PlanThe activities of the ASEE Diveristy Committee have been guided by a communal vision andhave informed and been informed by (a) the task force charge in 2009, (b) initial plans developedby the committee in 2011-12, (c) and a formal strategic action plan developed in 2015-16. TheASEE statement on diversity and inclusion describes the Society’s vision as to create and foster environments where every individual is respected and no one feels marginalized. ASEE believes that this can be achieved by supporting the education, recruitment, retention, and advancement of these groups in engineering education, engineering technology education, and the engineering profession. While ASEE recognizes that steady gains have been
Paso Carolina Favela is currently a Senior at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) and plans to graduate with her Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering in the Fall of 2018. Carolina is currently a yearlong university Undergraduate Research Student and Development Specialist for the STEMGrow program, a partnership with El Paso Community College (EPCC) that focuses on achieving the next c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #24050 generation of student engagement and professional preparation. As a current STEMGrower, Ms. Favela strives to innovate and
users. The Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology (DO-IT) center at the University of Washington [6] provides an extensive repository of resources related to accessibility and universal design, in particular guidelines for both engineering labs [7] and makerspaces [8]. The Accessible Biomedical Immersion Laboratory (ABIL) at Purdue University [9] and the Seattle Lighthouse for the Blind [10] also provide excellent recommendations and models. Recommendations are broken down into guidelines for physical environments, tools and hardware, and instructional and support resources. Open floor plans with clearly marked and accessible routes of travel are a priority in accessible work spaces, with reconfigurable and height
gender identity, race, national origin, ethnicity, religion, age, sexual orientation, disability, political affiliation, or family, marital, or economic status. a. Engineers shall conduct themselves in a manner in which all persons are treated with dignity, respect, and fairness. b. Engineers shall not engage in discrimination or harassment in connection with their professional activities. c. Engineers shall consider the diversity of the community, and shall endeavor in good faith to include diverse perspectives, in the planning and performance of their professional services [1].Prior to Canon 8's adoption
findings of this study?Methodological approachWe conducted initial phenomenological interviews during students’ first year (2014-2015),follow-up interviews with the sub-set of women from the Middle East (spring 2017), andfinal-year interviews with Irish-based participants (2017-2018). The Irish-basedparticipants joined our DT066 common core Bachelor of Engineering program together, inSeptember 2014.We conducted initial analysis, using interpretive phenomenology, to summarize eachparticipant’s first interview and help shape the direction of the study and the plan forfollow-up interviews. Starting in the third year, we used NVivo software to code allinterviews collected. As per Table 2, this included first-year interviews (n=7), the second
course content. On his way to completing adegree in Psychology, mathematics presented a serious obstacle. Unless he could succeed in thePre-Calculus Algebra course mandated in his degree plan, he would not be able to complete thedegree. This student reached out to the academic support services unit at the university andpartnered with members of the mathematics tutoring staff to create tools that would allow him tosucceed. The outcome of their efforts was the development of PDM. This fully audio method ofmath instruction and assessment allowed the student, whose motor control deficits precluded hisuse of braille and math braille, to fully control the solution processes for all of the topics heencountered in his college math courses.Although PDM
sessions suchas panels, round tables, workshops and training sessions such as Safe Zone training. The ADChas a vision, mission and published strategic plan, [2] and is an entity to which authors candirectly submit papers.The development of, and institutionalization of the Best Diversity Paper award within ASEE wasa major undertaking that required drafting of the process for soliciting and identifying bestpapers, judging them on a consistent rubric, and disseminating the top papers. The ASEEDiversity Committee crafted a proposal, vetted it internally, worked with ASEE IT staff tocustomize the paper handling system, Monolith, and then vetted with the ASEE Board ofDirectors. The ASEE Board of Directors approved the award and institutionalized it as
believe enrich their classes.Some participants started teaching right away, some after years or decades of industry experience. Someparticipants earned a doctoral degree early in their career, some much later, some do not plan on earning adoctoral degree at all. This breadth of pathways is important when considering recruitment and careeradvancement policies. A “one size fits all” approach to recruitment, especially if that approach is modeledon the tenure-track recruitment criteria, will result in policies that exclude some candidates whoseperspectives and experiences would be an asset to the program. There was no career pathway that could bedescribed as “typical” among these ten participants.We found that our participants were hired with an
Paper ID #23735Adding Diversity and Culture to the Engineer’s Toolkit: Evaluating a UniqueCourse Option for Engineering StudentsMs. Chelsea Nneka Onyeador, Stanford University I am a 4th year Mechanical Engineering B.S. student at Stanford University, planning to pursue graduate work in Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT next year. I am a Nigerian-American from central Texas, and I am a devoted advocate for diversity in engineering.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University Shannon K. Gilmartin, Ph.D., is a Senior Research Scholar at the Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research and Adjunct Professor in
maintaining or dismantling that privilege. We hope that these examples willbe helpful to others interested in integrating such content into their courses.Institutional ContextThe history behind the creation of these courses stems from being at the forefront of institution-wide transformation, including the inauguration of a new university president, theimplementation of a new University Core curriculum, the award of an NSF RED grant, and thecreation of a new General Engineering department [11]. The University of San Diego is amajority undergraduate, private four-year [12], faith-based institution that embraces Catholicsocial teaching in its mission. Our new president has enacted a new strategic plan, TheUniversity has identified six pathways through
the community, includingfaculty and peers, was welcoming and supportive, which helped them deal with the difficulty ofthe curriculum and the program workload. In contrast, several negative responses from women,people of color, and/or international students about the social climate demonstrated that there isstill work to be done to make the community in the program more inclusive to traditionallyunderrepresented students. This is in line with the finding in the quantitative analysis that womenrated their peer relations somewhat lower than men; those that rated their peer groups moresupportive were more likely to report identification with engineering and plans to persist.Peer relationships was the largest sub-category within the community