Conference Session

How are We Faring with EC2000?

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Daina Briedis

Page 7.453.1evaluative materials for the program evaluators (PEVs) and answer directly to the criteria and theself-study guidelines suggested by ABET. Other institutions do not follow the guidelines, butattempt to “write” themselves into compliance with the criteria, seemingly ignoring suchCriterion 3 phrases as “must demonstrate,” “documented results,” “evidence must be given,” and“are being measured.”In this context, Criterion 3-centered issues that are typically identified as shortcomings includethe following: • No measurement of outcomes at all—only opinions and self-assessment results; • Assessment results presented for the PEV to evaluate and analyze; • An assessment plan in place with little or no implementation

Conference Session

Unique Lab Experiments

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Dianne DeTurris

before being launched on anAeroTech L-1120W motor4. The launch occurred at a monthly Tripoli Rocketry Associationsponsored event in Fresno, CA. Although the students were concerned because the rocket weighed more than estimated, the launch proceeded as planned with a stable climb during motor burn. Unfortunately, the motor was not powerful enough to push the rocket to the altitude necessary for a reasonable

Conference Session

Mobile Robotics in Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Cathryne Stein

students came from a startling diversity of socio -economicbackgrounds; they came from inner city and rural schools, private schools, science andtechnology magnet schools, alternative or continuation schools, as well as your averageeveryday suburban public school. Some even came from home school situations,community computer clubhouses, or other types of organizations. The most noticeablething they had in common was how enthusiastic, motivated and focused they seemed tobe.These students now have various degrees of experience with planning, defining problemsand solutions, the design process, scheduling, mechanical engineering, programming,demonstrating, reporting results, and creating websites. In addition, some of the bestteams’ programming

Conference Session

Instrumentation Poster Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Mary Vollaro

discussions. In an effort have the entire class at the same experiencelevel; the trips must be well planned and coordinated with the topics being presented in theManufacturing Processes class.The industrial field trips also work to accommodate all students and support their differentlearning styles. The trips provide an educational experience that incorporates the visual andkinesthetic sensory modalities used for learning information. [1] To support the observations ofthe instructor and to gain insight into the needs of today’s students, the VARK (Visual / Aural /Read-Write / Kinesthetic) survey[1,2] administered to students in IE314 in Spring 2001. Theresults of the survey shows most students prefer to utilize a kinesthetic and/or visual

Conference Session

Assessment in Large and Small Programs

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

James Newell; Heidi Newell; Kevin Dahm

all students must be stated in terms that are measurable and demonstrable · A comprehensive plan must be developed to ensure that basic competencies are learned and reinforced throughout the time the students are enrolle d in the institution · Each discipline must specify learning outcomes congruent with the required competenciesLike many institutions (3), the Rowan University Chemical Engineering Departmentchose to use items that address multiple constituencies including alumni, industry, andthe students themselves. Assessment data from these groups were obtained throughalumni surveys, student peer-reviews, and employer surveys. These instruments werefairly straightforward to

Conference Session

New EET Course Development

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Youakim Al Kalaani; Abul Azad

theory to practice and be able to connect and see how the various concepts fit together.This way, course material can be covered at a faster pace since students have enough time toperform all the planned experiments and thus accumulate well-rounded skills required to succeedin this field of study.Based on this concept, five modular units of instruction were developed to cover a modernelectric machine course. The lesson plans listed in the Appendix are used to guide students andthe instructor through weekly class and lab activities based on reference materials 4,5. Page 7.1070.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Mobile Robotics in Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Carl Steidley; Stephen Dannelly

plans to use the Real-Time Lab as an important part of tours given toprospective students. A model railroad component was selected for five reasons. First, both discrete-state(modeled by state machines or Petri nets) and continuous-state (described by transfer functions)control problems can be modeled. Second, a sensor-instrumented model railroad is versatile andwill enable students to work on a large variety of potential projects ranging from simple tocomplex. Third, it is not difficult to obtain the necessary equipment; model railroads are easilyavailable in our community and many other locations. Fourth, it is virtually impossible to thinkof a more inexpensive option with the same capabilities. Finally, we believe that the

Conference Session

Design in the Engineering Core

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Josue Njock-Libii

that was learned during the semester and design a device that eitherworks according to, incorporates, or demonstrates that result. Students also had the option ofdesigning an experiment that would illustrate or demonstrate a concept, or a result, that is integralor directly related to the course. A third option was for students to redesign an existingexperiment for the purpose of improving it. In the latter case, they needed to identify the existingflaws that needed to be fixed, discuss how they were planning to fix them and actually carry outtheir plan. All projects required a preliminary report that discussed the choice that had been made,the preliminary work that led them to believe that their project was feasible and a detailed plan

Conference Session

Pre-College Programs

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Liv Ramstad; Ferd Schneider; Audeen Fentiman; Artemus Herzog; John Merrill

prepared by the Walnut Hills High School teachers and OSU faculty and staffdirectly involved in preparation and presentation of the course. It outlines the courseobjectives, content, structure, and management. Details on establishing a university/highschool/ industry team to support development and implementation of the course are provided.Finally, the authors describe the assessment plan and the lessons learned during the first year.IntroductionMany students with the talent and skills to become engineers are not aware that engineering isa career option for them and do not consider it as a college major. As a result, those studentslose an opportunity to pursue a rewarding and challenging career, and society does not benefitfrom the contributions

Conference Session

Capstone Design

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

John Paul Giolma; Kevin Nickels

designgroup. Each group advisor defines the specific content of the phases as well as the features ofdeliverables throughout the academic year. The six phases are shown in Table 1. Table 1: The Phases of a DesignPhase Report PresentationGeneration of design specifications Memo Report (~1page) Public PresentationConsideration of alternative Summary Report (1pg/alternative)solutionsDesign and construction of a Formal Report (~10 pages) Technicalprototype solution PresentationDesign and execution of a test plan

Conference Session

Mobile Robotics in Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Ronald Lessard

thatpaper surface was replaced by painting the gray scale directly on the plywood surface.Figure 1. RoboCup Jr Soccer Field “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyrig ht  2002, American Society for Engineering Education” Page 7.56.2The ball and special sensors to supplement the Lego Mindstorms kit are available fromWiltronics4. The construction plans for an example soccer-playing robot (robcon1.ppt,robcon2.ppt) as well as some example RoboLab graphical programming software(Programming.doc) are available from the Australian Web site. The

Conference Session

Effective Energy Laboratory Ideas

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Xiaoguang Yang; Chika Nwankpa; Anthony Madonna; Karen Miu

, automotive companies, architectural engineering firms, ship builders, pharmaceuticals, etc., are increasingly concerned with their energy systems and hire engineers for the planning and operation of lower power, lower voltage (<115kV) distribution systems. As such, the topic of power distribution systems has been addressed at several universities in terms of classes and software laboratories, with a smaller number of universities addressing hardware laboratories. Some existing laboratories are now discussed. Software laboratories explicitly for distribution system planning can be found in [1]. At the University of Florida, a hardware laboratory was established for power quality and energy studies [2]. In Taiwan, a distribution automation

Conference Session

Building Bridges in ET

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Newman; John Robertson; Lakshmi Munukutla

at the Williams campus has providednumerous opportunities to bring this partnership to a new dimension. In a short five years it hasmoved well beyond the conventional articulation, described above. Joint curriculumdevelopment, infrastructure planning, academic scheduling and sharing institutional data havemarked the uniqueness of the partnership between these two institutions. The specialcollaboration extends to housing and academic/student support services as well. The primaryfocus of this paper is to illustrate the innovative educational partnership and its benefits to thestudents attending ASU East, CGCC and other Maricopa Community Colleges.BackgroundASU East is a new campus of Arizona State University located in the city of Mesa

Conference Session

Closing Manufacturing Competency Gaps I

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Bradley Kramer

of the technical skills gaps identified by SME in theManufacturing Education Plan: 1999 Critical Competency Gaps document. The primarymechanism for achieving these results is to assign students to multiple projects (sequentially) Page 7.835.3that provide direct, mentored, hands-on experience with real product and production system Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationprojects. On average, each intern will work on as many as three or four projects before leavingthe program. Contrary to some

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Russell Taylor; Randal Goldberg; Oleg Gerovichev; Ian Donn; Anand Viswanathan

throughouta student’s school career. However, making technology accessible for learning is challenging dueto cost, safety and implementation concerns. This paper describes a method for drawing oncurrent, real life challenges faced by researchers in the field and translating such experiences intoa secondary school level program. The concept of the competition, application of LEGOMindstorms® robotics platform, methods of organization and expansion, past experiences andfuture plans are presented. Our goal is to show an example of how to integrate off-the-shelfrobotic technology with current real-world engineering challenges and to engage students in thefields of engineering, robotics, and medicine in a fun and exciting atmosphere.Introduction and

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Shawn Gross; David Dinehart

. The design of another building for the orphanage, while within thescope of a capstone course, did not meet the current needs of the orphanage. At the initialmeeting the idea of building a cross on a hill overlooking the orphanage was discussed. The crosswould serve as a symbol of hope for the boys and the surrounding villages in the valley. Theselection of this project in a third world country would offer the students some interesting designchallenges, tie directly to the University’s Catholic mission, and provide the feasibility of beingconstructed in one week. Consequently, plans were made to focus the course around the designand construction of a 25-foot tall reinforced concrete cross.Course DescriptionThe capstone course is allotted three

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Mechanics

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Hall; Nancy Hubing; David Oglesby; Vikas Yellamraju; Ralph Flori; Timothy Philpot

notprovide the extensive information, problem-solving support, and built-in quizzing and homeworkassessment that engineering students need. Incomplete software like this serve as add-on’s to aclass, requiring teachers to continue doing everything he/she is currently doing, plus assigningthe software and trying to bring it into the class. This is why the use of software has not “caughton” to the degree that many thought it would.These software products we are developing will be comprehensive, covering virtually an entirecourse, delivering much of the content of the course (particularly the remedial, basic, andintermediate level content). We plan to use these to replace some classroom time. For example,a three credit hour class may meet only once or

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Marjorie Skubic

University of Victoria (Canada) 4 and Rowan University 5. Li’s course onSoftware Models for Embedded Systems has similar objectives but focuses specifically onembedded systems 4. The course at Rowan University is a CS1 course (focusing on objectoriented programming) but does include some hardware; students are reported to like theprojects5. In the remaining sections, we discuss our educational plan, the project theme and testbedimplementation, assignments using the testbed, and include comments regarding the evaluationof the effort.Educational Plan The target group for this effort includes primarily undergraduate students majoring in CSand CE. To include new directions in the curriculum, it is tempting to introduce yet anothercourse

Conference Session

Women in Engineering: A Potpourri

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Peg Boyle Single; Naomi Chesler; Borjana Mikic

Copyright  2002, American Society for Engineering EducationDuring our three-day workshop, the Outward Bound facilitators introduced us to the “Goals,Roles, Procedures and Interpersonal Interactions” (GRPI) model for creating and implementingaction plans, helped us develop a “Team Charter” or mission statement, evaluated our individualand team performance using their “Plus/Delta Feedback” model (Plus: identify and providefeedback on what works well; Delta: what requires change) and led us in a team challengesequence that culminated in a rock-climbing-based team challenge. In addition to thesetraditional Outward Bound activities, time was set aside for an invited participant to address thegroup as a whole. All meals were provided by and prepared by

Conference Session

New Programs and Success Stories

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Howard Eisner

formed. These students proceedthrough the same sequence of courses, in lock-step. Forming these cohorts of studentsturned out to be a very powerful and cost-effective approach. Under the rightimplementations, one is able to predict class size and composition with great accuracy, anda single plan can serve for several years. Instructor assignments can be made with longlead times, and the overall cost of attracting students drops precipitously. These areenormous benefits, if indeed the formation of these cohorts can be achieved efficiently.This leads to the second point cited above. It became clear that both industry and government (especially in the Washington DCarea) were in a position to support cohort-based programs. However, it was

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Dru Germanoski; David Brandes

and processes of inquiry" and a linking of facultyresearch and teaching2 . These recommendations point to the need for more hands-on,project-oriented learning experiences. Stream or watershed-based field studies have beenused for this purpose at a number of K-12 schools, colleges, and universities in a variety ofdisciplines3 .The emphasis on the watershed as a theme for teaching is also consistent with national trendsin land-use planning and management. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) isadvocating a watershed-based framework for protecting public health and the environment4 .Much of this emphasis is a result of non-point source pollution, in which the cumulative

Conference Session

Perceived Quality of Graduate Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Jacobsen; Gautam Pillay; Fred Gunnerson

be commensurate with that goal.Third, there must be a recognized facility or group of facilities to support the anticipated work byboth students and faculty. Experience has shown that productive and profitable collaborationsbetween universities, industries, and the private sector are most successful in a campus-likeenvironment where multidisciplinary colleagues collectively participate in professional research,development, and education. In our case, two new facilities are planned that will supportsubsurface science initiatives: the Center for Science and Technology (CST) and the SubsurfaceGeosciences Laboratory (SGL). The CST facility is a research building owned by the State ofIdaho and will be located adjacent to the local branch campus

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Manufacturing ET

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Manocher Djassemi

of the 2002 American Society of Engineering education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education” At the outset of the semester students submit a proposal indicating the expected steps andactivities to complete the project. The objective of a typical factory automation laboratory projectwould be: plan, design, and build an integrated assembly/machining cell. In addition to normalteaching functions, the faculty work as consultants and provide logistical support as the projectprogresses. The faculty also provide a general guideline for implementing the project as follows:1. Project planning stage · Generating product ideas: brainstorming by entire class · Product

Conference Session

Curriculum and Laboratory Development

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Bruce Upchurch; Chi Thai

Vision” course, we were designing for a curriculum emphasizing the“pre-imaging” technologies and techniques rather than image-processing techniques as in atraditional computer-science oriented course (which was already being taught at the UGADepartment of Computer Science). We were planning to introduce concepts of appliedspectrometry in order to later develop into a color vision model as an application of multi-spectral imaging instead as a technology mimicking human color vision. We were also lookinginto lighting schemes, both structured and non-structured, and also at real-time image acquisitionmethodologies. Early in the development stage, we realized that we could not adopt the standardmode of laboratory design where groups of 2-3 students

Conference Session

ET Industrial Collaborations

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Michele Summers

essential for a new location such as SOT at Lafayette during its formative years.To assist the SOT at Lafayette in achieving its goals, the SOT at Lafayette developed thefollowing purpose statement for the IAB: The purpose of the Lafayette Advisory Board will be to advise the Director of SOT at Lafayette on matters related to (1) new degree programs and options, (2) long-range planning, (3) marketing/community relations, (4) development, (5) other local policy matters.There are many ways that the advisory board can contribute to the goals of the SOT at Lafayette.The organization of the IAB will include three standing committees to assist in achieving thesegoals

Conference Session

Promoting ET with K-12 Projects

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Tim Brower

Oregon and the Northwest. A second Technology SpaceCamp is planned for Summer 2002. This paper will discuss the organization, implementation, andcourse material of the Technology Space Camp, with the expectation that other technologyschools might use this information as a blueprint for their participation in similar programs.I. BackgroundIn order to place the motivation for hosting the Technology Space Camp in proper context, adescription of the structure of the Senior Project Course and NASA's Reduced Gravity StudentFlight Opportunities Program is relevant.Senior Projects at OIT -The OIT Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) senior project course is a comprehensivegroup design project and consists of a three-quarter sequence. This sequence

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Graphics

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

David Forsman; Kathryn Holliday-Darr; Michael Lobaugh

is divided into sections detailing how process education teaching techniques wereimplemented into different level graphics classes. Each section will detail the course, how thecourse was taught in the past, the active learning activities introduced, the results of thesechanges and plans for future semesters. Suggestions for anyone considering similar changes aredetailed at the end of this paper. Process Education in Computer Graphics – METBD 110Background:Introduction to Graphics and Solids Modeling (METBD 110) is a first semester freshmen classfor all students enrolled in the PLET and MET programs in both the associate and bachelorsprograms offered at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. This class is a three-credit

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Brian Argrow

continuous improvement procedures Near the completion of the AE 2000 planning, the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) announced new guidelines and criteria for program accreditation. The 1997aerospace engineering program criteria proposed by the American Institute of Aeronautics andAstronautics (http://www.aiaa.org) helped to finalize the first iteration of the AE 2000,particularly the upper-division courses. The outcomes-based AE 2000 assessment plan was in thespirit of that to be used by ABET evaluators. In 1999, the AE 2000 was successfully reviewed byABET. We view this as validation of the new program plan and implementation. Table 1 outlines the AE 2000. Fundamental science and mathematics courses, e.g., physics

Conference Session

A Potpourri of Innovations in Physics

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Patrick Joyner; Teresa Larkin

of 120 students) ofPhysics for the Modern World were offered. The 2 lecture sections were broken into 8 laboratorysections, with an average of 16 students in each lab. One of the 8 laboratory sections (a sectionconsisting of 7 students) was linked with one section of college writing (Composing the PhysicalWorld). Although Physics for the Modern World typically consists of freshman through seniors,all students enrolled in the linked courses were freshman - the College Writing class is amandatory requirement for all American University students, and the logical plan is for students tocomplete College Writing during their freshman year. A description of the curricular toolsdeveloped to link Physics for the Modern World and Composing the

Conference Session

Managing and Funding Design Projects

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

David W. Miller; Doris Brodeur

solely experience with Page 7.1128.2 measurement project planning, on analysis design iteration to modeling and meet requirements Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education measurement meet requirements Requirements, N/A - experiment One of the Quantifiable abstraction and