Technol- ogy and Infrastructure for the NSF Center for e-Design at the University of Central Florida. Dr. Yousef developed a strategic plan for information technology for the center. Dr. Yousef authored several refereed publications including book chapters, journal papers, and conference papers. He was also either the PI or the Co-PI in many research projects related to Cost Engineering, Cost and Quality Effectiveness, Cost Modeling, System of Systems Interoperability, Supply Chain Management, Decision Support Systems, Knowledgebase Systems, and Database Management. During his career Dr. Yousef earned the award of Excellent Service from the department of Industrial En- gineering and Management Systems in 2006, and
emphasis on astudent outcome. Figure 10: Sample Course Outcome Contribution to Student Outcome (a)Program objectives (consumer demand) validate quantified student outcomes as a platform forsuccessful careers. Quantified program objectives is based on the dependency: Program Objectives = f (Student Outcomes) = f (Production System)Quantified student outcome links in Figure 6 are the basis for quantifying student outcomecontributions to program objectives. The 2-tuple of parameters for each student outcome areCumulative Student Outcome Contribution and relevance of the outcome to a program objective(0 – 1.0). In this instance, program outcome relevance is specified by external stakeholders. The2-tuple products form a Program Objectives
students pursue IE as a career option.Recent engineering enrollment data from Iowa State University provides empirical evidence ofthis lack of awareness. As illustrated in Figure 1, the percentage of undeclared engineeringstudents choosing to major in IE after arriving on campus is much higher than those choosing IEdirectly upon arrival on campus. In contrast, the values of these two metrics tend to be similar formore familiar disciplines, such as mechanical and electrical engineering.Figure 1: Percentage of high school graduates’ vs undeclared freshmen choosing to major in IE.Previous research has shown that K-12 students’ awareness of a STEM discipline impacts theireventual selection of that discipline as a career option [2]. Existing literature
-on material that can beapplied to students’ future careers [4]. One way that undergraduate students receive hands-oninstruction is through participation in undergraduate research programs. Undergraduate researchprovides students with many benefits, including improved critical thinking and communicationskills, practice working with real-life problems and solutions, engagement with mentors andfaculty, and an increased knowledge of disciplinary focus [5], [6]. Undergraduate researchallows students to practice creativity, innovation, and problem solving, and is more likely tobetter prepare students for the workforce than passive pedagogy, like traditional lectures [5].Increased self-confidence has been identified as an additional benefit of
, and 3) Assessment of specific learningoutcomes. 1) Demographic information (First & Last Name, Email, Student ID, Term Course Taken) 2) Assessment of Learning Experience a. The simulation project overall positively impacted my practical simulation modeling knowledge and understanding. b. The simulation project overall positively impacted my practical simulation modeling skills. 6 c. The simulation project positively contributed to my engagement with simualtion course. d. I find the simulation project positively contributing to my career objectives. 3) How
., 2014). Such experience allows students andinstructors to collaboratively bridge the research and classroom and provide research experiencesfor students relative to traditional individual mentored research. Undergraduates who are involvedin research report cognitive gains such as a) learning to think and analyze, b) affective gains suchas delight, c) psychosocial gains such as belonging to a team, identifying as an effective engineer,and d) behavioral gains such as motivations to pursue graduate education or careers in engineering(Laursen et al., 2010; Lopatto and Tobias, 2010).Studies of undergraduate research experiences have been criticized for some reasons such ascounting on students to convey their own knowledge and skill gains, applying
course(PDC) to assist in their career development. PDC employs SMS routinely to help each studentcater to various job positions. In addition, resumes are improved by using additional relevantkeywords employers seek, which are detected by SMS. SMS has assisted in increasing thenumber of students that graduate with a job offers and in the course's goal of helping studentsobtain careers.The analysis presented in this paper shows that SMS can benefit various stakeholders, such asuniversities, students, employers, and recruiting firms. Universities will have a betterunderstanding of the job market and will be able to improve the education of their students withthe evolving job market. Students will be more qualified and better prepared for the job
-Marcos School ofEngineering at the University of San Diego is working to produce and disseminate a model forredefining the engineering education canon with the goal of developing “ChangemakingEngineers.” One of the strategies for achieving this goal is to infuse traditional engineeringclasses with new materials that address this changemaking theme. The goal is for students todevelop the same fundamental skills that they currently acquire, but to see better how these skillscan be applied to problems and situations that don’t appear in traditional textbooks. This greaterperspective will encourage some students to pursue non-traditional career paths, and other topractice with greater awareness of the impact of engineering on society.In Fall 2017
for the instructor: review teams must be created prior to class, a PeerReview worksheet must be created for each peer response session, and course content must beshifted in the semester to allow dedicated class time for the session.We believe that there is an opportunity for a community of practice for group-based peerresponse activity, so that the engineering education community can continue to develop, assess,and improve this framework.References[1] A. Yousuf, M. Mustafa, and A. De La Cruz, “Project Based Learning,” 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010. https://peer.asee.org/16081.[2] G. W. Figgess and R. G. Vogt, “Building Career-Ready Students through Multidisciplinary Project-Based Learning Opportunities - A
from Pennsylvania State University (PSU) in 2010 and 2012, respectively. Dr. Ashour was the inaugural re- cipient of William and Wendy Korb Early Career Professorship in Industrial Engineering in 2016. Dr. Ashour’s research areas include applied decision making, modeling and simulation, and process improve- ment. He contributed to research directed to improve engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Mastery Learning and Assessment Approach in Operations Research CourseIntroductionStudents’ learning is the ultimate goal that instructors aim to achieve. The learning process isinfluenced by the teaching and assessment styles that teachers use. Teachers provide
, and those thatare missing, in the problems that students solve, and are exhibited in the solutions they create.Then, we use the results to define a set of guidelines that would contribute to improve the realismof SDP’s, both in terms of their problem definition and of the evaluation and assessment ofstudents’ solutions.Introduction Research suggests that engineering education and practice are disconnected [1]. Inparticular, early career engineers believe that “engineering work is much more variable andcomplex than most engineering curricula convey” [2]. Successful engineering, in practice, isdriven by the skills necessary to solve open-ended, ill-structured problems, such as problemformulation, communication, people management
Editor for both the Engineering Management Journal and Quality Approaches in Higher Education. Prior to his academic career, Schell spent 14 years in industry where he held leadership positions focused on process improvement and organizational development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Writing as a Method to Build Better Engineers: Examining Faculty Perceptions of Writing’s ImportanceAbstractWriting is a critical skill for professional communication, providing a way to develop and examineideas, and a method to test learning. When perceived as meaningful by the writer, writing isfundamental for identity formation in disciplines, such as engineering. The
the academic experience, although the student did think it willmake material more related across courses. Perhaps the most interesting comment was from asenior student, taking the course out of the typical sequence, who indicated that while doing thismake versus buy assignment he/she had a “full circle moment” by realizing the impact of all theskills and knowledge gained in all the courses that can be used when starting a career. Thispreliminary feedback suggests that the stated project goals were shared by student impressions.Future improvements to the case study in IE302 include the ability to present the assignment abit earlier in the semester and provide even more opportunity for students to explore the inputdata needed to answer the make