change. In the past, what we nowidentify as design thinking was often driven by tacit knowledge, intuition, and personalpreference of expert designers. The potential now is to enhance this approach through cross-disciplinary, evidence-based research.Due to the widespread use of design thinking, and the preponderance of practical and academicliterature, many conceptualizations exist. However, a recent study by Carlgren, Rauth, andElmquist7, sought to bridge these gaps by exploring the literature and conducting interviews withmembers of six leading organizations. The result was a framework, aligned with both theacademic literature and authentic practice, that presents design thinking activity across threelevels of abstraction: (1) mindsets that
andmethods used to test the prototypes are also presented and discussed.IntroductionThe benefits to undergraduate engineering students of hands-on experience is well documented[1], [2]. If the hands-on experience is gained in the process of completing a team project, thebenefits are even more valuable [3] – [5]. Although not all undergraduate engineering courseslend themselves to hands-on projects, some are especially suited for the task. The plethora ofphysical devices and systems discussed in instrumentation and measurement courses certainlyprovide basis for many suitable projects. The work presented here involves the design,development, and testing of an accelerometer by students in a third-year mechanical engineeringinstrumentation and
to evaluate new exercises, which has beenshown to help increase interest in engineering professions [1]. The outcome of the yearlyprogram helped modify and enhance our formal offering for the college students.Program StructureThis program is structured as a pilot for curriculum development and is designed with flexibilityin mind to create a cohesive cohort through team-based learning. It aims to offer our teachingstaff the ability to select the topics they aim to pilot and test during the summer before they areimplemented in our school curriculum. While topics may change in different years, the generaloutcome continues to be a rich selection of multiple engineering and applied sciences topics thatbecome available for the summer pre
constraints.IntroductionSenior-level students in the undergraduate mechanical engineering program at South DakotaState University are required to take five technical elective courses. These courses generallyfocus on the application of the knowledge the students have gained in their core courses. One ofthe courses offered is ME 418 Design of Thermal Systems, in which the students apply thefundamentals they learned in Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, and Heat Transfer to thedesign of systems that involve fluid flow and heat transfer.Educational research has shown that project-based learning is a good fit for courses where thedesired learning outcome is the application of knowledge rather than the acquisition ofknowledge. Mills and Treagust [1] state that project tasks
in their own section(s) anddivide the classes up into student groups of 4-5 students. Our instructional team consistscompletely of teaching professionals (non-tenure track faculty) with a variety of backgroundsand industry experience. In order to make mentoring 10 to 20 teams tractable, all students teamscomplete the same design challenge. Creating a “good” design challenge is crucial, as the coursedoes more than simply teach the design process (see Figure 1). Teaming and leadership skills,project management, ethics, and technical communication are important outcomes for the course.All of these “Soft-skill” areas are made more palatable to our students if our design challenge isengaging and fun.With eleven different engineering disciplines
experiments.The laboratory design is discussed in detail, including how the collaboration of differing, butrelated, disciplines are integrated to take advantage of synergies and enhance the knowledgebase and skill sets of the related disciplines. Course outcomes, project cost, and future work arealso shared.KeywordsIndustrial Internet of Things, Remote Labs, Industry 4.0, Industrial EngineeringIntroductionAccording to a survey by Morgan Stanley-Automation World Industrial Automation, twentypercent of companies cite a lack of skilled workers as a significant challenge to IIoT adoption[1]. Hence, it has become imperative to properly equip the aspiring manufacturing employeeswith the appropriate knowledge, tools and equipment to function effectively in
and solve problems without hardnumbers. Designing a curriculum that focuses on connectedness through narrative arcs will helpimprove retention and ultimately lead to higher achieving students and graduates. Theframework, challenges inherent in implementing it, and an example utilizing the delta functionwill be discussed.BackgroundFaculty in engineering departments have long lamented the miniscule amount of retentionstudents seem to have between courses. Students compartmentalize courses [1] and seldom applynew skills to other courses, therefore producing graduates who have segmented and disconnectedviews of Electrical Engineering. Spurlin and Ozturk found that only 30% of students retaingreater than 70% of fundamental information between
-inventor for 60+ patents. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Designing a Sustainable Large Scale Project-Based Learning (PBL) Experience for Juniors in Electrical and Computer EngineeringAbstractThis paper presents a large-scale Project-Based Learning (PBL) curriculum that can handle 200students per year without requiring an undue commitment of faculty or teaching-assistant time.The following strategies were used to attain the student benefits of the PBL curriculum whileaccommodating a large number of students and while keeping the faculty and teaching-assistantcommitments to reasonable levels. (1) A top-level hardware/software specification of the
importance ofproviding undergraduate students open-ended, loosely defined projects, and allowing projectteams to assume responsibility for design and innovation.2. INTRODUCTIONEngineers, clinicians and patients often struggle to find balance between innovative technologyand the human side of medical care. Graduate level educational programs dedicated to teachingbiomedical innovation have seen significant growth in the last decade [1-7]. In addition, the fieldof biomedical engineering has seen a dramatic escalation in activity over the past 20 yearsleading to innovative medical devices and procedures. Due to the multidisciplinary characteristicof the field, biomedical engineering has a diverse research impact, often serving as a bridgebuilder between
. … Projects that provide opportunity to accomplish design, development, and implementation should be available.With this mission, the ME faculty members place considerable emphasis on all graduatespossessing professional competence. To achieve this outcome, Western Kentucky University MEstudents experience a curriculum where they can acquire design tools and skills, as well ascompetency in mathematical and technical analysis and communication [1-2]. The curriculum isconsistent with the Criterion 5 requirements EAC of ABET: “Students must be prepared forengineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major design experience based onthe knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work and incorporating appropriateengineering
provided feedback about the designs tothe professor solely for the evaluation of the course.In addition to detailing the outcomes of the project, this paper discusses the merits anddrawbacks of short timeframe multi-disciplinary teaching collaborations along withrecommendations for further development.I. IntroductionA. Industrial design and usabilityIndustrial design is a user-centered discipline and has developed many tools in its rich historyto enhance usability by helping designers to make better design decisions [1]. This could bein the form of interviews, discussions, focus group studies, or co-design [2]. In one way oranother, the user is typically involved in the process. Specifically, for a project to besuccessful, one must fully
and abilities required to respond to today's humanitarian challenges.Twenty first century engineers must embrace a new mission statement to contribute to building amore sustainable, stable, and equitable world. They must better meet the challenges of thedeveloping world and address the needs of the most destitute people on our planet, balancing twogoals: (i) effective sustainable community development, and (ii) meaningful education of engineers[1][2].As a result, some universities and engineering schools around the world have developed programsand initiatives aimed at working with engineers with the purpose of undertaking social andenvironmental impact. Just to mention a few, the humanitarian engineering program at ColoradoSchool of Mines
successful.Keywords:Industry Demand, Data Science Talent Gap, Undergraduate Curriculum Development, Data Science, ComputerScience Curricula, Interdisciplinary Programs1 IntroductionAn exponential growth in information and computing technologies’ capabilities in terms ofstoring, retrieving and processing large amounts of various types of data has led to an increasingdemand for experts skilled at working with data [1, 2]. Skilled Data Scientists and Data Analystsare in high demand, from Silicon Valley to Wall Street to large retail chains to health careorganizations and across many other industries and sectors. In particular, it has been observedthat the demand for data science/analytics talent, unlike say 10-15 years ago, is no longer limitedto high-tech giants [2
tackle their fields through the rigorous educational trainingprovided by their universities. The education of engineers follows a structured curriculumconsisting of mathematics, physics, and core engineering courses. These courses provide skillsdeemed necessary for engineers. However, these skills might not cater to the requirement of thejob market. It is imperative to properly develop and teach the necessary skills for the workforceto each engineering student since a degree is no longer a guarantee of a good job [1]. Each ofthese students need to be prepared for what the industry may expect of their skillset [2]. It istherefore beneficial for students and universities to be aware of the skills required by the jobmarket.Several topics of
information literacy aspects. The first step in the creationprocess consisted of mapping out the plot for the stories, ensuring all relevant information wasincluded, and adding possible detours and outcomes.The first module, Evaluating Information, features a series of 20 videos that moves the viewerthrough the process of the CRAAP test. The module includes five possible detours and twopossible outcomes. The CRAAP test involves students evaluating information and resources bylooking at the information’s currency, relevancy, authority, accuracy, and purpose. In the story,the viewer becomes a rookie detective tasked with helping “Detective Jones” investigate ascientist and an explosion in his lab. (See Figure 1)The second module focuses on setting up
dimensions and, finally, errors. Occasionally when a graderinspects the similar submissions of a large class, two or more drawings appear to differ only by afew superficial relocations of dimensions or views. Holding two such drawings, one atop theother, to a light may suggest but does not prove of plagiarism. An example prepared by theauthor is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Nearly identical drawings of the same CAD assignment. Page 1 of 7It became obvious to the author that an alternate method of detecting plagiarism was not onlydesirable but possible. Programming tools available in SolidWorks allowed the quick scanningof the part files instead of the drawing files.The program developed for
originating names, these files can be placed into one of twelve different categoriesthat that predict whether a particular file is probable plagiarism, near-certain plagiarism, near-certain self-plagiarism, or a false positive. In this paper, the program was used to examine theincidence of these types of plagiarism by retrospectively examining more than 3000 CAD filesover fourteen semesters during a seven-year period. We have found plagiarism in this CADcourse to be a relatively uncommon occurrence, but nevertheless present in 1-2% of allsubmitted files, and involving as many as 16% of all students in a particular section. Because wecan now detect plagiarism, we hope that this will discourage future plagiarism and instead helpstudents learn to be
product developments as outlined in the AEEE initiation timeline(Figure 1). Figure 1: AEEE Initiation TimelineThe completion of the project activities will directly impact the formation of a high schoolengineering program of study to be implemented beginning in the Fall of 2018 at a large public-school system in the eastern United States. The activities of the AEEE project to this point haveincluded the establishment of the Taxonometric Structure for Secondary Engineering Programsthrough a modified, three-round Delphi study and development of preliminary model forProgressions of Learning in Engineering (PLiE)9,10. To further the work and validate developedmaterials, the AEEE project held the first annual High School
medicine,learning to read medical images requires the ability to understand cross-sections [1]. Wanzel,Hamstra, Anastakis, Matsumoto, & Cusimano, [2] also reported a correlation between medicalstudents’ scores in mental rotation and their performance on a surgical procedure, Z-plasty. Inengineering, higher abilities in cross-sectioning have been linked to better performance inMechanics of Materials courses [3]. Two categories of spatial reasoning, as defined by Linn andPetersen [4], are mental rotation and spatial visualization. Mental rotation involves the ability tomanipulate three-dimensional (3D) objects in one’s mind by rotation, and spatial visualizationinvolves the ability to manipulate three-dimensional (3D) objects in one’s mind
relatively constant over the last 30 years.While women represent about 50% of the workforce, women made up only about 27% of theSTEM professionals, in 2008. Additionally, women made up only about 12% of the workforcein engineering, in 2013 (McCauley-Bush). In a Leanin.org and McKinsey study, on average,women are promoted and hired at lower rates than men, so far fewer women become seniorleaders. At more senior levels, we see women shift from line to staff roles, so very few end upon the path to becoming CEO, and women remain underrepresented in the corporate pipeline.Women are 46% of the entry level workers, yet make up only 19% of the C-suite, at the highestlevels of executive leadership (Leanin.org, 2016). Women made up only 1% of the
Reserve University. Outside of work, Brian has a passion for making and makerspaces. Advocating for and often discussing making sure a wealth of tools and information are constantly available to students and hobbyists who just want to create something interesting. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Developing a Low-voltage Microgrid for Experiments in Renewable Energy DistributionBackgroundAmong the top engineering challenges today are those related to integrating renewable energyinto the power grid efficiently and reliably; indeed, the economic development and deploymentof solar energy are one of the NAE Grand Challenges [1]. Solar energy alone is undergoing
including demographicdata. We vetted the instrument with an advisory panel for an additional level of validation and piloted thesurvey with undergraduate engineering students at two universities collecting completed responses from196 participants. Our reliability analysis and additional statistical calculations revealed our tool wasstatistically sound and was effectively gathering the data we designed the instrument to measure.IntroductionIn the United States, multiple reports including the Innovative and Entrepreneurial University Report [1],the Engineer of 2020 [2], and expository papers on the state of engineering education [3]-[5] haveindicated that post-secondary engineering education in the U.S. is lagging behind when compared tocompetitors
of an RFID system are: an antenna, an RFIDreader, a transponder (RFID tag). RFID technology implemented in a business environment canbe used to track and record real-time in-transit visibility. The advantages of this technology overany other identification technology is that RFID can send and receive information remotelywithout human intervention, ability to read multiple tags, does not require line of sight, capableof maintaining higher amounts of digital data, and higher supply chain security [1]It is generally accepted by researchers and educators in horticultural science that horticulturalcorps include; tree, bush and perennial vine fruits, perennial bush and tree nuts, vegetables,aromatic and medicinal foliage, seeds and roots, cut
, learning events, knowledge features and assessment events that will beapplied to facilitate robust learning of systems thinking skills, but also provides a literature-baseddiscussion of the growing importance of developing an orientation towards systems thinking skillsfor all engineers.BackgroundSignificant discourse exists in engineering education in the United States, especially in thepreparation of undergraduate students for the dynamic and complex enterprise they will eventuallyjoin. Each year, an average of approximately 80,000 undergraduate students graduate fromengineering programs [1]. Many of these programs foster discipline autonomy and teach domain-specific technical matter despite diminishing boundaries among the engineering
over awide range of institutions.The goal of all these efforts is to establish an effective and engaging concept-driven approach toteaching structural design which is backed up by convincing quantitative and qualitative evidence.IntroductionStructural engineering students are like any others, some are very naturally engaged and arrive inupper-level courses well prepared to take the next steps. However, based on experience andobservation, many are not well prepared and struggle to connect prerequisite material tosuccessfully form a meaningful understanding of structural design. But immediately upongraduation these new engineers are expected to be extremely well prepared to take on designtasks[1][2] which require skills beyond simple operation
feedback from eight researchers, with theinitial goal of attaining 10 responses. We identified ten statements that maintain at least 75%coding convergence across responses. Our results highlight key underlying assumptionsassociated with the TCC Framework and opportunities to improve the instrument to increaseclarity and reduce potential bias.Introduction and Literature ReviewOver the last two decades, there has been an increase in the number and extent ofengineering service-learning and community engagement programs. Associated research hasprimarily focused on student learning outcomes [1]. During this time frame, the widerservice-learning field has researched partnerships using methods that include analysis ofcommunity voice. Building from
a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (being“strongly disagree”) to 5 (being “strongly agree”). The 11 items are shown in Table1 below.Furthermore, we hypothesized that items on the survey will load unto factors as illustrated in Fig.1 below:Table 1: Description of Survey Items Item # Coding Item Description Trust(Value) Question 1 VAL 1 I receive the benefit I intended when I communicate with this classmate Question 4 VAL 2 Interactions with this classmate are not productive/useful. (Reversed)Question 7 VAL 3 My interactions with this person are valuable
significant amount of research has been conducted in these areas, targeting generalknowledge and skill development [1]–[5], team formation [6]–[8], team assessment [9]–[12],conflict management/team problems [13], the importance of campus culture and socialinteractions [14], and team diversity [15]–[18]. Yet many programs continue to struggle with thedelivery of strategic and progressive instruction that prepares graduates to engage consistently inproductive and inclusive teaming practice.ContextThe undergraduate programs administered in CBEE require extensive group and teamworkthroughout all four years of the curricula; however, instruction on effective and inclusivepractices is only occasional, and if present the outcomes are rarely assessed. To
pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 WiP: Developing an Observation Protocol to Categorize Formative Assessment in Engineering CoursesIntroductionStudent assessment is a necessary component of engineering education that gives instructorsinsight into their students’ learning [1]. Two broad types of assessments include summativeassessment and formative assessment
CRs are summarized in Table 1. Three of theeight problems were selected for the present study: 1) an open-ended problem, 2) a rankingproblem, and 3) a multiple-choice problem.For this study, the data from one problem will be analyzed for the four participants. The problemtype analyzed in this study is an open-ended problem. The problem statement asked theparticipant to determine the total headloss for 1000 feet of new unlined 8-inch Schedule 40 steelpipe that is designed to carry water at a rate of 550 gallons per minute.Table 1Description of the four contextual representations provided to solve each problem Contextual Format Description Representation Schedule 40 Tabular Three columns