- Conference Session
- Engineering Education Graduate Research Consortium (EEGRC) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Anna Newley, American College of Education; Erdogan Kaya, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada Las Vegas; Ezgi Yesilyurt, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student
the concepts of engineering design process ○ Control Group (Implicit Learning) ○ Experimental Group (Explicit-Reflective Instruction)● Teachers can address Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)● Engineering design process is defined as the process of “solving problems, designing systems, and understanding human behavior (NGSS Lead States, 2013)● The impact of integration of EDP in science classrooms is important to improve students’ understanding of Engineering (Newley et al., 2017).● Introducing video games in science classrooms is important to spark middle and high school students’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics [STEM] and
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Marigold F. Bays-Muchmore, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Alexandra Chronopoulou, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student
that of thestudents’ perceptions of engineering in regard to their own engineering identity and abilities. In a study by M. Besterfield-Sacre in 1997, incoming engineering students were surveyed ontheir perceptions of engineering as a field, their own abilities as engineers, and their confidencein their success [1]. The performance and retention of the students were then tracked for thefollowing three years and related back to their initial attitudes. Students who left engineering ingood academic standing had significantly different attitudes about themselves and engineeringcompared to students who stayed in engineering, or who left in poor academic standing. Theinitial attitudes of students who left in good standing reflected significantly
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Bryon Kucharski, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Joan Giblin, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Mehmet Ergezer, Wentworth Institute of Technology
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student
potential source of assistance.Previous researchers have focused on engineering undergraduate-based feedback and advice 11 .They asked students to reflect on their experience through interviews and suggest ways forstudents to find happiness throughout their college years, for example, joining professionalsocieties. That research did not focus on study habits, which is the crux of the present paper’sprocess.The study presented here is also unusual among help-seeking research because the resultsrepresent actual help-seeking behavior rather than an intention to seek help 12,13,14 . Help-seekingintentions, often used by researchers to control for varying needs for help, may differ significantlyfrom actual help-seeking behavior 15,16 . The results of
- Conference Session
- Student Division Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Dipanjan Saha, Texas A&M University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Student
semester a course is offered. In addition tolearning outcomes, assessments and teaching strategies in the backward design sequence, thecourse development cycle comprises of two more decision steps involving reflection and revisionas shown in Figure 3. For the flight dynamics class, a thorough review of all the formative andsummative assessments, questions asked by students from time to time during a semester andofficial student feedback at the end of the semester were utilized to better the design of the coursefor the subsequent semester. Develop learning outcomes