course? Y/N 4. What tasks or problems are planned for the students to work on? (Open-ended) 5. Anything else worth noting about the context? (Open-ended)In-Class Notes 1. Were the learning outcomes communicated to students? Y/N 2. How many students were present at the beginning of class? (Open-ended) 3. Notes (Open-ended)Post-Observation Notes 1. Did the task and talk align with the learning outcomes? Y/N 2. Were the learning outcomes assessed? Y/N 3. What proportion of students engaged in the task or activities? < 25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, 76-100%) 4. Notes on the overall class (Open-ended) Appendix B – ELCOT Quantitative Codes
local industry people whose feedback on implementation of surfacefinish standards in undergraduate and graduate programs will be sought.Table 1. Evaluation Plan for the Module on Surface finishPerformance Objectives Evaluation Instrument Performance Criteria ResultsNumber of courses using Syllabus Minimum two courses 3 coursesSurface Finish Standards in curriculumDiversity of SDO’s in Syllabus Minimum two SDO’s ASME, ISOprogramNumber of students in Enrollment 25 Per Semester More than 50 Senior UGcourses More than 30 GradsBreadth and
action plan, including thedelegation of responsibilities where possible.Reflections primarily revolved around themes consistent with the insights gathered from facultymembers. Most consultation hours were spent discussing strategies, providing suggestions, andgiving feedback on specific course materials. Faculty who sought out multiple follow-upmeetings were more likely to ask for in-depth feedback on their course materials andorganization. Those who did not engage in follow-up consultations tended to be more focusedon clarifying the expectations and steps needed for completion of the FIOT, rather than ondiscussions about the course itself.Consultations with faculty entirely new to either online teaching in general or to WPI werelonger in length
that led to their evaluation to the rest of the class. For most students this was the onlyrequired library session in the first year; library collaboration with other core courses was moresporadic at the time. Following this initial one-shot session, few students followed up withlibrarians later in the semester to discuss the sources or research for their design project.Late in 2016, the teaching and library team determined the current lesson plan wasn’t the mosteffective way to convey content or effectively support students’ work on their projects. While theactivity was helpful, faculty felt it became repetitive for students after the first 2-3 teams haddiscussed their assigned article and website. A one-shot session wasn’t the best use of
modules developed through thisresearch are interactive and require student exploration. They, along with other learningactivities could easily be used to encourage a more active classroom.As Finite Element Analysis is taught concurrently with Machine Design II at University, studentswere learning to use ANSYS software and the FEA theory simultaneously with machine designcontent. Students stated that the FEA activities helped them understand the machine designcontent much better than just performing book problems. However, due to sequencing in the twocourses, many students also found performing the FEA analyses to be beyond their abilities.Future plans for this research include sequencing the FEA and Machine Design courses to allowbetter synergy
more in tune with a student’s costs needs. There are institutions that do paygreater attention to the student’s financial needs and take that into consideration when theyaccept the student. These institutions have more planning, support, and aid available for theirstudents [9].One of the responses to the lack of state funding is to increase tuition. For universities, this is oneof the methods in which the gap between costs and funding are covered. However, one of theconcerns with this is that when the economy is performing poorly, universities typically receivelower funding. The increase in tuition is generally concurrent with an increase in unemployment.Many of these unemployed employees enroll into higher education institutions [3]. The
change over time during undergraduate formation?For the full project, we plan to interview at least 40 first-year and senior engineering students.This paper describes our initial step of validating our interview protocol through a set of pilotinterviews. We have done another round of interviews to validate and/or revise the protocolfurther. We included senior students in the second round of pilot interviews to ensure that thisprotocol is valid for the proposed cross-sectional study involving students at both the beginningand end of their undergraduate engineering education.Theoretical FrameworkA person’s beliefs about intelligence can be implicit, strong, and deeply-held. Mindset is aframework developed by Carol Dweck (Dweck, 2006)that
components will enable a wide range ofcolleges and universities to train the next generation of nanotechnology engineers.AcknowledgementsThis project is supported by the National Science Foundation through the ATE program, AwardNo. ATE 1700695. Any opinions, findings, and recommendations expressed in this paper arethose of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. Poole, Charles P., and Frank J. Owens, “Introduction to Nanotechnology”, Wiley, 2003. 2. R. Feynman,”There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom”, Engineering and Science, 23(5): 22-36, 1960. 3. Mongillo, John, “Nanotechnology 101”, Greenwood Press, 2007. 4. The National Nanotechnology Initiative – Strategic Plan, December
feedback to correct mistakes.If CS 1 only has MSPs, when will students learn to write larger programs? Our thoughts: ● Majors will learn to write larger programs in CS 2. ● Non-majors, if they need to program in their careers, are more likely to have to write programs similar to the MSPs, like writing a small add-on function for a statistical analysis tool, for google docs, for a database query, etc. If they need to write more substantial programs, they will probably take a CS 2 class (or more). ● With the above said, we note that we intentionally ran the experiment in a more “extreme” manner, to see what effect would occur. Going forward, our instructors plan to give one large assignment mid-quarter and one
textbooks include: Engineering Ethics:Concepts and Cases (Charles E. Harris, Michael S. Pritchard, Michael J. Rabins),Engineering Ethics (Charles B. Fleddermann), Ethics in Engineering (Mike W. Martin,Roland Schinzinger), and three Chinese textbooks include: Engineering Ethics(YongqiangZhang), Engineering Ethics(Song Zhang), Engineering Ethics(Zhengfeng Li, HangqingCong, Qian Wang, etc.) All of them are classic and commonly used. In addition, the threeChinese textbooks are marked as classic textbook or “Nationally Planned Textbook” on theircovers. The three selected American textbooks with more than 3 editions have been translatedinto Chinese and other foreign languages. The common use and wide spread also reflect theglobalization to some
members. The guiding assumption is that project outcomes are a reasonableproxy measure of individual learning. That may or may not be the case, but what seems to be anunfortunate result of that approach is that students efforts become fixed on project success ratherthan learning success.Accepting that an important outcome of an engineering education is to prepare students forprofessional group work, should not compromise the quality of the education that each individualstudent receives. The assumption that project success equates to learning success iscommunicated so often to engineering students through group role-playing schemes, projectprocess charts, task assignments, and grading plans, that students themselves will undercut theirown learning
10 0 Quiz Final Project Figure 5. Capability and Innovation Evolution of Student Learning in EOS To sum up, the authors believe domain capability, innovative skills (i.e., CDIO andSCAMPER), and self-awareness of learning motivation are essential for the product ofcreativity. For the learning motivation, we completed a survey using Day ReconstructionMethod (DRM) in 2014. We plan to design an enhancement of the motive building in CIM in2018. Then, we would like to compare the DRM results of 2014 and 2018 to make CIM moreapplicable for the system engineering education.Reference[1] Huang, Y.L., Cheng, C.Y., Lin, S.S.J., “CIM: Capability-Innovation-Motive
inequities in STEM education using quantitative and qualitative research methodologies and theories from interdisciplinary sources including cultural studies, critical race, gender and feminist the- ories. Her book, the Borderlands of Education, is co-authored with Susan Lord, Professor of Electrical Engineering. Camacho is affiliated faculty with the Department of Ethnic Studies, Women’s and Gender Studies, and the School of Peace and Justice.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy
slows the spread of technology enabled pedagogy – cost. Specifically, theyconcluded that “equipment prices tend to still be too high and are not sufficiently stable to enableeffective planning, especially with respect to how costs are split between universities and theirstudents [12].” There was a discussion of possible business models that could enable students topurchase and keep their own personal kits. While the cost of these active learning platforms isquite low (usually less than or comparable to the price of a typical new ECE textbook), manyschools (especially Minority Serving Institutions or MSIs) find it a major challenge to ask theirstudents to purchase or even rent the existing device options. Some purchase a collection ofpersonal
by employers.The islands’ technical industries struggle to fill positions with local qualified talent, whilepersonnel hired from off-island have twice the attrition rate as local hires [2]. Currently, with theDaniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST) under construction and planning for the potentialconstruction of the Thirty Meter Telescope underway, demands on Hawai‘i’s workforce are onlyincreasing. Since a majority of observatory positions are engineering and technology related,demand is highest for individuals with degrees in engineering, engineering technology, andcomputer science. Further exacerbating relations between telescopes and the community aresignificant disparities in demographics of telescope personnel. For example, women
underpressure” [20]. Research participants stated that professional skills have an impact not only insuccess in industry, but also with studies. This notion is supported in other research [21]. Timemanagement, teamwork, and prioritization were explicitly cited as skills learned at work andapplied in school. It seems from this research that even minimal work experience helps studentswith their ability to plan and produce. In other words, internships have an impact on thesestudents’ ability to learn. Experience at work seems to have taught students how they focus bestand how to prioritize as well as concentrate on the work. They seemed to have learned how tolearn in order to best understand the material to suit their own particular needs.Specific
members and supervisors, how to planevents, how to reach out and network, and how to maintain organization in a makerspace. Now,Glen learns to build efficient and effective forms of communication to other board members,supervisors, and other student workers. She develops a voice that allows herself to be heard andclearly understood. This aids in her ability to plan events for the space where she must networkand go beyond her current contacts so as to provide for the needs of the community. So for me it’s a lot of administrative stuff. It’s -- okay, so someone wants to do a workshop, let me make sure that the resources for that – let me get them a room, and pick a time, let me put it on Facebook and email people. Or like say we
. Reasons for attending included the need for motivation and addressingstruggles they were facing in their programs. These reasons point to challenges students facetransitioning to graduate school (e.g. balancing act). Students were reassured after attending thisworkshop that they possessed or could enhance the skills needed to persist and achieve successin graduate school.For the second PEGS21 cohort (entering Fall 2017), we applied first cohort feedback byencouraging the students to attend GradPathways workshops in pairs or groups as a means tofurther build community within the group. Time during seminar was also dedicated to eachparticipant sharing the two workshops they planned to attend. A list of these workshops andplanned attendees was
students’ knowledge competence in the subject matter and the ECSETresults demonstrated the good potential of using the module in increase students’ self-efficacy.In this study, the outcomes from three different universities are presented. Comparing the resultsacross these universities is ongoing, which will provide insights on the contributing factors thatcause the variation in the effectiveness of the module. Implementing the mobile learning modulein a graduate level course is also under planning to further evaluate the adaptability of themodule to different level of courses. The authors have made a commitment to share thedeveloped mobile learning module to the general public, free of charge. For interested parties,please visit https
research interests are in improving active learning environments, authentic assessment, and the development of classroom pedagogy to improve professional skills in engi- neering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Examining the Impacts of Academic and Community Enrichment Resources on First-Year Civil Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe Citadel School of Engineering conducted a critical internal review as part of strategicplanning in 2011, which pointed to limited retention efforts for students that are many times illprepared for college, especially engineering. Following the 2011 strategic planning efforts was aperiod of
the attention to the entire class todiscuss the problem collectively. Such a plan is that of one of the authors going forward. It isbelieved that the first part, in which each student attempts the problem not only via equations,but more importantly through written elaboration, is vital and that the instructor emphasize that astudent’s thought process is what will be given most weight in grading. Typically, there is greatdisparity in student preparation and ability upon arrival in EELE 201, and allowing each studenttime to digest and attempt the problem on his/her own is justified. There is evidence thatcooperative learning combined with metacognitve training is effective in promotingmathematical reasoning and metacognitive knowledge [23] and
educational website so that it doesn't need to retain and act upon a memory of user choices, inputs, and experiences (as occurs in the Trapped in Time learning adventure). This change resulted in greater robustness across a variety of platforms and simpler implementation for educators and children. The more dynamic approach to integrating the novel and website more than compensated for any loss in the dynamic nature of the user experience.Future DirectionsFuture research will focus on conducting a more rigorous assessment of applying ImaginativeEducation (IE) and transmedia in a controlled setting. In this research we plan to adapt ThroughMy Window to match the learning goals in a city school system in order to assess
research scholar upon successful completion of the research project. Lapatto [6]investigated the reliability of undergraduate students’ evaluation by conducting a survey usingSURE (Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences) and with a follow up survey after ninemonths. The students reported many different benefits they received from undergraduateresearch including readiness for graduate level research. A small group of students whodiscontinued their research also planned to discontinue their postgraduate studies. Other than thebenefit for postgraduate studies, some others benefit of undergraduate research wereindependence, intrinsic motivation to learn, and active participation in courses taken after thestudents complete their summer
programs.Several studies show this contrast, suggesting that further research in this area is warranted.The rationale for the higher population of students consistently in one program over the other isgenerally unknown. While researchers study the engineering population, the engineeringtechnology population goes relatively unnoticed. The effects of a student’s past and currentenvironments in engineering technology are relatively unknown.Researchers developed a survey to gather data from underrepresented populations inuniversities that meet the noted criteria. While the premise for this survey was to learn moreabout these students, their demographics, community and school support and preparation for theuniversity experience, as well as their plans for the
2016 summer program included: Visit to hiking locations near national lab. Lecture on distributed energy resources and inverter technologies, and the basics of power systems operations given by Dr. Fahimi Babak of the University of Texas - Dallas Testing and evaluation of inverters Tour of an energy systems integration facility Lecture on high PV distribution planning given by Roy McCann of the University of Arkansas Lecture on modeling and simulation of a distribution system given by Bryan Palmintier of NREL Tour of a wind technology center at NREL Lectures on distributed control and optimization, and distribution management systems given by Zhihua Qu of the University of
** 105 8% 2.90 2017 96 12% 3.03 *QOTD and Video Introduced ** Class Summaries IntroducedFuture WorkWe plan to continue to provide the Questions of the Day and the daily class summaries in futureofferings of the course. We may increase the homework assigned slightly, with two originalproblems for every assignment. The additional original problem allows a good opportunity forinterleaving, a technique in which prior material is mixed in with the new material. [9] Thistechnique has been shown to improve long-term retention of concepts. Even though thepercentage of students watching the videos was low, the fact that a
?Our immediate focus is on action behavior in an entrepreneurial setting. For example, given aparticular business situation, is a student more inclined to “jump right in” or will they study theunderlying fundamentals of the market opportunity and take a more measured approach.The trend in teaching undergraduates in a technical setting has certainly veered away fromdevelopment of full business plans to a more action-centered approach. To paraphrase SteveBlank’s famous dictum, we are telling our students to get out of the building. The businessmodel canvas (Osterwalder and Pigneur, 2010) is purportedly sufficient knowledge to take someaction. Techstars popular concept of a 54 hour StartUp Weekend is geared towards gettingparticipants in the
progressively guide theparticipants in becoming more effective and independent learners through the application of self-regulated learning strategies (Zimmerman, 1990, 1995, 2002) integrated into the mentoringsessions, and (c) serving as student role models who can highlight how they addressed academicand social issues they encounter, identify what’s really necessary to complete a degree in arigorous domain such as engineering (e.g., persistence, autonomy, active learning), along withthe career potential in terms of what computer scientists and engineers really do, and some of thesupportive benefits offered by the university (See Figures 2-3-4). Our project plan usesevidenced-based mathematics learning initiatives (Bressoud, 2014; Klingbeil, et al
principally designed for a learner-centered e-based environment, making it ready for largescale dissemination. Examples of calculus concepts that the author and his team plan to developand integrate include: (a) games, (b) puzzles and teasers, (c) animations, (d) visual and intuitivedaily-experiences-based examples, (e) movies and short video clips, (f) demonstrations, (g)hands-on activities (including those based on virtual reality and augmented reality), (h) teamingand communication exercises, (i) small-scale inquiry-based research, (j) presentations, and peer-based teaching/learning, (k) visual click-based e-book, (l) community and social engagement,and (m) challenges beyond the basics.2 Calculus ExamplesThe following is a set of examples for
othersoft skills, students participate in a complex semester-long project consisting of a series of labswherein they work in groups to create experimental plan, carry out measurement, perform dataanalysis and compose comprehensive lab reports. The project requires significant GTAsupervision and grading, which takes advantage of the instructional resources alleviated by auto-grading due to the implementation of CBA.4.2 Assessment DesignFigure 4.2 shows the SODAS mapping of Engineering assessment to Bloom’s taxonomy. Itdepicts a hierarchy of knowledge types inside a four-tier hierarchy along with the cognitiveprocesses engaged during each assessment activity, as defined in the refined overview ofBloom’s classification. Starting with the pyramid at