location or schedulespreclude their attendance at on-campus classes.1,2,3 Increasingly, however, such technology isbeing used for the delivery of course materials for on-campus courses where neither location norschedules are issues. Generally, the use of such technologies in these situations has been only toeither facilitate or supplement face-to-face classroom instruction and laboratory exercises4,5.However, several factors are now making electronic technologies a principal mode of instruction,even for on-campus courses: most students now either own or have easy access to computingtechnology, and thus access to the internet; electronic technologies offer some pedagogicaladvantages over live lectures, such as repeatability and graphical
should also be grounded in the design aspect of the technology not just in theresearch part as usually maybe the case in academia. Meredith, D. (1990) and Fung A.S.have presented some BASIC language design programs and a computer-controlledlaboratory air conditioning units respectively to teach HVAC courses. Walton A. et. al.(1996) discussed the development of three laboratory experiments to teach HVACprinciples. Santos J.J. (2001) emphasized controls education for HVAC design engineers.Some researchers like Stevens J.W. (1997) emphasized desiccant instruction in HVACcourses, others like Oppenheim P. (1994) emphasized introduction of the environmentaltechnology component in the curriculum of building construction programs. The next tworeferences
Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”The Freshman and Sophomore Clinics at Rowan University The Freshman and Sophomore Clinics at Rowan University are intensive, team-based andmulti-disciplinary laboratory courses taken by all engineering students in the college. TheFreshman Clinic is taught by engineering faculty from each of the four disciplines at Rowan:Mechanical, Electrical and Computer, Civil and Environmental, and Chemical. It targetsproblem solving and engineering measurements in the fall semester and introduction to designand competitive assessment in the spring semester. In Freshman Clinic, we have concentrated onusing teams to build a feeling of belonging among the first year Engineering students who aremostly in
Session 1712 NSF Combined Research and Curriculum Development on Multiphase Transport Phenomena M. J. Amey 2, A. Bénard 2, G. G. Chase 1, E. A. Evans1, K. Jayaraman 2, R. S. Mohan3, S. M. Parks2, C. A. Petty 2 (presenter), O. Shoham3, S. A. Shirazi3, K. D. Wisecarver3, M. Zhuang 2 1 The University of Akron/2Michigan State University/ 3The University of TulsaSummaryThis curriculum development project on multiphase transport phenomena draws on the researchexperiences from nine research laboratories at The University of Akron, Michigan State
affordable and widespread. New modeling and model abstractiontechniques are appearing. The most important set of technologies center on modeling andsimulation. Some of the key areas that require attention in modeling and simulation are: modelobject selection (what to model); degree of abstraction; level of depth; flexibility andmaintenance of models; integration of different models; and model validation. The results arediscussed under the following headings:Flexible Manufacturing: The discussion with a National Research Group from Oak RidgeNational Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, and Los Alamos National Laboratoriesindicated that the research in telerobotics and flexible manufacturing systems though showedprogress, it would be practically
concentrate on the elements required to master embedded systems design, andalso satisfy the needs of engineers currently working in industry.Due to the lack of time and facilities, traditional university education tends to emphasize theoryand concepts. Even though implementation (laboratory) projects are associated with manycourses, these projects tend to be more abstract than real implementations that can be useddirectly in industrial and commercial products. Typically, there is a large gap in students'understanding between theory (conceptual understanding) and implementation (concreteunderstanding). As a result, many students who have a good understanding of theory andconcepts do not have confidence to map their knowledge onto implementations. One
technical knowledge to be able to practice their engineering discipline.3. The Self-Study GapMany resources are available for a typical university-level course, and there is no reasonto replicate good aspects of these resources. Strengths and weaknesses of existingapproaches to university education are summarized in Table 1. Much factual knowledgeis readily available in textbooks and supplemental information available in libraries andWEB resources. In addition, simulation software and laboratories provide students withexperiences in the application of process control. Finally, the essential personal contactis provided during classes, tutorials, and office hours. However, the current resources have significant weaknesses as well. One
interestedand motivated while grinding through the fundamentals. The intent of course 13.S36 is wellmatched with the goals of these freshmen-oriented seminar classes.Having decided to introduce students to Ocean Engineering at the freshmen level by way of aseminar course, the next topic addressed was the content of the course. For the reasons outlinedabove we decided to create a hands-on, laboratory course. At that point in the coursedevelopment we obtained a copy of a remarkable book entitled, “Build Your Own UnderwaterRobot,” by Harry Bohm and Vickie Jensen 2. This book describes a number of simple marinebuilding projects designed for high school (and younger) students. Among the projects is asimple and elegant little remotely-operated vehicle made
Army Research Laboratory Modal Analysis of Blast Plates Army Research Laboratory Watershed and Reservoir Study Waterways Experiment Station Auger Pilings Design for LAMS Natick Labs Mine Vehicle Army Research Laboratory Page 7.921.10 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationV. ConclusionThe true indication of this project’s success was the clients’ smiling faces as they posed forpictures while standing on
logical one and an ideal vehiclefor the delivery of the 180-hour MPI program. 60 hours of this program will be spent inclassroom and laboratory activities (covering manufacturing processes and systems, problemsolving, communications, teamwork, and project management) while 120 hours will be spent atan industry partner’s site working on a paid internship. The instructors for the program will berecruited from the PRIME colleges and universities while mentors for the internships will belocated from area industry. A pilot MPI program was conducted in Summer 2001 at a single sitein one county with 25 students from 4 different high schools. In the Summer of 2002, ten sitesare planned with 25 students at each site – the program will impact the ten
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationQuality versus Quantity Other important questions must also be addressed during the online curriculumdevelopment process. After the online system is “up and running”, it becomes much moredifficult to implement changes for students who are currently enrolled in the system. Forexample, the development must consider what educational elements can be (or should be)integrated into the online experience. How should laboratory experiences be handled, or do welimit the types of courses available online to a subset of those required in a given discipline?Can an online degree program satisfy the standardization and performance
Session 3129 Course Management Systems: Expectations and Outcomes Debra T. Burhans1, Carl Alphonce2, Helene Kershner3, Barbara Sherman 4, Deborah Walters5 1 Canisius College/ 2,3,4,5University at Buffalo (SUNY)In the 1999-2000 academic year, an ambitious overhaul of a large, introductory computerliteracy course at the University at Buffalo (SUNY) was initiated with the help of a grant fromthe Pew Learning and Technology Program1. This course enrolls approximately 1200 studentsper year, divided into lecture sections of 200 and laboratory sections of 20-40
detailed outline which describes the contents of each chapter to some levelof detail.Pack and Barrett believed that a strong, detailed outline was the key to writing a goodbook. They spent considerable time deciding on the content of the text, the order thatconcepts would be covered, examples to be included in each section, and theaccompanying laboratory exercises. They worked on their own portion of the outline,combined the portions into a single outline, reviewed the overall product, and then put itaside for awhile. After 7 to 10 days they took a fresh look at the outline, madeimprovements, and completed a final draft. They provided the draft to colleagues in the
Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session 1566remained practically unchanged since around 1970, albeit for the piecewise and uncoordinatedintroduction of a number of new subjects such as computer science into traditional curricula. Dueto lack of equipment and support, laboratory work has been eliminated or confined to specialtycourses and design has taken the back seat to analysis. The perceived quality of engineeringundergraduate programs has shifted from excellence in education to accomplishment in research.However, since the 1980s, many warnings have been sounded regarding the inadequacy
laboratory sessions of two hours duration on theUniversity athletic fields. Experience showed that approximately eight launches and recoveriescould be conducted in a two-hour session. Winds were first measured with a hand heldanemometer to insure they were below 9 m/s. Wind compensation requires tilting th e launcherrod into the wind, but this decreases altitude and the accuracy of the altitude measurement, not tomention problems with wind drift causing loss of the model. Altitude is measured with an“altitracker,” a large pistol-like sighting device that measures the angle of elevation at apogee,and allows calculation of altitude when combined with a ground-measured distance from thelaunch site. The student conducts a countdown and actuates a firing
very busy schedules and came with a cost to ourroutine activities. The mechanism that we adopted was adding a new ritual to our yearlyschedule, a focussed retreat to measure progress, review curriculum issues, analyze the datagathered and set future plans. Performing these functions in a venue away from offices andclasses seemed to be the only mechanism that would allow us a chance to adequately address ourTC2K challenge.One additional outcome in our program’s way of doing business involved planning a significantupgrade in our senior laboratory. TC2K’s Criterion 4 addresses facility issues. With the additionof a new member to the EET program, we had an excellent opportunity to upgrade one of ourlabs. Our college dean was presented with a
corporations, professional societies, governmental agenciesand laboratories. The collective program evaluations support the need for and efficacy of theprogram. For all three-time periods, at least 80% of the students reported they would recommendMentorNet to other students. Both students and mentors emphasized the importance of makingthe college-to-work connection and identified this as the primary reason for participating inMentorNet. The college-to-work connection provided students with invaluable knowledge abouttheir career opportunities, the benefits of networking, and the development of networking skills.The students reported increased self-confidence, enhanced knowledge of the workplace andworkplace skills, and valuing the support they received
, ToolsABET Criterion 6 requires the program to document that the classrooms, laboratories, andequipment are adequate to accomplish the program objectives. The data will include thenumbers of classrooms, types of laboratories, and equipment available for student’s use.Numbers of classroom and laboratories can be found with those who track this at the institution,such as accounting or maintenance offices. Satisfaction with the classroom, laboratories andequipment can be found in the surveys mentioned above.Interpretation of Effectiveness and ImprovementsThe fourth part of the model (refer back to Figure 1) is the interpretation of effectiveness anddocumentation of curricular or program improvement. This is an important step in theassessment process
(portrayed by faculty)that they have studied their projects thoroughly and should be awarded the construction contract.Capstone Course After required freshman and sophomore “core” courses, the Air Force Academy’s civiland environmental engineering curricula begin with a hands-on “Field Engineering andReadiness Laboratory” (FERL) course between the sophomore and junior years. During thisthree-week course students complete 22 hands-on construction activities under the supervision offaculty and Air Force construction craftsmen. A sampling of the activities includes wood-frameconstruction, heavy equipment operation, concrete placement, and asphalt paving, as shown inFigure 2. Each activity integrates with one or more later major’s courses and
Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationOnce approved by the instructor, students constructed their mechanisms to their engineeringdrawings using materials available in the engineering laboratory facilities. They tested theirmechanisms for accuracy and troubleshot any problems that occurred during testing.Modifications were made to the mechanisms and documented. Full documentation of changesincluding the reason for the change was required.Evaluation of the project was based primarily on the accuracy of the design calculations, thecorrelation between the design calculations and the final physical trials, the accuracy andcompleteness of the engineering drawings and the conclusions drawn from the
get FDA approval milligram quantities are necessary to carry out clinical trials. The laboratory-scale bioreactors used in thepre-production are inadequate to meet the expected product demand (annual protein product market need to be 100 g per year). Since theProteinPlus used to obtain FDA approval was produced by SHP-77 cells, which are a human lung tumor cell line and grow in smallclusters in suspension, these same cells will be used for the large scale production. Observations of cell behavior in the laboratory-scalebioreactors suggest that the cells are both sensitive to mechanical damage and have a high metabolic rate. The doubling time of SHP-77cells under ideal conditions is 96 hr. The maximum cell density observed was 8.0 x 10+5 cells
, fastening,metal forming, casting, plastics molding and conclude with nontraditional processes. In order tosupplement the lecture portion of the course, laboratory experiments provide the students withpractical experience operating and analyzing the effects of the parameters of a variety ofequipment, including standard manual mills, lathes, and several welding processes. The finalcomponent of the course is for the students to demonstrate their abilities to design and fabricate asimple component utilizing a variety of manufacturing processes.In the Machine Component Design course, students are introduced to many machine componentssuch as shafts, bearings, gears, springs, clutches and brakes, chains and belts, threaded fastenersand power screws. One
of the form used to report a summary of the assessment results and anyrecommendations based on the evaluation of the results. Any particular assessment tool,homework, group project, laboratory reports, quizzes, testing, or combination deemed necessaryby the instructor could be used. The assessment might be used to monitor (M) or summatively Page 7.238.2assess (S) the student achievement. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationFig. 2. Schematic diagram depicting the process for course
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for Engineering Education ”The engineering course spans the first year and emphasizes problem-solving strategies by demonstratingapplication of these math and science principles, sometimes with laboratories, sometimes with in-classassignments. This course also includes information on engineering disciplines, communication skills,drawing and visualization, and computer tools for engineers.The engineering math sequence in this curriculum is significantly different from that in the traditionalprogram. The integrated curriculum uses a “just-in-time” approach to precalculus and calculus topics.Critical precalculus topics are reviewed just prior to the
component is too rigid to adjust for the unexpected. The skill ofcommunication with individuals outside of one’s expertise, such as customers, is paramount inorder to establish and become a component of the informal organization. Therefore newgraduates in engineering would need to have good communication skills in order to access thisinformal network.Kelley and Caplan examined the engineers at Bell Laboratories to determine what traits the starperforming engineers possessed.10 They discovered that neither IQ nor GPA indicated whichengineer would be highly productive. Instead, the approach the engineer used is what set thestars apart from the mediocre. The consensus from star engineers at Bell Laboratories shows thatessential skills to be a star may
methods. It shiftedemphasis from compartmentalized basic science, mathematics, and engineering science coursesto those designed to integrate topics, provide hands-on experiential learning, and a renewedfocus on product design. The new curriculum employs the resources of the Integrated Teachingand Learning Laboratory to incorporate a hands-on component for core undergraduate courses.The ProActive Teaching and Learning Philosophy was implemented with the new curriculum.This philosophy enforces student preparation and capitalizes upon this preparation to replace theconventional, passive lecture with an interactive session in which all students actively participatein topical discussions. In addition, team teaching is now the standard in the sophomore
valveregurgitation. Some of the courseÕs unit topics, such as the ones dealing with leverage, Fourier analysis,and Nernst potentials, are not used directly in the Major Project, but are important topics coveredin the lectures during weeks in between and after the final checkoff of the Major Project.Student Evaluations Ð Student evaluations of this course have been significantly positive. When asked about theoverall effectiveness of the course on a survey form at the end of the fall 2001 semester (83surveys completed out of 107 students enrolled), students responded with a score of 5.72 out of6.00. Several student commented on the integrative and real-world nature of the Major Project.When asked about the benefit of the laboratory work to the goals of
/ Page 7.867.4 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationBOB AVANZATO Bob Avanzato is an associate professor of engineering at the Penn State Abington College. His interestsinclude mobile robotics, fuzzy logic, expert systems, and curricular enhancement. Prior to his position at PennState, Bob was a senior engineer at the Advanced Technology Laboratories at Martin Marietta where he wasinvolved in digital signal processing and artificial intelligence research and development. (email: rla5@psu.edu
Page 7.559.2education. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Conference &Exposition Copyright @ 2002, American Society for Engineering Education· Fachhochschulen (university of applied sciences) offering applicationoriented education.The curricula of the Fachhochschulen have a bias towards a practical approach,whereas the classical universities have a more theoretical (research oriented)approach.The degree from the Harz Fachhochschule is similar to an Engineeringtechnology Bachelors degree offered in the US.The Harz Fachhochchule serves students studying, automation, informationtechnology and business. It features extensive teaching laboratories providing thestudents with a “hands-on” learning
array of practical and applicablescience, mathematics and technology activities for pre-college students that promotes anincrease in technological literacy.Engineering educators and engineering departments can join pre-college educators incontributing to this venture in a variety of ways including: Ø Initiating interdisciplinary collaborations with pre-college technology and science faculty. Ø Developing partnerships with schools and assist in developing technologically oriented curricula, including engineering projects and laboratory activities. Ø Sharing the pre-college resources available from the IEEE and the ASME. Ø Assisting in the curricular articulation with community colleges. Ø Serving as a member of a school or