related to SDG 5: Gender EqualityStudents were required to attend the “Women in STEM” forum at the LACCEI conference inCosta Rica. Most of our female participants found the experience of talking about genderequality "empowering," while the male participants mentioned the need to to transformthemselves into "male champions," and increase awareness amongst their peers. Table 5showcases questions that arose as a result of conversations related to SDG 5, which speaksdirectly to gender.Table 5: Questions on “Gender Equality” (SDG 5) to Stimulate Online Blogging within theInternational Engineering ContextsQuestions ConferencePlease discuss your thoughts on the Career-Life Balance session
’, decision biases. Decision biases are systematicand predictable errors in judgment that can negatively impact engineering decision making.Decision biases are especially prevalent in complex and ill-structured problems involvinguncertainty and risk [4], the very types of problems and decisions that civil engineering studentswill face in their careers. For example, planning fallacy and optimism bias explain the highfrequency of cost overruns and benefit shortfalls [5]. Decisions tend to be biased toward known,traditional solutions (status quo bias) and focus on present costs and benefits (cognitive myopia)rather than life-cycle or long-term sustainability [6]. Status quo bias also appears in engineeringdecision-making processes through procedures
Table 4 in the Appendix. This classintentionally does not introduce the different engineering disciplines explicitly, but rather focuseson teaching skills that engineers use and encourages students to both document and reflect onthose skills. The engineering disciplines do, however, appear in the course through a series ofvideos which are called “Day in the Life” videos. In these videos students hear from industryprofessionals and upper division engineering students about how the weekly topic is currentlybeing applied within their projects and/or careers. Each unit consists of videos, readings,tutorials, discussion boards, and/or simulations which teach the students new concepts, and guidetheir practice in applying the skills being taught. Each
returned to the University of Dayton to pursue an academic career. His research interests are in fluid flow and heat transfer.Dr. Michael J. Elsass, University of Dayton Michael Elsass is the Director of the Chemical Engineering Department at the University of Dayton. He received his B.Ch.E in chemical engineering from the University of Dayton and his M.S. and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from The Ohio State University. He then served two years as a post-doctoral researcher at both The Ohio State University and UCLA. His research interests are process systems engi- neering, process diagnosis, and simulation and modeling. He has instructed the Unit Operations Labora- tory for four years. c
the academic experience, although the student did think it willmake material more related across courses. Perhaps the most interesting comment was from asenior student, taking the course out of the typical sequence, who indicated that while doing thismake versus buy assignment he/she had a “full circle moment” by realizing the impact of all theskills and knowledge gained in all the courses that can be used when starting a career. Thispreliminary feedback suggests that the stated project goals were shared by student impressions.Future improvements to the case study in IE302 include the ability to present the assignment abit earlier in the semester and provide even more opportunity for students to explore the inputdata needed to answer the make
throughout theireducational career [13]. Similar results were confirmed for fifth graders in a separate study [14],and for learning-disabled students in [15] Another study, [16], showed that first graders learnedand retained at a significantly higher rate when imagery was used, and further, the studentsshowed higher level of creativity with usage of imagery [17], a result that can be exploited inhigher-education problem-solving. A more recent study [18] reports the effect of using visualthinking software to improve writing skills of students with mild disabilities, and another one[19] provides a practical best practice example on how visual thinking is used to enhance studentbackground knowledge.Although, these studies were performed at the level of
to use Inventor™ 3D CAD computer program to create engineering designs and teach them how to 3D print the designs using advanced 3D printers. 2) Teach students thermal and mechanical engineering 3) Introduce the students to applications of advanced manufacturing (AM) to enhance their interest in pursuing college degrees that would prepare them for careers in AM. 4) Improve students’ communication skills.The process that we developed was mostly oriented toward the middle school students and it wasformed from three steps: - Teaching the heat transfer phenomena, - Teaching energy, and the conservation of energy, - Learning the use of heat transfer software. 3Dr. A.C
in the engineering profession, providing students with positiveexperiences in engineering design within the academic setting may serve as a catalyst for futurecourse selection and career pathways [18-20].IV. MethodWe now detail the steps we took to develop and implement the ADE instructional frameworkand the associated data collection that occurred concurrently with these steps. First, we detail thesteps we took to develop the framework and the four associated EDTs during the 2016-2017academic year. We then detail the steps we took during the first phase of classroomimplementation during the 2017-2018 academic year.IV.a. Development of the Instructional FrameworkIn the Fall of 2016, the research team used the ADE instructional framework to
leader’s vision is disingenuous, people sense it. The EIcompetency that matters most to visionary leadership, however, is empathy. The ability to sensewhat others feel, and understand their perspectives, helps a leader articulate a truly inspirationalvision.Coaching. The coaching style is really the art of the one-on-one. Coaches help people identifytheir unique strengths and weaknesses, tying those to their personal and career aspirations.Effective coaching exemplifies the EI competency of developing others, letting a leader act as acounselor. It works hand in hand with two other competencies: emotional awareness and empathy.Affiliative. The affiliative style of leadership represents the collaborative competency in action. Anaffiliative leader is
failure to meetstakeholder expectations among others. [13] It also noted that a lack of education in leadershipto support the current prevalent career path of "starting from primarily technical work throughproject management and into management and leadership." [13] There was an intensecompetition for desired leadership positions that was shared in common with other engineeringdisciplines, as well as from non-engineers. The best example of this is in project managementwhich requires better educated civil engineers. In the case of the latter, more and more non-engineers are managing "civil engineers with the principal reason being that the non-engineerspossess stronger leadership, communication and business skills" and leadership positions
they havestrong concepts developed and are sure of the directions or specializations they will choose intheir future careers. Students’ concerns suggested that working in a remote laboratory in theearly years of an engineering degree could deprive them of learning some basic but essentiallaboratory skills.Hence this study highlights some important issues relating to remote laboratoryimplementation in the first-year of engineering degree. Students’ experiences and responseshave identified the need to consider whether remote laboratories can provide the opportunityfor students to acquire all of the essential laboratory skills. Further consideration is needed ifremote laboratories are to be blended into regular engineering studies so that
system. Heating elements were more commonly omitted, perhaps dueto students’ unfamiliarity with resistive heating devices, a concept generally introduced to themin a Junior-level class. There were also students, particularly in the group post-learningfunctional modeling, that gave more direct, black box responses in place of components asdiscussed in Figure 11. Word descriptions of a function can be found both in pre- and post-groups, but post- responses generally use more formal functional wording.Another study using these instruments could compare student responses to experienced engineersworking in industry or research, to gauge the effect career experience could have on mentalmodels of simple systems. Both the hair dryer and car radiator
his engineering education research interests focus on experiential learning at both the university and K-12 levels. Dr. Carroll serves as a voting member on ACI Committee S802 - Teaching Methods and Educational Materials and is Chair of the Career Guidance Committee for the ASCE - St. Louis Section. He has eight years of formal experience with K-12 engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Influence of Grading Bias on Reinforced Concrete Exam Scores at Three Different UniversitiesIntroduction Grading student exams fairly and effectively remains a challenge for many professors.Maintaining consistency among students on the
contributed to your confidence that was learned 4 during this project? Was there anything that altered or confirmed your idea of what an engineer 5 does resultant to your work on this project? Do you feel this project was a worthwhile experience to help you on a career 6 trajectory as an engineer? What is your view of undergraduate research in the undergraduate engineering 7 education process? What were the most valuable things that you learned from the principal 12 investigator? What were the most valuable things that you learned from the graduate student 15 [mentor]?
Education, 2018 Innovation in the Risk Management course to improve undergraduate university students’ skills for multidisciplinary and participatory workAbstractThe ability to work in multidisciplinary teams and communicate solutions efficiently is oneof the main requirements asked for by employers and international accreditation committeesto engineering graduates around the world. However, traditionally the curricular contents ofeach professional career related to the construction sector, emphasizes the application of itsspecific knowledge in an isolated manner.This is a reality in Peru as well. Engineering students are neither trained to work in teams norin multidisciplinary projects. This hinders
education to help students develop deep understanding. This work hasmostly been at the K-12 level; but argumentation is even more important for undergraduates in en-gineering and computing (and other STEM fields). Not only will argumentation help engineeringstudents master concepts, it will also better prepare them for their professional careers where theycan expect to engage in vigorous arguments about trade-offs in various approaches to addressingproblems in their design/implementation projects.Prior research has shown that some key requirements must be met to ensure that argumentationis most productive: The argumentation must be in small groups of 4–5 students each; each groupmust include students with different approaches to the topic; and the
- nological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006, she resigned from her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Singapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross-disciplinary ed- ucational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation. c
that are associated. The ideal career for her would be as a building inspector. This way she can both teach and help enforce proper safety.Ms. Sheena Nastasia Marston, Dynotec Inc Sheena Marston field engineer at Dynotec Inc, in Columbus, OH and is working towards gaining work experience to gain her P.E. license. Her background includes studies which resulted in attaining a MSc degree in Civil Engineering, B.A degree in Architecture from the University of Technology, Jamaica and a B.Sc in Construction management from Ohio Northern University.Dr. Lisa E. Burris, Ohio State University Lisa Burris is an assistant professor of Civil Engineering at the Ohio State University. Dr. Burris’ exper- tise lies in the areas
for Georesources and Pollution Research, Ayres Associates Inc., and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. He earned his BS (High Honors) and MS in Civil Engineering and his PhD in Environmental Engineering at the University of Wisconsin where he conducted research within the Small Scale Waste Management Project. Prof. Siegrist is an internationally recognized expert in decentralized water reclamation and in situ remediation of contami- nated land. During his 40-year career he has published over 300 technical papers and 3 books and was awarded 2 patents. His new textbook, Decentralized Water Reclamation Engineering, was just published by Springer (www.springer.com/us/book/9783319404714). He has given invited keynote
and how we empower learners to be interdisciplinary.Tyler J. Kerr, University of Wyoming Tyler Kerr received a B.A. in Geology from Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster, PA in 2011, and an M.S. in Geology (Paleontology) from the University of Wyoming in 2017. His background in pale- ontology and interest in emergent technology has led him to pursue a career 3D scanning, rendering, and digitizing museum collections. In addition to his digitization work, he runs the University of Wyoming’s Coe Student Innovation Center (CSIC), the university’s newest educational STEAM-oriented campus makerspace for students, faculty, and staff.Mr. Larry Schmidt, University of Wyoming Larry Schmidt is an associate librarian at
third iteration, the first author proposed a model based on the data and the results of the second iteration. The author presented this model and the others helped refine it with comments, questions, and suggestions for data. Another member joined the team here to offer additional perspectives, and due to his familiarity with professional formation. The remainder of the paper discusses and tests the hypothesis that resulted from this iteration.Current HypothesisThe current theorization has foundations in Ibarra’s11 framework for professional identityformation during a mid-career change, which consists of three processes: • Engagement with professional activities – This refers to the process of identifying and
interview transcripts. We present a representativequote and several similar, though truncated, quotes from other participants to illustrate thethemes. Each of these themes is an aspect of how the participants have constructed theirunderstanding of and managing uncertainty in design.Theme 1: Managing uncertainty can be learned, but none learned to do so in schoolA common conclusion from the participants is that the ability to manage uncertainty in designcan be learned. This was most succinctly stated by Stephen who responded to a question aboutwhether he approaches projects the same way at the beginning of his career versus where he wasnow by simply stating “No. Again it’s a learned experience.” The participants explained thatthere were five main
Paper ID #21738Motivational Attitudes and Behaviors in Capstone Projects: QuantitativeValidation of Assessment InstrumentsBashirah Ibrahim, Ohio State University Bashirah Ibrahim is a postdoctoral researcher in engineering education at the Ohio State University.Dr. Peter Rogers, Ohio State University Dr. Peter Rogers is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education The Ohio State University. He joined the university in October 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industrial experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing developing products using
“Easier to walk about the class today; students and interactions with fourth-year students. or career. started approaching me as well.” (UTA, 3)Table 1. The left-hand column notes the opportunities for improvement, as well as an excerpt from the undergraduate teachingassistants’ classroom observations and then a suggested alternative.4.1 ARCS Model of Motivation4.1.1 Attention: Peer-to-peer mini-lessons The identified opportunity to improve student motivation and engagement was that the timespent in the discussion section was often underutilized by the first-year students. The UTAsobservations routinely noted that the less structured time made many students feel that it wasacceptable to skip class and nothing happens, as
mastering it does not look rewarding.Moreover, students are unlikely to use BBL once they graduate, while they will probably use GDfor something no matter what career they may enter.An obvious benefit of eLN is that we can keep full copy of student works semi-permanentlywithout taking up physical space. With the paper-binder format, we would return it to thestudents after final grading but many students actually never pick up their binders, which wouldbe sent to recycling after several months as we do not have storage space for them.ConclusionWe are looking for ways to make engineering documentation process less of a chore, and moreengaging and rewarding for students. We also wish to reduce the workload of grading. After thetrial implementations of
programs will be covered.IntroductionMost degree programs that teach building engineering have design opportunities are often less thanideally constructed to reflect practical careers due to relatively few faculty members being trained, or theyhave no similar industry experience necessary to guide students [1]. Consequently in these settings, only asurface level understanding of their value is realized [2]. Many engineering students do not know how toapproach large complex systems due to their exposure to idealistic examples [3]. Additionally, they notcapable of providing critical multi-disciplinary integration of their designs due to the isolated nature oftopics in the classroom [4] [5]. Capstone courses provide a comprehensive evaluation of
number of our undergraduates are interested in pursuingindustry careers in design and innovation and would benefit from open-ended context drivendesign experience in medicine that fosters observation skills, deep empathy, and needs-finding.These contextual skills have been found lacking among engineering graduates by nearly half ofrespondents in a survey of 1,622 employers [3]. A contextualized learning approach [4-5] inengineering education has been shown to improve student motivation, confidence, andconceptual understanding in a variety of studies [e.g. 6-7].To meet this “design gap” in our curriculum and to address the need for human-centeredcontextualized design experience for our students, we developed an upper-level elective courseentitled
relative, contingent, and develops hisor her own opinions via critical reasoning. The stage of Commitment within Relativism refers toa commitment to a relativistic view. In this stage, individuals claim a contextual and relativisticview in different areas of life in addition to one’s study or one’s pursuit of knowledge. By takinga contextual constructivist view, individuals carefully go through factors and examine relatedinformation in decision-making processes. Individuals confirm their commitments to carefullythought-through values, careers, relationships, and personal identity while recognizing thelimitation of reasoning, and thus assuming major responsibilities in different areas of life.Since the first proposal of Perry’s model, subsequent
perspective towards a clear focus on learningoutcomes. Another Cohort faculty similarly noted: In my classes now, I emphasize how important the actual learning is and what they're going to take on, what they're going to take from this into their future careers. I’m thinking about if the students are actually transforming and learning a lot throughout the class, rather than just getting through it. (Faculty member C1-C)We now hear the faculty using the terminology and patterns of the Engineering Learningframework. It has now become a mantra for some faculty answering most questions about theircourse as “well of course we first think about the learning outcomes.” As they align theirpractices with Engineering Learning, faculty
help our colleagues who work on coursedevelopment at various levels of Engineering Education. Further details may be provided perrequest.DIYers can be turned into professionals by helping them understand that after graduation, real-world projects require much more rigor and attention to detail than the simple experiments thatare typically meant to show concepts. The student who can adapt to the demands of thecommercial world will be much better off when starting a career. We believe these labs showthat bridging the gap is doable.References[1] For example, see the following web sites: https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Arduino-so-popular https://makezine.com/2011/02/10/why-the-arduino-won-and-why-its-here-to-stay/ https