Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 4 results

Peer Review and Reflection in Engineering Labs: Writing to Learn and Learning to Write

Conference Session
Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Catherine Anne Hubka, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
important problems at the interface between chemistry, physics, engi- neering, and biology preparing the trainees for careers in academe, national laboratories, and industry. In addition to research, she devotes significant time developing and implementing effective pedagogical approaches in her teaching of undergraduate courses to train engineers who are critical thinkers, problem solvers, and able to understand the societal contexts in which they are working to addressing the grand challenges of the 21st century. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Peer Review and Reflection in Engineering Labs: Writing to Learn and Learning to WriteAbstractClear
Relevance Score: 3.913277

Using Undergraduate Mentors to Scale the Teaching of Engineering Writing

Conference Session
Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
on a Google sheet that the instructor manages.Tasks include grading daily quizzes, running critique workshops of three to six students, gradingmajor assignments, and special assignments, such as creating a format template in MicrosoftWord for the proposal.Background: Rather than having students bring drafts to class for on-the-spot critiquing,the course runs more formal critiquing based on the Iowa Writers Workshop One feature that distinguishes the course is the course’s peer critiquing, which follows theIowa Writers’ Workshop for creative writing [11]. In this approach, the students submit theirassignment excerpts at least two days before the workshop so that the peers and often a mentorhave the chance to read, reflect, edit, and
Relevance Score: 3.5975175

Motivational Factors of Undergraduate Engineering Students in Introductory Non-technical Courses

Conference Session
Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
YunJeong Chang, University of Virginia; Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
individual and group-based activities that aredesigned to prepare the students for the upcoming summative assessments. The first-half of thesemester focuses on technical writing and how to represent complex engineering ideas withvisuals and written descriptions. The second half of the course focuses on down selecting fromall the creative concepts in the individually-generated Idea Notebooks to one that will bepresented as part of the Rocket Pitch. Then the students are given three weeks to work withinthe discussion section on their provisional patent applications.3.0 Research Design The project entails data collection at multiple levels that attend to the course design, pedagogy,and classroom environment that affect the students
Relevance Score: 1.8392394

Successes and Challenges in Supporting Undergraduate Peer Educators to Notice and Respond to Equity Considerations within Design Teams

Conference Session
Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Jennifer Radoff, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Hannah Sabo; Gina Marie Quan, University of Maryland, College Park
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors, Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Paper ID #23278Successes and Challenges in Supporting Undergraduate Peer Educators toNotice and Respond to Equity Considerations within Design TeamsDr. Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park Chandra Turpen is a Research Assistant Professor in the Physics Education Research Group at the Uni- versity of Maryland, College Park’s Department of Physics. She completed her PhD in Physics at the University of Colorado at Boulder specializing in Physics Education Research. Chandra’s work involves designing and researching contexts for learning within higher education. In her research, Chandra draws from the
Relevance Score: 1.8351016