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Lulu Sun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Christina Frederick, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Caroline Liron, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Li Ding; Lei Gu, Georgia State University; Andrew Calvin Griggs II, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Paula Sanjuan Espejo, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Paula Sanjuan Espejo, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
- Tagged Divisions
-
First-Year Programs
Imaging,” in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, Hyderabad, India, 2014, pp. 378–389.[2] R. Ellis, The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press, 1994.[3] S. D. Krashen, Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.[4] K. J. Krahnke, “Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition,” TESOL Q., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 300–305, Jun. 1983.[5] S. D. Krashen and T. D. Terrell, The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. The Alemany Press, 1983.[6] J. N. Williams, “Memory, Attention, and Inductive Learning,” Stud. Second Lang. Acquis., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–48, 1999.[7] C. Frederick and L. Sun, “Work in Progress
- Conference Session
- FPD and DEEDs Joint Postcard Sessions
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jessica Daniels; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Ann Saterbak, Duke University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Design in Engineering Education, First-Year Programs
a larger change from Survey 1 to Survey 2 than from Survey 2 to Survey 3. Thethree highest changes were seen in developing a prototype for a design challenge (Q8), settingdesign criteria (Q5), and using an iterative process to complete the design challenge (Q10).Table 3. Engineering design process results. Survey 1 Survey 2 Survey 3 Difference Q Step P value Average Average Average btw 1 & 3 Identifying a design problem from 1 3.40 4.30 4.20 0.80 <0.005 the community Incorporating