Paper ID #22801A Transition Community for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Engi-neering ProgramsDr. Raja S. Kushalnagar, Gallaudet University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018A Transition Community for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students inEngineering ProgramsAbstractDeaf and hard of hearing (DHH) students are underrepresented and less successful compared totheir hearing counterparts in Engineering programs, as they tend to have less academic readiness.They also generally have lower ACT scores and lower content knowledge for introductorycourses. DHH students face difficult adjustments in handling the demands and
authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering, “Broadening participation in America’s STEM workforce: 2011–2012 biennial report to Congress,” National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/reports/Full_2011- 2012_CEOSE_Report_to_Congress_Final_03-04-2014.pdf2. S. Hurtado, K. Eagan, and M. Chang, “Degrees of success: Bachelor’s degree completion rates among initial STEM majors,” Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA, 2010.3. M. Ong, C. Wright, L. Espinosa, and G. Orfield, “Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate
overarching d e s i g n goal is forEPCC and UTEP together to complete an HSI STEM program “STEMGROW Program:Pathways to Broadening the STEM Workforce” that grows (hence the name “STEMGROW”)Hispanic and low-income student success in STEM education through a partnership betweenUTEP and EPCC [30].In our STEMGROW Program, we will increase the retention of STEM students with disabilities,through strategies to support special needs students’ persistence. Our goal is to grow the numberof students with disabilities in STEM fields at both institutions. Our EPCC Center for Studentswith Disabilities (CSD) is partnering with UTEP’s Center for Accommodations and SupportServices (CASS) to institute the evidence-based interventions to overcome barriers affecting
, J. (2015, June),Creating Inclusive Environments in First-year Engineering Classes to Support Student Retentionand Learning Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle,Washington. 10.18260/p.23757 https://peer.asee.org/23757[5] Brewer, M., & Sochacka, N., & Walther, J. (2015, June), Into the Pipeline: A FreshmanStudent's Experiences of Stories Told About Engineering Paper presented at 2015 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24355 https://peer.asee.org/24355[6] Walden, S. E., & Foor, C. E., & Pan, R., & Shehab, R. L., & Trytten, D. A. (2015, June),Leadership, Management, and Diversity: Missed Opportunities Within Student DesignCompetition Teams Paper
gender identity, race, national origin, ethnicity, religion, age, sexual orientation, disability, political affiliation, or family, marital, or economic status. a. Engineers shall conduct themselves in a manner in which all persons are treated with dignity, respect, and fairness. b. Engineers shall not engage in discrimination or harassment in connection with their professional activities. c. Engineers shall consider the diversity of the community, and shall endeavor in good faith to include diverse perspectives, in the planning and performance of their professional services [1].Prior to Canon 8's adoption
enoughto ensure proper use of it. However, there were participants who were content with theircompanies because of a perception of objectivity in the workplace.This study allowed the researchers to view the many issues surrounding lack of diversity in thetechnology industry, which lays a foundation for future studies on how diversity can beimproved in the technology industry.ReferencesAnzaldúa, G. E. (1990). Making face, making soul/hacienda caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color. San Francisco: Aunt Lute books.Bell, E. L. (1990). The bicultural life experience of career-oriented black women. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(6), 459-477.Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2011). “Microaggressions" in
information waswell-advertised. Students in biomedical and environmental engineering from the majoritypopulation felt that they had to seek out the opportunities. Women in the same programsperceived lab environments in these departments provided valuable experiences. One studentwho is a member of a URG noted that her research experiences have helped the student tobuild an identity as a budding engineer: “I feel like I do [response to being asked if (s)he feels like (s)he is becoming anengineer], because I’ve done research for so long. So, I started my first research project thefall of my sophomore year. And that one was not really my project. I was just mostly doingdata collection for a professor. But I’ve been doing a project that’s mostly
. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college- profiles/15EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf[5] S. E. James, J. L. Herman, S. Rankin, M. Keisling, L. Mottet, M. Anafi, “The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey,” Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality, 2016.[6] A. Phipps, Re-inscribing gender binaries: Deconstructing the dominant discourse around women’s equality in science, engineering, and technology, The Sociological Review, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 768-787, 2007.[7] Z. Nicolazzo, Trans* in College: Transgender Students’ Strategies for Navigating Campus Life and the Institutional Politics of Inclusion. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2017.[8] J. Barbour
inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. The authors wish to thank the STRIDE team and the interview participantsfor their participation in the study.References[1] The United States Department of Education, “Stem 2026 A Vision for Innovation in Stem Education,” U.S. Dep. Educ. Work., p. 55, 2016.[2] D. P. Giddens, R. E. Borchelt, V. R. Carter, W. S. Hammack, L. H. Jamieson, J. H. Johnson, V. Kramer, P. J. Natale, D. a. Scheufele, and J. F. Sullivan, Changing the conversation: messages for improving public understanding of engineering. 2008.[3] N. S. Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017
activity conducted over two consecutive course periods, students, in teams, choosefrom a list of articles about different types of technologies, such as a bridge, a GPS app, airconditioning in office buildings, and airbags. Many of the articles were non-academic includingsome blogs. Our intent here was to push students to not only be able to discern the key points theauthor(s) raise(s) and what information and evidence (or lack thereof) is used to support theirclaims, but also critically consider what the stance of the author is and how this might havecolored his/her assumptions and viewpoint.After evaluating the article as a whole, students are asked to analyze the technology itself andcreate a single presentation slide to summarize their
, which indicates that race and races are theproduct of social thought that “invent[s and] manipulate[s]” what can be considered “pseudo-permanent characteristics” for race when convenient by the dominant race, and are “retired”when no longer convenient [8, p. 8-9]. For example, there have been a wide list of categories andcharacteristics used to measure race in the United States that have changed over the years. Peoplecould not self-select their own racial category in the census until after 1960 – instead, they wereassigned a race based on phenotypical and linguistic features that conformed to the censustakers’ conceptual models of race [13]. In some parts of the US, race was assigned primarilybased on skin color and this determined what
]. [7] S. Burgstahler, M. Cakmak, K. Steele, and B. Blaser, “Equal Access: Universal Design of Engineering Labs,” Access Engineering, n.d. [Online]. Available: https://www.washington.edu/doit/sites/default/files/atoms/files/EA_UD_Engineering_Labs.pdf. [Accessed: 02-Feb-2018]. [8] S. Burgstahler, M. Cakmak, K. Steele, and B. Blaser, “Making a Makerspace? Guidelines for Accessibility and Universal Design,” Access Engineering. [Online]. Available: https://www.washington.edu/doit/sites/default/files/atoms/files/Making_a_Makerspace_8_03_15.pdf. [Accessed: 02-Feb-2018]. [9] L. Hilliard, P. Dunston, J. McGlothlin, and B. S. Duerstock, “Designing Beyond the ADA-Creating an Accessible Research Laboratory for Students and Scientists with Physical
DiversityCommittee members and delegates whose hard work and dedication have truly impacted ASEEand the engineering environment. We especially thank Kristen Constant for phrasingsuggestions.References[1] C. Herring, “Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity,” American Sociological Review, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 208–224, 2009.[2] N. M. Carter and H. M. Wagner, “The bottom line: Corporate performance and women’s representation on boards (2004-2008),” Catalyst, vol. 1, 2011.[3] S. Devillard, W. Graven, E. Lawson, R. Paradise, and S. Sancier-Sultan, “Women Matter 2012. Making the Breakthrough,” McKinsey \& Company, 2012.[4] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers,” in American Society for Engineering Education
, A. I. Karshmer, and S. Pazuchanics, "Cognitive Analysis of Equation Reading: Application to the Development of the Math Genie," International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons, 2004, pp. 630-637: Springer.[7] M. Bitter, "Braille in Mathematics Education," Radboud University Nijmegen, 2013.[8] Y. Pearson Weatherton, R. D. Mayes, and C. Villanueva-Perez, “Barriers to Persistence for Engineering Students with Disabilities,” Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE, Columbus, OH, 2017.[9] G. R. Price and D. Ansari, "Dyscalculia: Characteristics, Causes, and Treatments," Numeracy, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 2, 2013.[10] D. Zhang, Y. Ding, J. Stegall
characteristics: sickness, feeling dreador lack of satisfaction, feeling doubt and lack of confidence, or being polite or cautious.Individual participants also mentioned difficulties due to feeling shy and avoiding meetingpeople or feeling lazy.Language caused a great deal of stress. In first year:there is a lot of Irish people, and the teachers speak quickly and sometime we can'tunderstand it, but we try to focus in it and we take the main point from what he say (...)When I was in my country, I [took] these subjects, in my language. And it was really,really easy, in Oman, in my country, to do these subjects. But here because I understandthe calculation things, but when he speak[s], I didn't understand it. But I tried tounderstand it.During third year, a
reflection and response. Thesereading responses were short, sometimes as brief as only a few sentences, and were to besubmitted online before the first class session that week. Instructors gave individualizedfeedback on those responses. The readings were from many sources: journals, magazines,academic studies, blog posts, company websites, etc.; and covered various topics related todiversity in engineering from multiple perspectives. These readings included Cech andWaidzunas’s research on LGB students in engineering fields [15], Smith and Lucena’s researchon low-income first-generation college students in engineering [16], Cheryan et al.’s research on“ambient belonging” in computer science [17], and Fouad and Singh’s work on factors thatexplain why