graduation age is comparable to that of other STEM fields, it is in stark contrastto average graduation ages in fields such as education (38.3) and humanities (34.2), where it ismore common for students to return for a degree after working in the field for several years [8].Though there is limited research on returners at the doctoral level in engineering, research onreturners generally in a number of fields suggests returning students may have distinct strengthsand challenges. In addition to the rich applied work experiences they can bring to their doctoralwork [3], returners may be more mature, goal-oriented, and motivated, and possess strongteamwork skills and a high work ethic [9] - [11]. However, returners can also face challengestransitioning
personnel responsibilities in the organized deployment of IBBME Discovery Position Roles and Responsibilities Faculty Supervisor ● Overarching program vision and progression ● Acquisition and administration of funding ● Liaison with IBBME director and high school/school board administrations in support of Graduate Student Head ● Correspond on research publication and ethical research approvals ● Oversee graduate student skill development and facilitation of graduate professional skills (GPS) designation Graduate Student ● Overall supervision of program operation Head ● Liaison between
4 Learning ethical conduct 5 5* student reported her confidence is at 5 for her NASA research, but 3.5 in generalShe also responded to some open-ended questions for the pre-survey:Why did you want to be involved with this research/apply to NASA Space Grant? “After going to AISES [American Indian Science and Engineering Society] nationalconference and seeing Native Americans presenting high-level research I made it my goal to oneday present there. I really admired researchers presenting science they were passionate aboutand hope to be like that one day.”What are your expectations from this year? “I hope to learn a lot and grow as a scientist. Instead of just studying
, causeslearners to appreciate the contribution of engineering in our culture, assists learners inrecognizing the ethical and moral values that engineers need to demonstrate, and aids in theteaching and learning of engineering instruction. However, NOE teaching is not an easy task,and a lack of NOE understanding also raises many issues and obstacles for science teachers toincorporate NOE in science instruction. Science teachers need training to fulfill the requirementsdescribed in the NGSS and to inform teachers about NOE aspects. To meet this goal, weprovided a professional development that focuses on NOE and the engineering design processduring summer 2017 in a southwestern research institute. Using the cognitive apprenticeshipmodel, secondary science
Huang is a Lecturer in the National University of Defense Technology. His main research interests include global engineering education, ethics of education, and philosophy of Science and technology. He received his BS degree in public manage and PhD degree in philosophy of science and technology both from National University of Defense Technology (China). He is a visiting scholar of National University of Singapore and the Member of the International Association for Continuing Engineering EducationI- ACEE.Mrs. Zhang Jianing, Changsha SunVote Limited, China Jianing Zhang is an Engineer of Changsha SunVote Limited,China. She received her B.S.(1995), M.S.(1998), in Circuit and System from Tianjin University, China. She
practices, environmental, ethics and humanitarian engineering, and non-traditional knowledge transfer. Homero has been recognized as a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Dr. David B. Knight, Virginia Tech c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #22387David Knight is Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in the De-partment of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of International Engagementin Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. Hisresearch tends to be at the
feedback are presented.Introduction and Course DescriptionThe College of Engineering (CoE) seeks opportunities to enhance its program curriculumhelping students become more successful after graduation. As of October 2017, the CoE’smission is as follows:“The mission of the College of Engineering is to develop team-oriented engineeringprofessionals from diverse backgrounds who are prepared to ethically apply industry-currentreal-world skills to achieve value-added solutions in a dynamic world.”During 2017, CoE successfully received an ABET re-accreditation with no interim reports for sixyears for the BSEE and BSCE undergraduate programs. During the accreditation process, oneissue ABET visitors posed a question to CoE paraphrased as: where does the
drug [Topol, 2004].Using these back stories, we created a series of scenarios along with questions. We framed eachquestion so as to obscure its origin while potentially allowing the student to draw out and discussa decision error of systems engineering. Why not simply give students descriptions of the failuresand the findings we discussed and have the students evaluate them? First, we wanted to eliminatebias due to students being familiar with a particular failure. For example, the Space ShuttleChallenger accident is a frequent topic in engineering ethics lectures. A learned, in-context,response from a previous exposure would not give us an indication of their abilities in systemsengineering. Second, the point of framing a question around a
and engineering (CLOs 1-2, 5-7)(b) Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (CLOs 2- 5)(c) Ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturing, and sustainability (CLOs 3-5)(e) Ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems (CLOs 1-7)(g) Ability to communicate effectively (CLO 5)(h) Broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (CLO 5)(k) Ability to use techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice (CLOs 1-7
diverse individuals and more in alignment with current research on decision-making. With a focus on qualitative research methods, she is working to better understand the ways in which undergraduate engineering students experience design and ill-structured problem solving. Her interests also include neuroscience, growth mindset, engineering ethics, and race and gender in engineering. In general, Dr. Dringenberg is always excited to learn new things and work with motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds to improve engineering education.Amena Shermadou, Ohio State University Amena Shermadou is an Engineering Education graduate student at The Ohio State University. She received her Bachelors and Masters in Biomedical
coursework,Rebecca sought to achieve the best performance in relation to others.However, in Rebecca’s view, being the “best” reflected a conscientious and unrelenting work ethic ratherthan an innate intellectual talent. Indeed, she expressed disdain when people attributed her success oraccomplishments to raw intelligence: I feel like smarts don’t really have anything to do with it. It’s just your time management, your willingness to work hard, your willingness to get your stuff done, not be lazy or give excuses. . . You know if you’re any student, I feel like those are expected of you. It’s a major, and so your job is to do your job.Thus, Rebecca’s overall expectations for herself were highly informed by comparison to the
international teaching assistants In engineering evaluate undergraduate writing,” in 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2002.[11] N. Hayes and L. D. Introna, “Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning,” Ethics Behav., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 213–231, 2005.[12] J. Zhou, “What is missing in the international teaching assistants training curriculum?,” J. Fac. Dev., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 19–24, 2009.[13] D. Trebing, “International teaching assistants’ attitudes toward teaching and understanding of United States American undergraduate students,” ProQuest, 2007.[14] E. Arshavskaya, “International teaching assistants’ experiences in the US classrooms: Implications for practice,” J
undergoingevaluation. As mentioned above, here national studies such as the NAE Grand Challenges aremore likely to serve as inspiration for local action.There is also a considerable extent to which institutions model what they do based on initiativesthat are already taking place at “peer and aspirant institutions.” Many universities in fact engagein the routine practice of assembling study teams when launching a new initiative, and theseteams are almost always welcomed at the colleges and universities that have alreadyimplemented successful programs. Academic traditions of openness appear to contribute to ageneral ethic of sharing. In addition, accreditation visits themselves serve as an importantmechanism for faculty to see what peer institutions are doing
thesesponsors, especially those in the local region attend senior design classes to observe the progressof their sponsored teams, providing guidance and feedback at every stage of the project. Teamsoften visit the industries and observe the existing process or product they are trying to improve.What was unusual about the revision project described here is that external sponsors were invitedto provide feedback, not only on the project, but on the written proposal. Thus, not only thedesign project but also the proposal writing process simulated an authentic career experience.This authentic feedback and revision process provides an opportunity to study this instructionalmethod, and also raises potential ethical questions that might surface during a
, there remain pocketsof practice and education in “sanitary engineering.” For example, the National EnvironmentalHealth Association (NEHA), founded in 1937, exists, “To advance the environmental healthprofession for the purpose of providing a healthful environment for all,” [10], and the AmericanAcademy of Sanitarians (AAS), founded in 1966, exists to, “elevate the standards, improve thepractice, advance professional proficiency, and promote the highest levels of ethical conductamong professional sanitarians in every field of environmental health” [11].In 1998, the final report of the National Science Foundation (NSF)-sponsored meeting,“Research Frontiers in Environmental Engineering,” raised an important question, namely,“Should the non
the Executive Committee for the Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET, and also serves as a program evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission. He is also a founding member and serves as Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions through a standardized rite-of-passage ceremony. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Partnering to Develop Educational Software Applications: A Four-Year Retrospective StudyIntroductionSeveral years ago, a project was added to the first-year programming sequence at Ohio NorthernUniversity that focused on
Paper ID #21574Understanding Engineering and Technology Student Perceptions: Barriersto Study Abroad ParticipationDr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). His research and teaching interests include leadership, global agility, globalization, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many
they have not officially announced plans to do so otherwise, the question wascompletely changed. Instead, the question was rewritten to reflect planetary protection policies.The rhetoric surrounding planetary protection policies is presently a popular topic of discussionpertaining to current and future space exploration. What makes this issue so controversial andtimely is the ethical debate around the importance of planetary protection policies. These policiesare extremely crucial and timely for deep space travel to distant celestial bodies including theMoon, Mars, and asteroids. Thus, gaining the perspective of the undergraduate participants’opinions on this topic is meaningful to depict future policy initiatives around planetaryprotection.At
-Sacre, & McGourty, 2005). According to ABET’s EC2000 standards, the new generation ofengineers is expected to possess deep technical knowledge in their field of study as well asprofessional skills, such as communicating effectively, working in teams, solving unstructuredproblems, and an awareness of ethical and contextual considerations in engineering (Lattuca,Terenzini, & Volkwein, 2006). The NAE believes engineers need to be flexible, resilient,creative, empathetic, and have the ability to recognize and seize opportunities (NAE, 2002;Sheppard, Pellegrino, & Olds, 2008) How can entrepreneurship education lead to these learning outcomes? Mostentrepreneurship-related activities students participate in are experiential in
awareness ofengineering ethics 57. However, Hunkeler and Sharp58 did not find a significant effect of genderdistribution on group performance in their four-year study of a senior laboratory course. Lackey et al.21 found that journal score of a course predicted the first year GPA. Thecorrelation was stronger for men than women students, whose better predictor was high schoolGPA. The journal score represents student engagement, attitude, initiative, time managementskills, study habits, and willingness to persevere. Since women students, in general, do better onthose attributes, the authors believed that the journal score did not influence their GPA as muchas men students.Insight 3: There may not be any gender difference in creativity skills