details. Beth has her Master’s of Science degree in Architecture from the Illinois Institute of Technology and her Bachelor’s of Architecture degree from Ball State University. Additionally, she continues to practice architecture through her own company, Muse Design. She enjoys the synergistic relationship between her role as a professor and her role as an architect, and believes that this hybrid provides real world practicality into the classroom on a daily basis.Mrs. Kathryn Elizabeth Roche, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Fostering Civic Identity in Architectural Technology Students through the Evaluation of Critical Reflection in Service Learning
. Krystina CallahanDr. Kimberly L Bothi, University of Delaware Dr. Kim Bothi has a multidisciplinary background in engineering and social sciences, with research and consulting experience across a range of developing country contexts. She earned a Ph.D. in global community-based resource management from Cornell University (2012), and holds earlier degrees in en- vironmental engineering from Cornell (MS, 2007) and McGill University (BSc.Eng., 2000). As Director of Global Engineering in the University of Delaware’s College of Engineering, Kim is responsible for expanding opportunities for students, staff and faculty to engage in cross-disciplinary, globally-minded research and academic programming. In 2016 and 2017, Kim co
: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2004.[2] UNESCO. Engineering issues challenges and opportunities for development. Paris, France. 2010. ISBN 978-92-3-104156-3[3] D.T. Conley, “Redefining college readiness”. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center. 2007.[4] H. Lowe, and A. Cook, “Mind the Gap: Are Students Prepared for Higher Education?”, Journal of Further and Higher Education, vol. 27, no.1, pp. 53–76, 2003.[5] E.P.W.A. Jansen, and J. Van Der Meer, “Ready for university? A cross-national study of students’ perceived preparedness for university”, Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 39, pp. 1–16, 2012.[6] M. Carr, B. Bowe, and E.N. Fhloinn, “Core Skills
each year and state. In these regressions, weuse underrepresented minority engineering share as an outcome, i.e., the proportion of engineeringgraduates in the state and year who do not identify as non-Hispanic White or Asian/PacificIslander. In our estimates we account for year and state fixed effects and control for a limitedvector of state-level covariates (racial composition of residents and the total number of graduatesin the state). We cluster standard errors by state. We emphasize that our methods are not suited forcausal inference, i.e., we cannot whether concentration affects the diversity of engineering degreeproduction. With that caveat in mind, our estimates indicate that states with less concentrationgenerally have more diverse
Engineering Education, 2018 International Experience of Engineering Technology Students Learning About Renewable EnergyCultural exposure is said to be an enhancement to collegial learning. With this in mind, students inan engineering technology program were given the opportunity to go to Germany to a regionaluniversity, experience education in that setting, and visit sites dedicated to renewable energy. Thestudents were given a two-week experience that taught them through both formal and informalmeans. Ultimately, students experienced curiosity, openness to different cultural norms, and wereable to identify components of other cultural perspectives responding with their own worldviews.The researchers utilized
working environment. Yes, I decided to as engineering first because, actually in my mind I never think about teaching. But after several month of I worked as engineer, and my mother said, “Your face looks stressed.” And going back late at night and overtime is on that’s all make a little bit difficult for the parents but for me, I think it’s normal…after several months I decided to marry, so my parents said, “You just quit the job and apply for academic.” - Senior Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering, 8 YearsA senior lecturer shared her experience of joining academia once it was time for her to getmarried: “I forgot to answer why I involved in education, the reason was, at that time I worked in a factory and
and Applied Sciences at Columbia University. This course was targeting the higher levels oflearning as described by Bloom’s taxonomy. At the end of the course, we aimed for the students to be: a. Able to define nanobiotechnology in the context of modern science and engineering, b. Capable of understanding and interpreting concepts such as intermolecular bonds, adsorption and binding/unbinding processes, nanoscale transport mechanisms, and degradation mechanisms at the nanoscale, c. Comfortable in estimating orders of magnitude of objects that relate to engineering, d. Capable of comparing and evaluating research papers related to nanobiotechnology with a critical mind, e. Able to take a position towards an
, 2017. 8[24] N. Tuana, “Leading with Ethics, Aiming for Policy: New Opportunities for Philosophy of Science.”Synthese 177: 479, 2010. [25] ibid. [26] N. Tuana, “Leading with Ethics, Aiming for Policy: New Opportunities for Philosophy of Science.”Synthese 177: 481, 2010. th[27] T.L. Beauchamp, Principles of Biomedical Ethics: 6 Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. [28] J. Haidt. The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage, 2012: 155. [29] ibid: 158. [30] J. Haidt. The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage, 2012: 167. [31] H.W. Walker, “Moral Foundations of the Engineering Profession
, while the Civil Engineering Professional is expected to exercise responsible in chargeduties and have acquired sufficient knowledge and experience to handle complex engineeringproblems, the Civil Engineering Technologist is presumed to have adequate knowledge andexperience to address well-defined problems, and more importantly, to possess specific and in-depth knowledge within at least one specialty area, knowledge that may go beyond that of theCivil Engineering Professional. With this understanding in mind, the CET-BOK identifies 17specialty outcomes that are unique to the role of the Civil Engineering Technologist. Theseoutcomes are formulated in the cognitive domain and for the most part have assigned levels ofachievement at either
Fluid Power Association (NFPA) forsponsoring the presented work, and the support of fellow faculty members at Lawrence Tech fortheir willingness to use valuable class time in support of this work.References[1] L. Liu, J. Mynderse, A. Gerhart and R. Fletcher, "Embedding Problem-Based Learning and Entrepreneurially Minded Learning into Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics Courses through Fluid Power Based Modules," in Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, 2017.[2] M. Prince, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.[3] A. L. Gerhart and D. E. Melton, "Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: Incorporating Stakeholders, Discovery, Opportunity
500corporations and small start-ups. Others have served in legislative and agency leadershippositons at the federal and state level. These individuals felt strongly that their engineeringeducation prepared them to assume the diverse roles they were to later play as professionals, butmost also opined that they felt unprepared when confronted with their first leadership challengesfollowing graduation. The Engineering Leadership program at the University of Kentucky wasinitiated to address this.The program was established in 2007 through the support and active involvement of L. StanleyPigman, an alumnus of the College, and with the following goals in mind: 1. Program Goal 1: To develop a pilot program in the college for the enhancement of career
encounter, secondary STEM teacher professional development, and issues of power in STEM education discourse. He is also an Anthropology doctoral candidate at the University of Cape Town, where he was previously awarded a Master’s degree. His dissertation research is focused on exploring the ethical becoming of architecture students within courses utilizing community-engaged pedagogies.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. His research interests include ethics, design, and sustainability. Dr. Hess received each of his degrees from Purdue University, including a PhD in Engineering
Paper ID #22849Preparation of the Professional Engineer: Outcomes from 20 Years of a Mul-tidisciplinary and Cross-sectoral Capstone CourseDr. Tela Favaloro, University of California, Santa Cruz Tela Favaloro received a B.S. degree in Physics and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Santa Cruz. She is currently working to further the development and dissemination of alter- native energy technology; as a project manager and researcher with the Center for Information Technology and Research in the Interest of Society. Her background is in the development of characterization tech- niques and
Paper ID #23555Stimulating Interest in First-Year Mechanical Engineering Students throughDesign Modeling/Analysis and CNC ManufacturingDr. Todd Letcher, South Dakota State University Todd Letcher is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at South Dakota State University. His research is related to additive manufacturing.Dr. Gregory J. Michna, South Dakota State University Gregory Michna is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at South Dakota State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2006, held positions as a Lecturer
Engineering Thermodynamics Course.” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 41, pp. 107-114, 2007.[4] J. Bransford, A. Brown, and R. Cocking, “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School.” Commission on Behavioral and Social Science and Education, National Research Council, 2000.[5] J. Hamari, J. Koivisto, and H. Sarsa, “Does Gamification Work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification,” in Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, IEEE Computer Society 2014, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Waikoloa, HI, USA, January 6-9, 2014.[6] B. L. Wiggins, S. L. Eddy, L. Wener-Fligner, K. Freisem, D. Z. Grunspan, E. J. Theobald, J. Timbrook, and A. J. Crowe, “ASPECT: A Survey to Assess
Bayer Material Science Library. She worked in Qatar for over five years as a Medical Librarian before her present position as an Associate Academic Librarian for the Sciences and Engineering at New York University Abu Dhabi. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Is it worth it? Implementation of Electronic Lab Notebook Software amongthe STEM community at an American University in the UAEAmani Magid, MLIS AHIPAssociate Academic Librarian for the Sciences and EngineeringNew York University Abu DhabiAbstractScientists and engineers have been recording the results of their scientific findings andstudies via lab notebooks for hundreds of years to lay out protocols and track theirprogress. Most of this
Paper ID #21973Work in Progress: Development of Web-based Pre-laboratory Modules to In-crease Motivation and Reduce Cognitive LoadKimia Moozeh, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Kimia Moozeh is a PhD Candidate, graduate research and teaching assistant in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She received her Hon. B.Sc. in 2013, and her Master’s degree in Chemistry in 2014. Her dissertation explores improving the learning outcomes of undergraduate engineering laborato- ries by bridging the learning from a larger context to the underlying fundamentals, using digital learning objects.Prof. Deborah Tihanyi, University of
fossil fuel-based energy resources; � is cognizant of the impact of personal energy-related decisions and actions on the global community; and � strives to make choices and decisions that reflect these attitudes with respect to energy resource development and energy consumption. As engineering faculty, the authors believe that a technically literate public is crucial tothe development of rational energy policies. With this in mind, a faculty team from the Collegeof Engineering & Science developed a course on energy for nontechnical students. The coursehas been adopted into the university’s core curriculum, satisfying the objective for scientificliteracy in natural sciences. It is the first general education offering from
my days. So to re-emphasize,I suggest anyone looking to either begin to teach or to make changes in their teaching see allothers’ suggestions, methods, papers, books, etc. as sources of ideas, don’t be afraid to try newthings, but make sure you feel comfortable personally with the methods you choose to use andmake them your own.Catch Phrase #2 – Start with the End in Mind: Learning Outcomes First! (and Second,Third…and Last)The ideas for this first tool come from some of the greats in engineering education [3], [4] (andmany others) – I simply summarize them here as a checklist to print out and post on your wall asthe four commandments to which you should refer continually throughout any course design: Checklist #1 – Overall Course is
explores the intersecting realms of emerging technologies, science, fiction and myth, and the links between the human and non-human worlds. Her academic research and writing span considerations of ethics in biotechnology, nanotechnol- ogy, and reproductive technology, with two academic books, numerous conference papers and journal articles published under her name. She has also written in the genre of science fiction, and published award-winning books in the body-mind-spirit genre about her encounters with horses. She has taught courses in Nanotechnology Ethics and Policy; Gender Issues and Ethics in the New Reproductive Tech- nologies; Religion and Technology; STS & Engineering Practice; The Engineer, Ethics, and
beformulated. Often with undergraduates, and many writers in general, the most difficult anddebilitating part of a writing assignment can be taking a persuasive stance and building a paperor piece with the power to change the reader’s mind. Scaffolding can be categorized as pre-writing, the first stage of the three stage writing process, which is then followed by writing andrewriting. According to Murray, the prewriting stage can commonly take up to 85% of the totaltime spent on the assignment [4]. In addition to strengthening students’ writing, the emphasis onwriting as process also has positive impacts on content learning [4]. Using this scaffolding skillin engineering classes would provide an effective mechanism to train students to become
educators'essay collection. Arlington, VA: Nation Science Teacher Association PressByrne EP, Desha CJ, Fitzpatrick JJ, and Hargroves K (2010). “Engineering education forsustainable development: a review of international progress”. International Symposiumfor Engineering Education. 14Caine RN ed (2009) 12 Brain/mind learning principles in action: Developing executivefunctions of the human brain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Canziani BF, Sönmez S, Hsieh J and Byrd ET (2012) “A Learning Theory Frameworkfor Sustainability Education in Tourism”. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism,12(1):3-20.Casti J and Karlqvist A Eds (1986). Complexity, Language, and Life
EngineeringContrary to hypothesis 1e, there was no clear increase in the number of students who planned topursue MS or PhD programs in engineering. However, there were changes in students’ planswith some students initially planning to pursue an MS or PhD who changed their minds afterparticipating in the program, and others who initially did not plan to pursue an MS or PhDprogram changing their plans to pursue a higher degree in engineering. There also was variabilityin students’ plans to pursue education and training in engineering labs after the program (seeTable 4).Consistent with the quantitative findings, the interview data indicated students did not change,but rather solidified their engineering education plans after participating in the IRES program(70
during their undergraduate careerand in turn the only opportunity to gain their attention. With this in mind, Young et al. [23]asked the question, “What is the impact on students of designing/revising a course based onthese learning outcomes and knowledge tables?” The original course emphasized exposure tomany different topics within transportation engineering rather than depth in a few topics. Thecourse instructor redeveloped the course to include further depth into the most critical topics andreduce breadth using the knowledge tables and course outcomes created by the NTCP.Keeping in mind the school’s geographic region and the interest of the students, the totalnumber of topics in the course was reduced by about 25% [23]. To provide more depth
Paper ID #22496Designing a Converged Plant-wide Ethernet/IP Lab for Hands-on DistanceLearning: An Interdisciplinary Graduate ProjectDr. John Pickard, East Carolina University Dr. Pickard is an Assistant Professor at East Carolina University in the College of Engineering and Tech- nology. He teaches undergraduate and graduate Information and Computer Technology (ICT) courses within the Department of Technology Systems. Dr. Pickard plays an active role in building positive and sustainable industry relationship between the college, local businesses, and industry partners. Current industry recognized certifications include
where, when etc. That is why; when I was a student, I hated history. I always thought why I would learn about what war was fought in what age and who did what when it has nothing to do with my life.The professional engineer went on to suggest, “You can make a difference if you tell itlike its story so that it sticks in your mind, and makes it interesting.” For many yearswhile serving as a history instructor at a community college I frequently heard similarstatements from the best students in STEM fields.STEMstoryEducation has undergone a revolution in a generation. Many of us learned handwriting ingrade school, read Dick and Jane primers, performed calculations on a slide ruler, studiedmechanical drawing, and took vocational
experi- ence working with many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to assess impact of good supply
conversation with the institutionalreview board (IRB) at your institution before doing research on students. Some CTLs (includingthe one housed in our home institution), now have umbrella IRBs that may streamline thatprocess for you.Selling the FlipHow do I get buy-in from my department/administration/other constituencies so that I canflip?Julie – I did not go into flipping as a lone reed; I gathered the support and resources needed to besuccessful. I built a network of like-minded engineering faculty through participation in theFrontiers of Engineering Education symposium15 and through CTL workshops16 at myuniversity. Early on in my flip, I had a few students complain to members of our advisory boardabout the flipped class. Through my network, I was
. [Accessed: 08-Mar-2018].[8] M. L. Loughry, M. W. Ohland, and D. J. Woehr, “Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of Learning Using CATME Team Tools,” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 2014.[9] M. W. Ohland et al., The Comprehensive Assessment of Team-Member Effectiveness. info.catme.org, 2005.[10] A. Godwin, A. Kirn, and J. Rohde, “Awareness without action: Student attitudes after engineering teaming experiences,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36, no. 6A, pp. 1878–1891, 2017.[11] A. Kirn, A. Godwin, C. Cass, M. S. Ross, and J. L. Huff, “Mindful Methodology: A transparent dialogue on Adapting Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis for Engineering Education
System (VOS)," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, pp. 413-431, 2008.[6] D. Silverthorn, "Developing a concepts-based physiology curriculum for bioengineering: A VaNTH project," in Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 2002. 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society EMBS/BMES Conference, 2002. Proceedings of the Second Joint, 2002, pp. 2646-2647.[7] S. S. Klein and R. D. Sherwood, "Biomedical engineering and cognitive science as the basis for secondary science curriculum development: A three year study," School Science and Mathematics, vol. 105, pp. 384-401, 2005.[8] N. R. Council, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded